3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
Mixicles lol
>>15477746THE SHADOWFORK IS REALAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>15477738CHAINLINK 1000$ EOY
Link to anything?
>>15477778https://chain.link/mixicles.pdf
>>15477738Oh shit... it's realhttps://www.mixicles.com/
Only now, however, are smart contracts beginning to emerge that go beyond basic on-chain ownership through tokenization [59] and tap into other markets. These include the moresophisticated and much larger groups of contracts found in the capital markets aswell as the world’s largest market by notional outstanding value, derivatives [7]. Theaggregate value of capital markets alone (very roughly $200Tn) [75] dwarfs that ofmarkets that lend themselves to basic tokenization, such as venture capital (approximately $250Bn in 2018 [53]) and gold (roughly $9Tn total value at current marketprice [3, 88]). There is potentially vast untapped value waiting to migrate on chainThis is the fucking intro.
>Scamcoins are now imitating Chainlink Bullish as fuck for Link
>>15477818HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAHAHFNKEIWOFNDNSJSSUB 1 EOY CONFIRMED
>>15477738We are making it this month
Dumping some key text from the PDF for anons too lazy to click links-Abstrace"We show how to use oracles to build simple, privacy-preserving decentralizedfinance (DeFi) instruments we call Mixicles.Mixicles ingest input payments from two or more parties and yield payoutsthat are conditioned on oracle reports. They are designed to provide privacy forboth the terms and outcomes of the financial instruments they execute. At thesame time, Mixicles can support rigorous regulatory and auditing requirements.The most appealing feature of Mixicles is their avoidance of expensive cryptography and complicated contract structures. Mixicles are conceptually simple, and have low on-chain and off-chain resource consumption."
>>15477818>When you eat your nicely done McDonalds™ Big Mac® with a fresh Mixicles™ Mango Passion Juice© drink
>>15477852-Beginning paragraph of introduction"IntroductionThe decentralization of financial markets is well underway, as evidenced by the popularity of blockchain-based digital gold/asset ownership (e.g., Bitcoin) and the adoptionof blockchain-based venture capital/crowd sales (ICOs, a.k.a. token sales). Only now,however, are smart contracts beginning to emerge that go beyond basic on-chain ownership through tokenization [59] and tap into other markets. These include the moresophisticated and much larger groups of contracts found in the capital markets as?Ari Juels is a faculty member at the Jacobs Institute at Cornell Tech. He co-authored this workin his separate capacity as a technical advisor to SmartContract Chainlink Ltd., in which he has afinancial interest.◦Lorenz Breidenbach is an SNF BRIDGE fellow at ETH Z¨urich. He co-authored this work in hisseparate capacity as a technical advisor to SmartContract Chainlink Ltd.Smartcontract Chainlink Ltd.1well as the world’s largest market by notional outstanding value, derivatives [7]. Theaggregate value of capital markets alone (very roughly $200Tn) [75] dwarfs that ofmarkets that lend themselves to basic tokenization, such as venture capital (approximately $250Bn in 2018 [53]) and gold (roughly $9Tn total value at current marketprice [3, 88]). There is potentially vast untapped value waiting to migrate on chain."**AL:SO**CTRL + F from related document for "Chainlink" yields 14 results
TL:DR Private smart contracts without trusted hardware based on oracles that can retrieve sensitive data without seeing it but still prove it and it is auditable and regulatory compliant
>>15477852>AbstraceWhew senpai.
>>15477875>and regulatory compliant
>>154778671. . Secure and Reliable Oracles: Smart contracts need access to a robust ecosystemof oracles that provide secure and reliable access to critical external systems likedata feeds. Solving this problem is the essence of Chainlink’s ongoing mission.Nearly all financial instruments of any complexity need a solution. Somethingas simple as exercising a stock option, for example, requires knowledge of thecurrent market price of the target equity. There is also clear precedent for thisrequirement in the over $200Tn financial contracts today tied to LIBOR andthus reliant on LIBOR data feeds2. Smart-Contract Confidentiality: Smart contracts na¨ıvely implementing financialinstruments on blockchains (permissionless or permissioned) can leak criticalbusiness intelligence: Monetary amounts, instrument terms, and participatingcounterparties. In today’s complex capital and derivatives markets, privacyis both a given and a legal requirement of most contracts. The reasons forprivacy are varied, but often involve protecting against adversarial trading orundesirable market events resulting from specific contract terms becoming public. Meaningful confidentiality in on-chain financial instruments must extend totransactions, oracle queries, and oracle reportsLooks like this is essentially offering a subsect layer of privacy to what chainlink is trying to offer to the market.
>>15477881I fucked that one up, I can't see shit in these tiny ass boxes so you'll have to deal with a spelling mistake or two
>We also avoid the use of trusted execution environments (TEEs) in Mixicles.>TEEs can deliver strong confidentiality and high performance, but introduce trust assumptions some users prefer to avoid given recently demonstrated vulnerabilitiesThis is fucking gold.More privacy/security/trustlesness features that explicitly avoid previous key features like TEEs.One of my fears was precisely that they were going to have to rely "too" heavily on TEEs.Chainlink is on fucking fire.
>>15477818Oh wow...
200 TRILLION NOLINKERS BTFO
Since the pathetic discord trannies are in full force today I'm going to dump every part of the whitepaper explicitly calling Chainlink out by name."Our Mixicle design goals are simplicity and efficiency, as well as compatibilitywith the Chainlink network and its accountability features, i.e., ability to monitorand enforce correct oracle behavior""We have implemented a SIMI-PPS Mixicle prototype smart contract for Ethereum inSolidity using Chainlink’s SDK. Thanks to the intentional simplicity of our protocol,the contract consists of only 188 lines of code (excluding comments), making it easyto audit. (We would like to emphasize, however, that this prototype has not beenaudited and should not be used in production as is.) Furthermore, the gas cost ofrunning the contract is moderate even though the contract has not been optimized.""Whenever a new round is being set up, the example contract makes a call tothe Chainlink oracle contract to request delivery of data and pays the oraclein Chainlink’s LINK tokens. Users are expected to have funded the examplecontract with an appropriate amount of tokens. (As we mention in Section 3.4,we have chosen for simplicity to omit payments to oracles from protocol descriptions in this paper.)""Due to limitations of previous versions of the Ethereum Virtual Machine, Chainlink currently only allows oracles to deliver a 32 byte response payload. Therefore, in our prototype the oracle only delivers a tag value, but no player signatures, allowing a malicious oracle to report an invalid tag for which the playershaven’t agreed on a payout slate. We note that this attack is likely not toorelevant in practice, since the oracle can already mount a more powerful attackby reporting a false outcome.""We look forward to including these ideas and more in later versions of this paperand/or follow-up work, and welcome corrections and comments from the Chainlinkcommunity as we refine the early work presented here."
>>15477897On fire? Like dumpster fire or rocket to the stars fire
>>15477947This is insanely bullish, here's another link to the PDF in case the other person who posted it deletes their commenthttps://chain.link/mixicles.pdf
Did I make it yet?
>>15477738ITS ALL SO FUCKING TIRESOME
>>15477738Now just somebody tell me how bullish is this? brainlet here
>>15477959>tfw the market is full of retards and the price never reflects the value of this insanely ground breaking tech
>>15477984No cow unfucked.
I TOLD YOU ALL TO BOUGHT THE DIPCHAAAAINLIIIINK1000000EOYOY
>>15477973Sad it wasn't a chainlink killer but working together with chainlink?
>>15477950One of Chainlink's biggest power moves was acquiring TownCrier (headed by Ari Juels); which revolved around TEEs (SGX more specifically).Now Chainlink and Ari Juels just dropped a whole new elaborate system for adding privacy/security/trustlesness smart contracts (and oracles), explicitly sidestepping TEEs.It's an amazing move.
>>15477738If any of you fucking idiots had half a brain you would realize this is why money skelly hates money bellyEthereum is literally unironically the chainlink transfer network from here on out
>>15477984It is a system of derivative management for the finance industry using chainlink oracles. You tell me Anon, derivative markets are measured in the quadrillions.
>>15477787Kek it's real
>>15477835nice
>>15478000They'll all have to bend the knee eventually, you either embrace new technology or it runs you over. The worst part is that people will just say "a bunch of nerds just got lucky!". God I hate medium IQ normies. Low IQ people are alright, but the smug 110 know it all types are insufferable.
>>15478022This.Chainlink had the oracle and TEE (SGX) markets both cornered, and now they're taking the next logical step: dominating the DeFi market (which will logically run almost exclusively on smart contracts).
>>15477849Nope.
Enigma is essentially useless now? I wonder how different the tech is from eachother. Anyone have any insights on this compared to enigma?
>>15478016So they just gave ari Jules a free check then? They must have been developing this for a while now. I wonder what the hack door deal was
>>15477776TIS WEBM NEEDS A SOUNDTRACK!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbAQ3DhT9u8
>>15478052Tbh I’m not even smart and need to be spoon fed, but I know when smarter people then i believe in and get behind something.
>>15477984Considering it literally says it will be supplying security for a 200 trillion dollar industry to be able to utilize the chainlink network I'm starting to unironically think 1k eoy was fud. If this paper is correct and all goes well why even sell? Is this actually real? I'm getting pranked right now, right? There's no way I'm going to be a millionaire from this, yet the math is right there.
>>15477738>>15477746>Mixicles>not going with Aricles
We proposeDECO(short for decentralized oracle) to addressthe above problems.DECOallows users to prove that a pieceof data accessed via TLS came from a particular website andoptionally prove statements about such data in zero-knowledge>>/biz/thread/S15438063 but explicitly without TEE, here we go lads
Great timing on the DeFi whitepaper, boys
>>15478078This is our timeline now fren.
>>15478078This. People are braindead... this is fucking huge
Holy fucking shit this is big, why isnt it pumping?
>>15478108Because it is not called google
>>15478108Pic related sergey just dumped on us.
>>15478022I can’t wait to see them on stage together this fucking month.
>>15478077The absolute worst case scenario is you lose thousands of dollars for the single most likely shot at millions of dollars in your lifetime. I don't know if I'm a very smart person either, I just dislike the mentality of dismissing something without actually learning about it beforehand. That mentality is what most normal people believe, and I am of the believe that even if you're unintelligent having an open mind and willing to learn is far more important.IQ dictates the rate at which you learn, but complacency is the true killer. That's why you see unintelligent people still become self made millionaires. I believe in you anon>>15478108Unfortunately anything legitimately world changing takes a long time to actually be developed. What we're witnessing is another stepping stone, but it's one of those things where most people won't realize how huge this was until after it's already implemented. Even then most people won't be able to comprehend it, equate it to talking to a boomer about backend programming for their favorite app.
>>15478078You just got in nulinker? Enjoy the ride. 1K EoY was from last year when people expected mainnet to release in December.
>>15478139>>15478143>>15478149>>15478150Actually its not pumping because not a single news site has covered this. Probably when they will it will start slowly pumping...
>>15478158This guy fucks
>>15478158Keep dreaming moon boi
Why is this huge, IF this could be offered by Intel SGX?Does this lower the bar for more oracle ndoes to provide privacy?explain fror a brainlet pleas
>buy TownCrier to finance Deco>Have TEE and secure non TEE smart contracts
>>15478158No wait till the twitter shills post screen caps
>>15478060>So they just gave ari Jules a free check then?No, TEEs (SGX) didn't lose a single shred of importance.Look at it this way: the TEE building used to be the tallest building in Chainlink city, but they just got overtaken by a newer, taller building: Mixicles.The TEE building is still just as tall as before, but it's no longer 'the tallest'.And the result is that the Chainlink skyline is now that much more impressive.
I'm not good at short term price predictions but if you anons want me opinion for what it's worth this wasn't some big fuck you announcement like Google, Amazon, etc. But It's still massive and I think it will cause a slow short term rise from here >>15478158beat me to it lol. Whenever there's actual bullish news the sell the news niggers can't put two and two together but over time people realize the importance causing the slow rise in price. But that's just my theory
>>15478185Why?Who will be running TEEs instead of "using Mixicles"?
Steve officially BTFO Vitalik as the new big brain
PAMP IT!
>>15478078people have been calling this exact scenario playing out for two years and here we are, happening as expected...pretty tite
>>15478193The entire point is to have options.
>>15478185It’s still chainlink city just another addition to the infrastructure/city. Great analogy thanks.
mixicles ... AaaaHAHAHAHAa.... so fucking dumb.
>>15478193TEEs will still be needed for IoT use cases mixicles only relevant for simple contracts like defi
>>15478185Comfy explanation anon, thanks
>>15478193TEE will be less expensive
>>15478057This anon gets it
>>15478057underrated
>>15477738We demonstrate how to build a blockchain-dapp that can track fundsand use that to build new trustless, decentralized (de-facto, on-chain) financial instruments with no need to trade between coins or betweenindividuals.Our work includes:The proof-of-concept Mixicle (mixing and storing digital "money"). This instrument givesa new meaning to the name, Mixicle, when used by individuals.The proof-of-concept Mixicle (mixing and storing digital "money"). This instrument gives a new meaning to the name, Mixicle, when used by individuals. A DeFeo (DeFeo is a cryptocurrency that uses DeFeo Protocol to enable peer-to-peer financial systems.) DeFeo: Using DeFeo protocol, it can be deployed on the blockchain. It doesn't require any particular software to run. It enables a new class of financial instruments
we moonin now bois
MOOOOOON
>>15478057>Anyone have any insights on this compared to enigma?We're still reading, but it's obvious this is massive.This is a good description: >>15478035>It is a system of derivative management for the finance industry using chainlink oracles.
>>15477738holy shit are they going to show any progress at all? why do we just keep getting blog posts? wtff
>>15477738except it's literally dumping right now. target: 777 sats
Hope restored
CRUMB ... OVER... LOAD.COMMENCE ... DISPENSING .. OF ... CUM
>Mixicles ingest input payments from two or more parties and yield payoutsthat are conditioned on oracle reports. They are designed to provide privacy forboth the terms and outcomes of the financial instruments they execute.Oh fuck, is this why REN is tanking lately?
>>15478327Thats all you ever will get. Enjoy the dump to sub 1 nigger faggots.
>>15477738Awesome. This is better than I was expecting. Hats off to the team.
>>15477884In other words, not anonymous, meaning not fully private.
>>15477738$10000 EOY confirmed by the devs
30 million dollar tech company which suppose to lead us to the "4th industrial revolution" calls product MIXICLES .... AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA OOHOHOHOHHO ... Tells something about the IQ level if the link army... OOOOOOOOOOOO MIXICLES is shit. This annoucnement was shit. Price diving ...
>>15478388Checked and keked, even the devs say that 1000 EOY is fud now... the real EOY price was 1500 all this time.
>>15478377Privacy is one of the key words in this paper.But in any case, it seems the target audience for this product is legacy finance (derivatives etc.) where you're never going to be anonymous anyway (for now).
>>15477760
>>15478405Because Google isn’t a weird name at all
Here's the real redpill: Chainlink is a ponzi scheme, but it will be the biggest ponzi scheme the world has ever seen, bigger then the Federal reserve printing money, bigger then the wageslave ponzi, it will literally be the biggest ponzi ever. Smart contracts will be used for Chain link derivatives, chainlink nodes, and the majority of capital transfers will be done using chainlink. The ponzi probably wont collapse in my lifetime, either way my sell price is set at 350 trillion marketcap for chainlink, once that price is reached I will sell because I am overall bearish on this ponzi, even if i admit that 1k eoy is fud
That paper alone just shows how Chainlink is on a whole different trajectory to the rest of the space. The resources (human and financial) that went into that alone tells a lot.Pretty great to just sit here and watch all this.
>>15478485seriously kys
when will this actually come true? why do they keep coming out with blogposts? ITS BEEN YEARS NOW
>>15478487you are a retard if you think chainlink can ever become 350k a token please shut the heck up you inbred tard
Who else is ready to MIX IT UP!!!!
>>15478487I see currently a head and shoulders forming for link. Might be bearish for now until I can open a position .
>>15478405>>15478227>>15478405Dis dude created these memes within an hour the whitepaper for deco and mixicles got released. Make of that what you will
>>15478503400k. 350k is reddit fud.
Okay the deco.works is cool. The possibilities of this are endless.
>>15478530Also thought the same thing, really gets the knoggin joggin
>>15478503You are the retayard lol, he doesn’t know.
>>15477778DYOR you brand-off nigger
>>15478499This
>>15478492thisAcquiring TC was one thing, but this is on a whole new level.
>>15478377>Auditability: Mixicles enforce confidentiality as described, but are designed tofacilitate transparency to third parties where appropriateIt can only be audited if you give permission for it to be audited.
>>15478503It's Fundamentally based mixicle tokenomics, cringe boomer FUD
>>15478022>money skelly hates money bellythanks for the keks
>>15478388Checked. Holy All Father please, I don't need to be uber rich but we are going to make it aren't we? I just want to give my fiancé and future family a place to live away from the city and get married. Please oh Lord
>>15478388meme-ing aside what does this image actually mean
>>15478625it's a payout diagram for a call option with a strike price of $1500 and a premiumof $700.
>>15478625>>15478633Yeah I just read it, they’re referring to GOOGL
>>15478185Say it with me bros:>DEFENSE>IN>DEPTH
>>15478078How big is your stack?
>>15477738Dicksicles?
>check the price>still sub $2that's gonna be a yikes from me brother. fucking req tier blog posts trying to pump the price.
>>15477776He cute.
>>15478724Go spam some muah 700k peanuts threads
>>15478702Only 10K
>>15477973TWOYEARS
>>15478740I don't need to spam, everyone already knows sergey will dump if it rises again.keep jerking over "muh tech" tho which nobody gives a fuck about
HAHAHAHAHA ITS SHIT!!!!!!!! ITS ONE BIG OTHING BURGER!!!!!!!!!!!! ITS LITERALLY NOTHING!!!!!
>>15478764Most people never care about technology until it either benefits them or removes their jobs from existence.
>>15478057oOF. TOR IS SEETHING RIGHT NOW
>>15478185It is growing just like those chinese ghost cities.Their buildings are used to pump fake stats so the chinks can dump cheap shit on the markets.Sergey just printed a 40+ page buzzword fiction and dumping his bags on your poor asses.Fuck, you really deserve to get rekt and wage till you die.Wage !
>"Powerful new oracle technology">-3.79%
>>15478764Thanks for warning me oh friendly anon caring so much about my financial wellbeing. Sold all thanks to you oh friendly never Linker
>>15478833>link/btc charts
>>15477746Any guesses on what the testnet mixicles will be called
>>15478907Family Juels.
>>15477738How the fuck is this not a discord larp? Mixicles? Gayest shit I’ve ever heard
>>15478907Testicles
>>15477738>mixiclesLMAO
>>15478945nice
>>15477746MYTISTICLES REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>15477941>water melonsis Jason a nigger? after all this time... just sold 100k
>>15478833>link/btc
>>15477738¡¡¡¡que viva los MEXICALES!!!!
>>15478530imagine how interesting your life needs to bethe sad part is that he prob owns link, and is just neeting away waiting for $1k eoy
>>15478921Kek
>>15478540Stopped reading at she's over 18
What is mixicle?
>>15479194This. The clock is ticking
>>15478764Imagine you have to take a massive dump right now and Sergei happens to be there. His problem is anon holds his share. He can take the biggest shit ever and there are still enough toilets open to do the same thing. He can't shit without someone else ruining it for him as a group. The stink would override his massive dump and he'd be left in a shitty stall wondering what the fuck just happened.
>>15477950>On fire? Like dumpster fire or rocket to the stars fireIt's a dumpster fire to the moon
AHAHAHAHALINK IS DONE. HOLY SHIT. ITS AN UNREGISTERED SECURITY AHAHAHAA OOOOHHHHH NONONONO
Unfortunately there are only two ways we will really moon. One is from speculative money moving from BTC into promising alts following a massive runup. Inb4 margin trading is a better hedge, anyone with a half a brain who isnt a gambling addict or knows they cant manipulate the btc market in their own favor will be hedging with alts.The other is that we have an ETH-like runup due to scarcity from mainstream exposure leading to use, compounded by scarcity from staking. Reminder that ETH’s runup wasnt actually just a speculative pump— it was actually real use of Ether in order to purchase ICO tokens. The speculative aspect was the enthusiasm for ICOs which required people to buy up ETH in vast quantities in order to purchase tokens from companies. For anyone wondering why eth wont rebound, its because those companies sold all that eth for fiat or btc a long time ago. There is no more scarcity.
>>/biz/thread/S15438063It cost $ 20 million
>>15479524Nice source lmao
Simple Private Decentralized Frozen Cocksicles
>>15479550He was right though and leaked info a week before the announcement. Clearly an insider.
>>15479391this>>15479504>moving from BTC into promising alts>muh promising alts>promising >alts
>>15477738
>>15479568>He was rightProofs?>leaked info a week before the announcementHe "leaked" it a day after IC3 tweeted about today's announcement.
>>15479524Man.It wasn't Sergey dumping on neet's it was Ari getting his fair share of our 1k eoy. Good for him if he really helps us get to the promised land.
>>15479633He was just doing a “cryptic” message with combination of things that was already knownReally prophetic lol
>>15479704Holy fukk.
>>15477894a literal boomer
>>15478022>If any of you fucking idiots had half a brain you would realize this is why money skelly hates money bellyyep, but it goes deeper than chainlink, anon.2:25 mins into this:>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niVodrtLWgM>Shitalik Buterin: Oddly enough, I did actually did look into some of the NXT specs and they have turing complete scripting language as one of their wish list features.>So, good luck to you guys on that.>from the video transcript here:>http://prisonorfreedom.com/what-is-the-difference-between-ethereum-vs-nxt-or-any-other-alt-coin/note the way he says the last line in the video.also this: https://twitter.com/vitalikbuterin/status/581843910512754688TL;DR vitalik's ethereum beat sergey's NXT to be the base layer for decentralised smart contracts, but sergey got his own back by creating the standard for decentralised oracles with a focus on servicing big capitalist corporations instead of feeding data to commie-libertarian crypto kitty ponzi's.bonus: about 22 or so mins into this podcast ari juels shits on maker dao and gives a balanced view on libra.https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/facebook-cryptocurrency-libra/
>>15479876>bonus: about 22 or so mins into this podcast ari juels shits on maker dao and gives a balanced view on libra.*i meant 13:25 for ari shitting on makerdao, and the rest of the podcast is a pretty fair commentary on libra
>>15479876keep going
>>15479876>TL;DR vitalik's ethereum beat sergey's NXT to be the base layer for decentralised smart contracts, but sergey got his own back by creating the standard for decentralised oracles with a focus on servicing big capitalist corporations instead of feeding data to commie-libertarian crypto kitty ponzi’s.this, the big boys were never supposed to run the crypto show, that was the whole pointit’s clear we’re all gonna make it, just a matter of when and how much money we are going to have.
>insanely bullish whitepaper that says Chainlink powered smartcontracts are being developed specifically for derivative trading. >Zero price action >mfw
>>15479952What part of “long term hold” do you not understand?
>>15479952there's a post on /r/cc now. everyone should go upvote it
>>15478377Yes but banks and other FIs would not be comfortable dealing with unknown counterparties due to AML issues and potential fines. And this is aimed at them so I'm quite happy with it.
how long will it take normies to catch up? post your guesses! my guess is at least a year
>>15479979downvoted
>>15478921
>>15480041Where we're going, we don't need normies
>>15480041Pioneers will be aware of it in six months. People with actual power will become aware of it in a year. It won't filter down to the "normie zeitgeist" until the mid-2020s even as it puts a fuckton of them out of work.
>>154780522019 biz is almost exclusively 110 IQ know-it-alls except less normies and way more unemployed virgins
>>15479979>there's a post on /r/cc now. everyone should go upvote itNulinkers s m h
>>15479979downvoted, thanks for the update.
>>15479876you do realize both the people on that podcast are Those people shilling banker stuff? "balanced" kek. talking about "banking the unbanked" which is lingo for creating billions of new debtslaves (and dumping you).sure, we're gonna be rich off of it, sure, vitalik is stupid for not realizing this would happen, but i'd support maker over libra any fucking day and so should you. libra =/= link
>>15479979KYS
>>15480041please go back to redit
Municipal Marmalade Makes Magnificent Mixicles Margaritas.
>>15479945remember when shitalik said "oracles are great but i dont know why they are worth 32 million" and all the times he's purposefully neglected to name chainlink when talking about oracles? now we laugh, because it's real clear that sergey of nazarov got the ultimate one-up on him by launching *the* oracle standard for corporations on his pozzchain. ponzi skelly forever cucked by money belly.>>15479946>this, the big boys were never supposed to run the crypto show, that was the whole pointat this point i'm sure shitalik keeps delaying eth 2.0 because he hates all of the corps that use/want to use ethereum as the basis for their blockchain solutions.>Overall, Gray said he sees the public ethereum blockchain as a key component of its vision, as evidenced by its plan to enable a collaborative environment on Azure. He noted that access to quality developers remains an issue for enterprise industries, and that by fueling efforts with resources from ethereum’s developer pool, more progress could be made.>“We want to contribute to help them achieve that, but we’re providing higher level services,” he explained.>He added that Microsoft will also require the participation and interest of ethereum’s community as well should it want efforts like Bletchley to succeed, concluding:>“We need them to work with the community to improve public ethereum performance, to nudge them into enterprise.”from here:https://www.coindesk.com/microsoft-blechley-v1-ethereum-blockchain-template
>>15480105>but i'd support maker over libra any fucking day and so should you. libra =/= linkwell, personally i'd rather support reserve over maker. cats out of the bag now anyway, if it isn't libra it'll be google coin, or jpmcoin, or who knows what else. since libra uses chainlink i'll support the one that makes me fuckin rich.
>>15477835I just got a woodie
>>15479964Been holding since Ico dude.
>>15479952there is near zero normie money left in crypto anymore. they left in early 2018 and are never coming back. the only thing that can pump LINK any higher from here is real world adoption or a marketwide bull run (which isn't happening).
>>15480310>he thinks normies won't fall for the get rich quick scheme twice
>>15479368>It's a dumpster fire to the moonI don't want it any other way.
>>15480311Holy fuck why isn't there a thread about this?
>>15480319there will never be a shitcoin run like 2017 again. regulators are clamping down hard on crypto to protect the dummies from getting justed again, just like they do after every bubble. without massive amounts of insider trading, organized pnd groups, and other forms of blatant market manipulation 2017 would have never even happened.
put me into this historical threadi want to be remembered for something once in my miserable life
>>15480311hhhnnnnnnnnnnngggg
>>15477738it’s a scam
>>15480405Go outside, stretch then breathe in. Then out.
>>15478081>AriclesKek
>>15478499revolutionizing the finance industry takes years.
>>15480311
>>15478764retards like yourself don't care about tech until it is too late, and this is the reason you will be eternally a wageslave
So will I make it with 2.4k link?
>>15480666checked
>>15477738So, it's sharding for smart contracts with tangible benefits in terms of privacy, oracle bootstrapping and auditability? Is there any reason you couldn't use an analagous mechanism to shard ETH itself and kill all the ""ETH killers""?
>>15480311This is so fucking bullish We are going back to $3 soon I can feel it, bros
>>15479504Interesting, I agree with this post. I think scarcity is different for LINK though, as they're actually required to use the network.
>>15480666Let's say I care about the Tech. Watch all the Aantrop videos explaining Bitcoin. Enrolled in an online university to obtain a computer science understanding. (I know I won't ever get a job with that degree but I give me structure and helps me with discipline. What more can I do? The degree is going to take a while.
>>15477738>Run your juels
>>15480711Read the whitepaper
>>15480737I kinda thought that was implied but OK.
>>15480068Hearty keks will be had as an entire industry of lazy normies are put out of work while we get insanely rich
>>15480755Nice of them to give bagholders a shoutout
>>15479979Done the needful, downboated. Also go back and kys
>>15478487>>15478503
>>15480843> 2027I love the math but this timeline is wack
>>15480909could be true, this shit doesn't happen overnight
>>15480909>>15480933The 2027 date comes from the "10% of global GDP will be on the blockchain by 2027" in Klaus Scwab's book. Pic related.
Guess what they wanted to write instead of tesla
>>15480909I’d say 2021
>>15479704Brainlet here, is DECO not a completely different protocol/competitor to LINK?
>>15479979so the top two are obviously /biz/raelis but the bottom one, I genuinely can't tell. It's about dumb enough to be genuine.
https://twitter.com/awrigh01And OpenLaw delivers as well
>>15480993US gov node
>>15480976>>15480993how long till Sergey is put in jail?
>>15480843>2027what is the point of being rich if your youth has passed you by
I am consistently astounded at how readily people will just give away their money to known scams, and then celebrate and extol the virtue of the scam-artists who are defrauding them.
>>15480380I got you in my screen cap anon
>>15480711I'm not sure I'm correct but I would say the one major thing you're missing is time in market. You shouldn't underestimate the importance of having a feel for the markets overall. I don't know what you should do. It is incredibly difficult to find "the golden goose". When anime-chan posted the LINK presale contribution address, I thought it was a pretty good project but I would never have imagined the level of development we are at now. I've probably only become certain of LINK succeeding in the last 6 months or so out of the years I've held. I can't claim that I totally understand every bit of tech and every line of code but I can say that in my opinion anyway, I'm pretty good at looking at projects in the aggregate which includes many different tangible and non-tangible metrics. My conclusion is that LINK is the logical evolution of blockchain technology, and I'm invested accordingly.In case anyone wants to ask about other projects, I haven't seriously looked at anything other than LINK since the ICO other than Ampleforth recently which is interesting, but I'm unsure of the value proposition.Identify a major problem for blockchain tech adoption, find the project that is solving it, do your research, and invest heavily once you're confident in your choice.
>>15480368because /biz/ is dead
>>15477869Holy shit! CDM likely using Chainlink!!
>>15481044to buy a private island to fuck prime pussyand to drive loud cars
>>15479586Oh shit man, you're right. None of the institutional involvement in any of non-btc projects, namely link, is warranted. You should tell them! Make sure that investors who believe in the multi-billion mcap projects know what you do, and pull their money out! Thank god you arrived on the scene!>>15480698Yeah I think the staking with LINK will create a ton of scarcity. Only when that's really underway will we see a big runup.
>>15478071Nothing remotely akin to that semblance of music will be played at the yacht party
>>15481108There are no serious investors or institutional money in Chainlink. It's just a bunch of fools, like you.
>>15481139https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL3Rj9IT4McThe correct theme, if not the correct genre, of the yatch party.
>>15480755>useless funding tokenTrannies, again, btfo
>>15478388Holy shit they even included 700 as a number, these niggers know how to meme magick
>>15481044To know your family will be secureSorry, im old
>>15481044no matter how old you are, teenage girls are always the same age
>We change the ‘a’ of “oracle” to an ‘i’ for euphony and visual appeal.lelelelfootnote 1 though, that's some good news
>>15481151pic related from the chainlink website
Bullish buy $LINK LINK $5.00!
>>15481228You are no different then Epstein you stupid fuck
>>15481049are you insinuating that ari juels is a scam artist? the guy who invented proof of work in 1999? how many HRT shots have you taken today?
Today is the day of the 7
>>15479952It’s all so tiresome.
So non of you /biz/ link marines actually talked about the tech. Who will use SGX/TEE now? TC a nothing burger and sergey was duped to buy a piece of code that turned into garbage ? So mixicles is the answer- securely grab certain data without seeing the rest of data- explain to a half a brainlet.
>>15481552>APPENDIX C Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs)>If Alice and Bob are willing to trust a trusted execution environment (TEE) such asIntel SGX to enforce correctness and confidentiality, it is easy and simple to constructa powerful Mixicle. Indeed, TEEs have been proposed for a number of blockchainprotocols>Consider the following example, with SIMI modified so that O runs in a TEE (enclave). Alice and Bob send input funds to M. They send P0 and P1, along with a specification of switch, to O. O then evaluates switch(x) off chain, and directs M to send input funds to Pswitch(x). An outside observer only sees O direct funds to afresh, random address—nothing more. Alternatively, O could just take Alice and Bob’s funds in custody on chain and execute M entirely off chain, subsequently routing funds to the right player on chain. In this case, O is implementing a private contract. In both cases, realizing O as a TEE ensures the same confidentiality and integrity properties as SIMI, plus privacy for switch (although the operator of O could see which servers O interacts with). The first variant could be implemented using Chainlink/ IC3’s Town Crier system [91]. The second, private contract variant is a clear use case for Ekiden [25], which could execute the contract entirely off-chain in a trusted manner. Trusted hardware is imperfect, of course. Serious attacks against SGX have come to light involving controlled channels, shared cache, and speculative execution, e.g., [15, 50, 56, 85, 90]. Some users may therefore feel uncomfortable using TEEs. It is for this reason that we designed Mixicles without a reliance on TEEs.An interesting direction to consider is use of TEEs for correctness, but not confidentiality, as in the Sealed-Glass Proof model of [83].>rtfm
>>15480372>>15480319Idk about that. I hopped on coinbase in 2013 when btc reached 1k and forgot about my account until 2017 when i bought ltc, made decent gains, then shat it all away on REQ and FUN. Now I check charts and /biz/ literally dozens of times a day for like 2 years now.
>>15481585Explain desu. I can copy and paste too but unfortunately my brain can’t digest that messy poop.
>>15478071nigger tier fuck you
>>15481151Nice, how do you know?
>>15481151Also ever heard of Oracle?
>>15481216I'm only 28 and that is a life goal
>>15477861Criminally underrated
>>15480959Kek. I noticed that too. Subtle hint to Chainlink $1000 Eoy and Chainlink flippening eth
>>15480380i feel dat
>>15481228Thankyou Matthew McConahy
lmao
>>15477738Comfy thread
>>15480973LINK is the network All these new technologies for oracles will be available via the chainlink network
based
>>15481907Is there an actual chainlink node?
>>15477776GODDAMN ALMOST BRUH
>>15480959>1k at time TNice meme
>>15477777
>>15477738Dicksikls
>>15477738wow another buzzword, nice just bought 100k
What is Sergey/CL and Ari/IC3 connection. How far back do they go. What’s is their relationship and what’s the ultimate goal ?
>>15480959>Peak NYC temp in 2025 exceeds 120FWhat did Ari mean by this
>>15481953>>15477777
>>15477861Underrated
>>15478907kek
>>15478388Dubs of truth 10k eoy
>>15478081Topkek
>>15481071stop jacking yourself off you pseud
>>15478178Underrated
>>15480041Around 2025 it because mainstream as in the general public are aware like they are btc but they’ll never understand it like they don’t bitcoin
>>15479704>OwenWilsonWhoa.jpg
So looks like the Maker people running DAI have also been developing oracles for years and are now far more integrated than Chainlink.>https://blog.makerdao.com/introducing-oracles-v2-and-defi-feeds/This is worrying.
>>15482535no shit. Literally nobody is using Chainlink (because no one needs KYC oracles). The partners are not using it. It was a P&D, nothing more
>>15477738DR;NS
>>15480755>not enough decimals Found a problem
>>15482535Its obvious that the current implementation of Maker’s oracles represents the largest ongoing security risk to the platform itself. As Maker adds new assets, as the assets locked in the contracts increase, as new data sources need to be incorporated, as old data sources need to be deprecated, and as data feeds need to be re-weighted, the risk of oracles being compromised increases. At $300m in assets locked by crypto users with one collateral asset, the market has said the current level of oracle security/centralization is fine. In a scenario with $1bn in assets locked, with multiple types of asset collateral, or when Maker tries to bring institutions on to the platform, this level of centralization will likely be deemed unacceptable, hindering adoption. Ultimately, Maker’s oracles need to be secure and flexible enough to provide reliable data over the lifetime of the platform, and are the only security threat that increases in risk as the platform scales. It is obvious that the current architecture cannot scale and is at risk.
>>15482535next you'll find out about Augur. Are you new or something?
I don't understand all the baseless, relentless FUDing. Is it really making the price cheaper. Don't you want others to succeed?
We’re gonna be super rich or this is all just a Jewish trick.
>>15482774Anons are the new Jews.
>>15482145they go back to being apart of the team that created bitcoin, they are both formerly mentees of mr. finney and possibly/likely mr. Szabo. The ultimate goal is an actual God Protocol.
>>15478921based anon
Seriously I enjoy the efforts to FUD. People already understand that this means a lot of new retards are interested in this project.> Sincerely an OG
>>15482963i need some green dildos please im not excited by graphs with red lines
>>15478388Green dubsKek confirms
>>15482738there's no fud, the team owns 65% of the supply and is aggressively dumping. It literally cannot go above $2 unless the team stops selling, and they won't until they've each cashed out $100milThose are the facts, if you still hold link, you are a literal retard
>>15482902Relaxed because I'm comfy with my stack
>>15483006Boring fud spreading is boring. But thanks friendly never linker, glad you took time out of your busy day to warn the poor stupid anons to sell their stinkirs asap. What would we do without you oh great never linker
>>15482815I am the jew now.
Hello future me. If I see this again I guess you’re a lot better off now lol.
>>15483055same
my name is tom
>>15482359Not a pseud if I'm right, and I am.
>>15483125?
>>15483125Hi Tom, I'm Sergey
>>15477787this is embarrassing.Literally running code on trusted servers. These ideas are way older than even the idea of a consensus protocol.Completely worthless, apparently designed only to generate hype.
1k is fud. My name is Chris and I am going to be a millionaire.
>>15478057I dont't think that Enigma is focusing on finance. It's more like a general privacy solution. REN is focusing on finance i think
summary of the protocol:1. users generate pseudonymous identitites2. users transfers data to the server3. the server computes the result4. the only way to ensure the computation was correct is to make the entire computation publicThis paper is a scam. A scam designed to work on brainlets that don't realize they are brainlets and think it's a genius invention because the paper looks complicated to them.
>>15477787>https://chain.link/mixicles.pdfsummary of the protocol:1. users generate pseudonymous identities2. users transfer data to the server3. the server computes the result4. the only way to ensure the computation was correct is to make the entire computation publicThis paper is a scam. A scam designed to work on brainlets that don't realize they are brainlets and think it's a genius invention because the paper looks complicated to them.
>acquire Towncrier cuz muh TEEs>decide not to use them anywayNever change Sergei
>>15483325*yawn* it's all so tiresome. Go do something productive.
>>15483325Can someone break that down into English.
>>154833123.1 Confidentiality
>>15483340In English, >>15483325 ignores the section of the paper that addresses his concern, because he has not dilated his pussyhole today, and it is swelling and sore.
Requesting Sent meme about yugi and kaiba dueling and at the bottom says some pajeety thing along the lines of "buy now big returns"
>>15483366Why is /pol/ always right
>>15483340I already did that.Using symbols like pi is part of the intentional obfuscation.>If O provides an incorrect reports, i.e., one that is inconsistent with switch, then either Alice or Bob can reveal terms, signed by O, to an auditor, which can then confirm the discrepancythis is page 13.yes, the whole idea is really that fucking stupid.Use a server to execute something, and the only way to verify correctness is to have an auditor that sees everything.You could execute this protocol before computers even existed.
I can explain those "payment slates" with scary-looking pi.Imagine you want to sell bread for wine, but you want to hide the fact it's about bread and wine.You agree with the other party to replace bread with 'X' and wine with 'Y' in the contract. You both sign the note stating the replacement elsewhere, to be used in case of attempted fraud.This is literally it, the idea that's described (among others) on the screenshoted part.Whoever wrote this is intentionally making fun of the dumb reader.
>>15483357Baste
>>15483428Yea, so oracles are incentivized to provide the correct information or their bad actor behavior will be revealed on-chain if they try and fuck with providing bad data for private smart contracts. This is very bullish.
>>15478081
>>15483489Your description isn't correct, because the paper proposes an "auditor" instead - in a funny attempt to make the computation secret.However, what you wrote is a correct description of fraud-proof based layer2, like TrueBit.https://truebit.io/This is a very, very old idea.
>>15483525
>>15483525>who invented the light bulb >who made it popularNot the same things.
>>15483577What the fuck does this mean???
>>15483606The whole point of today's postshttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.00938.pdf>Thanks to the widespread deployment of TLS, users can access private data over channels with end-to-end confidentiality and integrity. What they cannot do, however, is prove to third parties the provenance of such data, i.e., that it genuinely came from a particular website. Existing approaches either introduce undesirable trust assumptions or require serverside modifications. As a result, the value of users’ private data is locked up in its point of origin. Users cannot export their data with preserved integrity to other applications without help and permission from the current data holder. Even the value of public date on the web cannot be fully realized as there is no secure way to relay it to systems without network connections, such as smart contracts. We propose DECO (short for decentralized oracle) to address the above problems. DECO allows users to prove that a piece of data accessed via TLS came from a particular website and optionally prove statements about such data in zero-knowledge, keeping the data itself secret. DECO is the first such system that works without trusted hardware or server-side modifications. DECO can liberate data from centralized web-service silos, making it accessible to a rich spectrum of applications. To demonstrate the power of DECO, we implement three applications that are hard to achieve without it: a private financial instrument using smart contracts, converting legacy credentials to anonymous credentials, and verifiable claims against price discrimination
>>15483596they haven't made it popular though. So they've done nothing since they also did not invent it. 0.60 EOY
>>15483577kek do you think that's somehow related?Basically, a second server is used a proxy for a ssl connection.Because of this, it knows the encrypted content came from the site.The "(Proof)" part generates a zero knowledge cryptographic proof that some specific data was contained in a particular encrypted ssl connection without revealing anything else.https://tlsnotary.org/ is the same idea, but done with zero knowledge, so the server knows what you're proving.The idea to use zk-snarks is obvious, but the implementation is complex, so if they release the library it's going to nice. I'm sure there's some prior art somewhere, so the patents aren't likely to be enforceable.Also, deco has literally nothing with common with the "mixicles" paper.>>15483596lightning network works based on fraud proofs.
>>15483669>Also, deco has literally nothing with common with the "mixicles" paper.k
>>15483682Did you just search for "deco" and screenshot the first result? What you quoted proves you wrong, as it mentions it as something completely independent.
>>15483669>https://tlsnotary.org/ is the same idea, but done with zero knowledge, so the server knows what you're proving.>but done with zero knowledgeshould be: but done without zero knowledge
>>15483700Yes, faggot. Completely independent, published on the same day, by the same people. It's almost like they don't go into detail here because they published a whole second paper to address the points on confidentiality.
>>15483745>by the same peopleYour inability to understand written information is tiring. The only person that's on both papers is Ari Juels. You can notice he's the first on mixicles, but last on DECO. Why? Because he wrote mixicles, and other authors are only tacked-on for other reasons, maybe they reviewed it or provided funding (this one would explain Sergey). He didn't have anything to do with DECO except get used for promotion by the real authors, which is why he is in the last place. That's the norm in all papers, exceptions are rare.If you ever had anything with research you would know this. Most papers have some well-known name that did nothing, to increase citations and reach. In the worst cases the well-known name demands to be the first just for the privilege of being added as an author, stealing the work in a way. At least Ari Juels isn't such an asshole.
>>15483745
>>15483798yep you're right, 2 papers that both cite each other published on the same day, completely unrelated groups here. Ari probably has never heard of either mixigals or decos, he's only included for the prestige you're right.
>>15483865At the end of the day, you're only trying to fool yourselves.Looks like the last-ditch attempt at pumping the price up with "mixicles" didn't work out.
>>15483887Guess that means to keep buying before the pump sweetie pie
Why are we not talking about how Chainlink is promoting racemixing?
>tfw you will never get to play with Ari's JuelsGod damn that man is a fucking genius. Him and Sergey are going to save the world.
>>15484208T. Ari JewsWhat did you expect?
>>15481397this basically confirms swift beyond a shadow of a doubt doesn't it?we knew this from breadcrumbs and the 2017 poc, but here they say they work with swift (not worked), and help connect bank's smart contracts... i think we gun be rich niggas, the problem is that this might be sergey shilling to dump more 700k's
>>15483161you can get a point across without sounding like a pretentious, narcissistic faggot, is my point.
Will I make it with my 2000 LINK stack?
>>154842812 years. priced out.
>>15484283What do you mean bro?
>>15484300I mean:You had two yearsNow you are priced outWould you like me to say it again?
>>15484307I understand that but it doesn't help to focus on the past. It is what it is now.My question is will one be able to come close to making it with 2000 LINK stack? I don't need lambos, I just want a comfy life.
>>15484318You think I have a crystal ball? Do you think I understand your definition of "coming close to making it" or "comfy life"?Should I consult an oracle? How would I answer this question for you?
>>15477738NO ONE IS GOING TO USE PAJEET'S NEW TECHNOLOGY OF SMART SUPER DUPER FANCY GAY FAG ASS CRYPTO ASS COIN.NO ONE!!!STOP WASTING YOUR TIME AND MOVE TO STOCKS IF U WANT YOUR CASH TO ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING FOR YOU.FUCK YOU CRYPTOFAGS!WHY CANT THERE BE A 4CHAN BOARD ONLY FOR CRYPTO?!