/biz/ - Business & Finance

I'm starting to get some real fomo. I don't want to buy link now when I could have gotten it for $0.60

>>14449326
Price atm is 80% pure fomo atm. Not even joking

>>14449361
buy now , you’ll never see those prices again

>>14449406
Unironically what biz was saying about buying NEO at $100 in early 2018

A btc crash will wipe us out

>>14449361

there's a point where even if it goes to $5 now you're better off buying a coin that is oversold not overbought since the risk vs reward will be better considering when you're getting in, the current celebrants got in when link was under a dollar so they may hodl or sell before/through corrections since they will be in profit yet new entrants will be in the red while other coins are rising so it's risk/reward and opportunity costs at play.

>>14449381
This. I know we'll be in the $2's within a few days

>>14449381
I'm not asking about the price right now. I'm asking about the price when the ICO effect kicks in with a million blockchain startups all using LINK leading to organic volume growth. Obviously the price right now is hype driven, who wouldn't buy this shit before the rocket takes off.

Nah it would be in the 300's

>>14449361
Read this and use the balls god gave you.

>>14449451
>>14449452

cu guys at 10$

>>14449494
shut the FUCK UP dude I hold 100% LINK. I'm not asking for meme answers or hopium I want reasoned discussion about price projections

>>14449494
How does a man get this fucked up over something so stupid. Just do it again.
>if only I was clairvoyant and had perfect market information and a higher education and experience in trading I'd be a millionaire instead of a maccies wage cuck

..........here we go

>>14449722
Another retard who's going to get dumped on

>>14449722
>$36 fee

Literally nothing but a few automatic computer computations = $36

Goyim!

>>14449494
Imagine how he felt when eth was 1000 lmao

>>14449775
I wish there was a way around it. Shit I'd buy link if it was on Robinhood
>>14449758
Just making a quick flip for now guy

>>14449775
>get insured
>get storage
>get server security
>"wtf I have to pay a fee?!?! it's just a script!"

>>14449722
Mfw i had this in december 2017

>>14449533
Well 1k is fud , Highest estimate i have seen is 7.7m per token

I think its somewhere between that

>>14449775
Why is the fee so high?!! The 36$ alone would be worth around 700$ if you got in when link first started getting shilled.

>>14449970
ok again no hopium or memes, the price is obviously not going to $1k

>>14450739
You don't understand chainlink then newfag. Fuck off and fuck jannies also

>>14449533
>>14450739
Ah, I see you're a nulinker. Your "100% in" is probably like what 400 link?

If you had been here for the 2 years of discussion you would know that $1K may be a low estimate, but time, depth and scope of adoption will determine the price. If derivatives use LINK there is no real way to calculate the roof of this.

>Ah, I see you're a nulinker.
as of march, so sure

>Your "100% in" is probably like what 400 link?
3100

>>14451213
>If you had been here for the 2 years of discussion you would know that $1K may be a low estimate
not really, people who hype this thing up like theres no tomorrow concede that $100 would be a generous ceiling

>>14449775
isnt that what we are trying to get in on?

>>14451779
Nice 3 month stack. Fuck off smug kid