/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15809177
does this shit provide decentralized oracle solution ? No. so gtfo

>>15809189
Actually yes. Not that hard to find information about it

>>15809189
Yes, and they are actually superior to LINKs kyc'ed centralized scam oracles.

Pt1. ferme ta gueule Gille et spam twitter.

>>15809193
my bad, you're right but i highly doubt they will ever come even close to chainlink solution which already has big advantage in actually every field.

btw. many kyc'ed centralized oracles are decentralized oracle network where every node is checked.

btw2 (pic related). iExec is compatible with chainlink

>>15809299
what advantages are you talking about? serious question

>>15809320
better team
most decentralized working network at the moment
longer exp on working on oracles
ari juels
mixicles, threshold signs
already set up, proved connections
bettter economics

remember that decentralized oracle network is natural monopoly, there is simply no point in existing 2 of them

>>15809177
>15809177
top fucking kek
iexec is a centralized piece of shit

>>15809177
IEXEC is a centralized piece of shit

top fucking kek

>>15809493
>>15809472
anyone can be scheduler you mong

>>15809519
>cope

>>15809493
Obviously you don’t know shit

>>15809524
how is this cope.it is in documentation.

>>15809519
It seems you have forgotten to reply to >>15809455

Or could it be possible that you have no rebuttal? Not even some ad hominem?

>>15809531

>>15809177
This is an ethereum competitor you shilling fag.

RLC is a dead project, you fags got scammed by frenchies TOP KEK

>>15809551
and you can start your own scheduler. you are posting photo from testing workerpool which is managed by iexec.

>>15809586
what' sthe point of starting your own scheduler you mongoloid? then you are only managing yopur workers and paying yourself, workers haver to subscribe to schedulers, who are centralized you mongoloid

>>15809586
that's exactly like the Coordinator from nano, they will tell you they'll remove it, but they will never remove it

>>15809595
Are you really that retarded?
>My country pool
>My town pool
>My dapp pool
>USA Radiology Consortium Pool
>Autodesk Rendering Pool
>etc...

You clearly have no idea what iexec does. Keep coping and be poor faggot.

>>15809776
yeah and all centralized kek

>>15809776
taht's not how decentralization works you mong, it's not because each company has its own pool that the pools arn't centralized lmao

>>15809177
WHY CANT BOTH WIN ? IM BALLSDEEP IN BOTH

It's fucking over Gilles. stop trying to make iExec a thing. It's never going to be a thing.

>>15809582
> microsoft, ali baba, intel, EDF, IBM
> dead project

Pick one stupid faggot.

>>15809455
>better team
Philosophy major and serial entrepreneur vs brainiac team with +15 years of experience on grid computing

>most decentralized working network at the moment
KYC != decentralized

>longer exp on working on oracles
Never done an oracle before, took 2 years and 32m$ what iExec did as sideproject

>ari juels
Literal who

>mixicles, threshold signs
I bet you don't even know what the fuck they do and just repeat what other brainlets tell you here

>already set up, proved connections
Ethereum price feed using Binance API, kek

>bettter economics
Not proven

>remember that decentralized oracle network is natural monopoly, there is simply no point in existing 2 of them
Agreed, that's why LINK will btfo

>>15809797
>>15809800
Ok you just confirmed yourself to be mentally handicaped, I'm sorry for bullying you.

>>15809813
Dunning Kruger effect in full swing here.
>Ari Juels
>Literally who
Pick one

>>15809455
>better team
>B E T T E R T E A M

anon, please dont tell me you're serious.

here, have this: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8UEfrTEAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra

when fedak was researching the frontier of grid computing and distributed systems, sergey was picking his nose with a fork

>>15809177
I like chainlink, but I from an investor point of view iExec is way more interesting because of the growth potential. That's why I have no link atm and RLC and other coins.

>>15809839
>Gilles Fedak
Do you think quoting the name of Ari Juels impresses someone else than a linktard?

>>15809822
hahahhahahhaha

>>15809852
Fuck off, Poominder.

it's over linkies , it was only marketing , RLC is the real tech

https://wiki.hyperledger.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16324764

>iExec: 4 contributors will develop Ethereum smart contracts, integrate TEE options that support most of the the mainstream programming languages and native applications, and improve TCF easy-of-use for developers
>Chainlink: 3 contributors that will contribute to the TCF's plans for how to integrate with decentralized oracles and attested oracles, which will be able to provide both TCF computations and various on-chain computations enabled by them with secure access to various key API inputs and enterprise/payment event outputs.

>>15810171
"I'll take oracles" - Sergay at the planning meeting

>>15810158
rlc is a piece of shit centralized bandaid solution.

chainlink renders them completely obsolete.

because any cloud computing service can offer his services on chainlinks network.

TOP FUCKING KEK!
what a trash project, only XRP brainlets can invest in this french scam

>>15810433
great rebuttal.... oh wait you just attacked the only LINK competitor with scientific acumen.... BUT YOU WOULDNT KNOW THAT STINKER

how much is RLC worth today again? oh yeah...

>>15810433
You whish. dOracles are supreme and will be industry standard soon. Moon soon as well. Microsoft parnetship incoming.

>>15810444
The fuck you smoke nigger?
RLC is not a decentralized oracle network, it's a centralized computing service with kindof anyone plugging his worker to participate in the computing and getting paid in return.
it's a shit tier french project with only a fucking white paper, and nothing much behind it.
RLC fags are just a bunch of incompetent french developpers, under paid and that have 0 innovation in mind.

if you want real innovation go check the sillicon valley

>dorkles

>>15810468
worst fud I’ve ever read. Cope harder

>>15810468
FUCK YOU FUDDER. THE RLC ARMY WILL DESTROY YOUR PATHETIC LINKERS

>>15810468
Partnership list says otherwise
>muh google blogpost

Confirmed subhuman link faggot

>rlc fags still butthurt they wont be providing the oracle for hyperledger avalon and chainlink is
Lmao oh no no no maybe when you have real partners, a working product and a real development team get back to us.
>rank 153
>18mm market cap
Lmao holy shit you retards got baugetted get fucked retards

>>15809177
>doracles
MOZZ'D

AND

POZZ'D

RLC IS A SCAM TOKEN. CHECK OPENMARKETCAP VS COINMARKETCAP
>REAL 180K VOLUME VS FAKE 6MM VOLUME
>DYING COIN AT .22 VS FAKE PRICE AT .75

ANYONE WHO BUYS THIS IS LIKE BUYING REQ

MOZZ'D AND POZZ'D

>>15810608
actually iexec will be providing oracles

>>15810628
Im sorry sweety but go back and read the page again as it clearly states chainlink is providing the oracle while you streetshitters are only writing smart contracts, congrats retard you're priced out of link and have to rely on your shitty non oracle beatinf the industry standard lmao holy shit your shitskins are dumb

>>15810628
They'll be supplying poo

Post a picture of your hand

>>15810588
fkin kek
>muhh partnershrimps
hahhahahhahah
losers

>>15810656
Whiter than you'll ever wished to be

>>15809189
neither does Chainlink

reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>>15809455
>remember that decentralized oracle network is natural monopoly
Chainlink is 100% centralized, any dev knows that. Sergey is lying about decentralization and non-technical normans like yourself fall for it.

>>15810433
>rlc is a piece of shit centralized bandaid solution.
>chainlink renders them completely obsolete.
incorrect, Chainlink is also a shit centralized bandaid solution. Learn to code brainlet.

okay I never bothered with crypyo currencies but why are they all using cringe label words like "oracle" and shit like that? What the fuck is the point of all of this shit?

>>15810759
what bike you riding?

>>15810992
Africa Twin Adventure Sports

>>15809493
Decentralized cloud? lul

Might as well buy SENT and their decentralized VPN

iExec bagholders can neck themselves

>>15811029
We already made it

pump is just starting
target 390 sats

>>15810973
fucking kek, he invested ina literal dead shitcoin
>he uses dishonest mental tricks to convince people to buy his shitcoin

it's too late nigger, chainlink IS the decentralized oracle standard, your centralized computing "thing" i don't even know if it can be called an oracle network, is just a scam deal with it, stop coping, you lost tons of money because you're a retard that don't understand tech, and got jewed by the ffrench

>>15810734
> thinks actual partnerships, actually posted on said partners websites is shit
>invests his money in google blogposts, while there is literally 0 mention of CL anywhere on any of googles websites as an active partner of theirs

Lmao next level link faggot autistic bullshit

Not

Gonna

Make

It

>>15811291
This is a completely false statement. As you can see in pic related, there's multiple chainlink mentions on google website

>>15812362
If you dont belive me, go to google.com and search "chainlink", you'll see thousands of chainlink mentions. That means there's a strong partnership between them

>>15812362
>does a google search
>thinks thats googles company webpage

HOLY FUCKING SHIT BRAINLET, please tell me you aren’t this fucking stupid

>shills link and believes the “just hold $100 eoy meme

Oh good god.... you really are that fucking stupid, arent you?

>>15812379
Is that the “google partnership” linkies talk about ?... Because it comes up in a search? Lmaooo my sides

>>15812395
>Getting baited this hard

>>15812465
Lmao this. Fail

>>15809177
V4 side chain will make Iexec the cheapest Dapp solution by FAR. This thing is so underrated / underpriced its unreal.

>>15812543
except its not decentralized

>>15812395
>the joke
>miles of empty space
>your head

>>15812591
Yes it is.

>>15812622
>scheduler

nope.

>>15812634
>decentralized cloud computing
>not decentralized

Ok stupid

fuck LINK

At the end of the day Chainlink is still centralized doodoo

>>15809189
there is no need for a solution when there is no so called oracle problem ;) think for yourself

>>15812659
Deep breathe
AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>15812745
cope

>>15812745
>deep breathe

Sandeep, i thought we talked about this? No shitposting until you’ve cleared the poo off of your fingers

linkies are scrambling to justify why link is 35x rlc

>>15812817
l-link won. l-link has higher mcap

These threads remind me of that other "chainlink killer" being shilled on biz in 2018. Can't even remember its name because it's so forgotten. Something with an M?

>>15812908
Pls buy Mobius sir,,, Mobius is still very much on trajectory of killing Chainlin sir

>>15813024
Thank you. Fucking Mobius lol.

>>15813041
Was mobius partnered with microsoft, intel, ibm, ali baba, edf, and ubisoft?

>>15812817
>>15812833
>iexecucks thinking they know more than the market
LINK has 35 times the potential you dumbfucks

>>15813082
in your logic trx is better than link sjw slav cuck

>>15813082
If Chainlink is 35 x times superior to iExec. Isn’t it iExec which has the more potential ?

>>15812465
>getting baited this hard

>>15809612
Nice bait

>>15813252
Does ma and pa's book shop have more potential than Amazon?

>>15810433
>because any cloud computing service can offer his services on chainlinks network
lol are linkies literally this fucking retarded

>>15810468
>it's a shit tier french project with only a fucking white paper, and nothing much behind it
It has decades of development behind it, maybe you're projecting

>>15812908
Linkies live in perpetual fear because they are so convinced that they are right about everything, despite being absolute failures at life, that anything that threatens their ego becomes dangerous.