/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14298062
those who have brains and can think and research well all like BCH. the sheeple will follow eventually.

>>14298062
based. they will both pump, they are both useful and have retard strength communities behind them.

>>14298062
I'm just dont with all the BTC/BCH/BSV shit. I went all into Ethereum and Link.

>>14298218
Exactly. Rejoice when you see a spastic who is all in on either one and shilling. Those are the the anons who are pumping my assortment of buttcorn forks

>>14298240
ETH will pump as well, but nowhere near as hard. Holding LINK and ETH is required to not be a retard as well of course. You did well

It seems that BCH is backed by really competent devs and a lot of bitcoin early buyers. All this clown fest made me look closer into them. They're the shit. Apparently it's making huge leaps in terms of real life adoption too, more than any other coin, in fact (second maybe just to BTC).

BSV, though.. File storage on the blockchain? Insecure 0-conf? Dangerous multi-block reorgs? Dramatic marketing? Give me a break...

>>14298277

>>14298277
I love dramatic marketing. Boomers love figureheads. Once they get real press as in Craig in CNBC debating Roger... whewww friendo.

>Son I saw That solotshi nokomoto on the TV I think Ill buy his new currency project

>>14298277
Yep thats exactly whats happening, merchants around the world accept BCH cause its easy and cheap. they don't want to open a fucking lightning channel, put money in, risk it getting stuck etc etc. too much hassle, and even using LN is more expensive than just on chain BCH transactions.

All the cool shit is being built around BCH lately. blockchain poker, social sites, ( memo.cash ) etc etc.

BCH works and works well.

>>14298240
ETH is a good choice too, I can actually see it taking over market dominance in ~4 to ~8 years. There are more ETH markets than BTC markets. No one uses the BTC network and the value of the coins are directly related to network usage.

You can tip people BCH with tip bots, you can tip somone one cent or less. You can't do that stuff with BTC.

>>14298062
Bsv is focusing on digital payments over irl payments as thats where the majority of transaction volume lies. And transaction volume secures fees to pay the miners. This is all exacerbated by the block reward halving. BCH is a zombie coin with a hard use by date. Even if BCH could increase their transaction volume, their node software is poorly optimised and cant process more than 22mb blocks which is the same limit bitcoin core software can do with an increased limit.

>>14298341
YESS YESSS PUMP MY BAGS

>>14298805
>Bsv is focusing on digital payments over irl payments
They can get there but for now they are the cool-javascript-app-stored-on-chain-Coin
Try buying a VPN or server or pizza or flight or any other product online with BSV right now. You cant, yet.

BCH will scale and PUMP in unison with BSV and Grandpa BTC which will also POMP without even scaling at all.

>>14298805
You must be unaware that BSV stumbled upon a dangerous 6-block reorg when the block size spiked at 100+ mb. Naked 0conf is absolutely insecure and goes against the principles of the blockchain. The project itself is run by people (Craig, Calvin, Jimmy) who are absolutely clueless about the intricacies of the protocol. Besides, "Bitcoin Satoshi Vision" sounds like cheap Indian garbage. Who's gonna take it seriously?

>>14298277
>Insecure 0-conf? Dangerous multi-block reorgs?

>>14298277
>t seems that BCH is backed by really competent devs

LMAO

>>14298962
much better than being bankrolled by a billionare who used to be FBI top wanted for wire fraud and tax evasion and now boasts about wanting to create the government-friendly coin

Meanwhile BCHs resident billionaire literally went to prison

PUMP MY BAGS DELUSIONAL BCH AND BSV SHILLS

>>14298240
get rekt

>>14298879
>no transaction lost

>>14299042
You should go all in BCH they have the most competent devs.

BSV has no future it's a shitcoin anyway

>>14299135
are you meming on me fren?

>>14299612
No not meming, BCH unironicially has the most brilliant devs in the cryptospace, we should entrust all our monies to them because they know best what to put in the protocol. If it's something they come up with, it's guaranteed to be good. They are the professionals.

https://twitter.com/bsmith12251960/status/1063277772792102912

TRUST THE DEVS

>>14298879
You must not be aware that reorgs part of bitcoin by design and the parrelel chains ensure all transactions are included

>>14298062
>goes up 40% in a week
>crippled
Only one cripple around here

>>14299965
BSV 5xed from bottom already.
BCH 5.8xed.
BTC 3.3xed.

get cucked

>>14299934
I agree. Fundamentally we should entrust all decisions to Amaury on BCH and Craig on BSV

>>14300013
You can trust Amaury to change the protocol or you can trust Satoshi NOT to change the protocol. Easy decision.

>>14300203
>I wont change the protocol, pinky promise
>by the way I own all miners and the single node implementation and all startups using the coin

Both BCH and BSV are low IQ follower types trusting figureheads. Same goes for BTC

Please visit another thread and SHILL MY BAGS

>>14300269
You suffer badly from the Dunning-Kruger effect. What you don't realize is that this space has so much information asymmetry that people like you who try to guess in the wild what is going on based on price charts are going to get completely assfucked by people with inside knowledge of what actually happens behind closed doors.

Do you understand this? You are literally a fucking guppy fish in a shark infested tank who thinks he's the best swimmer in town.

>>14300437
Your point is I can't predict the future which is very correct and smart. That would speak for diversification and being in multiple corns though, since like you correctly state, we don't have insider knowledge of who will prevail.

so how do you arrive at we should drop BCH? because Craig will dump the tulip corns? what i he doesn't? I should just trust him? I can't tell the future remember.
Thanks I'd rather keep profiting from all the emotional cuck investors who go all in on one coin.

>>14300522
>we don't have
Speak for yourself. A lot of people here have inside information, and laugh at people like you who are flailing blindly.

Let's see...

If I'm employed at a major exchange, what data do you think I have access to? All trading data, all customer data, all leverage data? Money flows, recent deposits, etc. I would basically be able to predict or even directt the future of the market with a high degree of accuracy.

If I am employed at nChain what information do I have access to? All patents filed, including those that are not public? Would I have access to business partnerships not yet announced? Would I have access to information about Craig's actual coin possessions and the scale of his mining operations that are not currently public? Would I have access to any of his deliberations or strategies to ensure the success of his coin?

If I work at the SEC, would I be able to know which exchanges or crypto projects are being investigated for violations of law? Which personalities are going to be indicted in the near future? Would I know what kind of regulatory frameworks that are being developed?

Continue this list, and then ask yourself... Is there a possibility that some of the people that comment here are in any of these, or similar positions that gives them an information edge over you? Would they share that information with you?

My point is this: you are not the smartest person in the room, you are whale food. But good luck making it, your arrogance is going to be a hindrance.

>>14300716
YESS NICE other anons will read your post and fomo into BSV and PUMP MY BAGS

Dont you get it? if the satoshi saga is true, which it well may be, good. I will still profit more than 90% of cryptoneets who were too slow to bag up nicely at 60$ a pop or scared because hurr BSV

Going all in on anything however will ruin my risk profile since I do not have such info and would be a low IQ cuck if I would follow craig and his island dwelling Casino-friend based on his public claims alone.
You are proving my point

nobody should go all in on craig
1. he could die/ be killed
2. core could somehow prevent wallet withdrawal
3. he could conceivably come out as an extremely elaborate ruse
4. he could fuck up in court and end up in jail somehow

with these in mind i split my btc bags 60 40 eth bsv. if bsv turns out to be a nothingburger, the ecosystem will certainly need eth for the forseeable future. if craig is not lying and obliterates btc, salty core supporters will likely move to eth rather than bsv, so all my bags should pump at least in terms of segwit coin.

thoughts?

futhermore, if bsv is legit, ETH will still remain important like java and c++, especially with zk snarks and near-free transactions in 2.0. they are apples and oranges imo

>>14301452
>>14301478
>thoughts?
based anon with good reasoning behind his folio.