/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13263287
Theres no reference to iExec on that video. Stop fake shills

>>13263287
>he doesn't run a remote robot farm that is secure, traceable, and verifiable thanks to iExec and PoCo, with products delivered by AI and robots to buying customers, straight from farm to home.
Damn it feels good being on a beach and seeing logistics of all of my minion robots doing my bidding all over the world that I rent out and sell to everyone.

I wonder what other neat advancements we'll see :) It's only a matter of time. If you hold 5k iExec for 2-5 years you'll be a multi millionaire pretty much guaranteed. You're welcome /biz/.

>>13263325
I put iExec logo on it because this type of tech will be decentralized thanks to iExec and Poco. Watch the SLAM robot video to learn why this is inevitable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUDO8BeeqBg&t=4s

biz will never make it

>>13263343
>>13263347
>>13263413
getting kinda desperate? What's the matter, still way short of your shill quota?

>>13263422
No I just enjoy mocking the retards that flood this board. I'm up on my money enough thanks to RLC to shitpost all day if I wanted to.

you can't shill somenthing which RLC isn't doing. I know you are enamourade of your investment, of your coin , but you should remain with feet on the ground.
What's the great advantage of running those bots on the blockchain?

>>13263287
Humans btfo'd for eternity

>>13263502
>you can't shill somenthing which RLC isn't doing
Says who? A retard like you? LOOOOOOOOL
Imagine thinking you can tell people what they can and cannot speculate on. There's enough information surrounding iExec and robotics that even a 5 year old child could imagine this being powered by iExec.

>What's the great advantage of running those bots on the blockchain?
Decentralized Farming.
Wow that was hard. You just proved it that biz is full of retards.

>>13263511
>proved it that biz is full of retards
You sure did

>>13263547
Imagine not having the imaginary capability to understand that you can speculate on a tech that can -already- control robots/AI and can be applied to the robot in the OP.

>>13263511
>>What's the great advantage of running those bots on the blockchain?
Decentralized Farming.

French here, maybe not being native english it's hard for me to understand what you mean with ''farming''.
Do you mean ''people farming with their idle PCs'' or do you mean ''robots farming a field'' ?
In any case, why all this being decentralized should it be better than a centralized farm?
Where is the advantage?
P.S. I own a suicide bag of rlc

>>13263614
>Do you mean ''people farming with their idle PCs'' or do you mean ''robots farming a field'' ?
Clearly robots farming a field based on the subject matter in both the image and the youtube video.

>In any case, why all this being decentralized should it be better than a centralized farm?
If you don't understand why decentralizing anything is better than centralized versions of that, then you do not understand the core elements that make decentralization so valuable in the first place.

It's extremely complex and I don't feel like writing an essay to you when you can barely understand English, however there are probably many advantages to this.

You could have:
>publicly funded decentralized farms
>amazon-like service where food is delivered straight to the buyer, eliminating all middle men, and making food cheaper/more available/more sustainable thanks to efficiencies
>personally ran remote farms as a business. Farmville is now real life and the goods get delivered automatically while you reap real benefits.
>farming is extremely old tech and hasn't truly been "updated" since the inception of tractors. Smart farms.
>Since robots/AI are more accurate, it drives costs down while giving more sustainability thanks to better efficiencies and less environmental impact

There's probably some more but I don't feel like thinking of more. As this may be 5-15 years away, it goes to show what RLC is really capable of in the near future. It's exciting as fuck.

>>13263674
Oh and also, imagine renting a portion of a farm to produce a certain amount of goods per rent-cycle for the buyer.

I could probably go on and on if I just sat here and thought of more shit and I'm sure it could get quite complex.

>Trusting Mashable, the new Verge

This bot is a joke, weed killer gets diluted after 1 rain

>>13263709
You're delusional if you think robots like this aren't possible/coming in better versions in the near future.
>weed killer gets diluted after 1 rain
What does this even mean?

Shit fud 0/10 try again

>20x less herbicide

bullish for the environment. people freak out about fossil fuels but i think a much more sinister enemy of the environment is factory farming practices. were spraying insane amounts of pesticides and herbicides into the environment and it gets in soil runoff and gets into municipal water and it leaves residues on the food that we eat and causes all sorts of crazy health effects over time.

if in the future we're spraying less poison into the environment people would get a lot healthier. based robots.

>>13263674
Honestly I see a lot of hype, but no real results. Also there are other platform that are scalable for doing this, instead of releying into the shitty eth pos 2.0. that can never be able to handle all this, and to scale in the way you described

>>13263817
Theres no other platform for offchain computing. Blockchain tx scalability doesnt solve computation of smartcontracts. Only iExec can do that right now.

>>13263817
>but no real results
No real results?
Clearly demonstrating that the tech works, there's already a good bunch of developed dapps, and plenty more, isn't "real results" to you?

I bet you buy shitcoins that don't have jack shit compared to RLC.

>Also there are other platform that are scalable for doing this
No there aren't. Show me 1 "platform" that can control SLAM robots in the same way that iExec can. Oh wait you can't. Because it doesn't exist and never will.

>instead of releying into the shitty eth pos 2.0
Ah another stupid fudnigger, makes sense.

bye bye retard

>>13263511
>Decentralized Farming.
so if i rlc it helps farms be decntrilized. That makes no sense you fucking retard. Me trading shit coins on an exchange has nothing to do with that

>>13263834
>so if i rlc it helps farms be decntrilized.
This is what I am talking about.
Biz is quite literally fucking full of retards and pajeets, sometimes both!

Weed killer robots absolutely 100% don't need a fucking blockchain for anything. RLC has such retarded shills it's hard to take the project seriously.

>>13263905
I already explained in a post above why this would be a good thing and most likely will be what happens. Traditional farming is on its deathbed.

If you think iExec is a just a "blockchain" you're a fucking retard.

>>13263935
You're delusional. Stop shitting up /biz/

>>13263948
>muh delusional
Say something of value pleb.

>>13263955
Why are you married to this shitcoin? Do you think it's a good replacement for a personality? I can always tell it's you because you have so much impotent rage and keep posting about robots like some obsessed child.

>>13263980
>Why are you married to this shitcoin?
Because it shits on every shitcoin you own.
I'm sorry you don't understand the future. I cannot help you. You will fade away just like every retard that goes against iExec.

>>13263992
>mom i posted the cringy fucking robot again!

>>13264007
>mom i complained about someone shilling me the next 10000x!

>>13264018
You're so insecure it's hilarious. Seething but powerless

>>13264029
Am I? I enjoy educating people. Maybe you're the insecure one because you're raging on my post.

>>13264038
This whole thread is you calling people retards and telling them to shut up when they say something you can't comprehend. I can tell you have all your hopes and dreams riding on this shit. Please diversify a bit so you can be less emotional.

>>13264076
Nah just calling the hopeless pajeets and obvious fudders retards.

Try again. You're one of them!

>>13264080
Seething

>>13263287
Weed robot
dude lmao
Fucking pathetic

>>13264089
>muh seething

>>13264095
Laugh now
Cry later when you realize how stupid you were for not buying a suicide stack.

Hey look, Monsanto made some terminators so a class-action lawsuit won't stop them from poisoning the world.

>>13264202
In the future pesticides will not exist.
We will have robots with iExec powered AI that can pick weeds using robot arms with 100% accuracy and efficiency.

>>13263830
>Clearly demonstrating that the tech works, there's already a good bunch of developed dapps, and plenty more, isn't "real results" to you?

no one is using it tought... why?

>No there aren't. Show me 1 "platform" that can control SLAM robots in the same way that iExec can. Oh wait you can't. Because it doesn't exist and never will.

to control robot you need a bunch pcs and results delivered trought blockchain time stamped, it's nothing man.. you mae it like it was what a great thing... that's the reason it didn't pumped even after the slam meme on youtube

>>13264261
>no one is using it tought... why?
Because it releases in May.
Time will tell as to how many people end up using it, as we all know using new technology takes time for people.
>to control robot you need a bunch pcs and results delivered trought blockchain time stamped, it's nothing man.. you mae it like it was what a great thing... that's the reason it didn't pumped even after the slam meme on youtube

I asked you for..1 fucking coin, and you can't do it. You just resort to some dumb baseless fud that means absolutely jack shit to me.
Shoo pajeet!

>>13263905
>Weed killer robots absolutely 100% don't need a fucking blockchain for anything
yes ... why this would need blockchain?
>Theres no other platform for offchain computing. Blockchain tx scalability doesnt solve computation of smartcontracts

>the computation of smartcontracts
this has no sense... what is supposed to be the computation of smart contracts?
iExec is a marketplace where demand and offer for AWS-like products encounter themselves. It's not all the science and technology you are saying.
The difference with AWS is that this is decentralized, and has also great latency and performance it's not the best
computation of smart contract means nothing fucking brainlet

>>13264313
>yes ... why this would need blockchain?
It needs iExec because it's the only way to decentralize real world robots. As you can see in the SLAM robot video, RLC can ask a robot to do a task, and get a verified and secure result thanks to PoCo.

Tell me another shitcoin that can do this.

>It needs iExec because it's the only way to decentralize real world robots
Why the fuck should I decentralize ''robots'' ?
What's the deal?
Are you afraid that someone will turn robot against humans, lol? And so being decentralized there's no single point of failiure?
let's assume I buy a cleaning robot. Explain me why the hell would I need to decentralize it

>>13264364
>Why the fuck should I decentralize ''robots'' ?
>What's the deal?
Already answered why you would decentralize robots in this case specifically.

>Are you afraid that someone will turn robot against humans, lol?
This is an inevitability if we do not handle AI correctly.
>And so being decentralized there's no single point of failiure?
You're learning!
>let's assume I buy a cleaning robot. Explain me why the hell would I need to decentralize it

Okay, I'll spoonfeed you on this, since we're all here to make money, right?

>buys cleaning robot (or cleaning robot army)
>customer buys robot cleaning service(from you) through an iExec dapp you registered the bot on
>robot gets delivered to location(Either by self-driving deliverybots(also powered by iExec) or other means)
>robot cleans the location and verifies task completion(maybe even with possible video/building layout thanks to PoCo)
>robot uploads task completion to the buyer so they know it's a done job
>everyone is happy, cleaning robot owner gets paid, robot gets delivered back to base, charges up for the next job.

>>13264414
Let's see the case in which I won't use blockchain:

>they take a robot from my farm
>they go to the house to clean and the robot cleans the house
>When the house is clean I pick up the robot
>I send pics of the clean house to my custmer
> I get paid in paypal

You don't need blockchain

>>13264515
>he thinks his singular, manual labor can compete with my giant army of self-delivering robots while I sit on the beach in Cancun sipping on some drank

You do need blockchain, or well, if you wanna remain poor then you don't.
You aren't smart if you think your plan is better. You would rather pay people to deliver robots, pay employees to clean houses(maybe the buyer doesn't want that, because humans are shit and steal stuff), pay for gas costs, other bullshit costs of running a human-led business, etc.

This is just ONE thing iExec will be able to do in our robotic future. Of course iExec has many other uses ranging from AI to general compute tasks, but this is just a very interesting use case.

Ok this makes sense.
But Holochain as a better approach to dapps scalability and won't use iexec to power the dapp

>>13264663
Holochain has no consensus algoritm.
its just a fancy git hub

>>13264663
>ok makes sense but let me shill my shitcoin
iExec can scale near infinitely. That's a huge point of iExec in general.
Explain why holochain is "a better approach" because to me it just seems like you're another shit-brained fudding cunt trying to shill a shitcoin on my thread.

Ok this thread is going nowhere and OP doesn't help.

My 2 cents in the context of farm robot:

By offloading computing to a computing provider, you reduce costs of robots because they can be simpler with a couple of cameras, a 5G connection and a small controller that moves the parts. The AI and computer vision can be offloaded per task to a cloud provider, so the AI decides what to do next, detect bad weed, kill it, etc and send back results to the robot that does the action.

This can be done in a centralized cloud (AWS, Azure,...) or decentralized cloud (iExec), but in the long term decentralized will always be better (less cost, providers fighting per task price, Fog computing, PoCo, etc...)

Does anyone fall for this scamcoin?

>>13264790
>OP doesn't help.
Sure I did. You just expanded on more of the intricacies of why it would be valuable as well. This shit isn't simple my friend. It's extremely complex and fractal.

A centralized service like this would never be able to compete against a decentralized service/marketplace.

>>13264711
>Holochain has no consensus algoritm.
Immunity sistem to exclude bad actors

>>13264716
>iExec can scale near infinitely. That's a huge point of iExec in general.
Explain why holochain is "a better approach" because to me it just seems like you're another shit-brained fudding cunt trying to shill a shitcoin on my thread.

It's a kind of L.N. with bitcoin, Alice wants to see a video hosted on the channel of Bob and needs to interact just with Bob, while the other nodes in the network just verify some small piece of code, called DNA (DHT) the same way like torrent works
In this way it can scale infinitley without compromising security
Eth and blockchain not sure about that
not shilling, I don't have holo but I am considering to buy some

>>13265150
That doesn't explain why it's a better approach than iExec and it doesn't tell me that holo can do anything that iExec can do.

>>13263347
holy shit

>That doesn't explain why it's a better approach than iExec and it doesn't tell me that holo can do anything that iExec can do.

iExec is blockchain agnostic, anyway the holo approach is genius in fact holo is not blockchain and eth 2.0. will never be able to scale as a centralized server or holo
if those boomers manage to became the internet 3.0 than there will be no more space for blockchain or iExec
These is what scares me

>>13265699
None of this makes any sense to me.
Holo can't do anything and looks like a scam peddling proprietary hardware meanwhile RLC works on any configuration.
I don't think holo can do anything RLC can do, personally. You haven't really said anything that tells me it can do anything.

Are there any examples of what holo can do? Videos that show actual examples of a working product? Or is it all hypothetical still like most crypto shitcoins?

>>13264099
>>13264123
can't even take a meme
sad

>>13265729
this video explains:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vfzK_UVlFc

>>13265844
But does it work? Do we have any examples of this? I'm not going to buy a super speculative shitcoin that doesn't at least have an example of working. Seems overly ambitious complicated, and unfeasible so most people won't use it. The value of crypto comes from the communities that use it, so if no one uses holochain it isn't worth anything in reality.

Unless you show me some videos of it actually working I'd rather stick with RLC and maybe buy some speculative HOT bags when it dumps.

Also this guys face just screams "please buy my bags"

>muh decentralized robotics
smart people know this is a useless token for swing trading, you dont actually buy into the 'use case' bullshit? what a retard lmao, no important stuff will ever run on this shit, you are either extremely deluded or are carrying massive bags

>>13266308
>no important stuff will ever run on this shit
Wrong. Natural Language Processing is extremely important. Many other use cases I could go on and on but you can DYOR.

If you don't think AI and robotics are the future of agriculture and menial retail jobs you're a retard.

>>13266256
But does it work? Do we have any examples of this? I'm not going to buy a super speculative shitcoin that doesn't at least have an example of working. Seems overly ambitious complicated, and unfeasible so most people won't use it. The value of crypto comes from the communities that use it, so if no one uses holochain it isn't worth anything in reality.

Unless you show me some videos of it actually working I'd rather stick with RLC and maybe buy some speculative HOT bags when it dumps.


they have a Dapp that is a twitter-like, they are going mainnet soon
The problem is that I have no side money left to buy this shit, I will kill myself if this shit could do an eth, it's unlikley, but better be safe than sorry.. it's one year that this shit came on 4chan, at the beginning it was shilled like Fantom is shilled now.
I tought it was a classical pump and dump
I kept curiosity on it just when I have seen that after one year people still talk about it

>>13266331
yeah robotics is the future, but it wont be 'decentralized' much less running on iExcrement deluded fuck, stop spamming this board and go kys

>>13266356
>they have a Dapp that is a twitter-like
where? i want to see it, otherwise it does not exist
>mainnet
mainnets are memes, iexec has actual dapps already made and it's easy as fuck to adapt most centralized apps to become a decentralized one with iExec.

>>13266357
A lot of robotics will most definitely be running on decentralized platforms for all of the reasons I posted above. You obviously have a low IQ to think otherwise. You go kys retard, you must go back.

>>13266423
nice dunning kruger, enjoy the useless bags. You think you are so smart now with your 'investment', makes perfect sense to you, but mark my words no one will ever use this crap except to pump and dump. Dont even take my word, just wait and see, in 2022 it wont even be on a major exchange

>>13266481
>it wont be 'decentralized' much less running on iExcrement deluded fuck
>nice dunning kruger
Projection.

>>13266481
You wont have to wait that long. In 1 year it'll be used by all dapps, Google, Amazon, MS, etc

>>13266511
>>13266551

>>13266628
That's right crawl into your hole and die with your shit opinion.

>>13263547
Boom roasted

>>13266740
>boom roasted
Cringe

>You wont have to wait that long. In 1 year it'll be used by all dapps, Google, Amazon, MS, etc

iExec used by google for what? lol
in 1 year you will have dapps? what are you saying?

>>13266942
Centralized alternatives cannot compete.
They will hedge with decentralized technologies, iExec being the best of its kind.

Just wait and see. All blockchains need iExec to scale as well.

>>13266976
You're trying so hard mate. Just let it go and your shitcoin will do better

>>13266990
You aren't trying because you can't.

>>13266976
>Centralized alternatives cannot compete.
They will hedge with decentralized technologies, iExec being the best of its kind.


Man do you want to know the truth? I am afraid that somenthing like holochain or Fantom gonna pull an eth, holo was shilled one year ago also, and it's among the most shilled coins. I have learnt about it and if you go beyond the fud about feets, boomers and women in the team, the tech seems surprising, but I don't have any money left to buy

>>13266976
>Centralized alternatives cannot compete.
The truth is that at least in this moment centralized alternatives are way MORE EFFICIENT than decentralized alternatives because they need to verify all the transactions in the network and this doesn't happen with centralized servers
iExec is all about compunting, not scaling (transactions / byte per second)
You don't know even what you have bought... the state of you

>>13267254
Are you retarded? iExec doesnt solve tx scalability, but it does solve smartcontracts scalability. How are all smartcontracts going to scale if everything is done ONchain? You dont even understand what iExec does.