/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15773191
What part of never fucking selling don’t you understand? Lock your Linkies up in a node and get 60k/Yr minimum guaranteed

>>15773207
how did you get the "60k a year" minimum? pulled it out of your ass?

>>15773191
who cares, at this point we have speculation that there would be no reason to sell your link becomes it makes you passive income. never selling is not a meme. it doesnt make sense to sell chainlink at anytime until some crazy shit like a new tech comes along somehow.

>>15773215
You don’t know how to research and do simple calculations? Just fucking sell you retard.

>>15773191

>>15773223
>research
lol you pulled the 6% per year exactly out your ass, because no numbers exists at this point, nobody knows how much staking rewards you will get, unless you provide source

>>15773223
>>15773222
no PoS coin has been successful, the closest was Ark

>>15773215
Read the whitepaper.

>>15773242
Okay. .33 Link every 5 minutes as long as your node is active. Do the math yearly now. Stop being stupid.

>>15773266
>inflation is good
even your best case scenario will not make you rich

>>15773299
Who the fuck said anything about inflation? .33 links will be coming out of the 350M links allocated to node operators for use of the network. You really didn’t do your research did you? When I tell you never sell, I’m not meme’ing the more links stored in nodes, the more nodes we have, the more the network gets used, the less the circulating supply is, and therefore the price of link will be higher. Cmon don’t be a brainlet.

>>15773299
And if this is a risk you don’t want to take, then just sell anon. Get off the ship while you still can.

>>15773326
youre going to lose everything based on made up numbers you dont understand that no one else cares about. Who am I kidding you probably have a grand total of $200 at stake.

>>15773349
I’m willing to lose everything because this project combines blockchain and the real world. What part of that do you not understand? And made up numbers? Go check the tokenomics and read the white papers. You fail to realize that out of everything that has been shilled since ‘17 only BTC, ETH, and LINK remain right? The entire chainlink team, whitepapers, and token have been examined so fucking deeply that no stone has been left unturned. now no one gives a fuck about spoon feeding idiots like you information, that’s why we fud. the fud gets more intelligent people to actually do research and think on their own.

>>15773431
you remind me of that neckbeard who plays WoW in Soupth Park episode

>>15773207
Chickity China, the Chinese Chicken.

>>15773431
Anon, heres the thing: computing power is essentially free. We have single CPUs now that can replace entire server rooms. No amount of clever marketing is going to sell computing power. Every company is already doing this. The market is saturated well beyond full. Hell, google is GIVING AWAY computing power for free. Crypto has a usecase, but only as a currency. This global computing nonsense is squeezing water from a stone. Blockchain is just data integrity. This is exactly the "Dot Com" bubble. The fact is, no one wants to buy software when they can get it for free. Even IF this coin was somehow different, and special, someone else would just rip it off for cheaper. Youll never profit from its success, which is unlikely anyway.

>>15773452
It takes one to know one anon. Like I said, dyor research and take a break from this website. Come back in a year or two, unless link moons before then. That yacht party might be a reality.

>>15773452
The same neckbeards who got rich off of BTC and ETH?

>>15773486
Do you think the chainlink network, works? Bridging the gap between blockchain and real world data? If it’s even possible in the slightest, then chainlink is simply years ahead of any other project. They have some of the best minds working on this project. Now suppose link does work, the node operators have to be paid somehow. That’s where the LINK token comes in. Like I said anon, don’t risk more than you can afford to lose.

is 3275 links enough for singularity?

>>15773526
Its solving a problem that doesnt exist

>>15773191
At $1k I'll have close to 200 million. Nobody needs that much. I'll be selling half way way before that.

>>15773609
Wow... 200 million.. maybe my crush will finally love me back with that much of money.

>>15773191
Chainlink has completed its current cycle. Fractal analysis shows that we're entering the reaccumulation phase, it will rally to $10 around the same time BTC rallies to $100k. In other words now is a fine time to buy, around $1 is an even better buy.

>>15773494
Anon please be careful if you attend

>>15773589
>I don’t need a car I have a horse
>I don’t need a phone I write letters
>I don’t need a computer I have books
I can go on and on anon. It’s not about solving a problem, it’s about efficiency. Chainlink does exactly that, with any kind of blockchain. Please I urge you to do research. If you don’t feel comfortable, then sell. Let us retards sink with the ship since link is a pump and dump scam led by Sergey who has already exited scammed before.

>>15773191
Only idiots wait till 1K already got my sell order set at 999.99

>>15773656
You are actually sick in the head if you equate an erc-20 shitcoin with cars or the computer. You are beyond help

>>15773654
Life is short. What better way to spend last few days on this planet with people that share the same ideas as you?

>>15773687
Right, that’s why chainlink it’s erc-677. You’d know that if you dyor. Just sell all ready.

>>15773689
Dont take this the wrong way but I doubt anyone from here would be interesting IRL

>>15773642
Bitcoin is at 8k, so if that goes to 100k then it's a better ROI than if link goes to 10k in the same time period

>>15773711
You telling me you don’t want to see the retards that put sharpies in their asses or asked for pics of sharpies in asses?

>>15773191
>>imagine LINК hits $1,000

Imagine creating a negative thread about XRP and seeing how quickly the it vanishes with troll threads appearing to bump it down the list?

Imagine saying something negative about any other crypto currency and not having shill armies and disinfo agents appear out of thin air?

>>15773742
I would like to see 42 n ask him questions idk about sharpie fags brother

>>15773227
If Jim carrey wouldve said "You are a maniac!" wouldve been 10/10

>>15773742
That's a hard no from me bud

>>15773255
This 60k a year is guanranteed even if you stake just one link

>>15773191
>>15773299
https://youtu.be/CRxU-3WZgds
6:27

>>15773191
99% of biz will sell at $5 because they "learned their lesson" last time

>>15773609
Ngmi

>>15773191
selling 100% of your stack at 1k USD would be pants on head retarded, anyone with above 10k should have sell targets on the way up and reserve at least 1k for staking indefinitely