/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15322135
Completely brainwashed and addicted to hopium

>>15322135

>He doesn’t possess the relevant information.

>>15322135
Link is a classical perpetual motion machine scam. Bank upfront investment while promising endless energy/decentralised trustless oracles as if you are just one innovation and sufficient funding away from fundamental core problems.

I think SENT and Pocketnet.app which can expan horizontally on a userbase instead of institutional adoption are better especially if get in early during the hype cycle.

SENT had one hype but pocketnet.app hasn't.

>>15322173
Linktards are the equivalent of magatards on pol

dr;ns

why are you so interested about it? link is a shitcoin anyway

If LINK has no customers it means none of the projects who've said they are using LINK have customers
If thats the case, blockchain projects are all dead
Till theyre not
And they have customers
At which point they will all use LINK
So yeah, not now, but $1000 EOY is FUD

>>15322226
Read up on perpetual motion machine scams.
Link will not be the last if i'm correct. Excuse bad grammar my english is not that good.

https://medium.com/adventures-in-consumer-technology/the-modern-perpetual-motion-scam-69f41d6cbe6

Basically scam upfront massive investment while the breakthough is just another dollar away you fake activity while laughing all the way to the bank.

I'm currently mining POC of Pocketnet because it's not even on the market so a nice lottery ticket.

If you want to communicate more and use my reff link here.
https://pocketnet.app/index&s=5d8cb72dfe4e2cd72dfebd8ed980834409cec28a896e7ed8d10983fa7486e73f&mpost=true&ref=PL7RNWypccYBPsDAygW3H4aKfzGBwMeWyt

I believe in things that work already and can be scale up with flaws constantly being fixed not grande soclutions.

>>15322261
None of the "partner" are using Link at the moment. It has 0 users currently, yet retards like you talk as if:
1. It's already decentralized.
2. It already has users.
The fact that even the "partners" aren't using LINK just proves how shit it is.

>>15322312
You're the kinda faggot who scoffed at Netflix while they picked up a copy of the notebook from blockbuster on a friday night to watch with your wife before her bbc bull boyfriend drilled her manky pussy

>>15322135
1, decentralization from 3rd parties you literal retard, no mo cowopowationz

2, mirroring link tokens from eth to another chain wouldnt be that hard.

3. HUNDREDS of companies

ps you had 2 years. if you dont buy today youll regret it for the rest of your life.

>>15322348
you are the kind of person who falls for perpetual motion machine scams because they look like they solve fundamental problems but don't until you spend just another dollar more

>>15322367
Im the kinda faggot who can read the writing on the wall

>>15322135
why do nolinkers talk about link as if:
1. their opinion matters
2. they will get anyone to sell
3. they are better at investing

>>15322382
it spells scam

>>15322405
LINK alone has already made me a 3000% gain

Best
Scam
Ever

>>15322135
It literally has all of that, also $32 million may as well be zero because that is not a lot of money for what Chainlink has done. Stay poor.

>>15322367
You stupid fucking pajeet faggot. The team has never asked anyone for a dollar after initial funding.

>>15322431
You tell others to invest because link solved the decentralised trustless oracle problem. That is why it will be worth 100 and 1000 of dollars.

>>15322435
>It literally has all of that
that is provably false. Why are you lying to pump your bags?

>>15322446
they do raise capital by dumping their bags on you that was the deflection I got in the detective anon thread. They need to raise money by selling tokens as announced was the excuse given.

>>15322135
>1. it is currently decentralized
it's not because you need KYC and a huge amount of LINK to run a note

>2. it is currently blockchain agnostic
it's not because LINK is a ERC-20

>3. it currently has thousands of users
doesn't have and never will because LINK is a solution looking for a problem

>>15322451
>1000 of dollars
I can smell the curry

Why do link fudders waste their time making threads to dislodge a hardcore group of hodlers? To put it simple, Link is so big here and it has potential that shills will bash link to get attention, then shill their coins.

Tl;dr Link fud threads are thinly veiled shilling campaigns

Why do people pretend it hasn't already done a 10-20x for most people?

>>15322469
Even the pocketnet Ivans got 10k users and like 12-20 nodes running. LINK is pathetic.

SENT can aqquire Endusers as well. dVPN and dSocial got good chances to find mass adoption by virtue of providing blackmarket and porn.

Remember Bitcoin is backed by the price of cocaine on the blackmarket, had billions in goods moving on it every year before the investment niggers even heard of it.

>>15322501
>aqquire

>>15322501
Black and grey market applications arent good examples. Link is trying to do boring shit for boring companies, not host your blacked porn sites.

>>15322497
I think its the retards who are invested in shitcoins with no future, who cant bare to sell at the massive loss they have already had to take, in the hope that their coin finally does anything (it won't)

They had 2 years

>>15322525
> Link is trying to do boring shit for boring companies,
Link is trying to sell a product they don't have to companies which can
do what Link currently does within a heartbeat while profitting massively.

The token is not even necessary for the whole operation from what the linklets told me here.
As said in this thread linklet bagholders tell me LINK doesn't need investment in the other thread linklets told me that the devs dump coins on them to invest into it. Make up your bloody mind.

On top tell me how close they are to solving the trustless dOracle problem.
If you don't understand how critical black market adoption is for crypto success you are a fool or a shill.

>another LINK FUD circlejerk thread

>>15322584
answer some questions I'm genuinely interested not fudding.
>>15322568

>>15322464
Seriously never understood why people refuse logic.If you can't separate your emotions from your investment you are doom to fail.Though so many people are emotionally invested into chainlink it's going to be pink wojack city in due time. Link should have done OTC trades, vs dumping on binance.
The google partnership was confirmed through a blog, and people are taking that as gospel. Thats the same thing that happened with bmw & vechain. Only difference is chainlink concentrates their marketing efforts on /biz

>>15322584
This, these fudders really are pathetic.

>>15322595
trustless dOracle migth be impossible without general AI

>>15322568
Yawn. You're a boring shill.

>>15322657
why not simply answer the questions since it's boring you can do it effortlessly.

As said the other linklets told me they are not exit scamming they are raising capital from bagholder as announced. Now people here tell me LINK doesn't need capital they invented the next big thing after sliced bread.

So what should it be?

>>15322393
>verifiable facts
>opinions
Those are not synonyms dude