/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13575812
if you wait 7 years

>>13576022
And you move to Zimbabwe

>>13575812
Eventually yes but not anytime soon

>>13575812
Been wondering this for the past year fren, as I've slowly bought myself into a stack. My goal is 1k before the bull, still not achieved though.

So bump.

>>13576109
How can anyone not afford 1k link in 2 pay checks?

>>13576286
because not everyone is a pajeet with dreams of being homeless and/or suicide

>>13576072
or eastern europe
latvia is the promised land

>>13576109
Same. Anyone who browses this board has to have 1k suicide insurance stack.

>>13575812
I'm an oldfag that has been in LINK since the first day it was listed on etherdelta. the price predictions on biz are fucking retarded. literally meme numbers that newfags started believing and have repeated so much that they are commonplace now. best case scenario for LINK in the next 1-2 years is roughly $10. if crypto goes on another major bull run in 2021 then it could go higher but don't count on it. you LITERALLY need 100k to make it.

>>13577844
you're not as old of a fag as you think you are and havent witnessed what absolute peak speculation looks like.
When ETH was still a shitcoin anyone throwing predictions over $1000 each seemed delusional.

Im not saying LINK will be $1000 EOY, but I will not be surprised to see it valued at $100-$200 a token during a speculative rush.

>all this FUD
link is hitting $1k whether you like it or not

>>13577844
Fuck off, Timo.

>>13577871
I was here for ETH, Antshares, IOTA, all that shit. even if you believe LINK can eventually reach the market cap of ETH the supply is 10x (350M now but will be 1B by that time) that would put it at about $16.

>>13578151
market cap mans literally nothing

>>13577871
>>13577992
this is pure moonboy delusion. You're absolutely retarded and lost perspective on this whole thing a while ago. Chainlink already has a marketcap of 230 million dollars. After a 5x which is already a fucking bubble pipedream we are at Monero/Tron territory. Monero has been around forever and Tron is the second biggest twitter normie hype coin around with literally half a million followers. Do you see Chainlink going much beyond that? It's probably very overvalued already for the attention that it's getting, which is not much in the grand scheme of things. It has no product, most partnership do not require the token as they plan on doing shit on private chains and enclaves or just want adapters for their APIs to feed their shit centralized. There is no way in hell that 1000 Chainlink will give you generational wealth status. That would require it to reach 3000-10000$ and surpass the whole crypto currency marketcap at the top of the bubble when fucking fortnite kids were donating in bitcoin for the memes, when CNN was talking daily about it to boomers and when every fucking nigger held xrp and shiet. Don't fool yourself, you'll be happy once it reaches 2$ which will make it one of the best investments during the last couple of years. Stop living in fantasy land.

A realistic estimation, long term, is indeed 50-100k LINK. We're not at the bottom anymore, the bottom was ICO price to 17 cents. You're not getting any cheap LINK anymore, it's already at a heavy fucking premium.

>>13578195
>It has no product, most partnership do not require the token as they plan on doing shit on private chains and enclaves or just want adapters for their APIs to feed their shit centralized.
Go back and read the archives from last year dumb newfag. You have no understanding of smart contracts nor chainlink.

>>13578233
I bought LINK during the ICO. I have a clear understanding of smart contracts. No need to argue with people who think Chainlink is actually immutable and trustless at the same time

>>13578195
i will be ecstatic when it reaches $2, but i really think you are underestimating it

>>13578311
>tfw i was unironically right that all of the link FUD is coming from baghodlers so they can accumulate more

see you at $1k fellow hodler

>>13578194
You don't know what literally means

>>13578195
>normie fomo generates crypto value
Stupid and naive

>>13577844
Sorry bucko, even $1 million is not really "making it". You can stop working if you live a super meager lifestyle, and hope your long term investments hold up. It's not as much money as it used to be. A normal person house is more than a quarter of that.

>>13577844
what you just said literally makes you a newfag, youve seen nothing

>>13578151
Eth 2017 peak ~$1400/10 = $140, that's my number

>>13575812
not enough to retire but enough to be comfy.

>>13578151
retard, if chainlink reaches the same mcap of ETH it'll be $300 per token.
most tokens will be locked up in nodes or held by sergey and co. will always have a circ. supply of 350 mil or less.
link will reach $50 per token if it can match XRP's current mcap. (It will).
you guys are seriously underestimating and will be crying when you sell too soon.

Rather be invested in ETH than CHAINLINK. The former has unlimited potential while the latter is a scam.

>>13576672
If you don't have $1200 in disposable income every month you literally have no chance at making it.

>>13579217
so you need 1 link per every month remaining in your life?

>>13579037
The first sane post I've seen ITT.

>>13578341
You're confusing rational thought with fud. I'm holding 80k LINK, it's nearly my entire portfolio, but i don't expect more than $5/LINK which is still a huge gain

>>13579037
Muh shitcoin factory. Eth can spit out shitcoins nonstop and it won't mean anything without chainlink connecting muh data silos

>>13575812
Only if you had it on PAX and set the buy orders enough. Your singularity came and went. That was the prophecy. LINK is finished

>>13577899
>>13578233
check this man

>>13578601
Thanks gramps but you're just making my point. You need AT LEAST 6 figures in LINK if you want to make it in the next couple years, best case scenario. 10k stacks will continue working at McDonald's indefinitely

>>13580044
Just knowing so many snobs hold 50k+ stacks ia depressing and should tip you off that this likely won't ever touch double digits and beyond

>>13580186
Lol

>>13580105
this

>>13578195
>buying Apple stock in 1986
D E L U D E D