/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13189068
$25 is bare minimum if it keeps it's current value against ETH and the industry as a whole moons. But it will likely be more than $25 because LINK will capture value and increase against ETH.

>>13189068
Are cups of coffee $25? Okay then.

>>13189068
Yes, $25 is very realistic. I would say it will worth anything between $20 and $100 in the next years, maybe $500 tops if everything is smooth and running as planned

Honestly i can see $50 being possible, not much more than that desu

This is only if another bull comes like 2017, not likely though

Why would a useless erc20 token with huge total supply be 25$

>>13189098
They will be.

$25 lmao.
You guys have no idea. This is not a project that if it succeeds will see moderate price action. There is no in between with LINK. The peak will not be $5, $15, $25, $80 etc. You have just TWO options when you decided to go all in on link, and its either

Option A: Link and the team succeeds in what it set out to do and it is the defacto oracle solution for companies and subsidiaries alike and we see the token valued at hundreds and hundreds (possibly even thousands) of dollars a piece driven by pure greed and speculation
OR
Option B: Link and the team fails in a spectacular fashion and the price of the token goes to zero and it will be lost forever in time as the project that "could have been".

Do you get it now?

>>13189098
xrp holders are so salty
only analysis from real linkies is welcome here

>>13189142
good analysis
its well on the way to being the "standard". gonser wouldn't have joined the team otherwise
the real question (and unknown)
is what is stopping them from running it on hyperledger? and if they do use hyperledger as the primary chain, do our linkies have any value since they are erc20 tokens

EO 2019 - $25
2020 - $45
2021 - after some mainstream adoption $175

>>13189142
Link is all or nothing. Either you lose it all, or you end up with nothing.

>>13189068
Not anytime soon. By the time the bull market returns (1+ years away) the circulating supply will be closer to 1B than 350M. It also won't have a screaming 50x run since those only come from wild speculation and the speculation period for LINK is almost up. The only way LINK reaches $25 is if smart contracts gain mainstream adoption (probably 5+ years away) and chainlink remains the industry standard enterprise oracle solution.
>t oldfag LINK marine since a few days after ICO

>>13189243
if you actually know what you're talking about, you know that usually what happens with these projects is that they end up overvalued because of FOMO. Do not underestimate the "oh shit i thought it was a meme" reaction. LINK is a minimum $25 token. That's if it does nothing, but with this absolutely not-before-seen momentum, LINK will be priced in the top 10. Best believe. The API market is already huge, and we are only getting more IOT devices connected. You are thinking way too modestly.

>>13189068
>he thinks 1k is a meme

>>13189105
So what are you expecting in the coming years, a weaker bull than 2017? Like how much weaker?

>>13189288
You're spending too much time on biz smoking hopium. There may not even be another bull run in crypto ever. And smart contract adoption is a long way off. We're in 2019 and still not one of these shitcoins is being used for anything other than trading for other shitcoins. You need to wake up and realize the days of FOMO are gone from crypto and may never return. Normies got burned bad. They think (know) crypto is a scam. And without them (and massive tether printing) you don't get insane speculative bubbles. Those only happen once a decade and rarely in the same industry twice.

>>13189416

This, crypto is dead, everything in crypto can be simply done by the banks in an afternoon of coding, just adding cryptography hashes for accounts and it's done

>>13189416
I have 2k ETH, I don't need LINK.

>>13189416
Also you are one dense mother fucker to say this in the same week XTZ pulled 65% off of staking news. You have no idea what's coming, and you will FOMO later.

>>13189416
Based and cryptopilled.

>>13189068
>Probable
Look at this dipshit, out here with a new Sergey meme not believing 1k EOY, get your ass out of here.

>>13189416
kek. typical post at the bottom of the market. I'm more bullish than EVER after reading this.

>>13189416

>>13189068
Why don't you think the 1K price tag is realistic?

>>13189288
yup this is sound desu

top 10 is 10x in sats which is $5 per LINK. then you have btc moon to 20k from 4k is another 4x. that would make it $20 per LINK.

>>13189243
>By the time the bull market returns (1+ years away) the circulating supply will be closer to 1B than 350M
Literally no evidence of this

link is a biz meme

It will be celestial voyage towards $1000

25 dollar link is 9bn. Check out how high all of the shitcoins got during the 2017 run.

>>13189416
>"There may not even be another bull run in crypto ever."
>How To Spot The Bottom For Dummies!

>>13189211
Kek. Love this pasta

>>13189659
this. /thread

>>13190091
Dude so are you

>>13189211
How old were you when the family determined you were challenged in intelligence? Did you eat a lot of glue?

>>13189437
Lmfao, now that is comedy fucking Gold.

>>13190176
>>13190205
Did you just wake up from nap time, young lady?

>>13189142
So basically a 10% chance to succeed and 90% chance to get your ass rekt.

>>13189103
$20 is realistic. $100 is stretching it. And $500 is down right delusional.

t. 100k link stack.

>>13189169
Don’t worry about private chains. They’re stepping stones. All you need to know is Ethereum building native oracles on the protocol would go entirely against the 4th principle in the Design Rationale.

>>13189718
Never mind. $100 is plausible.

>>13190867
Then you clearly don't understand smart contracts and what happens if chainlink becomes an industry standard.

>>13190902
you are correct, the skies are the limit for price. but its going to take a while for smart contracts to make a real impact in business. ethereum also has to come up to standard with their scalability

>>13189142
What you're saying is we are going to make it?

>>13189437
Cool. Next, we can spend a weekend training the cars to drive themselves. Maybe make it a cool fiver and solve the mailman problem so the other things work double plus good.

>>13189416
> There may not even be another bull run in crypto ever

It's happening now maybe bro, never invest wht you can't lose and you'll be fine. Maybe there will be some oter bull run, the 1 trillion market cap crypto meme remember

>>13189142
Same can be said about ETH tho

So where the fuck are they even at as of now? Any sign of a working product yet?

dude
cup of coffee

$1000 is fud you damn low iq nigger

>>13193382
Oh no... he fell for it...<div class="like-perk-cnt"><img alt="" src="//s.4cdn.org/image/skeletons/18.gif"></div>

>>13189098
In 2-3 years because all they do is print print print print

>>13189416
SAMSUNG, DOCUSIGN, J.P.MORGAN, FACEBOOK, IBM, MICROSOFT... lot of big names are digging in blockchain and crypto... we dont need fomo normies giving us "muh btc will replace fiat" we need these big names corps giving us a real world adoption, and they are trying to.

>>13189146
>xrp holders are so salty
They are ironically the scum of the blockchain-space followed by EOS-hodlers..
>muh adaption
>muh superior tech

I impatiently await the day LINK will surpass XRP

>>13189288
Don't forget that literally no-body out there knows about LINK yet... As soon as we reach Top 10 everyone will know.

there are 2 options
either link will be at 0$ because it will not be adopted
or link will be at hundreds if not even thousands of $
and this is within 10 years max

>>13189718
good point anon
but will there be another bullrun?
wasn't the last one fueled by normie specualtion and icos?
every normie i know who bought back then is holding bags and openly tells me crypto is a scam

You fucks have no idea how much money we’re all going to make..

>>13189211
Check n kek

>>13189068
I just went all in LINK.

>>13189068
LINK can never exceed the price of a Big Mac as then the token cannot function as intended. this was priced in during the shadowfork. Read the whitepaper. I only have 200k LINK which is nowhere near enough to actually make it

>>13189718
the top 10:

>BTC
>XRP
>ETH
>shitcoin
>shitcoin
>copy of BTC
>japanese shitcoin
>XRP copy
>china hustle
>smart refugee cities

$1000 EOY

>>13189068

why is it up on bitthumb with increased volume but volume not counted on cmc?

>is $25 probable?

>>13189416
what has tether to do with it?

>>13189416
This post didn't age well

>>13193333
Checked.