/biz/ - Business & Finance

Literally who

>>14804155
This is unironically a good thing. Xrp went to 110billion mc on crazed moonkids

>>14804155
Bullish

>>14804166
Bitcoin CEO
Linkies crying

> shills coming out of the woodwork
Literally. The. State. Two. Years.

>>14804155
what was the point of making this thread?

>>14804155
>>14804186
It's FUD to get people to sell.

What the fuck is up with these twitter shills? There are literally so many spamming nowadays. Can we just go back to .50 when it was comfy as fuck

>>14804202
Right, we are waiting at the bottom to buy

>>14804224
The question is why is the price dropping despite all these shills.

the problem is chainlink was built on eth, which is dying too, LINK should switch to tendermint/cosmos ecosystem to survive

>>14804247
Sergey is trying to shake them out

>>14804155
Am I suppose to be scared of a tweet?

>>14804251
What’s the point of shaking people out?

what if sergey nazarov is the father of bitcoin?
what gives?
what is this guys schtick?
he's been running around selling people internet funny money promising all these supposed working projects, is this like the new church? instead of collection plate its ethrum and bitcom?

>>14804247
Everything is dropping. CL did a x10. It had to dip a bit

>>14804155
>>14804169
>>14804173
>>14804224
>>14804247
>>14804249
Stop listening to faggots on twitter, just make up your own minds. For triple IQ people your mental capacity is fucking retarded.

>>14804224
how retarded are you? Its mostly /biz/ you fucking idiot

>>14804279
He does look very Christ-like tbqh. Especially if he grew out his beard and lost some fucking weight

Are you flaming faggots really going after Samson Mow because he dissed your precious little cryptocurrency? My God you literal subhumans are pathetic. Leave the guy alone, his opinion is his opinion - end of story

>>14804306
i wish you cancer would fuck off

>>14804303
No you mongloid. Biz shills were there when it was below $1. It’s not just biz anymore

>>14804155
>millennial colloquiallisms
Cope.

I just Googled the guy. This came up. This guy is crashing the price!

Who the fuck is this chink anyways

>>14804301
Who is listening to Twitter fags?

>>14804351
Nice fedora fat ass lmao

>>14804483
projecting jew worshiper.

>>14804155
>Joy emoji

>>14804182
this

>>14804155
Good lad samson fudding LINK so he can accumulate more. You can literally see he's trying hard, even tweeted an emoji and all.

>>14804173

>bitcoin CEO
>a decentralized network
>CEO

no one gives a shit about this made up title

twatter shills. stop wasting time on bitcoin maximalists. samson is not interested in anything but baiting you.

>>14804155
Cancer > AIDS > Bitcoin Maximalists
These maxi's missing out on link is going to make getting rich off it even sweeter

>>14804852
they could be wrong about link but if you were only interested in btc and someone came to you shilling and memeing some alt you would think it's juat another scam because every alt outside of link is basicly a total shitcoin

>>14804155
im down to get to xrp levels, 100 billion market cap would put us at what price? ~$200-300 im all in OP thanks for the reminder

>>14804338
>guy makes non-argument, cunty remarks that both assume great importance in himself and are completely baseless
>people on the receiving end of his remarks respond to him and call him out on his bullshit
makes sense, normal stuff
until
>you get butthurt over free discourse
his opinion is retarded and we're allowed to give him our opinions that elaborate on why
also, blockstream literally wants to remove the proof-of-work aspect of bitcoin by guaranteeing that miners will no longer receive mining rewards once the bitcoin supply runs out, thus totally destroying the aspect of bitcoin (the thousands, will-be-millions of dollars it takes to mine a single bitcoin) that gives it fundamental value
you're a retarded communist in every sense possible
this fuckface is probably accumulating chainlink right now; every time the banks want in bitcoin, they fud
analogues

>>14804852
isn't AIDS way preferable to most kinds of cancer these days?

>>14804946
>blockstream literally wants to remove the proof-of-work aspect of bitcoin by guaranteeing that miners will no longer receive mining rewards once the bitcoin supply runs out
so you would rather have FIAT 2.0 with never ending inflation? lol
>>14804946
every single bitcoiner wants to mantain the 21m supply limit

1 retweet
14 likes
oh no

>>14804224
2 years

>>14804979
okay i was just gonna respond to this with a brainlet tesseract, but you're clearly approaching this as a good-natured person
i'm pretty sure nobody *except for maybe blockstream down the line, after a million promises that they won't* wants to print or generate more bitcoin out of thin air or otherwise
blockstream, through wanting to offload bitcoin transactions to the lightning network (which is off-chain and does not pay out incentives to miners from the transaction fees), is effectively removing from the equation the ONLY thing that gives miners any incentive to contribute their hashing power to the bitcoin network
think of it as "mining after mining"; it keeps the proof-of-work model going in a totally economically sensible way, completely on-chain (though some argue otherwise—and while i disagree with these people who say it doesn't work, in the long run nobody cares and everyone gets what they deserve one way or the other)
if there's no proof-of-work element involved in acquiring your cryptocurrency, then it all basically turns into either speculation, or much less direct and consistent metrics—such as with proof-of-sake's reliance on people who are using the chain as a platform for their products or services, and the sheer complexity in accounting for all the variables involved. there are some clear-cut winners (chainlink, given that it is a network of decentralized oracles that provide the data that practically the entirety of the crypto space needs and doesn't have—and to assess the value of chainlink as a whole is to assess the value of its individual components, which is like assessing the value of various companies), and then there's everything else, which are the operations the the clear-cut winners are selling tailored services to.
tl;dr buy chainlink and proof-of-work cryptos, never fucking sell

Samson Mow and Charlie Lee don't know what Chainlink is. We're still so fucking early. This is the very beginning of the awareness phase.

>>14804155
Not Samson Mow!!!
FUCK

>>14804979
okay i was just gonna respond to this with a brainlet tesseract, but you're clearly approaching this as a good-natured person
i'm pretty sure nobody *except for maybe blockstream down the line, after a million promises that they won't* wants to print or generate more bitcoin out of thin air or otherwise
blockstream, through wanting to offload bitcoin transactions to the lightning network (which is off-chain and does not pay out incentives to miners from the transaction fees), is effectively removing from the equation the ONLY thing that gives miners any incentive to contribute their hashing power to the bitcoin network once the supply runs dry
think of it as "mining after mining"; it keeps the proof-of-work model going in a totally economically sensible way, completely on-chain (though some argue otherwise—and while i disagree with these people who say it doesn't work, in the long run nobody cares and everyone gets what they deserve one way or the other)
if there's no proof-of-work element involved in acquiring your cryptocurrency, then it all basically turns into either speculation, or much less direct and consistent metrics—such as with proof-of-sake's reliance on people who are using the chain as a platform for their products or services, and the sheer complexity in accounting for all the variables involved. there are some clear-cut winners (chainlink, given that it is a network of decentralized oracles that provide the data that practically the entirety of the crypto space needs and doesn't have—and to assess the value of chainlink as a whole is to assess the value of its individual components, which is like assessing the value of various companies), and then there's everything else, which are the operations the the clear-cut winners are selling tailored services to.
tl;dr buy chainlink and proof-of-work cryptos, never fucking sell

>>14805344
LN won't remove fees, so your argument is retarded. Either way, you'll complain so w/e.

>>14804155
literal who?

>>14804155
hahahahahahaha
>they have a ton of shill
should we tell him?
hahahahahahaha

>>14805344
>blockstream, through wanting to offload bitcoin transactions to the lightning network (which is off-chain and does not pay out incentives to miners from the transaction fees), is effectively removing from the equation the ONLY thing that gives miners any incentive to contribute their hashing power to the bitcoin network once the supply runs dry

LN is here only for micro transactions that are irrelevant in terms of fees for miners, on chain transactions in the future will only be used for large transfer aka the settlement layer, so no, the LN network doesn't take away the PoW aspect, it simply offloads the less meaningful weight from the chain.

I consider myself pretty much a btc maximalist and I don't even care about LN network, I have no need to use it.

And if you're a big blocker then simply say it, I dont have time to argue about that tho, for big blockers there is bcash or bsv or whatever, time will prove me right anyway.

Link gave me good profit but i think its time to move to btc

>>14805329
Is it a coincidence both chinks mention not knowing about Chainlink on the same day, in your frame of reference?

>>14805410
never said that LN wouldn't remove fees; there ARE still fees, paid in large part to blockstream
the bitcoin supply runs dry, and miners don't get paid; they're no longer a part of the equation, and thus, neither is mining at all

if, by "[my] argument is retarded", you mean to imply that bitcoin's value is in no way supported by the costs of mining then you might be severely brain damaged, or just an NPC incapable of forming a single independent thought

here's that tesseract i was talking about
it's you

protip: administer cerebrolysin and cortexin intramuscularly to significantly repair any damage to your central nervous system you may have sustained
you can buy both from rupharma, nootropicspot, or cosmicnootropic (which ships to canada, if you're there)

>>14805469
Nah they're bum buddies.

>>14805251
Can’t wait until we hit sub $1 in coming crash. Gonna be hilarious to watch you faggots cry

>t. Jan 2018 Sibos buyer

>>14805469
>>14805595
Now we just wait for the fat cuck behind Monero to FUD LINK to complete the trifecta of anime twitter fags.

>>14804155

>he doesn't know

>>14805469
charlie was trolling with that comment you fucking brainlets jesus i as i get older i cant tell apart the trolls or not. im also starting to give less fucks as i get older. and i hit on.

>>14806728
Riccardo will challenge Sergey to a big mac eating contest.

>>14804155
Yeah, take an advice from this fag. Check my screenshot.

>>14804166
lol the dude launched a "Space Alien" game token on Bitcoin by using a sidechain. basically a no body.

https://www.coindesk.com/blockstreams-samson-mow-is-launching-a-space-alien-gaming-token-on-bitcoin

>>14804155
>bigmac cashes out $50 million
>spends $1 million on discord pajeet trannies to shill link

Sounds about right desu

ill never understand the "useless token" FUD
it seems lazy

>>14804303
Wrong, little brainlet.

>>14808266

>>14806835
Why would he troll twitter like that.
Woukd he just go on the internet and tell lies?

>>14804155

>>14804155
This. I like how the fat fuck intensified the paid pajeetery while dumping at the same time. XRP tier filth.

Everyone on here got 100k link when it was $0.03 and are now millionaires, didn't you get the memo OP?

>>14804155
The fact faggots like this regurgitate transexual FUD calms my nerves.

>>14808592
Go get yourself some cow piss tea while at it.

>>14804166
he's a blockstream cunt fag

>>14804155
He's a Bitcoin maximalist. He cries about every altcoin that pumps. I promise you, LINK is not special. He was crying about BAT a few months back when it pumped too. He's a weird fucking freak and a sore loser. He can't stand to see any other cryptocurrency do well, so he cries on Twitter when it happened.

Protip: BTC maximalists are fucking freaks. Ignore/avoid them at all costs. They got lucky with Bitcoin and now they think they're a lot smarter than they actually are. Samson and the pedophile Pony are key examples of this.

>>14808639
Nigger you literally had twenty four months.

>>14808657
Whore, pls

>>14806835
You're going to die alone with your cats, ya dumb bitch. Enjoy your HPV.

>>14804155
Literally WHO???

>>14805432
there's no need to, he'll learn soon

>>14804155
>14 likes
>BTFO
Choose one

>>14804447
Fucker is competing with link.

>>14804173
Him who now controls Bitcoin, created by SN, calling his SN's newest creation a scam. And he does so unironically.

4chan soibois btfo