/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13963583
JSON parser are widely used, maybe is yours used one day too

Italian government will use chainlink

>>13963583
I only have 200k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it. All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda.

It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. I need to make it to 500k before mainnet for fucks sake. Link is only going to $5 max. Right now I might make 1MM before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 1MM into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 2MM, but more likely 3MM to make it.

The upper predictions for Link where about $60 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity.

All of that isn't going to happen anymore. The singularity is cancelled. Now we will have a slow growth to $5. And the sad but ironic thing is most people on this board will hold from 20 cents, to $5 and then hold all the way back to sub $1 again because you all believe the 1k eoy memes, and just like the retards who held BTC and didn't sell at 19k, you will do the same with Link at $5. Looking at the current charts depresses the fuck out of me when I know I only have 200k Link, nowhere near enough to make it.

At best I will have 1-2 sweet years, and then return to wagecucking after that. But it will be worse because I will have tasted freedom and know what I am missing out on.

>>13963602
DELET

>>13963602
sono italiano, questa cosa è vera o è larp?
>>13963612
>I only have 200k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.
if you have 50k to trow into a blockchain project it means that you already made, it on your own and you don't need chaninlin
Stop fudding like a retarded, try to fud better with KYC fud for example

>>13963602
This should have a thread of it’s own. Oh and fuck fudders

>>13963583
Just because a product is released doesn't mean it's immediately adopted

Most companies/banks using Chainlink are most likely working with it internally, until they are confident it can perform at scale and to their liking

From an engineering standpoint, the odds that anyone would be ready to go for any serious application or contract on day 1 is basically 0

I imagine it will be more of a slow trickle, as teams independently announce the launch of ((their)) services. Maybe some big ones group together for an official announcement, ideally with out big mac boi, but no word of that yet

>>13963583
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Chainlink is fucked
Praise Vishnu

>>13963583
Why exactly? Its up 110% in a month?

>>13963657

Thank you bro

>>13963583
Just buy and hold. Buy more. No sweat. It will all work out shortly.

>>13963612
>and just like the retards who held BTC and didn't sell at 19k
And the retarded ones who held bitcoin when it went to 1000$ and than back to 200$?
Do we want to talk about them?

Please, I know that your is retarded fud, but if you ever were seriously you have to consider that Chainlink is one ofthe biggest project afer eth if not the biggest of all
It needs some time to gain adoption
You are fool if you expected one single candel to 1k, lol
It would need several years (possible 3-.4, it depends on how bitcoin goes and the usage of the network) to reach 300$, assuming that bitcoin would go to 1 trillion market

In the upcoming years, considering staking and fomo and the new paradigm in automated sistem the chainlink network is possible for it to reach the level of visa and mastercard marketcap

I reapeat, Yikes: YOU WILL NOT HAVE MY LINKIES AT 100$, NEITHER AT 1000$.

AT 10'000$, MAYBE..... NAH, AGAIN I AM NOT SELLING

>>13963653
There have been two threads, one of which showed that it was an adapter written by the dev of "devoleum," a fucking 'olive oil on the blockchain' scam.

>>13963657
*with our big mac boi

love u sir gay

Sergey didn't lie, the audits were done when he said they were done, Quantstamp is legit, it also has a lot of breadcrumb material, he said mainnet would come without reputation at first, just very few reliable features and it would been developed on it really fast, he also said he has been looking at how to work on smart contracts like 5 years ago with his SmartContract page

He also said that insurance would come first, then derivatives at the end of year, we don't know if insurance will come in 1 or two months, or three, there is no information about that

Those who lied were the larpers, they lied about everything, go ahead and check what sergey actually said, and it's not bad

The only real fud was the 19000 node operators... Unless there is some information now in June that was totally a lie from Sergey and should be a redflag from now on

There was a maybe larp but it sounded convincing about a speaker that will mention chainlink at Docusign Monumentum next week.

Also of course they won't release a mainnet with all the users using at the same time, too much can go wrong. They announced 50 partners at launch, probably they will slowly start using the mainnet as well.

Every coin drops as mainnet. There is a general feeling of fear now, that's why it's slowly dropping. But don't believe the FUD, why would people who have nothing at stake waste so much time?

>>13963583
I heard gov in romania will implement chainlink in 2020. hang in there fren, major money is coming!

>>13963733
>The only real fud was the 19000 node operators

I thought he was referring to us with our neet nodes. Weren't there only around 19k addresses holding Link when he did that conference. The rest of your post is spot on though.

>>13963612
>>13963700

Calm down mate you are replying to almost year old FUD.

>>13963602
Literal who