/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14488010
You should have to post your gfs nudes to post

>>14488010
Should change it to date of first purchase of chainlink. That way you have true 2017 buyers board.

>>14488010
I'm not trusting your website to fetch my information from Metamask, sorry.

Is this some sort of scam

>>14488097
When would you cap it? I actually didnt remove from binance until jan 2018.

i dont know if im comfortable signing shit every time im gonna view that site. might do in the future though. its already bookmarked so i will probably come later but im holding off for know. still like the idea a lot.

>>14488170
The only thing I can get from the login signature is your public address, which I’m not storing. It is the best way to verify imo.

>>14488176
Nope not a scam, a location for discussion which has a natural barrier from non autists

>>14488482
And you can link it to posts and IP I suppose.
No thanks anon

>>14488010
AGGGHHHHHHHHHH MY LINKIES ARE GONE NOOOOOO{OO

>>14488688
Dubs of truth

>>14488097
wow. a board full of newfags. how about we have a vvip board where you can only post if you sign from an ETH genesis wallet

>>14488683
Think about it like this
Which is more likely to dox you:
Using a plain text username password pair that you probably use on a dozen other sites, linked to your ip, cookies etc

Or a public key that you could put through an exchange->monero/ shapeshifter at any point you desire?

A SIGNED INTO MY METAMASK AND THE SITE TOOK MY STINKY LINKYS WTFF????

DON'T GO BIG SCAM WTF

REPORTED TO FBI!!!!!!!

NIGGER!

>>14488790
this. just lost 4 quadrillion dollars in links
what the fuck is wrong with you

>>14488010
Lol we’re gonna be refugees from the Reddit mob again...
But it’s too fun poking them on here to expose them for what they are (herd animals)
They just recently doxxed crypto oracle out of spite thinking it was me
Sadly it might actually be worth using your platform because as the price continues to go where we all know it will, more desperate people will come out of the woodwork looking to steal from us if they can.
Looks like that’s how the world works boys
Is it any wonder the highest echelons of society treat the population like rabble?
Because they know the rabble would eat them alive simply out of jealousy and spite even if it makes everyone’s lives worse, as long as no one has a better life than them it’s worth the cost it takes to tear it down.
Kindergarten played out on a global scale
The Reddit mob is here gentlemen
Will you turn tail and run again and be a refugee once more?

>>14488789
the latter obviously because I clean my cookies like a monster, use different VPNs and only throw away emails, let alone a wide variation of usernames and passwords. sorry champ I didn't apply paranoid shizophrenic levels of infosec just to have myself datamined posting in a save space

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LINKIES GOONNNNE

>>14489007
Didn't you said you are going to take some days off?
>Craig Holmes is Crypto Oracle
I need to tell the lorians about that, they will have a good chuckle about it

>>14489277
Everyone knows “time off” from 4chan means 2 hours tops
Going to a get together soon though
Can’t wait to see what happens with the price tonight hahaha

>>14489458
you have an addictive personality. I might have over estimated you name fag

>>14488010
We are already here retard
I’m not going to another website

>>14489750
Lmao imagine thinking link has an actual use case

so its just 4chan except i have to sign everytime i enter and potentially give you access to my meta mask?

hard pass pajeet

>>14489791
It is obvious if metamask is going to remove funds. It says sending _ ether to this address. There is a hack if you use a non plain text message, which I don’t. My implementation is safer than idex’s actually if you’ve used that before. Look up web3.personal_sign for more info

I like biz, it will suck if it is overrun by tron holders, so I’m setting up a spot where they can’t get in without decreasing the link supply

If you're not on one of the private discords at this point you don't deserve to know about our secret whale plans

>>14490722
>doxcord
>secrete
you don't seem to know how doxcord works, there are no secrete servers or exclusive rooms.

>>14490722
I bought in Jan 2018 and frankly speaking I could give less of a fuck about discord plans or discord trannies

Kys you pos

>>14490820
Go back to eating frogs

>>14491165
I wonder who you think I am.
Anyway, you are wrong

>>14490722
Sucking two cocks a day isn’t a plan

>>14489047
>use different VPNs
>afraid his IP will be linked to his ETH address
???

>>14488221
I'd say everything before LINKtober is fine... speculation and discussion went down the shitter in early 2019 when shit got boring and we basically just larped and recycled memes and fud

>>14490146
op, if nothing else you've provided irrefutable evidence most anons haven't the slightest clue about blockchain
the stupidity of the feedback you're getting is baffling, both here and in the other thread
and those fags are going full dunning-kruger on you too. plain amazing

>>14488010
How did you make this, OP?

>>14488010
90% of threads here already are about link we don’t need a dedicated link site

>>14491575
>>14489750
think of it as a bunker for when the normies become unbearable. they dont understand sarcasm over text, they dont have anything of value to offer and they will answer your arguments with have sex.

>>14491424
yeah he was larping for some reason. load ze firefox scam extension fud.
>>14491533
i started with mitsuba on github, pieced together the metamask from different reference documents, using infura & web3.py for server side validation. The hardest part was converting mitsuba to allow for server side validation, but its needed because otherwise theres always a way for someone to disable a script here or there to break your authentication

>>14489007
i don't trust this platform...

>The Reddit mob is here gentlemen
good

This is about like that time /biz/ found Skycoin in Runescape.

>>14491303
French is what I think you are

>>14492358
sí señor

>>14492013
i dont care faggot fuck you

MY LINKIES ARE GONE NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

For those who haven't used metamask for signing before; this is what it looks like. This is how dapps authenticate your account. its very easy to use

also along with many marines, i have quit my job to pursue my passions and have free time. so if you have ideas for dapps and want to work together, linkchan@protonmail.com

i really like the idea of this but i'ma brainlet and im afraid of losing my linkies if this is an elaborate scam.. they're the only things I have in this world:(

You know what's funny, I originally came to /biz/ in 2018 as a refugee from /b/ /pol/ as they had gone to shit (they were always shit though). And that simple act turned into the most insane plot twist in my life.

>>14488010
As someone with 150k link, I'm interested in this. Will you be able to provide the source in a was that we can verify it's not an exploit?

Personally I think the minimum for vip should be higher than 10k. That's not much for someone who has been in for a while.

>>14493701
id like it to be more of a community, rather then a tiered pnd group. i can show screenshots but i dont really want to open source because i feel like having a working product is my only competitive advantage, personally not good at marketing at all so my current plan is to let it naturally grow if its going to happen .

>>14493787
That's fair. It's just the VIP area I'd like to see get bumped up anyway. A millionaire's lounge. Can keep the regular boards 1-5k or whatever.

>>14493787
this is the biggest honeypot for datamining LINK holders possible. dont go there, dont sign with your key, it permanently ties that address to that IP and your real life identity, the companies will offer huge amount of money to OP to get this data, he will turn on you because its money he cant turn down. stay away from this

also dont use link gear shop, they buy and resell customer data. keep your linkies safe

>>14493787
>closed source
>obvious bait way to lure link marines in is by making a chan clone
>pic related, its you

>>14493787
>>14493994

>>14493994
>every site that uses metamask will sell customer data
fuck off. metamask is literally the portal to web3. you know the shit all of these tokens are made of? In order to use them to actually do things, you have to connect your machine to the ethereum network.

if youre literally prospecting crypto only for fiat gains and dont give a flying fuck about the technology, then sure. dont bother learning how to use metamask

>>14494121
I never said every site, i said your site will and is made from day 1 to do so, just the way you defend yourself anyone with iq over 110 can figure it out to never go to that place because we both know you log every single detail and plan to resell it

>closed source
>just sign the metamask TX
yeah, right, what happens when you find a whale that signs and you swap his next sign request w a tx transfer?

fucking jew i can smell you from across the globe with your tactics

>>14494121
i keep my link on a ledger, is there any way to enter the site without using metamask

>>14493994
yeah, fuck it ill open source it soon. dont call me a god damn glownigger ffs i just enjoy biz and dont want the ride to end when normies come steamrolling in

>>14488170
AHHHGGGF I FUCKING LOVE THIS IDEA, but I also dont trust anything like this anon.

>>14494224
how does open sourcing the site guarantee that is the code running on the server? or that u wont randomly swap people that have huge amounts of link to TX confirmation instead of sign? what happens when your DNS gets hijacked or you get BGP hijacked and people steal link from your users? did u ever take OPSEC classes or courses? u have no idea what ur building here.

the normies already came to 4chan since 2015, you included, if you ever posted something as dumb as u just did u would get called out instantly by 15 people, unfortunately everyone who agrees with you itt is exactly what you want to avoid, only people that will use your honeypot is those that u want to ignore, the reddit aids retards

>>14494268
>>14494203
>>14488170
alright frens youve been heard; this is going open source as soon as i figure out how to clean the data from my instance

>>14494294
Perhaps there’s a safer blockchain way here.

>>14494294
so youre saying web3 is basically unusable from the browser for any site? my research has shown that it can be run in a safe trustworthy fashion with the right precautions. please provide a source if you have evidence to the contrary.

if someone hacks my site, which theyd have to get my aws private key, 2fa etc to do, then change my transaction so that it switches to a transaction instead of a signature, it would still alert the user that the site is asking for money, or it would show the 0x hash of the transaction which is about to be outlawed by metamask anyway.
]

>>14494501
>>14494215

>>14494381
yeah, not being a retard that signs with a pre-reddit eth addr of his CL holdings to discuss a project made for businesses and enterprise worlds that doesnt need nor care about people the moment sale finished.

i dont think u get it, everyone who got link in 2017 will be a high net worth individual in the future and that data on them will be worth millions too, because u can then tie their IP addresses with their LINK amounts and use your own data (from a marketing agency for example) to profile those targets further, just need to look up what other website logs you have that have that same IP and you now have email, real life location, every website you visit and use, all profiled and tied to that LINK address and LINK tokens are colored PERMANENTLY.

>>14494501
web3 is usable but you have no way to prove you will run the code that is open sourced, that you will not log or profile users, or that you will not get "hacked", or that u will not sell that data. this is about you having information and ability to collect/log/profile LINK users from 2017,2018 era, nobody in top 1000 wallets is stupid and retarded enough to sign, so you only end up with literal morons that will not provide good arguments or contribute to discussions in any way but low quality content

>>14494294
>being a post-2015 user
Christ, the horror.

>>14494501
all it takes is someone contacting you that has a chrome/firefox RCE 0day and then you can steal link from every single person that opens your glowinthedark board

and blowing a 0day browser RCE on a site with GUARANTEED, VERIFIED, SIGNED BY THEM high net worth individuals is surely going to net more than $100k profit what is the amount 0days get sold for.

do u realize how retarded you sound with your idea?

>>14494707
>RCE 0day
im not storing the addresses or the transactions thats why id open source
>web3 is usable but not when run by anyone except a megacorp
also nice ad hominem

>>14488010
I really love the idea but as an autist and especially an autist in crypto I am extremely paranoid when I hear anons posting about linking ips and selling that data later on. Is there any way that we could use smart contracts/link to prove that data is not being stored? Something like this would also be a huge boon to any VPN that could adopt it as well. I mean what if the VPN you were using could demonstrate its "no logs" policy using a smart contract?

>>14493217
>i'd much rather send .000000...0001 link to the address, have it store who sent it and how much link is in their account and then save the account rather than signing in with fucking metamask because i don't ever use it and i refuse to.
it sounds like you're solid, though, and i'm probably just fagging up the place

>>14494831
what the fuck are u using as defense retard? it does not matter what u claim to store or not

>you can NOT prove what u store
>you can NOT prove what info you log
>you can NOT prove what code you run on the backend
>you can NOT prove you wont spearphish some whale or multiple smaller ones with a RCE 0day
>you can NOT prove you wont resell the data you collect

>>14494831
>im not storing the addresses or the transactions thats why id open source
and this prevents you from popping all high net worth LINK token holders with a 0day RCE how exactly?

>>14494831
>>web3 is usable but not when run by anyone except a megacorp
>also nice ad hominem
you are an anonymous person that wants to create a safe space for "LINK" holders, which is a perfect place to pop a 0day and steal all their tokens, up until 15min ago you didnt even want to open source it. you can not debunk any of my claims, not only that, the way you talk seems like you are some 16 years old scriptkiddie that jerks off to George Hotz and jerks off to his own python "coding"

Sumpunk or ritz cracker? Which one of u oldfags is this

>>14495017
>some anon made a coding project
>im just going to call him a dumb nigger for hours without sources
why not just offer a useful suggestion on how to improve it?

>>14494977
you are not getting the point, there is no way you can safely do this without giving him a HUGE upper hand in like 20 different scenarios of abusing that data. if u send LINK, sign with metamask, sign on your PC, its irrelevant, all those methods will *tie* your link address to your browser fingerprint and the website alone can be used to pop anyone who has enough tokens to be popped, you will never know it, its a 0day exploit, its not disclosed anywhere, your antivirus/trezor/ledger or whatever it is wont protect you because you can be analyzed with a RAT that logs every keystroke, every mouse movement, every program, password, cookie and everything you do on your device, 24/7.

how can u be so retarded to think its a good idea to create a website that filters everyone but major LINK holders and then place the control of that website to a random retard that came up with that idea?

>>14495090
its ok to browse /pol/ and /sci/ but you cant use others arguments you stole to win your own kid.
can u debunk or disprove any of my claims in >>14495017 ?

there is a reason no one was retarded enough to mention or come up w such an idea, because 2 steps in you realize it puts a lot of power and trust in the creator of it, 24/7, at any time you can randomly pop a person and steal all his LINK, and he cant prove it was due to your website because you are literally in control of his entire PC.

>>14489007
They're going to get blackpilled either way watching anons make gigagains while looking out the Crypto Overton window, making jokes about the way things are..

>>14495096
is your concern that it's a possibility,or that it's the intent?

>>14488221
Before october 2017.
2018 was full bear market and a lot of the posts were from shitters half the time.

>>14495096
>>14495158

Just stopping in to say I agree with everything this anon is saying
50K linklet here, I'm already taking precautions and making changes to my life to secure my newfound wealth

If (when) 10k+ LINK is millions, nobody worth half a fuck will do something so dangerous
I'll probably still be around on biz, I'm sure we'll come up with a way to identify OG linkies

Time-stamping a pic of some expensive shit for instance, or flashing buy/sell walls at indicated times on indicated trading pairs, etc.
Then again this is 4chan and who really cares that much

>2022
>I bought LINK in 2017 worship me
Kinda cringe but it will be true to an extent I guess

>>14495239
thats not the problem here, problem is you can not trust anyone for such a project. if i had a website which filtered everyone that holds LINK and they visit my site daily, and i am an anonymous person, i would pop every single one of them and steal their LINK, $100k for a 0day vs probably a few millions and more in the future once LINK price grows is a very good way to get rich, and even if he doesnt, someone will hack him or gain access to his keys, one way or another, a pajeet working at amazon risking his $5 a day job to partner up with someone that has a 0day and everyone on the website loses their link. the website feature is too concentrated of high net $ individuals to not be targeted 24/7

>>14495158
no i dont currently have a way to prove what code im running. i will look into this. t

i dont browse pol or sci, i have no idea whose arguments im stealing (?) you really love ad hominem dont you. please provide some sources beyond "pop in and steal their link"

>>14494300
>ok guise i'm not a scammer, let me just remove the scam code from the source i'll post in a few minutes on sjwhub while i still run the scam version on my unaudited server
the jewing continues

literally why? seems cultish. also, an echo chamber. this is fucking stupid

>>14495335
i will personally make sure the site is under ddos 24/7 by people that took down bitfinex/coinbase any anything else in their way for the lulz

>>14494576
>i dont think u get it, everyone who got link in 2017 will be a high net worth individual in the future and that data on them will be worth millions too, because u can then tie their IP addresses with their LINK amounts and use your own data (from a marketing agency for example) to profile those targets further, just need to look up what other website logs you have that have that same IP and you now have email, real life location, every website you visit and use, all profiled and tied to that LINK address and LINK tokens are colored PERMANENTLY.
holy fuck those are the kind of retards that hold LINK. Biggest sell indicator I've ever seen

>>14495358
b-but its ((( open source ))) on github! i dont log anything!

>>14494707
when's the last time there was a chrome 0 day retard? What year is this, 1995?

>>14488010
can you please have a board for linklets? maybe make it minimum 100 link

or fuck my ass and send me some link I want to post
0x49744e8495F5c56bBC4ec0051F529C7db9e5f604

>>14495096
>you are not getting the point, there is no way you can safely do this without giving him a HUGE upper hand in like 20 different scenarios of abusing that data. if u send LINK, sign with metamask, sign on your PC, its irrelevant, all those methods will *tie* your link address to your browser fingerprint and the website alone can be used to pop anyone who has enough tokens to be popped, you will never know it, its a 0day exploit, its not disclosed anywhere, your antivirus/trezor/ledger or whatever it is wont protect you because you can be analyzed with a RAT that logs every keystroke, every mouse movement, every program, password, cookie and everything you do on your device, 24/7.
kek, learn some programming, everything you said is wrong.
If you use metamask from your ledger, it will ask you on your ledger screen to confirm before a malicious site steals your tokens.

How does it feel to be low IQ and know nothing about tech?

If I built a 4chan clone on bsv and used a Chainlink oracle to tell the bsv contract that you had 10k link in an ethereum wallet, would anyone want to use that?

>>14495435
i hold 2mil link just so we're clear
>>14495455
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1224/product_id-15031/opec-1/Google-Chrome.html
>>14495503
but entire machine is compromised already retard

i wonder if u legit changed ID just to shill your own thread

>>14491512
Jesus was that on purpose? It was brutal. I had no hopium left except for the occasional larp or drunkanon post to keep me going.

>>14495543
>but entire machine is compromised already retard
YOU'RE SIGNING FROM THE LEDGER RETARD. THE MACHINE BEING COMPROMISED DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING.

How does it feel to be a retard and get BTFO?

Also I'm not OP. I'm an actual dev and know Chainlink is centralized vaporware. Would never use it. Whereas you're obviously low IQ and don't understand the tech.

>>14495608
https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/1224/Google.html
and theres no RCE exploits since 1995,right?
same way machine being compromised doesnt change anything, right?

you jews always changing tactics when revealed, really disgusting

>>14495543
>https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1224/product_id-15031/opec-1/Google-Chrome.html
kek, you are a fucking retarded noob, none of these "0 days" allow an attacker to execute code outside the chrome sandbox, aka it cannot gain control to your machine or anything else. kys you fucking retarded poser.

>>14495323

What can OP do to restore trust and maintain security then?

>>14495462
When did you get in? 2 weeks ago? Come on anon, there are people here who have been following this project for 2 years when it was under wraps and were left with breadcrumbs, and constantly scouring the internet, Linkedin, Twitter, and vague interviews to connect the dots. You just got in, don't you think it's unfair?

>>14495653
>>14495654
kekekek how does it feel to get BTFO every single time you post something? Must feel pretty bad brainlet

>>14489007
I think I'm turning around and am now viewing what you suggest as "real pussy shit". Anons reeed over normies, npcs, wagecucks, etc for years. Redacted's latest hype has dropped all of these people into /biz's laps, eager to learn what is for Christmas. Who could possibly benefit from the smartest anons all abandoning this opportunity for mass redpills and overall mental hardening of the lemmings? I'll be here until it kills me, trying to better my human brothers. Nobody is unteachable in regards to mental freedom, just unreachable until right now. Currently exhausted by these fags already admittedly, so it would be nice to know some other frens understand what I mean here.

>>14495671
I was thinking he could do the equivalent of /s4s/ or /trash/ for linklets.

>>14495727
That's what here is for.

>>14495654
>>14495674
>>14495654
>>14495674
https://www.zdnet.com/article/firefox-zero-day-was-used-in-attack-against-coinbase-employees-not-its-users/

OH NO NON ONO NO

((( SHUT IT DOWN )))

>>14495737
but I'm not talking about here

Doesn't fucking work on mobile.
KYS
Almost 2020 using Boomer tech
Neck yourselves faggots.

So now that I've BTFO every single argument of that wanna be hacker retard, let me tell you the actual risk from using this website:

1. OP can get your ETH public address, as well as a history of all your public transactions
2. OP can get your public IP address..
3. OP can get everything you type inside that page, even things you don't submit. It cannot track anything you type anywhere else on your computer or other pages.
4. OP can try to trick you into sending money instead of free signing, but metamask will alert you. So will your ledger if you are using metamask through it.
5. OP could sell your IP address and whatever info you typed, but let's be real, nobody ever gonna buy that.

OP cannot hack your computer through 0 days or steal your linkies.

Also, LINK is a centralized vaporware scam, and no legit dev (like myself) would ever use it. Sell now while you can.

>>14495746
firefox is shit retard, don't use it. If you use IE from 1995 you're also gonna get exploits.

>>14495793
>muh exploits dont exist and muh sandbox is infallible

Eylmao maybe for you, I'm not betting 100k++++ on there being a ful 0 exploits on whatever browser it would be that I'd use to visit.

>>14495793
yes he can
>>14495818
both are shit, there are chromium sandbox escapes as well, go back to hackforums instead of defending an obvious phishing scam

>>14495773
metamask doesnt have a mobile client, im sure its coming within a year or 2
>>14495793
thanks for that synopsis

>>14495856
Well you're a fucking retard because browser exploits are irrelevent. Your compter is NOT safe. If you're not signing from your ledger or offline computer, you're gonna get hacked. But not from this website. There's a million easier ways to exploit than through a browser.

The chances that one of the 50 linkies (retards) that use this site also use a browser with an exploit that you know is 0.0000000001%.

So kys you fucking brainlet

>>14495872
>both are shit, there are chromium sandbox escapes as well, go back to hackforums instead of defending an obvious phishing scam
First of all, no there are not. Second of all, like I said, it's fucking irrelevent. If you've got 10k worth of crypto on a online computer, you are retarded. Your crypto is not safe, and it's not cause of a Chrome exploit or because of that site. Metamask lets you sign from a hardware wallet you GOD DAMN RETARD.

>>14493613
to .clarify for brainlets, just open sourcing some code does not prove that the code you see is running the actual live site. Not saying it's a scam... but you first, anon.

>>14495908
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=942898#c3

there are no sandbox escapes!

>>14495908
You're advocating for people to bet between 3,5 and 35k at the minimum at current prices on there not being some faggot tier exploit which magically manages to drop a trojan in their temp files.
Muh exploit muh through a browser.
Name a single way you could cuck someone out of 10k linkies.
First you'd have to identify an individual holding 10k linkies; how the fuck would you do that? Read the stars?

Joining this board is per definition a security risk. I"m sure the anon that started it means well but that doesn't mean you're not retarded for joining.
>muh you're gonna get hacked
Maybe, maybe not. But a hack doesn't constitute to instantly losing all your holding if set up correctly; have fun decoding an encrypted file with a 50+ symbol password just to find the wallet adress.

>>14495959
yes it does, you can use checksums on the javascript, though most brainlets wouldn't know one way or another.

>>14495946
its legit insane how hard ur trying to larp here with your hackforums skiddie knowledge and kys insults like it has value, i get it OP invited u here to jerk off together but the truth is this is a scam from day 1 and there are unreleased exploits for RCE+sandbox escape for both Chrome/FF and nobody here claimed metamask or hardware ledger are attack points that will be used once u gain access to PC of LINK holders, anyone placing trust with a proof of all their ETH transactions and LINK holdings to a random retard that uses python and cant even do base64 encoding deserves to have all his link stolen

>>14495761
I know. But the purpose of the site is to separate those who bought in while the project was under wraps versus those who bought in after mainnet released and Link gained visibility.

Why didn't you buy in earlier?

>>14495960
>https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=942898#c3
That's not an exploit in any version anyone would be using you god damn retard.

>>14495980
Well the reason you think there's a risk is because you're a brainlet. No one can steal your crypto from your ledger, no matter what they install on your computer. And a hacker can easily install something on your computer through infinite ways, a browser exploit being one of the least likely. If you've got your crypto on your computer, you're definitely gonna get hacked and lose it, but not because of that site.

>>14495980
theres more than 20 different ways you can steal LINK from people using/visiting the website, dont use it and warn as many people as you can not to use it.

>>14496029
I have several software wallets, among them a meta mask produced wallet, as well as a hardware wallet. Should I consolidate my funds into the hardware wallet? It appears I should also get a computer solely for interacting with my software wallets and use a VPN with it.

>>14496029
that exploit was fixed, again, there are undisclosed exploits both for sale and more will be found soon, try harder to defend your hackforums buddy and his scam project

>>14496005
Well if anyone has 1k linkies on their online computer, it is true they will get hacked, possibly through the information they shared on this site. But not through a browser exploit.

Also if anyone has 1k+ linkies on their online computer they are dumb enough that this money will get lost one way or another so why care about what is already lost?

>>14496083
You're basically retarded, that project is no more scammy than metamask dexes or anything else that uses metamask. If anything the teams at the dexes is more likely to have someone competent logging all the IPs and trying to hack high value wallets, not through browser exploits though.

>>14496089
>browser RCE exploits dont exist
>sandbox escape exploits dont exist

??

i legit hope the +3 rep u got from OP was worth it to approve his scam

>>14496029
>muh ledger 1000% exploit free
How does hacking work in your mind? 1337Hackerman goes around hacking every person connected to the internet? This is a surefire way to determine golden goose targets. Literally doxxing yourself if you use that site.
>any version anyone would be using
You think the majority of users update their shit like their life depends on it? Are you crazy? Everytime they update something shit gets changed or bugged. Consumers know better: until they get hacked.

I genuinely have difficulty understanding how if you are a dev as you say you can pretend like there are no sandbox exploits out there anywhere. It is fairly likely there are some out there, the only question is can you afford them and if you can how many others know of it.

>>14496061
I think the anon that made the site doesn't need to have bad intentions. However it should be clear as day to anyone that partcipating in such a group is practically doxxing yourself, much like going to any "og link holder meetup" or whatever gay shit people come up with. It's nothing different than opening yourself up to be exploited without anything to gain for it...

>>14496124
i am retarded because browser RCE/sandbox escape exploits dont exist? they dont sell for $100k?
somehow ur scriptkiddie brain cant figure it out that a RCE wont be used to change signing of TX, you can do anything u like for as long as u like, depending what u deploy on victim PC. his scam website will filter all non LINK holders and non low $ holders of LINK so his site is a honeypot for millionaires to browse all day 24/7, its more scammy in collecting data, profiling users, selling data, being able to change code at any time to whatever he wants, being able to target a single user w specific code, being able to run exploits, fingerprinting, you name it.

you are basically btfod by actual proof linked to CVE and chrome bug reports while u keep notching up insults in attempts to come out ahead, quite sad for HF Ub3r account tho.

>>14496197
like i said 3 posts ago, the creator doesnt need to have bad intentions, theres more than him that control this show, hosting provider can tamper the website, domain can be hijacked, DNS can be hijacked, cloudflare can be hijacked, BGP routing can be hijacked, his 2FA/SMS/aws key can be hijacked, he can be paid to do it, he can be forced to do it.

>>14496254
youre assuming im recording the addresses and ips. so if i can definitively prove that im not recording that data will your proposed risk be nullified?

>>14496325
no, your hosting provider, their datacenter can and DO LOG AS REQUIRED BY LAW and the retard you are you will put ((( cloudflare ))) on website

>>14496325
and not only that, you can decide to turn on logging as "accident" during maintenance startup, and "accidentally" log just a few of link holders.

there is no possible way to prove what you are running on the backend and if u didnt temporarily tamper with it

>>14496355
so now the datacenter's getting hacked? at that point we're all fucked. You cant get that even with my private key and 2fa (how will they use RCE without my 2fa device?)

>>14496469
no, you cant turn off logging of data if you host it on AWS, its all logged, the dumb nigger gorilla you are you even bought the domain on amazon. what the fuck does your 2fa device have to do with RCE?

you are mixing multiple points of attack of ur dogshit website into one and invalidating them not working together, they are seperate vectors of attack on your dogshit scam

you can not create a centralized website as anonymous person that requires being ultra rich in crypto to enter or participate, then claim you wont do anything evil with your trust, are u mentally impaired since birth??

>>14496557
>you can not create a centralized website as anonymous person that requires being ultra rich in crypto to enter or participate, then claim you wont do anything evil with your trust, are u mentally impaired since birth??
yes i can actually do that, i think you are spending too much time on {{{pol}}}. i think it is time i stopped humoring you with responses. have a good evening

>>14496616
go ahead, i am just here to warn everyone i can about your scam while they still have their LINK

>>14495714
Based

>>14495793
Honey pot for link gain taxes

Last I checked I could bypass the 1k link requirement with no-script. How'd you fix the issue?

>>14497320
1 get eth signature on signin
2 pass eth signature to server
3 retreive eth address from signature web3.py
4 determine token balane from address web3.py

then set a session and that determines viewing level. it was an ordeal converting the php templates into php templating templates (3 layer nested templates)

>>14497350
Unfortunately, only the Chrome Metamask extension has the feature to connect a Ledger or Trezor. The Firefox version doesn't have it so the website is going to be flooded with low-IQ Chrome goolag lovers. I know you wanted a high-IQ board, but without Firefox/Ledger uses you're only going to be getting the idiots.

Why do you even need the metamask feature? It's not like people will larp about owning Link when they don't. Only .000000000001 percent of the population even knows what the fuck Link is.

>>14489007
You turned up at the same time as the reddit flood you fucking rambling schitzo tripfag, posting hemetic images as if you have some deep insight because you read H2G2 once.
The jannies and mods should ban you simply for the amount of talking to yourself you do in threads that could otherwise die. Kys faggot