/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13938303
Cope.bitcoin doesn't exist

imagine giving a fuck about btc or bsv when we have MONERO making incredible innovations especially as of recent without ANY of the btc drama.

fuck satoshi and fuck bitcoin that shit sucks compared to xmr

>>13938303
>Craig = le God
>>>/plebbit/ and/or >>>/neckyourself/, faggot.

The guy is a genius, thanks to him I was enlightened and was shown the truth and now run my own full non-mining, full-node, and I can secure the next money revolution for $4.55 from my basement!

>>13938950

>>13938373
Have fun going to prison using a terrorist coin

>>13938303
>patents
isn't LN under MIT licence just like bitcoin?
LMAO

>>13938303
get over it buddy, nobody gives a fuck about creg and his bullshit

STOP OPENING THREADS YOU ALREADY HAVE 10 THREADS OPEN CHOOSE ONE OF THESE AND POST THERE YOU FUCKING SHILLS ARE RUINING THIS BOARD

>>13938711
>>13939399
>>13939394
>>13937758
>>13939340
>>13936018
>>13938136

POST IN ONE FUCKING THREAD YOUR SHILLING GARBAGE I WANT TO USE THIS BOARD FOR THINGS OTHER THAN SEEING CROTCH PICTURES AND THAT RETARDED AUSTRALIAN GUY

LIKE LITERALLY I COULDN'T GIVE FEWER FUCKS WHO SATOSHI IS WHO CRAIG IS OR WHOSE COCK YOU LIKE TO SUCK AT NIGHT STOP FUCKING POLLUTING THIS BOARD

STOP
OPENING
THREADS
STOP
STOP
T
O
P

>>13939512
Thanks for the bump

>>13939540
>LIKE LITERALLY I COULDN'T GIVE FEWER FUCKS WHO SATOSHI IS
Then why do you post in Satoshi threads?

>>13939559
YOU'RE WELCOME NOW FUCKING STOP OPENING NEW THREADS AND SHILL IN ONE, JUST IN ONE, NO NEED FOR 3003535838538329520958203952039820395 THREADS EVERY FUCKING DAY

>>13939577
FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU

>>13938303
and we are supposed to believe the fact that he and his accoplices are all jewish is just a mere coincidence...

>>13939512
>>13939540
>>13939555
>>13939582
>>13939598
COPE

>>13939615
Anyone else feeling sleepy?

>>13938303
>All of the so called "evidence" proving Craig is a fraud is manufactured by Greg Maxwell and his men
Remember that court document that supposedly showed Craig claiming an address that belonged to Roger or some other guy who then signed "Craig is a fraud?" Yeah, that document was tampered with by somebody.
Most people don't realize that CSW pissed off some very scummy people several years ago and they have done everything they possibly can to discredit him. It's sad to see how many people have fallen for their smear campaign.

>>13938303
There’s a certain desperation about continually restarting these threads. Streisand Effect, anyone?

>>13939719
What. The. Fuck

>>13939949
Take a look for yourself.

>>13940090
You are a goddamn retard, the list was literally submitted by csw
Page 38
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.24.4.pdf

Did Maxwell put a gun to every bitcoin miners head and force them to act like toddlers and accept an agreement where they implement segwit first and big blocks later?
D

Did he have that many guns to their heads?
No?
Then He is Just a Fucking Dude, get over it, and hate on the miners. Who are still mining BTC and not BCH.

>>13940197
Wrong. The document was originally produced by the plaintiff after they compelled a handover of reams of records from one of Craig's old companies. You have been bamboozled to perfection.

>>13940217
He orchestrated several campaigns to give the appearance of "social consensus" that didn't exist. Look up his history with Wikipedia. He is a an avid sockpuppeteer.

>>13940197
and yet here is the original. Do you see how the adress that signed with "muh faketoshi" is not in this original document?

>>13940268
If your "orchestrated campaigns", or is it champaigns, and "social consensus" can nullify the "they vote with their hashpower" from the whitepaper, then BTC deserves to die and become a bitch of old style banksters.

then say thank you maxwell.

>>13940237
What a fucking retard, the document was submitted by csw as plaintiff
Read the document from courtlistener
If you cannot read an official document I’m sorry for you

>>13940570
>retard
>csw as plaintiff
My sides. CSW isn't even the plaintiff. They are not sending their best.

>>13940692
First lines in the document:
>Name: Craig.
>I affirm:
>1. I am the plaintiff.

Ok so just sign the genesis block and all will be well

>>13940570
>csw as plaintiff
How the fuck can csw be plaintiff if he is the one getting sued? Is this bait or is the core iq realy this low?

>>13940771
>(You)
I can't even...
>>13940812
They aren't even really trying anymore desu. They have nothing left at this point but desperation and panic.
>>13940367
Bitcoin isn't dead yet. Nothing has been nullified, only delayed.

>>13938373
t. unlimited supply

>>13940812
How the fuck can you keep talking shit when you haven't read one line of the document? Craig was suing W&K INFO DEFENSE RESEARCH LLC for bitcoin or usd equivalent that he claimed they agreed to pay in 2011.
>>13940904
>I can't even...
You can't even read.

>>13940942
>Craig was suing W&K INFO DEFENSE RESEARCH LLC
How fucking dense are you? W&K is Craig Wrights company. What the hell do you think the W is for? I can't believe you are this stupid

>>13940692
You cannot even read
What a faggot

>>13941002
Just to add: The K in W&K is Dave Kleiman, Craigs best friend

>>13941002
>10. The defendant is a US LLC based in Florida USA. The US resident director was David A Kleiman.
See how easy it is not to be retarded when you can read.

>>13940942
I appreciate you trying even after being so humiliated, I really do.
Please try and keep your story straight, though. We are talking about the Kleiman case wherein the documents were produced through a discovery process. Unless you have access to previous court case records that show the document was not tampered with, your narrative is fake, gay and pathetic. Have a nice life.

>>13941007
Yeah, that's an affidavit for some other case and wasn't produced by Craig for the Kleiman case. It is certainly funny watching you scramble to cover for your unraveling narrative with bullshit and fake outrage.

>>13941002
I see. So Craig is suing himself for the bitcoins he owes himself and shows as evidence forged handwriting signature supposed to be from Kleiman. Makes sense.
>>13941082
Affidavit:
>a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.
Signed and filed November 2013.
That this document was later used in another court case is irrelevant. Originally it was submitted and signed by Craig.

>>13941128
>I see. So Craig is suing himself for the bitcoins he owes himself and shows as evidence forged handwriting signature supposed to be from Kleiman. Makes sense.
What the fuck are you on about? Are you denying W&K was Craig and Daves company? This is public information and something you can research yourself

>>13938303
DELET

>>13941128
You claimed the affidavit was proof that Craig attested to the authenticity of the doctored document in the Kleiman case, when in fact it is from a different case. You have to show an affidavit attesting to the authenticity of the doctored document for any of your argument to make sense, but of course there is none, because Craig did not produce the forged document and would not have sworn to its authenticity when it is clearly a fake.
Keep showing how dumb the anti-CSW propagandists and useful idiots are, though. This is very funny.
>>13941186
Shhh... let him continue to dig his hole. It's clear he is either clueless or desperately trying to save face among his fellow idiots.

None of it matters if he won’t/can’t sign the genesis block

So until then, stiff

>>13941186
Irrelevant like everything you retards say. I was reading you back the heading of the fucking document you idiot. It's then clarified that Kleiman at that time had control of the company.
>>13941235
It's supposedly filed in the Supreme court of New South Wales in 2013. Any lawyer can make one phone call to verify the authenticity. Craig doesn't seem to want to dispute it in court, only on twitter.

>>13941271
>Well the morphology, location, incidental plant debris and PCR all point to this being a mammoth, but I'm going to ignore all that until I get a complete gene sequence.
You'd make a great paleontologist.

>>13941315
>It's supposedly filed in the Supreme court of New South Wales in 2013. Any lawyer can make one phone call to verify the authenticity. Craig doesn't seem to want to dispute it in court, only on twitter.

>He still doesn't understand that the authenticity of the affidavit isn't the issue in question because its a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CASE.
I refuse to believe anybody can be this stupid. You have to be a deliberate shill clinging to anything you possibly can. Go ahead and make that phone call, I'm sure they will say, "yep, it's legit" and yet still your entire argument falls flat.

>>13941315
>It's then clarified that Kleiman at that time had control of the company
At the time Dave Kleiman was dead. How could he then be in control of the company? Can you please stop lie/making stuff up in every fucking post? It is really tiring and dishonest

>>13941378
>he still doesn't understand that it being brought up during a completely different case is absolutely irrelevant to its authenticity
Either it was actually submitted by Craig at some point or it wasn't.
> they will say, "yep, it's legit"
That would confirm Craig actually made all the claims in that document including ownership of the 16cou address on page 38 and that he attempted to forge Kleiman's handwriting.

>>13941461
I'm only reading you back what the officially filed court documents say since you guys are all illiterate. Helping poor illiterate third worlders to not lose their money counts as charity.

>>13941487
>Hurr durr, an affadavit composed for a court case several years ago certifies the authenticity of all documents submitted for a completely different court case.
This is so stupid on so many levels, I don't even know where to begin. Anyone who's not totally braindead at this point is laughing at you, mate. If you aren't a shill I genuinely pity you. Good luck out there.
>>13941515
>you guys are all illiterate
>I DON'T UNDERSTAND SOMETHING VERY SIMPLE. I KNOW EVERYONE ELSE MUST BE THE RETARDED ONES NOT ME

>>13939615
I see people are starting to get it. That pattern recognition kicking in.

>>13938303
Revenge soon!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SucBfMhQb6M

>>13939719
What am I looking at in pic related?

>>13941515
so you don't prosess what you read? You only copy paste to "win" a debate? That explains why it feels like I argue with a parrot

>>13941574
>Hurr durr, an affadavit composed for a court case several years ago certifies the authenticity of all documents submitted for a completely different court case.
I have only talked about what's in the document. Everything I'm saying is true if the document was really submitted by Craig. The forged contract with the forged signature is referenced in the 12th item on the affidavit.

>>13941487
Also want to add this kind of either willful or accidental stupidity is why the Satoshi affair needs to be adjudicated before an actual court where low-IQ noise-makers like MBqTnJPZ can be filtered out with prejudice.
>>13941603
It's an extract from a document submitted to the court as part of the discovery process for the Wright-Kleinman case. It was obtained from a computer owned by one of Craig's companies and was obviously doctored by someone who had access to the computer, probably as part of some plan to discredit CSW and possibly blackmail him.
Whoever it was did a good job shooping the fake doc, but they made one mistake: one of the address lines is much blurrier than the others.
>>13941614
He's just falling back on pure word salad nonsense at this point. >>13941646
Max cringe.

>>13941708
>'s just falling back on pure word salad nonsense at this point
Yeah, it is really annoying. At this point I dont know if he i stupid or a shill or if it's just bait. It's tiresome anyway. It's like arguing with our old friend O1G

>>13941614
This is how logic and the law works. Room for interpretation is deliberately removed.
What was the relevance of the company having been owned by Craig at some point? Why are you confusing any point as much as you possibly can instead of reading even one line of the relevant documents you claim to know everything about?
>>13941708
I know you faggots are "just pretending" but you're still cancerous idiots.

>>13941708
Ah I see now.

Craig himself also went for the throat on that one

>>13941758
Don’t waste your precious time with these brainlet
Let them jerk off each other on craig bullshits
There is no end to all this shilling shitshow
They should sign or gtfo

>>13941758
>This is how logic and the law works. Room for interpretation is deliberately removed.
Your problem is that you are NOT able to interpret. You don't think or process what you read. You just see the words and then reiterate them as if they're an argument in itself. It's kind of eerie to experience people like this first hand. Makes me think of "1984" by George Orwell.You should read it

>>13941755
They are paid kikes, their pilpul is unmistakable. Most likely hired by the same Jewish astroturf firm, O1G included.

Argue with enough jews and you will recognize their rhetorical signature pretty easily.

>>13941856
Every single time. Really makes me think desu

>>13941832
Please help me as I've tried to help you. What is there to interpret? Either Craig submitted that fraudulent affidavit or he didn't. If it's confirmed by the lawyers in the document and the court which it was filed in that is 100% confirmation that Craig pretended to own the 16cou address and that he forged the handwriting of Kleiman. There's no room for interpretation, this affidavit is not a work of poetry or is it? Do you mean the forged handwriting and pretending to own those addresses was some kind of political satire?

It's very easy to dispute the document in court if it's fake but if he was doing that Craig couldn't be talking publicly about it at the same time.

>>13941917
>. If it's confirmed by the lawyers in the document and the court which it was filed in that is 100% confirmation that Craig pretended to own the 16cou address
Ask yourself this one simple question: Is the above quote true?

>>13941917
>Please help me
If you can't understand that
>it's confirmed by the lawyers in the document and the court which it was filed
Is not a true statement, for reasons you seem unable to grasp, you are beyond help.
>no room for interpretation
There shouldn't be, except you are interpreting the presence of a separate, old affidavit as proof of a newly produced set of documents, including an obvious forgery.
>if he was doing that Craig couldn't be talking publicly about it at the same time
You must be a Jewish shill given how much you love talking out of your ass and just making shit up. >Gradually I began to hate them...

Just caught up with this excellent bread.
Hate to admit it, but the Creg shills seem to have a point here. That list of addresses is queerer than a 3 dollar bill. Doesn't make sense at all that Creg would have made the forgery.
Fuuuuck, I might have to join team creg now. Fuuuuck.
Honk Honk!

>>13942007
>There shouldn't be, except you are interpreting the presence of a separate, old affidavit as proof of a newly produced set of documents, including an obvious forgery.
The declaration by Stephen D'Emilio with the addresses was also submitted in November 2013 with the affidavit as part of that older case. You can call Australia to look up the original files and copies from the different lawyers if you're motivated to do that. It's easy to confirm as true or false, as it is now there's no information to dispute it except what a known conman says on twitter.

>>13942153
>The declaration by Stephen D'Emilio with the addresses was also submitted
you mean this one? >>13940270

>>13942153
The affidavit is for a completely different case you dunce. Three different anons have all told you the same thing how can you still not get it lmao

>>13942198
Maybe. If true that should be easy to confirm instead of whining about it on social media. You won't accept it even when every single person involved and the Supreme Court of New South Wales verifies the claim to the 16cou address was submitted by Craig and his lawyer in 2013.

>>13942201
Are you just trying to trigger me? Why would anyone think I don't know this?

>>13940197
Can anyone shed some light on this document? It clearly says that the plaintiff is Craig Wright, and it really contains the 16cou.. address on page 38

>>13942201
Unless you mean there's a third case I don't know about and two of the cases happen to have been filed in November 2013. That would still be irrelevant.

>>13942358
It's fake just like >>13940090 >>13939719
See >>13940270
Somebody wanted to ruin Wright and faked a bunch of easily falsifiable bullshit. They probably planned to use these docs as "evidence" for an expose or other smear campaign, but now they got caught up in the discovery process for the Kleiman where they can be easily show to be forgeries. The truth will come out of the court case eventually. Cap this.

So, we have this (unless the document has been altered by intruders):

Document 24-4
Paintiff: Craig Steven Wright
Defendant: W&L INFO DEFENSE RESEARCH LLC

and the 16cou... address on page 38, which is also Document 24-4 (unless, again, it has been altered by agents)

>>13942461
Both were altered. Ask yourself where those docs actually came from and whether or not their authenticity has been attested to in the ongoing Kleiman case. (It hasn't been)

>>13942482
As to why they were altered, see >>13941708

>>13942458
>>13942482
Aha, just like I suspected. I knew that Greg's agents broke into the judiciary storage house. They've already done it before. Thanks for the confirmation.

>>13942358
The Kleiman family is suing Craig. These documents from when Craig sued Kleiman in 2013 surfaced in the process of discovery so the Kleiman family compelled the Australian courts to produce them. Because one of the addresses made a signed statement saying Craig is a fraud Craig is now claiming on social media the addresses in these documents were altered from the originals. This would mean people are taking a lot of risks that will backfire just to embarrass Craig. If he's telling the truth regarding the documents the courts can confirm that. As it is public court documents we know of say he's full of shit. If he is Satoshi he can sign a message instead of spending countless hours writing these blogs. The reasonable conclusion is that the compulsive liar is lying.

>>13942620
By the process of discovery it's meant it was dug up from the archives?

>>13942520
It wasn't the "judiciary storehouse," you pothead. The docs were obtained from computers belonging to Wright's company and were hoovered up during discovery. They were altered before they touched the court process.
Obviously Greg himself didn't do the alteration, but some think that whoever was responsible might have been in contact with our favorite scraggly neckbeard.

>>13942664
During discovery each side can request/compel the other side to produce relevant information. In this case, mountains of harddrives from Wright's company.
>>13942620
>Kleiman family compelled the Australian courts to produce them
The price is wrong again, bitch. The Aussie courts haven't produced anything. Both of those forgeries came from Wrights company.

>>13942729
There are originals in Australia and copies in the files of some of the lawyers. If these copies weren't produced by the court they're verifiable by them so anyone forging them would not get away with it.

>>13942686
>The docs were obtained from computers belonging to Wright's company and were hoovered up during discovery.
Document 24-4 you mean? That's damn interesting. I just took my gun and I'm going to shoot in the air if it's true. Where can I see the protocol of extraction? I want to see their computer model (if it's Mac, then it's kill)

>>13942765
They were counting on not having this whole business going to court. The goal was probably to smear and/or blackmail Craig for money or his silence.
What do you even mean "get away with it?" The docs were forged and distributed anonymously. Zero risk for the blackmailer if they stayed anon.

>>13942885
I bet Greg went as far as to employ the Zaibatsu. They can actually threaten judges and forge documents on the spot. You can't turn them down because they'll literally send a pig's head to your home.

>>13942885
Get away with it as in base anything of significance on it like a court case. You're working so hard to avoid the obvious conclusion that the compulsive liar is lying that you have to make up ghost ninjas. I don't think I can trust anything ever again with these ninja ghosts around.

>>13938373
Didn't they just change the way mining is done in a retarded way?

>>13938303
This is Craig Wright
He, and his footmen attempted to hijack the BTC community and then BCH, which ironically was their own creation. Craig's nChain has 1000+ patents. That's when the smear campaign against BTC started. All of the so called "evidence" proving BTC is a fraud is manufactured by Craig Wright and his men. Make no mistake, Craig Wright is not Satoshi and alot of people have serious money and social stakes in keeping on with the current narrative that BSV is the real BTC. Make up your own mind.

>>13939512
>>13939540
>>13939555
>t. greg

>>13939582
That isn't how /biz/ works though. Threads are created at the same rate as /pol/ with not even a quarter of the posts.

>>13942967
Snark is not an argument.
>>13942993
>compulsive liar is lying
>Argument by tautology
Whatever you say man. You are clearly never going to be convinced. I'm just an OG leaving breadcrumbs for the 1 in 20 anon who is not a completely brainwashed retard. Have a nice life!

>>13941007
>supreme court of New South Wales

Where in Florida is that? Sounds Commonwealth to me, but w/e.

>>13941315
>Craig doesn't seem to want to dispute it in court, only on twitter.

who is worse, 'creg = le god' faggots or 'have sex' cockends? I'm torn who to summon hellfire, misery and eternal pain upon first

>>13941580

>patents
the ultimate buzzword, almost as bad as partnerships

>>13941325
Yeah but you got all your data from the mammoth himself and he looks more like a little rodent if you ask me

So when he signs the block he can be a mammoth. Until then? Stiff

>>13943037
>That's when the smear campaign against BTC started
Delusional. We've all been shitting on BTC since at least August of 17' and it isn't because of particular personalities. It's because BTC is a complete and utter shitcoin that broke away from the original protocol to form a banking layer and sell "sidechains" to fucking retards.

>>13944055
Have kids

>>13944106
Kek, that analogy got you didn't it? That's why you felt compelled to respond with a blatant falsehood (there is no evidence for CSW = Satoshi not provided by CSW himself) as a coping mechanism. Your rather deny the obvious than reevaluate your brainwashing.

>>13944187
what is this autism i'm reading? i'll support creg coin over this bullshit

>>13938303
Retard

Craig became an intel asset when his home was raided.
He is not the creator of Bitcoin. He's a trojan horse they inserted into the crypto community as a fail-safe for Bitcoin forking/scaling. If he was legitimate, he would have slaughtered the anti-SegWit2X propaganda by signing a message. He didn't and has yet to provide any substantial proof of him authoring the whitepaper.