/biz/ - Business & Finance

https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop

The era of shitcoin is over.
All in bsv

>>13784151
>g'day cunts it's me, I'm that bloke satoshi. I did the bitcoin and that honest I did.

>>13784420
It's over, Craig won.

>>13784151
>Satoshi has to be someone who fits more to my own views.
It pisses me off that this is the main driver behind people denying him being Satoshi. For that reason alone I hope that by some miracle he is indeed Satoshi, I want all of these braindead morons to get STIFF.

>>13784478
No, I'd be all behind him if he didn't feed his loyal followers fabricated garbage

>>13784151
> Craig Wright makes an application to the office saying that he's satoshi nakamoto
The fact that bsvjeets are unironically trying to tout this as proof basically proves they're brown cockroaches.
Imagine lacking such a basic level of reading comprehension.
Such is the state of the eternal bsv mouthbreather who falls for 50iq scams. I don't even have pity for you anymore. Just contempt.

>>13784236
>https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop
>Are you satoshi?
>Yep
>Ok then here's your copyright
so this means absolutely nothing then

"In a case in which a work is registered under a pseudonym, the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author."

"As a general rule, when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made."

>>13784714
You don't know that's how it went down.
I am a junior lawyer and though I don't specialize in copyright, I can tell you there was likely some kind of further confirmation than just asking the man "are you really sure you're Satoshi?" especially since this case is very high profile.
You can easily get all correspondence relating to the case through a FOIA request. Somebody should do it.
>As a general rule
Which in legalese means, "for most routine cases." I don't think this was a routine case, do you?

>>13784151
>Strewth! I'm satoshi cunt!

>>13784999
CHECKED

>>13784151
so creg confirmed he is the applicant for the patents
with this he committed yet an other fraud
orange is the new black

>>13784151 (OP)
so creg confirmed he is the applicant for the copyright claim
with this he committed yet an other fraud
orange is the new black

>>13784999
except the US govt came out and said his claim, as stated, is full of shit

>>13784714
>Ok then here's your copyright
no such thing happened
more like this:
>mr wright can you confirm you lay claim to the copyrights of satoshi nakamoto full knowing you commit fraud if you are not actually him (not that we check)
>yes
>ok your registration is now official (liar)

>>13784999
Checked and stiff!

>>13784151
Read the rest of it, you stupid fucking brainlet.

Literally 0 verification, it all relies on him to "confirm". That confirmation is "Yes".

That's all he did.

I do like how it says people submitting false claims could be subject to penalties..

>>13784151
>2019
>still no signature
neat

>holds 1m btc
>doesnt dump to support BSV

ok sure

>>13784151
Copyright office: You are copyrighting the whitepaper and you are the author?
Cumgargler Sanjay Wrong: Yes
Copyright office: Just to confirm - you are the person behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin?
Cumgargler Sanjay Wrong: Yes

Calvin Ayre shills: CSW CONFIRMED AS SATOSHI BTCORE AND BCH GONNA HAVE TO CHANGE THEIR NAME WOLOLOLOLOL

>>13785346
>Someone who intentionally includes false information in an application may be subject to penalties.

Teehee.

>>13785346
Lawyer-anon here just getting back from the other thread. That is almost certainly not how it went down. For high profile cases there is usually something extra needed.
Fuck it, at this point I might just FOIA the docs myself and post them for everyone's entertainment.

>>13785519
>high profile cases

>>13784151
CopyWright wins

>>13784420
noooooooooo

>>13784596
You have mental issues, seek a psychologist.

>>13785250
They LITERALLY confirmed he was the author, how fucking buttmad are you right now lmao

GET. FUCKING. REKT. SHILL

>>13785044

No, Coindesk did. You just are incapable of figuring things out unless some DCG-owned news outlet tells you.