/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14089514
Why is that girl so hot
Inb4 have sex

>>14089521

have sex

>>14089521
cause makeup

>>14089514
If your goal is to lose all your money this is the perfect portfolio. 5 stars.

>>14089521
Have sex incel. Now improve the portfolio and I'll dump more sexies.

>>14089531
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE FUCKIN GOT EM

>>14089550

have sex

100% BSV

>>14089514
LINK is just another shit coin now, everyone already sold

>>14089514
95% XCM
5% Quant

>>14089582
>ETH dumped harder on mainnet than LINK
>everybody sold LINK
Nice try discord transformer.

>>14089582
Dilate plz

>>14089514
100% QNT.

>>14089514
40% btc
40% eth
10% nuke
10% random shitcoin gambles

>>14089666
Fucking checked. What is nuke?

>>14089514
40% Quant
30% Fantom
30% Link (for the maymays)

>>14089666
Im thinking 15% NUKE

>>14089679
Thanks anon and Nuke is bomb 2.0 which rught now it is being airdropped for free. Search “nuke” on 4chan search and you’ll probably see a discord invite somewhere. Can’t spoonfeed it all to you DYOR

>>14089647

Quanties think they are the next TCP/IP to rule the world, yet a proprietary software that you need to pay a license fee for will never be a global international standard.

They think Chainlink can't connect blockchains together... but it can and so can so many other protocols with much more determinism, less trust, and cheaper.

The whole point in using a decentralized backend like a blockchain is to get deterministic services, yet they think using a trusted software to run all your transactions through is logical. In fact, it ruins the entire value proposition.

They think of themselves as the blockchain of all blockchains yet it's proprietary software and you need to pay a license to use. Again, it doesn't make sense to use proprietary software to leverage decentralized backends.

There is also a major problem in their tokenomics model. There is no way of actually knowing how the token is used since everything is negotiated behind closed doors. They say you have to hold it to get a license fee, but how can anyone prove it? They say you pay to sign data like transaction fee but no one can prove that either. There are no on-chain metrics to prove anything unlike all other protocols. Essentially, they have central control over the pricing of the entire protocol. For all we know they could be doing a freemium model with these companies to test out to see if they like it. Also, with it being proprietary, how do we know that there are no backdoors built in? Quant is simply not compatible deterministic systems.

Then don’t get me started about Shillbert always hyping up the coin and nothing to show. If Quant is so big, why is he shilling all the time to neets? Look at Chainlink and then look at smug Gil taking pictures in his “fancy” meetings. All these partnerships are exploratory, yet the community thinks billions are flowing through the network. There is zero transparency about what's actually going on since it's proprietary. They should be an STO

>>14089666
pretty much this, If you understand risk management, you wouldn't keep more speculative plays as your largest holdings.

dope city

>>14089521
Because she spent hours putting on makeup and then more hours taking the perfect picture.

>>14089873
if you researched LINK you would go all in

https://imgur.com/a/bklfSCi

>>14089582
It's nearly at its ATH

>>14089521
>braces
Theres something erotic about them