[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 10 KB, 300x168, 1550007566866.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758227 No.15758227 [Reply] [Original]

Staking tomorrow
Not kidding

>> No.15758234

>>15758227
how do you know

>> No.15758235

What will staking on a network with no activity look like?

>> No.15758239

>>15758227
Liar

>> No.15758240

>>15758227
thats a good joke OP ha-ha

>> No.15758246

>>15758227
Nah, it’s happening TONIGHT

>> No.15758249

What exactly is the purpose of staking link when no one uses it?

>> No.15758261

>>15758249
>>15758235
it will be hilarious

tens of millions worth of stinkies staked and waiting for some shitty 10 cent app to use them

>> No.15758272
File: 129 KB, 1916x1195, EFfFX-WWwAAZF-a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758272

>>15758235
>no network activity

>> No.15758273

>>15758227
Yeah but do you mean we'll be able to lock our tokens and start making gains from tomorrow, or is it just an announcement?

>> No.15758277
File: 313 KB, 494x419, 1567321513698.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758277

>>15758227

>> No.15758291

>>15758272
where is this from?

>> No.15758294

>>15758272
Less than 20 shitcoin startups that have never turned a profit and are mostly for gambling on shitcoins...impressive

>> No.15758312

>>15758277
It took a while but it was worth it

>> No.15758313
File: 2.68 MB, 255x191, 1356175319524.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758313

>>15758277
kek
watched the whole thing, very worth it

>> No.15758336

I'm a link cuck I like a quick buck SCOOP

>> No.15758337

>>15758272
This is a cumulative total ... is there a chart plotting daily jobs by node with just the daily total? Would be interesting to see any fluctuations between nodes if there are any.

>> No.15758343
File: 78 KB, 786x618, 1569454291447.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758343

>>15758294
you have to start somewhere. mainnet only came out in june. meaningful smart contract adoption is still a year or 2 away anyway.
the team's progress has been blistering in 2019 compared to any other project in crypto. please do tell if you know of a project with better fundamentals?

>> No.15758346

>>15758273
Announcement

>> No.15758347

1,4 quadrillion derivatives market needing some collateral tomorrow boys, get ready!

>> No.15758406

>>15758343
Fundamentals mean nothing because nobody here is smart enough to understand them. It’s all about memes and hype. Luckily link has those things too.

>> No.15758428
File: 14 KB, 275x275, 1499726195854.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758428

>>15758227
fuck u wont do what u tell me

>> No.15758429
File: 432 KB, 1046x1070, disc_FUD_PIECE72.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758429

>>15758343
band protocol is releasing their mainnet just a few days after being listed on binance

>> No.15758435
File: 128 KB, 512x512, 1500069376029.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758435

>>15758272
holy shit this is bullish as fuck

>> No.15758437

>>15758346
Drop a couple crumbs to prove you're not a larp, otherwise your a demoralization tranny

>> No.15758440
File: 9 KB, 262x192, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758440

>>15758429
Everyone should join our band

>> No.15758442
File: 310 KB, 654x639, 1561058832960.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758442

>>15758429
i remember RLC had this same type of chart as well, claiming they were better than link

where are they now again?

>> No.15758487

>>15758343
No one is actually going to use smart contracts for anything significant. If they were, you’d see some kind of implementation. Notice how no one is hyping blockchain or any of this shit anymore?

Why the fuck would the powers at be want to forfeit ownership of the world’s data?

Thinking Smart Contracts will actually be used by any legitimate companies is analogous to thinking the Federal Reserve will start backing dollars with bitcoins.

>> No.15758489

>>15758277
what’s the equation for this

>> No.15758520
File: 559 KB, 640x640, 1557104673310.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758520

>>15758487
kek stay poor

smart contracts will only make the powers at be even more rich and even more able to control society. it's inevitable, just like AI and automation; that's all smart contracts are.
and chainlink already has the privacy aspect covered with things like mixicles and TEE's. no need to hand over your data, while getting all of the benefits chainlink offers.

>> No.15758537
File: 168 KB, 1820x1139, B3837A5B-E049-4203-9AD8-8C3F3294D19A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758537

>>15758272

>> No.15758552

>>15758227
Tomorrow there is going to be an announcement, but it's not staking nor a partnership. It's going to be a big marketing move.

Best regards,
Dan Forbes

>> No.15758562

>>15758346
They don't announce shit like that.

>> No.15758577

>>15758489
should i use link pool or set up my own node business?

>> No.15758589

>>15758537
this doesnt mean more usage of the network, that graph is going up because theres more node operators, not usage fucking retard

>> No.15758600
File: 81 KB, 470x595, A7C7B569-7DFA-4AF8-9D98-8A6DBE561FE4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758600

Dubs confirms staking
Trips confirm swift partnership

>> No.15758603

>>15758272
> cumulative jobs

You do realize with the heartbeat this is a chart of 0 jobs.

>> No.15758605

>>15758600
Oh fuck, I didn't expect that. Checked

>> No.15758621

>>15758562
You’re right somebody else will.

>> No.15758627

>>15758589
>contract transaction counts

>> No.15758689

>>15758428
>fuck u wont do what u tell me
What? What are you trying to say?

>> No.15758716
File: 188 KB, 660x371, horse-rimmer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758716

>>15758227

cheers johnny. giddy up.

>> No.15758896
File: 514 KB, 1440x960, 1561417938668.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758896

>>15758600
Swift confirmed.

>> No.15758951

https://medium.com/linkpool/creating-trustless-pools-and-staking-for-all-266451277e3f

uhh guys

>> No.15759000

>>15758951
WEW LADS STRAP IN

>> No.15759038

>>15758600
Gotta buy some more stinkies now...

>>15758951
This is several hours old.

>> No.15759093
File: 460 KB, 1045x1207, 1569780654063.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15759093

>>15758429

>> No.15759118
File: 1.60 MB, 1024x1024, 1562118827013.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15759118

If I have a lot of link should I just make my own oracle business?

>> No.15759168

>>15758487
>smart contracts and DLT are not being adopted
Blockchains are a glorified public database. The only value it provides is being immutable which makes it a good option for creating a binding contract between 2 or more parties that cannot be changed and can execute automatically based on certain external events occurring. Those external events are fed into the contract via an oracle, which is currently centralized and is a single point of failure making the whole thing pointless.

>> No.15759172
File: 435 KB, 1045x1207, 1569785948766.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15759172

>>15759093

>> No.15759208

>>15759172
>>15759093
>blockcahins

>> No.15759223

>>15759208
παρονομασία
>https://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/cahin-caha

>> No.15759250

>>15758589
theres more usage AND node operators. can you not read a chart?

>> No.15759292

>>15759000

Checked trips of truth.

>> No.15759589

>>15759168
Streets are glorified public toilets.

>> No.15760145

>>15758227
>not kidding
>just lying

>> No.15760250

>>15758337
The steepness of the curve is increasing so jobs are going up

>> No.15760321

How do you get jobs as a node operator? Don't other companies have to approve you? Sounds like a pain in the ass if you're not using a pool.

>> No.15760327

>>15758227
Are you kidding tho?

>> No.15760333

>>15758272
fundamentally going vertical

>> No.15760348

These FUDs start to shake me out but it isn’t enough

>> No.15760415

>>15758346
....but they dont announce this type of stuff...

>> No.15760431

>>15758589
>seething swinglinkie who sold at $0.45

>> No.15760554

If you check the pivotal you’ll see your about a week off. Staking will not be for another week so October 9nth if they get it finished on time faggot

>> No.15760588
File: 654 KB, 1000x1000, C46F96F8-2AB1-4F2B-8BC8-1774053CE755.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15760588

>>15758272
So a handful of literal who pajeet scam sites, what a fucking joke

>> No.15760610
File: 39 KB, 657x527, 1545276794312.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15760610

>>15758227
is this good for linkpool share owners??

>> No.15760792

>>15760333
fundamentally checked

>> No.15760858

>>15758294
>bitcoin
>using a magic the gathering trading card website to trade internet currency on
>Bitcoiners thinking it goes to $100

lmao

>> No.15760879
File: 141 KB, 428x523, 1512755621730.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15760879

>>15758600
here we fucking go

>> No.15760894

>>15760554
Um sweetie check the icebox for service agreements.

Staking won’t be done till 2020

>> No.15760902

>>15760894
You don't even have ice in india.

>> No.15760938

>>15758577
what are these?

>> No.15760975

>>15758227
Tomorrow I'm going to buy a steak.

>> No.15761000

>>15758689
FUCK YOU WONT DO WHAT YOU TELL ME

>> No.15761019

>>15761000
Do Fucked and zerocheckedpilled

>> No.15761040

>>15760321
>google
You apply, and it's based on if you meet the requirements for node uptime and job pulls. if verified though, word going around is that payout is .33 link per 5 minutes

>> No.15761072

>>15758277
Fucking tremendous

>> No.15762036
File: 717 KB, 684x1200, 1561170567805 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762036

>>15758227
>Staking tomorrow
my body is ready
>t. >2 LP shareholder

>> No.15762044

>>15758227
noway

>> No.15762075

>>15758277
lol'd

>> No.15762090

It must be because EVERY time LINK starts to break upwards BTC shits the bed.

>> No.15762100

>>15758227
Can one of you larpers be right for once? Holy shit this is tiring.

>> No.15762151

>>15762090
It's remarkable, really. I suppose it's coincidence. Just bad luck, I guess.

>> No.15762158

>>15758627
he's right though, this counts shit like bzx. so if I send link to a fulcrum smartocntract to trade link, I'm not using chainlink, i'm sending shitcoins to a contract

no one is using link right now

>> No.15762168

Staking won’t be announced tomorrow. The absolute state of desperate linkies.

>> No.15762194

>>15758277
Top fucking cackle

>> No.15762202
File: 147 KB, 756x1118, 1568563090324.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762202

>>15760333
checked

>> No.15762240
File: 365 KB, 1172x1630, 06E3CA95-CD2F-4DFA-A0B1-A28F5C2E7C68.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762240

>>15760894
Why do you think linkpool released their staking pools article just yesterday?

>> No.15762275
File: 890 KB, 810x693, 1569794978347.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762275

>>15760333

>> No.15762277

>>15762240
If you have a thought please share it, rather than asking "why do you think..." do you have an opinion? Care to share?

>> No.15762278

>>15761040
What is the catch here? How passive is node operation once set up? That's 96 LINK a day roughly, just being paid out for the ETH/USD heartbeat? If I can manage to set up a node producing just that at the current prices is 163 a day quoted at your pricing per 5 minutes against LINK currently. That's 59,500 approximately for the year pre-tax. I have no coding experience. How high are the barriers to entry to get accepted jesus?

>> No.15762283
File: 131 KB, 1077x383, SmartSelect_20190926-203120_Twitter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762283

>>15758600
Swift forever

>> No.15762291
File: 721 KB, 480x240, 1569267782976.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762291

>>15759000
>>15758951

>> No.15762292

>>15759000
Checked
Bros, we're gonna make it

>> No.15762338
File: 141 KB, 1024x574, 0BEC197E-9195-4582-B824-7759FA3BBD52.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762338

>>15762277
The thought was self evident from my post. The clear *implication* is that linkpool released their article about staking pools to coincide with chainlink’s release of the staking function. I could be wrong or I could be right but you sure sound like a boomer. My opinion is that if staking is released shortly then the article was 100% coordinated to increase hype before said event.

>> No.15762344

>>15762275
Who are the other guys in this pic? I can't remember ever finding this out

>> No.15762419

>>15762338
Thank you for replying and clarifying.
Since Jonny is part of both teams, which blurs the distinction of LINK being separate from Linkpool ... your assertion could be valid. Interesting possibility, I appreciate you sharing the thought.

>> No.15762518
File: 68 KB, 450x595, 053D82D4-2D7C-4BEB-B9A7-6234A9ED4125.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15762518

>>15762419
No problem

>> No.15762779

>>15758346
Another larp. How entertaining.

>> No.15762796

>>15762283
Its been 2 years

>> No.15762820

>>15758227
Yes you are

>> No.15763134

You stole my meme from Facebook that I stole from Reddit who stole it from a pregnant sergay

>> No.15763635

>>15758277
Oddly comfortable to watch

>> No.15763645

>>15758277
Audible kek

>> No.15763662
File: 117 KB, 800x800, 1544996371568.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15763662

>>15758277
checked and keked

>> No.15763750

Tomorrow in 2021

>> No.15763776

>>15758277
Excellent delivery.

>> No.15763814
File: 22 KB, 332x1024, 1561851636136.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15763814

>>15758277
fucking kek that was worth it

>> No.15763957

>>15759589
>Streets are glorified public toilets.
>glorified
no?

>> No.15764234

>>15758227
That'll be the day

>> No.15764303

>>15758227
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>> No.15764326

>>15764303
ETH is not being used either.

>> No.15764327

>>15758951
Jonny is so based !
Link $1k eoy

>> No.15764340
File: 224 KB, 544x572, 1516300449001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15764340

I'm awake, the morning is here. Where the fuck is my staking? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>> No.15764361

>>15764326
ETH has a few thousands devs building on it right now, and a few dapps have a few thousands users (augur, maker, every single token, etc). And it had this adoption and interest INSTANTLY after launch. The adoption is low, but it exists.

Chainlink has no adoption. Not now, not when it launched. Only fake partnerships for hype that do not use the product.

Only the most desperate linkers compare LINK to ETH. They have literally nothing in common.

>> No.15764363
File: 43 KB, 236x153, 64i4vcz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15764363

>>15764303
Nogger

>> No.15764451

>>15764361
>Only the most desperate linkers compare LINK to ETH. They have literally nothing in common.

I agree. Comparing link to ETH is misguided, primarily because ETH, at this point, is a failed experiment.

>> No.15764494

>>15764451
>I agree. Comparing link to ETH is misguided, primarily because ETH, at this point, is a failed experiment.
It is not. With sharing Eth should be perfectly capable of providing all the features a linktoken transaction service will need.

>> No.15764516

>>15764361
>Only the most desperate linkers compare LINK to ETH.
I agree because Ethereum is a shitcoin while
LINK's gonna connect blochain to the real world data event

>> No.15764535

events*

>> No.15764832

>>15764494
>With sharing
You mean like how with staking, rep, etc link will destroy all? Ok as long as we are in the same page I'll give you that one ranjeet