/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15664973
shhhhhhh

Can you imagine if we were in 2017's market? We would have all already fucking made it

>>15664981
>>15665001
I mean seriously and correct me if Im wrong but this is the first time someone credible has come out and said chainlink is the api access layer for swift. And just casually like it was something everybody knows.

Its easily the most important announcement in the history of the project if its real- they cant have meant for it to come out this way right?

>>15664973
You faggots may have just become significantly more wealthy, and that includes linklets

>>15665029
Sure it's big but people know it already, Chainlink has ties to swift just from looking at their website. Chainlink won't even get close to $1000 until staking drives the price up, Big banks start integrating it, or a Big bank makes an announcement like chase or bank of america.

it's a meme project, nobodu really invests in it

>>15665035
>>15665073
To be fair there is a huge difference betwewn "we work with swift" and "we are involved in literally every transaction on swifts new multi platform value transfer offering"

If this is all literally uniroincally true serg will be the first trillionaire since rockefeller

>>15665126
Yeah, a play on words may be just that.

>>15665126
Nah, he will be rich but I doubt the big players don't have a stake in SmartContract the company

I am ready

>>15665073
>Chainlink won't even get close to $1000 until staking drives the price up, Big banks start integrating it, or a Big bank makes an announcement like chase or bank of america.
With staking being right around the corner, how far away do you think adoption is?

>>15664973
It's called the start of links awakening. By the end smart contracts will be in normie consciousness and we will be rich visionaries.

>>15665223
what the fucking shit

>>15665223
What does libra have to do with swift

kyc oracles which are glorified API json parsers

>>15665251
Literally nothing, it's a competitor at best

>>15665223

>>15664973
Any oldfag knows this. Linkmarines already made it in 2017, the rest was just waiting. They called us delusional, in fact they still do.

Anyone who holds even a decent stack of Link is literally a future millionaire. Just remember that. Visualize it.

>>15665223
Holy shit I've made it.

>>15665126
Well sure they might not fully have something that is functional or they may have something. someone just doesn't let you use their logo on your website unless they are legally connected.

>>15665223
being associated with a sinking ship like Libra sure sounds promising

I won't bother explaining, but the swift integration is a meme and not what hopium link tards think it'll be. It won't be a big announcement that will pump your bags. It'll just be an adapter using a public API. It won't be exclusive to chainlink. There's already a PayPal adapter and it did fuck all to the price, and no one is using it.

I am utterly disgusted with the current state of the link community. Still arguing about the unrelated gpi link, and now obsessing over an hexagon logo on the libra image.. Absolute brainlet tier.

>>15665223
Im all for mythical breadcrumbs but this is just retarded

>>15664973
its still all talk no matter how you look at it.

>>15665371
You have a fatal misunderstanding of how important open banking initiatives like PSD2 are. Chainlink is exactly how the big banks prevent their lunch being eaten by competitors AND make a killing while doing it. Arguably, SWIFT was the reason why Chainlink was created in the first place. Everything else is just secondary.

>>15665309
>https://flatearthconference.com/
If you can guess why Sergalicious is presenting here I'll send you 177 LINK.

>>15665404
You have a fatal misunderstanding of reality you deluded you faggot

>>15665420
Not an argument. Just another deluded fudder as usual.

>>15665223
But libra will be banned everywhere sooner than released so libra doesnt matter.

>>15665429
Keep regurgitating those retarded AB posts. Where is he now?

Priced in

>>15665446
Keep coping. I'm sure your shitcoin is getting integrated with SWIFT before Chainlink right?

>>15665223
This is the kind of stuff we used to have
Circumstantial and associative
But they just out and fucking said it

It has to be wrong

>>15665301
I only have 40k will I make it?

>>15665484
It's always been 10k to make it, 1k suicide stack.

>>15665470
Chainlink has no relationship with Swift. They did a PoC using public APIs 3 years ago. Nothing else since.

>>15665126
Agreed. Sergey will be the richest man in the world in less than 10 years if chainlink works as expected

>>15665488
Its 1k to make it and 100 for a suicide stack now but dont tell the nulinkers

>>15665503
I understand you redditards need SWIFT to come out and write a detailed blogpost about their integration, but by then it will be too late. Chainlink will have a massive green dildo to singularity and you'll be fomo'ing in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f0KJc4Lj3Y

Along with OP's post, anyone with half a brain can put the pieces together.

>>15665513
Maybe. 10k for the short term though.

>>15665488
I remember reading 50k for a suicide stack.

>>15665560
I remember being called a linklet for my stack in 2018. Today, I'm considered a larper when I post my stack size, so I don't bother anymore.
How time flies.

>>15665126
>>To be fair there is a huge difference betwewn "we work with swift" and "we are involved in literally every transaction on swifts new multi platform value transfer offering"
>>If this is all literally uniroincally true serg will be the first trillionaire since rockefeller

>A representative of Swift confirmed to CoinDesk that it is a SmartContract customer.
https://www.coindesk.com/swift-completes-blockchain-smart-contracts-trial

>>15665503
>Chainlink has no relationship with Swift. They did a PoC using public APIs 3 years ago. Nothing else since.

wrong, see here. >>15665588

also stop copy pasting FUD you spastic pajeet.

>>15664973
Seriously wtf? you're still surprised?

>>15665641
Im surprised the first direct mention came from a partner and a slide was made that just shows it outright.
They had to have the deck reviewed right? Did cl really want this to be the first time this was shown?

>>15665566
How big is your stack?

>>15665654
>Did cl really want this to be the first time this was shown?
The partnership with SWIFT is right on the front page of the Chainlink website though.

>>15665671
"We work with swift" is
"We are part of the biggest new offering from swift at the core level and most of sibos will be about this offering" is not

>>15665588
Checking those digits

>>15665371

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.financialexpress.com/industry/facebook-appoints-another-engineer-evan-cheng-to-lead-blockchain-division/1236019/lite/

Evan Cheng is on the board of chainlink you reprehensible shithead.

Libra is integrating LINK. Take your low tier fud elsewhere tranny.

>>15665560
>1/20,000 of all coins is a suicide stake
even for the most deluded linkies thats just retarded, the 1k suicide / 10k making it is the optimal ratio

>>15665689
>"We work with swift"
This rolls off the tongue, more normie friendly.

>>15665029
Can you delete this?

>>15665689
>"We are part of the biggest new offering from swift at the core level and most of sibos will be about this offering"
This is comparison doesn't sound professional, it sounds more like Tron tier shilling.

>>15665709
you had two (2) years

>>15665751
And I have 14k, where does that put me

>>15665345
>Government doesn't like libra so therefore it's a failure.

Do you realize how powerful the jews are and how they have been planning this probably before you were born(Assuming you are in your 20's and not a 40yo boomer)

>>15665793
priced out for normies, so comfy

>>15665029
>chainlink is the api access layer for swif

A use case is an example of how it can be used. Not how it is being used.

>>15665891
I have 11k since late 2017 - comfy. Was broke at that time... should have bought more but wa snot possible.

>>15665513
1000 is a meme. 100 is the real make it target, making 10k the make it stack

>>15665709
Honestly i probably should

One of two things is true
The most important shit for cl in 2019 just got leaked by some french tard
Or
Some french tard was lying in front of his frenchtard buddies and there should be a clarification

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud

https://blogs.oracle.com/startup/every-startup-in-the-blockchain-with-oracle-cloud-and-chainlink
https://enclaveresearch.com/comments-on-the-chainlink-white-paper-parallels-to-early-web/

https://blog.framework.ventures/revisiting-chainlink-future-of-oracles/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrynpollock/2019/07/02/is-google-chasing-the-90-potential-of-blockchain-that-facebook-left-out/#3b05e8e53185

http://www.iftf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/images/ourwork/Food_Futures_Lab/IFTF_Good_Food_is_Good_Business.pdf (Bill Gates Foundation) Ctrl f: "Chainlink"

https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/convergence_of_blockchain_ai_and_iot_academic_2.pdf (EU Blockchain Forum) Ctrl f: "Chainlink"

http://www.fc-ssc.org/getfile/index/action/images/name/5cc7d42426ec9.pdf (UN South-South) Ctrl f: "Chainlink"

https://www.bis.org/publ/work811.pdf

https://www.lawsnap.com/smart-contracts-are-set-to-transform-the-trillion-dollar-derivatives-industry/

https://www.thepaypers.com/expert-opinion/smart-contracts-can-clear-up-standing-settlement-instructions-confusion/780695

>>15665925
They disucuss how their baas integrates with chainlink/swift and then say any execution layer is interchangeable
They are saying that the swift side is already decided and up

>>15665937
1mil is making it for you? are you 12 years old?

>>15666003
Get out of here, pervert.

>>15665976
all talk

>>15664973
please delete this thread

>>15665566
same

>>15666027
yep, basically all uneducated journalists reporting on the lies fed by the Chainlink team. The truth is all the Chainlink "partnerships" are either fake or literal whos. No one is using the "mainnet", this is made more and more obvious as the months go by, and the price is dumping to reflect this.

Reminder that Eth had THOUSANDS of users on the testnet and mainnet 1 year after raising $16mil. Chainlink is NOTHING like Eth. It's an objective scam at this point.

>>15666316
This is fake too.
https://crt.sh/?id=1671486604

>>15665371

You dumb incel.

Haven't you figured it out yet?

Swift is moving towards the use of smartcontracts. Defi is all about smartcontracts. This is obvious. Everyone on this board including you do recognize this.

Now, all you have to do is ask yourself how will these smartcontracts connect with Swift legacy systems along with all the other 11,000 banks? There is only one option and that option is Chainlink.

To think for one second that they aren't going to use Chainlink means you have no idea what smartcontracts are, how will they be used and what they need to succeed.

Think you idot. think!

ok guys; listen to this

the fudders keep saying chainlink will not be involved in swift gpi, then ask them who will be involved? what project is gonna do what link can do?

1000 eoy is real frens.

>>15664973
it prints lambos

>>15665977

"now that we've talked about the use case..."

No, try again.

>>15666420
R3 Corda

Literally just google it

>>15666471
kek. just kys

>>15666373
>There is only one option and that option is Chainlink.
You really need to learn some programming brainlet. Chainlink only has CENTRALIZED oracles. And there's plenty of other (and better) options for centralized oracles than Chainlink. The proof is there's plenty of projects using oracles in production, none of them even consider using Chainlink.

Swift will not be using Chainlink, that is a certainty. Chainlink will make some examples using the Swift public APIs that anyone else can use and pretend it's a partnership, that is guaranteed, lying about partnership is what they've done since day 1, but Swift actually using Chainlink? That will never happen.

Oh and the best part, is that non-programmer brainlets like yourself will actually believe the team's lies that it's a partnership, just like you did with Google.

>>15666540
The absolute state of biz when we are unironically trading 2017 FUD back and forth.

>>15664973
What’s so hard to understand about $1000 EOY?

>>15665566
The original price expectation when I bought my stack were more at the 10-30$ range. People expecting to make it with a 10k stack now seem delusional.

>>15666874
except this was before we knew about derivatives and numerous other applications. even assblaster expected 3 digits in the medium term, without mentioning derivatives.

the delusional ones are those thinking otherwise now. there simply is no middle ground for link. either it succeeds as the base of the smart contract economy and moons violently well beyond 3 digits or it bleeds to 0 as it sees no use. low 2 digits doesn't make sense anymore as a price expectation. if it reaches 2 digits, it will go a lot further.

>>15665560
I've been her since Link's inception and it was never 50k faggot

>>15667043
It was 100k, not 50k

delusional retards

>>15667043
Been here since ICO, it's always been 10k to make it.

>>15666874
Kek I accumulated with a realistic price of 1,5 by 2021 in mind. Was a journey coming to terms by literally becoming a multi millionair by next year if not a billionair if the 1000eoy over the last 3 months. What a journey.

>>15664973
>1.80$

>>15667101
its always been 30k to make it since the yacht party marines fuck nulinkers if you didnt have 12000 usd to invest in 2017 youre too fucking poor

>>15667208
Can confirm it was always 30k to make it

I have a 400 link stack. assuming I hold 4-5 years, will link ever make a btc like run past 10k? I'd assume staking which equals token scarcity would do nothing but continue to make the price moon

>>15665029
>>15664973

SWIFT won't be around in 5 years

>>15667293
Sure let me guess xrapid and buttcoin will take over the intra banking sector

>>15667286
Yes. Chainlink will be worth more than BTC is today.

The men you see here with 10-30k stacks will be long gone at the 1k mark or even below between dips and corrections (ie 400 -> 50 USD, etc.)

>>15667286
bro you dont even have a suicide stack, why do you even care.

i have 15k link and nothing will happen i should have sold at 4

>>15667008
I am a bit concerned about the safety of the Ethereum blockchain in this case. If the value of LINK becomes high enough, it could make it worthwhile to attack the ETH network to steal its ERC20 tokens.

>>15667139
It changed my perspective on life. When I imagined becoming a millionaire, I realized that I had no clue about what I wanted to do with my life. This is truly an adventure.

>>15665484
>>15665488
>>15665513
>>15665560
>>15665566
>>15666119
>>15666874
>>15665699
>>15665793
>>15665891
>>15665926
>>15665937
>>15666003
>>15667008
>>15667208
>>15667241
>>15667286
>>15667335
>>15667350
I only have 100k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.

All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. I need to make it to 300k before mainnet for fucks sake. Link is only going to $10 max. Right now I might make 1MM before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 1MM into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 2MM, but more likely 3MM to make it. The upper predictions for Link where about $60 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity. All of that isn't going to happen anymore.

The singularity is cancelled. Now we will have a slow growth to $10. And the sad but ironic thing is most people on this board will hold from 20 cents, to $10 and then hold all the way back to sub $1 again because you all believe the 1k eoy memes, and just like the retards who held BTC and didn't sell at 19k, you will do the same with Link at $10. Looking at the current charts depresses the fuck out of me when I know I only have 100k Link, nowhere near enough to make it.

At best I will have 1-2 sweet years, and then return to w

>>15667370
It truly does change things. There are no excuses anymore to procrastinate or blame somebody else. The hardest part for me was coming to terms with that having to manage that amount of wealth will be more work than just surviving on a combination of NEET shekel and odd jobs. But I will be damned becoming like this sorry fag >>15667393 who seems to be better off just becoming a bum living off government hand outs. With wealth comes responsibility, something Boomer minds who just live to consume don't get.

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>>15666355
Common misconception, ranjeet.

>>15667393
Mentally-ill

>>15667393
Why bother if you believe in a $10 ceiling? You could 6x your current stack playing swing trades over the next couple of years. Hell, if there's a bull run, you could pick almost anything. You are paying too great an opportunity cost for 6x.

>>15667370
>If the value of LINK becomes high enough, it could make it worthwhile to attack the ETH network to steal its ERC20 tokens.

Can any anons confirm if this is an actual concern?

>>15664973
Do any anons have the graphic that shows chainlink between r3 and the swift banking network?
Where it shows any dlt could be r3? Or the source material?

>>15667616
kek that's not a concern, Sergey will never let the value go up, he still has 98% of his 650,000,000 tokens left to dump

>>15667488
It certainly gives me the feeling of having a second job now. I am currently trying to learn investment to prepare myself to manage my future wealth, but I still don't know what I will do later. I can wake up from my repetitive daily dream at last.

>>15667293
Have a federated chain consisting of international banks that acts as the settlement/kyc layer and $wift dies

>>15667293
Imagine thinking this.

>>15667854

>>15668337
> I am currently trying to learn investment to prepare myself to manage my future wealth,
Buy more link. It's easy

>>15664973
the "I missed 4.50 and Sergey dumped on me 700k at a time" cope gets worse every week

>>15664973
>Was this a mistake?
a (((mistake)))

>>15667609
Exactly, he’s full of shit or absolutely retarded.

>>15668337
Whats your stack?
First if we should get wealth quickly is not to overreact. Second sit on cash waiting for a correction. Third buying dividend stocks/metals/reits to protect your wealth and live of dividends.

>>15666540
So who offers decentralized oracles?

>>15664973
>>>/qa/2962964

>>15667499
Ur a maniac m8

SEVEN HUNDRED KAY

>>15666657
The FUD campaign was too effective. Went off the rails.

>>15665223
wow, a hexagon. such a coincidence huh. very rare shape.

>>15667370
Unironically looks /comfy/. Your rent would be so low you could buy way more link.

>>15665513
1k to make it, no. 100 for a suicide stack? if by that you mean a stack with which you commit suicide for having not bought more... ok.

>>15667370
>I am a bit concerned about the safety of the Ethereum blockchain in this case. If the value of LINK becomes high enough, it could make it worthwhile to attack the ETH network to steal its ERC20 tokens.
This is a real concern. It would be something to ask Sergey about at a Q&A.