/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14267146

>tfw fudders are laughing because you're down to 8x your buy in

>>14267146
It’s going to 0.80 again - no joke

>>14267146
this definitely isn't discord manipulation. How low are your buy orders faggot?

>>14267146
I open the fridge. The smell of big macs slowly crawls up to my nostrils. I freeze up. Terrifying thoughts begin to emerge from my subconsciousness as the happy meal engulfs me. I cannot take it anymore. The flashbacks make me have a seizure. I fall towards the floor but remain unscrached as I hit a soft cheesy texture instead. Entire room is now filled with this moist deep fried culinary disaster. I begin to suffocate and in desperation utter my last words "1000 suicides EOY".

>>14267181
$0.40

>>14267146

Sorry you got blindsided by the Google partnership pump. There is no amount of selling or fudding you or your pathetic discord can do that will get the price back down to a $1 where you sold like a retard.

Now go dilate and then kill yourself.

>>14267239
>actually believes the discord tranny meme
>to make matters worse;
>actually believes that Chainlink is not a meme

>>14267262
>actually believe the Chainlink is a meme meme

Hope I can turn 1 eth into 500 LINK by the end of this

>>14267295
Please tell me you didn’t fall for the Chainlink reverse meme is a meme meme

>>14267262

Sorry you got blindsided by the Google partnership pump. There is no amount of selling or fudding you or your pathetic discord can do that will get the price back down to a $1 where you sold like a retard.

Now go dilate and then kill yourself.

>>14267239
>Google partnership

Imagine STILL thinking it was a partnership. Imagine not selling at $2. Just imagine. When the last retard realizes that the google thing was mostly just empty hype this shit is going dooooooown.

>TFW bought 21k sats
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>14267329

>fell for the Chainlink is a meme meme meme meme
>playing 2D chess while King of Big Macs has transcended our own dimension into the nether world

>>14267337
>doubling down on the memes
This is actually really sad... have fun waiting 5 years to climb up to $2.00

>>14267181
If some idiot discord trannies can tank your entire market with some simple manipulation, then your project sucks shit. All projects get FUDded, only the good ones can survive it.

>>14267337
>Google partnership pump
Ask google if they have a partnership.
Remember the Vechain Bmw partnership?

>conservatively bought a small stack at 1 dollar
LINK whales, if you drop this to .60 I will forever join the platoon

AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!! You fags tricked me into buying this shitcoin!! Never again! Im going back to nano.

>>14267376
>>14267388
>>14267402

Sorry you got blindsided by the Google partnership pump. There is no amount of selling or fudding you or your pathetic discord can do that will get the price back down to a $1 where you sold like a retard.

Now go dilate and then kill yourself.

>>14267661
There never was any partnership, it was just some literal WHO that wrote a blog post that merely mentioned Link along with DOGECOIN!!!

>Sorry you got blindsided by the Google partnership pump. There is no amount of selling or fudding you or your pathetic discord can do that will get the price back down to a $1 where you sold like a retard.
>Now go dilate and then kill yourself.

>>14267146

>>14267146
1.64 for now. and going down.

>>14267376
>Imagine STILL thinking it was a partnership.
>>14267692
>There never was any partnership, it was just some literal WHO that wrote a blog post

cope

>>14267402
see >>14268091

>>14268100
>google partneship page
>ctrl+f
>"chain link"
>0 results
Gais the Google partnership is so speshul dat Google are keeping it a secret by not listing Chainlink as a partner on their website.

>>14268130
no words, just cope

>>14268091
Lol non linkers never bought at any point, then try to discourage true linkers who bout below 1$.

>>14268130
Why did Google waste time designing a high quality graphic with the Chainlink cube? Just for the lulz?

>>14268138
>>14268091
it pretty much was just a blogpost though. Probably a guy trying to dump his link bags. I bet he will do the same thing next week with mobius or something.

>>14268130
The reality is that Chainlink makes a tool that is absolutely necessary for smart contracts to function. They are the first to market and absolute light years ahead of any competition when it comes to securely feeding data to smart contracts.

If you think that smart contracts are going to be a big deal (and honestly I don't know how you can't think that) then the tool that Chainlink is building is going to be a core part of that.

So partnership x or namedrop y becomes immaterial to the fundamental fact that people who want data fed securely into a smart contract, or payments triggered, or data trustlessly moved on or off chain, need Chainlink. It's only a matter of time before the number of projects using this tool are so many that there are no more "partnerships" announced. People don't announce a partnership with Amazon when they use AWS, and they don't announce a partnership with Google every time they use Google Cloud. They just use it.

Oh sirs im losing money i cant afford to lose i borrowed it from someone Else pls make it stop

:( I'm never gonna make it

>>14267171
Please god, i need more

>>14268187
Sell your goats, sell your daughters, buy more. It's called DCA my friend.

>>14268174
>it pretty much was just a blogpost though.
Blogposts are how major companies (especially tech) make their major announcements.

Here's a "just a blogpost" where Google Cloud announces their latest flagship project called "Anthos":
https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/hybrid-cloud/new-platform-for-managing-applications-in-todays-multi-cloud-world

cope

>>14268167
That graphic is actually pretty sophisticated. It shows uncle blocks and even an orphan block.
But you wouldn't be able to tell.

>>14268167
That graph is pretty sophisticated too; it shows uncle blocks and even an orphan block.

Someone with actual in-depth knowledge of blockchain made that.

>>14268234
The fact that the graphic even exists makes the Google FUD pointless.

Symbols and patterns never lie.

>>14268288
Yup.

And to think retards took out loans to buy this meme token. Suckers, the lot of you quite foolish

>>14267376

>>14268138
Sold my stack at $1.96. Don't worry though you're still up 700% I mean 500%..oh look it's only 400% now.

>>14268167
They're showcasing the use of BigQuery with Chainlink as an example of non-typical usage. If anything, they're promoting their own product by using you deluded retards.

>>14268225
Google partnerships can be found on the Google partnership page.

>>14268481
See >>14268225

cope

>>14267146
Time for everyone who bought over $2 to panic sell kek. Can't wait to see the wojaks tomorrow when it pumps back up to $1.80.

>>14268486
Once again, retard, repeat after me. Google has a web page that lists all of their current partnerships, Chainlink is not on there. I wonder why...

>>14268481
>>14268412

>>14268481
https://twitter.com/GCPcloud/status/1141669527790465024

The amount of cope you need is delicious

>>14268499
This page? https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/partnerships/
The ones that are news organizations?

This page?
https://www.google.com/partners/
The one that means partners as in people that qualify for Google Ads?

>>14268499
You have a chinkie mind about the term "partnership".

Here's how Google Cloud interprets "partnership": https://cloud.google.com/partners/become-a-partner/
i.e. a voluntary and/or paying commitment.

It's the same with pretty much all major (tech) companies; like Citrix: https://www.citrix.com/partner-programs/
or Odoo: https://www.odoo.com/become-a-partner

In fact, just google "become a partner" and you'll see the same thing over and over.
What Google Cloud did with Chainlink is MUCH more valuable than that.

cope

>>14267168
i hate stinkies but this, unironically. there is no victory until this shitcoin goes back below a dollar, which is where it was just a month ago

OK let's make a few things clear.

#1. I can hire a pajeet to make a graphic like this for $50. That's less than 20min the amount they pay for a single Software engineer. They have 20000 software engineer. The graph represents nothing. Some marketing guy hired a pajeet designer for the blog post, who cares?

#2. Coindesk is a shit website that constantly lies to pump shitcoins. They absolutely do not know that Google has a partnership with LINK. They also wrote that LINK was a partner with Swift in 2016 which was a lie. Or maybe it was cointelegraph? Regardless, do not trust crypto news sites, they are liars/paid shills.

#3. The blog post and twitter post absolutely do not mean a partnership or integration. You have to be mentally ill to read it and think it means a partnership. Learn to read or get treated.

Now linkies can you please stop lying to pump your bags? It is proven beyond a doubt that Google is neither a partnership nor integration. If you read the blog post can came to that conclusion, get treated, you are mentally ill.

>>14268637
You fudders are getting good. I can't tell the difference between pure retardation and cope anymore.

>>14268637
>The blog post and twitter post absolutely do not mean a partnership or integration.
See >>14268578
and >>14268572

What Google Cloud with Chainlink is MUCH more valuable than what they see as "partnerships".

>blog post
See >>14268225

cope

>>14268138

>Cope

>>14268578
>>14268657
kek now linkies have admitted is not a partnership, and they try to spin this as a good thing.

STOP FUCKING LYING TO PUMP YOUR BAGS.

It's not a partnership. It's not an integration. It's literally just them shilling their own project to Chainlink customers. Yes, you can use BigQuery with Chainlink. You can use BigQuery with anything. BigQuery does not and will never use Chainlink. Chainlink uses BigQuery.

I know if you're not a dev, you're gonna be too stupid to understand that and you're gonna think it's the other way around. but BigQuery literally cannot use Chainlink, it's not what it does. It will always be Chainlink using it.

>>14268194

>Cope

>>14268578

>The absolute amount of C-O-P-E

Sorry, your StainStink will crash and burn down to $0.01

>>14268543

>>14268695
>kek now linkies have admitted is not a partnership
A literal Google Cloud "partnership" is a paying commitment for which anyone can apply.

This is MUCH more valuable than that.

>You can use BigQuery with anything.
But Google Cloud doesn't do an entire write up about "anything".
But they did for Chainlink.

This kills the stinklers, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>14268695
>It's not an integration
Google Cloud is currently running a testnet node: https://docs.chain.link/docs/big-query-chainlink-testnet (they link to it in the write up), and pic related means they'll be running a mainnet node.
That's integration.

>>14268726
kek so you basically just admitted this is a marketing stunt from Google to shill their own BigQuery service.

They do this with many other products. They release 1 post per day and it's basically mostly that. It's a marketing blog.

Having blockchain and ethereum in the title is a massive clickbait and marketing angle.

It means absolutely nothing about Google using, integrating, partnering or endorsing Chainlink.

If you read the blog post and think so, you are mentally ill.

>>14268753
Chainlink integration provides added value to Google Cloud/BigQuery, yes.

>>14268746
STOP FUCKING LYING. Google is not running a node.

Some fucking literally who is running a node that uses BigQuery. Google is NOT. Someone is using their public fucking product called BigQuery.

ANOTHER FUCKING STINKY CAUGHT LYING TO PUMP THEIR BAGS

>>14268761
THEY DID NO INTEGRATE. STOP LYING TO PUMP YOUR BAGS. BIGQUERY IS A PUBLIC PRODUCT THAT ANYONE CAN USE. NO INTEGRATION.

>>14268764
>Some fucking literally who
cope

>>14268776
You're getting angry.

>>14268776
>BIGQUERY IS A PUBLIC PRODUCT THAT ANYONE CAN USE.
Yet Google Cloud does not publish entire writeups and main account tweets about "anyone".
But they did with Chainlink.

Do any of you fudders have anything to say about Salesforce? You're probably getting bored regurgitating the same thing you've been saying about Google all week.

>>14268843
Google is not running the node.

STOP LYING TO PUMP YOUR BAGS

>>14268855
They write about many random companies that use their product, like Chainlink, every single month.

STOP LYING TO PUMP YOUR BAGS

>>14268860
Dapps is not Salesforce

>>14268860
you're getting BTFO so now you want to change the topic kek

>>14268860
>Salesforce

>>14268883
Stinkies are literally compulsive liars. Constantly lying to pump their bags. No one should trust a single positive statement they hear about LINK on here, it is always an exaggeration of the truth, aka a lie.

>>14268871
>Google is not running the node.
whoopsie!

>>14268913
If you think this means they are running the node, you are mentally ill. Learn to read. Get treated.

STOP LYING TO PUMP YOUR BAGS

Everything in the green apart for this shitter kek

>>14268871
>"OUR documentation"
t. Google Cloud

>"it's not their documentation"
t. anon

k

>>14268941
Congratulations on your +5%. Only 92% more to go.

>>14268947
all CGP documentation is on Google Cloud's website. I use CGP daily because I'm a dev, you are not. You are a compulsive liar who's trying to fool uneducated people into buying your bags.

>>14268967
So are you saying Google Cloud is wrong when they say "OUR documentation"?

>>14268967
>I'm a dev
Saddest LARP I've ever seen.

>>14267692
>>14268130
>>14268481
>>14268342
>>14268499
>>14268637
>>14268695
>>14268742
>>14268753
>>14268764
>>14268871
>>14268907
>>14268941
>>14268967

Sorry you got blindsided by the Google partnership pump. There is no amount of selling or fudding you or your pathetic discord can do that will get the price back down to a $1 where you sold like a retard.

Now go dilate and then kill yourself.

>>14268724
whoops, sorry about that little fud of yours

Oh no, it's been holding at the $1.60 support that it's been fluctuating at since the Google news, whatever will I do?