/biz/ - Business & Finance

I'D LIKE TO SHAKE HANDS WITH EVERYONE WHO SURVIVED THE CRYPTO WINTER

>>13508153
>oy vey goy
bearish

>>13508164
>>13508153
we made it frens
we are all gonna make it

>>13508164
lambos are back on the menu frens

old news

but grandpa boomer u said its going back to 1000? u shorted right? i hope you did with 100% of your retirement fund so you cant afford hookers anymore

>>13508153
6k is reached. What's next? Are we gonna go up 10k this week or not?

>>13508299
10K end of month conservatively

>>13508164
Thank you, sir. My little sweet heart is pounding right now. ʕ ꈍᴥꈍʔ

>>13508304
Delusional but a lot more fun than the Bobos.

>>13508322
pro tips: it only needs to 1.5x for 10K

>>13508304
Alright thanks. But what about LTC? Halving is coming this August.

>>13508153
>everyone is bull

Shorted

>>13508164

>>13508153
didnt this retarded boomer call a massive dump early this year lmao

All the short selling assholes are piling in to short $6k but rates are so high there will be a massive short squeeze to push us over $6k and start the golden bull.

Imagine gambling away all your money

>>13508153
This uptrend seems kinda wobbly, especially compared to the one Peter is comparing it to. Nevertheless, he is the infallible one.

>>13508164
thank you fren

>>13508482
or push us over 6k and then dump on all the late longs

>>13508352
kek

i'm just here for the drama. elon needs to ditch tesla and move full-time into cryptospace.

>>13508330
>math

>>13508153
ye

this mofo called for a BTC dump to $3.5k when it was at $18k!!! and every mofo thought he was smoking crack.

Now he tells people it's going to go back to $19.8k and everyone thinks he's on crack again.

People just don't learn.

>>13508153
>peter brandt

────
──────
────
──
──

>>13508153
Funny how he doesnt include the line before the last cycle bottom.
Thats some cherry picking there

>>13508153

Yeah but how much of this is organic growth vs. people capitulating out of tether? Real question for the bulls, does that not even matter to you?

>>13508164
I ALMOST KILLED MYSELF BUT I'M SO GLAD WE MADE IT

DRINKING SOME SIPS FOR THE ONES WHO COULDN'T BE HERE WITH US

>>13508340
Already started being priced in. Look at how it has done in 2019

>>13509101
parabolic movement is usually followed by 80% correction. Every newfag knows this

>>13509155
Is this some sort of abstract Schlomo or am I just seeing it everywhere now?

WE MADE IT! BEARS BTFO ETERNALLY! BUY BUY BUY MY BULL FRIENDS WE ARE ALL GONNA MAKE IT!

>>13508153
I was just reading some economic research all about how these guys made bubbles in a lab setting, they included a lot of data about them and all. My point is that it is literally never coming back. It can't.
What they found was that bubbles were always created by the participation of inexperienced traders, and that when people had the opportunity to learn, they made trades far more consistent with fundamentals.
Now I understand btc has fuzzy fundamentals but even so the idea of repeating the bubble is a fantasy at best.
Think about what the market was like at that time. It was filled with people who had no idea what they were doing. They have zero experience in any capital market. Now, they've seen it inflate and pop, they've learned a bit, and won't trade past realistic values.
Maybe you're thinking: a new group of dumb buyers can come in. And that is possible. But the old, experienced group keeps prices down. This is why stock market bubbles are relatively uncommon - happening when there are inexperienced participants, ie, ninja mortgages and dotcom era (unless the pros let it happen to get rich, which does happen, but that's another story). It's why volatility decreases over time, too.

Here's the paper if you care to read it.
https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spring09/cos444/papers/porter-smith03.pdf

>>13510163
my twenty year old cat was killed yesterday by a car, it hurts bros

>>13508164
Phew, that was exhausting.

bitcoin is going to 6500. may and june will be alt season. i think cosmos/atom and own/chx will perform the best

>>13510235
By definition, "the participation of inexperienced traders" depends on how many additional inexperienced traders are left. A bubble that hasn't reached a systemic level can always be fueled by more inexperienced traders, unless new laws or regulations are made that prevent new inexperienced traders from participating.

The crypto bubble never reached a systemic level, and there seems to be more political will in letting crypto grow than killing it (because people are still greedy). So, the bubble will return at least one more time.

>>13508919
Anyone who goes long at 6k is a fucking retard. Don't get me wrong the muh sub 3k bears are just as retarded. But a dip will come.

>>13510336
you are spamming that in every thread pajeet. unironically kys bagholder dumbfuck

>>13508164
Everyone buy now, its perfectly safe.

>>13508164
There's a shimmer of hope today. We made it.

>>13510344
What a cope. We never run out of idiots. It's that the more times you have a bubble, the more people are familiar with them. So those who got shit on in this last bubble will join the ranks of old and prevent a bubble from forming in the future by selling. Just throwing in some buzzword makes it no different.
Read the paper I linked, they do exactly what you say cannot happen in a lab setting. Spoiler: the bubble doesn't form again.

>>13508153
Fuck. That boomer is a huge retard. Unironically bearish.

>>13508348
it will only be over again once normies start investing and talking about how it's smart

>>13508164
>handshake accepted
I'd like to pour some out on the kerb for the following tripfags and namefags. Minute silence please

>RenkoBro
We'll miss you, fag. Sorry you never got that $1500 buy-in

>Z
Predicted bounce off 8k. Probably an hero'd by now

>AK-gas fag
Too stupid to make it

>Lambo anon
A.k.a Uzzi, popped up on the LINK scene round about recent high in Satoshis. I think he sucks dick for money somewhere in El Paso now

Congratulations anons who remember Chinese New Year, Wall St, Tether FUD in too many instalments to count. The pink fields. I'm going to call it. We bull nao. See on the other side, anons. Remember to sell this time

>>13510220
Why would you even share something that is so horribly artifacted?

Bitcoin literally won’t go above 6k at this stage. It’s going to crash back down to 4,xxx first.

>>13508153
A single, giant, $100 million order on April 2nd is supposed to have "shifted the trend"
If this can be done I don't get what the point of watching MAs is then, as this latest pump has essentially all the hallmarks of a pump and dump

>>13508153
Did this loser see that we went up and down that MA several times in 2015?

>>13511804
>muh meme quality
lel

>>13508352
underrated post

>>13509101
he never said it's going back to $19.8k. he implied it's going to X, where:

340 -> 19,800
$5,700 -> X

now go calculate X.
(hint: it's NOT linear)

>>13508164
hello, fren