/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13818141
Why does it even matter if he's Satoshi or not at this point? The entire point of crypto is that it operates without the need for a leader, without the need or care for regulation by governments. If Craig actually is Satoshi, then Satoshi is a cunt that only cares about making money off his invention, and needs to be exiled from this space like the others before him, like Roger and Jihan.

Am I taking crazy pills? Is he the type of person that you'd actually be happy with following? Someone that constantly uses the law to get what he wants, says Bitcoin always leads back to cash, and throws his money around to show off and basically screaming at people to recognize how smart he is? If he's Satoshi, then Satoshi can fuck right off.

>>13818141
C O P E
O
P
E

>>13818151
Good response and reasoning, thanks for proving me right.

>>13818151
kek, how many of these "I don't care if he even IS Satoshi" cope threads you guys reckon we'll see over the next week?

>>13818141
That's basically what Craig has been saying all this time

>>13818141
protip: it doesn't, but people are still angry because he claims to be.

>>13818164
We will see them as BTC crashes all the way to $0 before the mass suicides happen

>>13818151
Holy fuck. This is the best meme. Never stop this.

If he is Satoshi, we can laugh at the keys he lost.

>>13818141
> Is he the type of person that you'd actually be happy with following?
YES! If you had read his medium posts you would too. He is utterly based and redpilled. He know what's up, and is seriously what bitcoin needs at this point. Bitcoin will die without him. Just look at how core/blockstream managed to cripple btc. What do you think will happen the next halving when block are too small to contain enough transactions and fees to make up for the reduced block reward? Bitcoin dies without transaction volume, and the time is running out. Seriously read Craig and get woke. https://craigwright.net/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/

>>13818164
But it's not that he doesn't care, it's that it doesn't matter who it is. To anyone. Personally I am curious to find out who satoshi was but in 2019 crypto has grown way beyond the point where satoshi would have much say. When he disappeared in late 2010 his influence was already diminished but do you seriously believe that he could come back 9 years later and hijack the whole thing? His opinions would be interesting, doubtlessly, but that's about it. Bitcoin is on an entirely different league right now.

He's obviously in despair after losing that huge lawsuit to Hal Finney's parents

>>13818261
This. He's coming out way too late if this is seriously the case. Crypto's already fanned out so far from just Bitcoin, and it's going to be hilarious watching him try to lord over the entire space

>>13818141