/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14331364
>EOM
1.82
>EOSep
0.82
>EOY
0.082

>>14331364
EOM: $3-5
EOY: $50-200

>>14331364
$1.60
$1.20
$0.60

>>14331380
Fuck off nigger 1000$ EOY

>>14331364
EOM
4.79 after azure announcement
EOSep
3.89
EOY
6.12

2.20
5.20
10.80

$1000 EOY.

EOM 1.5
EOS 1.25
EOY 1

>>14331364
$0.008 after July 1st. Jesus Christ how are people still holding this longscam?

>>14331401
If LINK is at double digits let alone triple or 1000 eoy I will put a broken bottle up my asshole

>>14331364
$1 as the new list is released this week and a slow bleed to .25 before the singularity in 2020

$0
$0
$0

>>14331364

>EOM
current price
>EOSep
$5
>EOY
$8.2

>>14331396
Seems reasonable

>>14331364
EOM
$10
EOSep
$100
EOY
$1000

>>14331429

>>14331364
1.95
3.20
12.50

>>14331417
Seems reasonable

eom 1.85
eosep 2.15
eoy 1.95
only realistic one here

>>14331364
$0.65
$0.85
$0.45

>EOM
7 bucks
>EOSep
35 bucks
>EOY
60 bucks
>EO2020
735 bucks

>>14331364
>EOM
$1000
>EOSep
$100000000
>EOY
$10000000000000000

>>14331809
now this is based as fuck an answer

asking price prediction for link on 4chan rofl
99% reply are complete autist that dont understand link and think it scam.
if some major announcement i think it can easily reach 35$+ eoy

>>14331809
seems reasonable

>EOM
$2
>EOSep
$100
>EOY
$1000

>>14331424
Seems reasonable

Cup of coffee
Pool of coffee
Ocean of coffee

>>14331896
Seems reasonable

>>14331728
GAYY haha fag

if i have a small amount of money (£200) should i buy link or bitcoin?

>>14331364
>EOM
1.80
>EOSep
1.20
>EOY
1.99

$2
$5 if big news and adoption, $1 if not
$10 if big news and adoption, $1-$2 if not

>>14331396
Yes, this seems like the most sensible prediction

>>14331795
would be thrilled with this timeline

>>14332152
>>14331959
>>14331923
>>14331763
>>14331647
seems reasonable.

>>14331459
Capped you better own up when we hit double digits

2.73
5.5
27.5

>>14331364
EOM: 2.37$
EOSep: 3.15$
EOY: 21$

>EOM
2,35
>EOSEP
7,60
>EOY
22,5

$1.12
$0.80
2 BTC

The top was already in for 2019. There is nothing big to look forward to this year, except for adding a couple more centralized nodes that no one uses.

$1.75
$1.15
$0.85

>>14331396

mfw

>>14333435
Who hurt you faggot?

>>14333755
he's just speaking the truth

>>14331364
2.10
17.45
33.75

>>14331364
>zero
>zero
>less than zero

>>14333865
it's okay you're too stupid and don't understand link, same with that fucking retard lmao

Eom $3
Eosept $8
And $1000 eoy ofc

>>14334264
kek I am a dev and understand LINK perfectly, yet I am constantly told by non-developers that LINK is great.

Guess what, I am the target demographic for LINK, and I think it's utterly useless. I can make "decentralized" oracles in 5 seconds on my own. I don't need LINK. It's not fucking decentralized. No one will ever use it.

I have read both the mainnet documentation and the whitepaper, and understand the tech perfectly, and have way higher IQ than you.

>>14332064
kek

>>14334396
What do you hold ?

>>14334396
Bullshit, any dev with an atom of brain cells can see the benefit

1.64$
1.32$
3.15$

>>14334839
>dev
>atom of brain cells

pick one.

>>14332214
btc will probably only do about a 10x from here for the next bullrun. Link is still relatively new and hasn't had a massive speculative bubble yet so it will most likely do much more than a 10x.

>>14336749
There will never BE a 10X speculation bubble because we mustn't let Reddit know about our secret club!

>>14331364
1000 eoy checked

>>14331795
seems reasonable

>>14332273
I would literally involuntarily ejaculate in my pants in that timeline

Tomorrow

>>14331364
GIBE RANDOME NOMBER PLES I NEED MY DAILY USELESS RANDOM NUMBER TO POUT IN MY CALUCLAOTOR I MAKE POINTLESS SPAM THREAD FOR ME TO ASK FOR NUMBER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>14336857
this is a Hyperledger connection between Oracle and other businesses. They all have one thing in common
>it’s all true

>>14334396
larp or not, i agree.
For the majority of use cases, simply accepting the risk of incorrect data is better than paying, $0.50 or whatever BS per api call. that could quickly add up to paying thousands of dollars a day for what could just be a hobbyist program.
In other cases, say you want a weather checker, or "was_flight_late?" call, you can still query that data for free from a weather.com service, maybe an airline's website, and since there is little incentive to falsify that data, there's really no reason to spend all that money and time integrating LINK. And if that data source is the sole source of that data, LINK provides zero additional security.
as for the derivatives market, the issue is although there is "insurance" in LINK, you don't really need LINK to fulfill that either. the threat of lawsuits and losing business agreements is risk enough for parties to stay within contract. escrow accounts already fulfill that role.

>>14336888

>>14331396
>>14331795

$5 EOM
$36 SEP
$50 Dec
$80 Jan 2020
$120 Feb 2020

$15 May 2020

>>14336914
>as for the derivatives market, the issue is although there is "insurance" in LINK, you don't really need LINK to fulfill that either. the threat of lawsuits and losing business agreements is risk enough for parties to stay within contract.

https://www.theblockcrypto.com/tiny/synthetix-suffers-oracle-attack-potentially-looting-37-million-synthetic-ether/

You have no comprehension of how derivatives work and even less comprehension of how smart derivatives contracts will work.

https://www.derivativesandreporeport.com/2019/02/isda-publishes-guidelines-for-smart-derivatives-contracts/

https://www.financialregulatoryreport.com/financial-services-regulation-u-s/isda-considers-the-suitability-of-swaps-documentation-to-the-blockchain/

You are going to get massively rekt and when it happens, no one will have any sympathy.

The ENTIRE POINT of automated, self-executing smart derivatives is that the data provider, aka oracle, has to be sufficiently incentivized to provide correct information since the trigger will be automatic.

The purpose of staking (and reputation) is to ensure that the oracle has significant skin in the game when we are talking about contracts where millions of dollars are at stake.

The WHOLE point is that this is not simply a question of whether the parties will "stay within contract" but whether the data provider will perform as advertised.

If you are talking about a contract where anyone is worried about paying $0.50 or whatever BS per api call then you are talking about pissant smart contracts that no one gives a shit about. That has nothing to do with the trillion dollar derivatives market and the trillion dollar insurance market that are the first use cases for chain link.

eom 3-4$
eosep 7-10$
eoy 30-50$
fomo begins eoy and 2019 we go to 300-1000$

unironically

>>14338060
2020 I meant

Could this be the coin if it wasn't getting delisted from Binance and Bittrex for burgers?

>>14338197
woops meant to start a thread and posted here my bad

>>14336888
Checked, trips of Hitler truth wills $1000 eoy with awesome partnerships and announcements

>>14338016
doesn't this mean that owning a link node is worthless, unless you are the data provider yourself? and if you are investing into someone else's oracle, doesn't that mean they have reduced skin in the game and more incentive to cheat? It's not their money they're lying with.

>>14338304
Even better if it's someone else's money. How many times are they going to get away with that? Third parties who do not benefits from the.lie will not stake their link into the Oracle that loses their link in a bad transaction. That Oracle will die and the trustworthy ones will win. Btw way to go putting immutable evidence of fraud on a blockchain

>>14338304
>if you are investing into someone else's oracle, doesn't that mean they have reduced skin in the game and more incentive to cheat?

Yes it does mean that. But the investor will be paid for taking on this risk. Analogous to someone who loans money to a business gets paid interest in order to compensate them for risk that business will keep the money and not pay then back

The rate of interest that the market demands is a function of the creditworthiness aka reputation of the borrower

This is why reputation is an important part of the link ecosystem

>>14331396
Any prediction with $50-$200 just seem so surreal to me. That means the whole project has a market cap of 50-200 billion. In contrast to actual companies this feels so impossible to achieve in such a short time.

>>14338649
so when are we going to see derivative smart contracts, at least proof of concept? main net has been out awhile and i haven't heard of anything.

>mfw I'm a complete potatohead retard when it comes to this crypto shit and just stumbled upon this potential LINK bull run.

OooooH BABY

>>14338665
Microsoft has a total assets of $258 billion. What's going to happen with those 750 million unreleased coins tho

okay seriously whats the fastest way to get in on this, i know the big news is dropping tomorrow and i want to beat it

>>14338665
XRP reached a mcap of $140 billion and had almost nothing to show for it.
Mcap in crypto is not an accurate valuation of the total value of a coin/token, it's literally just the spot price multiplied by the circulating supply.
And remember Sergey wants derivatives and insurance to be the FIRST things using link by EOY

>>14331364
EOM $2
EOSep $5
EOY $10-20
I think we will see more massive price movement next year. Who knows how soon swift might start using the network though, final PSD2 deadline is September 25 I believe

>>14331364
2.50 TONIGHT. Just watch. SCREENCAP THIS.

$14.3 would place us at a MC of 5 billion. That's position 7-8 on Coinmarketcap. Hmm.

>>14339940
OOF

>>14339292
Seems reasonable

>>14334396
based
but hard truths like that will not get through the emotions of those who expect this investment to elevate them from poverty. your words are wasted.

>>14334396
>>14336914
>>14340991
This low IQ stuff is better off on reddit guys. It just won't work here. Go on. Get.

>>14331364
>EOM
2.00
>EOY
10.00
>EO2Y
100.00
>EO3Y
1000.00
>EO4Y
10000.00

REMEMBER GUYS NEVER SELL

>>14331364
PRAISE KEK
1000 EOY IS FUD

>marketcap of 5 billion = #8 on CMC
>5000/350 = $14.29.

Happy 7x.
t. nolinker waiting for a dip below $2.

>>14331417
>>14331763

Why do you think PSD2 and ISO20022 will cause Link to dump and not pump more? September is looking like Link's most bullish month this year.

>>14331466
CHEKED

>>14341818
Due to sell da news wannabe wolfs of wallstreet.

>>14331380
invert that...

>>14334803
It is pasta you gaylord
>>14336914
It is pasta you faggot

>>14331688
Checked

>>14331688

>>14332351
The realistic choice.

>>14331364
$1000 EOH (HOUR)

So when does Sergs speak tomorrow?

There's some optimistic fool who has a sell order of 14k Link up for 90k sats
I hope he gets to see that filled by tomorrow

So you're telling me this project has confirmed ties to the banking cartel (Iso 20022 compliant, just in time for the Psd2 directive), the cream of the crop of global legal firms and institutions as well as some of the biggest tech companies in the blockchain space focused on the soon to be mass adopted enterprise level smart contracts such as consensys, Microsoft, IBM, docusign, Intel and Digital Asset and that the solution to the oracle problem which it is aiming to solve is essentially the God protocol as described by the creator of the smart contract concept himself, ie one of the main pillars of the fourth industrial revolution and the backbone of the future blockchain infrastructure (10% of global GDP in less than 10 years) that will allow massive automation of post trade processing, thus saving all the biggest markets such as derivatives, logistics and insurance possibly trillions in saving, AND its the only project of its kind due to its blockchain agnostic and decentralized nature and has the first mover advantage, but despite all these confirmed facts it's being largely ignored by the crypto community, although it has gone up from 120 to 45 ranking in a bear market with no marketing just in a couple of months, simply because a dozens of dedicated autistic neets down vote every possible clue about it on reddit and ACTIVELY fud their own investment instead of shilling it, because they're the only ones who realized this revolutionary project would basically replace all the lawyers with neet nodes where 1 link needs to be worth at least 5k usd in order to be sufficient collateral for the quadrillion derivatives market, the same neets who first called btc and eth when no one was taking crypto seriously and have harnessed the power of weaponized autism and meme magick to put Trump in the white house? Do you realize how delusional and insane that sounds? Personally I'm all in.

>>14343046

That's around $10. Not totally unreasonable really, considering if there wasn't a whale dumping 100k every few minutes, the Google pump had enough volume and buying power to push us to $5. If anything seriously good is announced at Oracle, it could happen again. Remember the people attending are all richfags.

$3
$20
$95
One year from now: 138.6

>>14341145
>Seriously thinking the total market cap will stay the same this year

>>14343059
You can tell how old this pasta is since Link is a top 25 coin now

>>14343184
Seems reasonable

>>14331364
Tfw stupidly sold and then rebought my link and ended up losing 20 LINK, I'm never gonna make it am I bros?

>>14331459
I suggest you buy some lube now

>>14334396
Ooooooooohhhhhhh, it must be embarrassing to be you, I'll screencap this and start a Link fud cringe thread in sept

>>14331459
Care to enter your stack into a smart contract saying this?

>>14345156
Seems reasonable