/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15071567
It is never going to $100 let alone $1000, stinktards.

Link will never hit 1000 you idiot

>>15071575
ok linklet

How do you know link will be worth 1000$? Like, really? How? Meme magic?

>>15071584
link will hit $1000 this year

wow linktards are insanely delusional

>>15071575
I remember in 2017 people like you said, LINK will never hit 1$ again, let alone $5. Oh boy were they wrong...

>>15071596
WE JUST WIN

>>15071584
itll never hit 10 dollars

>>15071596
stop questioning the meme and just spread it you fucking spastic

>>15071567
Nobody is going to hold for 2.5%. 5-8% would be more likely, so using your math that's a token value of $312.5 - $500.

>>15071640
Won't even hit $5

>>15071683
It already did once.

>>15071567
This brings peace to my universe within.

>>15071682
Yeah 2.5% is worse than what a wealth manager would project for investing with them. If I had $5m I’d be putting half of it in some real estate developments friends of mine do 1m kept in link and the rest on starting a business/living off.

I only have 2.7K

ITT, delusional fags

Link will be a top3 coin before the end of this year. It has outperformed every other shitcoin and will enter singularity when Libra announces cooperation with LINK. See Pic related.

>>15071779
Who the fuck are you.

>>15071575
classic

I played the shitcoin game and didn't accumulate enough. Plus my income is low and I'm not selling my VIDT or IHF

>>15071682
>>15071789
Guys the 2.5% I put as a return is based on a savings account. The point was to demonstrate that if you are a COMPLETE LAZY FAGGOT you will make it off of doing ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Putting your money in a savings account is a 0 effort "I am not even trying" kind of lazy.

Of course you can get higher returns re-investing or staking. That wasn't the point though, the calculations are to show that literally breathing in air is enough to make it once link hits 1k with a 5k stack.

>>15071973
Wow, now that is Vintage.

>>15072008

They're retards man don't bother.

>>15071627
>hit 1$ again
>again
Nigga link usd 2017 ath was like 80-90 cent

>>15071698

4 is not 5.

>>15071603
Based

>>15072459
Uh no, it was about $1.50

>>15071567
Only 5k? Dammit I've bought to many.

>>15071567
>1.1m
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>15072601
imagine being this dumb

>>15071596
It's all in the fundamentals.
In this case, it's going to go fundamentally vertical and then you just win.

>>15071567
post sheet faggot

are we gonna make it frens?

>>15072662
that's okay anon just send them to me :)
0x0f03a7BBf273d098C6ff7188C2086b9eB4Ffa478

How many times do us oldfags have to tell you?

1k for a stack big enough that you won't kill yourself when it moon

10k to make it. (Financial independence)

100k for fuck you money.

5k will put you halfway to financial independence. Best course of action would be exit after your sell targets, dump it into a high div yield fund and use that to fuel the next investment. The next one should be far more conservative and fundamentals focused as you'd only need a 2-5x to make it from there.

Also, LINK will not reach $1000. It's ceiling is somewhere around $100-$150.

I know for a fact that you newfags won't listen to me though and will continue holding it until corrects to somewhere around $20-$30 when the market as a whole corrects itself, just like it did last cycle.

But I'm sure this time it's different, right guys?

>>15071584
Tulip bulbs got up to $750,000 each in today's market.

>>15071982
wow, very similar to LINK fud

>>15073470
the make-it number for biz has always been 10mil, fuck-you money is 100m

1K IS A MEME IS A MEME CHANNEL YOUR POSITIVE THOUGHTS TO VISUALIZE THIS NEW REALITY IN WHICH LINK IS 1K AND IT WILL BE TRUE

DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHTS

>>15073680
>82,000 a year for breathing isn't making it.
>At least double that figure to 164,000 a year if staking rewards are slightly better than shit.
5k is the making it number.

>>15073793
5k stack to make it in American states, 10k to make it in liberal states.

>>15071567
>Token Value: 1,000

Imagine actually taking time to make that spreadsheet. Sometimes I feel like a loser until I come on here and realize things could be so much worse.

>>15073793
You genuinely think you'll make 164k/year from a fucking 5k stack?

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

>>15074146
I already posted the math.

2% ROI?

dude, if it is this low, you can bet there is not gonna be many people wanting to run a node

>>15074199
Checked. What should I do anon, only have 2k stack but have some LP (0.1).

fuck you op have 2.7k link and i will make it

>>15071567
Putting $10,500 on an speculative shitcoin on its way down

>>15071596
based on a very conservative estimative on how much of the derivatives markets link can capture

do the math yourself, even at a very low %, considering stacking taking a good part of the circulation supply, it could easily reach $1k

>>15074224
How fucking high do you think it's going to be? Highly likely it's <2%.

>>15074292
vechain tier delusion at this point, sadly.

>>15074300
4~5%

at <2% its not even worth the risk, you would be better off putting your money somewhere else that wont require all the infrastructure to run a node. you can get 3% with much less risk

>>15074199
Yeah which is entirely based on LINK reaching $1000 lmao. It won't happen dude. Read more about the entire market in its current state. The peak will be $150 at best. Maybe we wick to $200, maybe we don't. Regardless, $1000 isn't happening. At least not for a very long time.

If you don't learn why that price won't happen or how to spot macro peaks, you're going to be very very JUSTed once the bull market peaks.

>>15074378
Even at 4% it's not worth it, one can easily get that amount in an REIT.

>>15074378
Which is why the NaaS' will be prevalent. Fair point about getting more elsewhere though. I guess 4-5 is reasonable.

>>15074234
If the staking return is even just 4% 2000 links at 1000 per token would put you around 60k a year NET income. 60k a year doesn't sound like a lot but as a net income post taxes that's essentially the income of someone making 80-85k a year.

>>15074619
4% is shitty considering how volatile the crypto market is.

>>15074420
>peak will be $150
This board is so delusional, going up to $150 is utterly impossible.

>>15074645
It is shitty which is why we all expect it to be higher than 4%. The point of these conjectures is to assume bad or worst case scenarios and see if you still make it. If you make it under worst case scenarios than you are great if it does anything better.

>>15074619
But won't I have to pay tax on it? Ausland.

>>15074691
>worst case scenarios
If this was the case then you should not assume link will reach a 1000 per token.

>>15074691
Come to think of it, S&P 500 gives 7% annually and 2% dividends on top of that...why would anyone stake instead of cashing out?

>>15074645

when and if chainlink start working the way is intended to work, its going to have zero relation with the crypto market

>>15074739
>zero relation with the crypto market
Assuming this overly optimistic viewpoint is true, it's safe to say the price of link tokens will still be more volatile than boomer stocks and bonds.

>>15072459
You are not wanted here

>>15074705
True but speculation isn't going to do anything. If it doesn't see adoption the price won't be going too high and if it does it's going to go through the roof. I don't see a middle ground for this project it's either going to 0 when it fails to be adopted or soaring towards 1k when it is adopted.

>>15074764

to be honest, this is all pioneering stuff, no one really knows, we just assume based on what its intended to do and how

>>15074800

this

there is no middle ground here, its zero or full adoption, standard protocol and everything

and if is the second case, it wont stop at $1k

>>15074875
>and if is the second case, it wont stop at $1k
Agree because if it is adopted and actually works as intended the cost savings smart contracts will provide will make everyone want a piece of the pie. It will just keep going up and up unless major competitors come out offering a better service. Right now as far as I'm aware link has no competitors. The longer it goes without competitors the higher the price will be if it gets mass adoption.

>>15072008
So in other words you chose a completely arbitrary comp. you know some savings accounts pay out .1% interest. Why not .1 then? What the hell makes you think it would be 2.5% besides the fact that very few banks will give you that?

>>15071596
Math

>>15073400
sent ;)

>>15075398
OP is delusional, but ~2% is typical rate of inflation which the Fed will do a little better than match with bonds/bills (even monthly ones). The best savings accts will be close to bond/bill rates. My savings rn is 2.35%.

>>15071567
Op you have that spread sheet