/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14481673
eternal bagholder

>>14481673
200k holder here. Never sell because this shit doesn't even have volume

And...why?

>>14481673
I remember you fags trying to ride on links wave. Youre going to hold those bags until binance delists you.

>>14481808
Made me chuckle.

>>14481673
Never going over a dime you mean.

Are u talking about the xero accounting integration? Or something more

>>14481673

Request Network is the Substratum Decentralized Network's French cousin

Hello?

Because xero integration? #14481673

>>14481673
50k bagholder here. Kill me now.

REQ is the next LINK

>tfw during the crash I kept buying REQ on the way down instead of LINK

There isn't even a reason to sell anymore.

>>14481673
I REQUEST MY MONEY BACK

This coin needs to be mentioned in every LINK thread lest people think biz only picks winners. This shit was shilled just as hard as LINK and now survivorship bias means that people think LINK was all that was shilled.

>>14481673

No thanks, I'll accumulate when it's in the sub 1-cent range next week.

>>14483942
Yep. The truth is that /biz/ shilled just about every worthless shitcoin that is now either dead or forgotten. LINK is the only one that didn't completely die. Broken clocks are correct twice a day

>>14481673
Wierd

>>14484105
*weird

>>14483942
Fucking newfag. Nothing has been shipped harder than Link. Not even ethereum

>>14483942
REQ was shilled ALONGSIDE LINK, and even "as hard" as LINK for a little bit, but LINK by far has had the most consistent and frequent shilling over a long period of time of any coin.

>>14484085
bullshit and you know it.

>>14484203
>>14484140
Are you new, or in denial? Everyone started shilling LINK harder and more consistently because it didn't tank to below two fucking cents. Before that happened to REQ, it was being shilled just as much.

>>14484127
Creepy

>>14484240
No, I'm smarter than you, and there is nothing you can do about it.

>>14484241
That's what I just fucking said. REQ was shilled as hard as LINK for A LITTLE WHILE, until REQ started to permanently tank while LINK kept its loyal base and a steadier price.

>>14484241
No, it wasn't. You have to go back

>>14484273
>>14484281
Nope, I'm smarter than you. Deal with it faggots

>>14484281
I remember the suicide threads after the toilet conference

I actually had quite some req, but sold most of it for linkies early 2018. I ended up with 20k links and 1500 req when they were both ~50c. One bag is now valued at 80k, the other at 35$. Never trust a frenchman

>>14482594
50k here as well..

>>14484460

Similar story lad.

It was going to be 250K REQ or 150,000 LINK back in 2017.

Guess what I chose? I would have already made it if I had that LINK stack.

REQT

>>14484085
Link and req was shilled way more than other coins in mid-late 2017

>>14484303
>>14484352
Link have been the most shilled project of this board. More than Ethereum, BTC and the rest of shitcoins combined. Saying otherwise is newfaggotry and you have to go back now

>>14484460
Reading this post makes me feel like Bogdanoff activated quantum immortality and made me choose a majority REQ over LINK. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>14484526
Nope, the truth is in the archives forever and there's nothing you can do about it :)
I owned you sweaty, and that's in the archives forever too now, and there's nothing you can do about that :)

>>14484596
You sound like a huge faggot. Go to warosu, search for ChainLink and then REQ at whatever date you want and go back to rebbit. Nigger

>>14484520

REQ was shilled, LINK had a following.

>>14484663
seethe harder little faggot :)

>>14484203
That's why I'm not selling my REQt bags

The thing with req is that every FUD was actually true.

Op we are waiting for your you to explain