/biz/ - Business & Finance

wen moon

WHEN MAINNET

Will you sue craig for defamation?

>>13043472
>>13043472
>>13043472
when

MAIN

NET

>>13043468
When bathroom?

>True Chads hold 50%/50% 0xBTC/LINK

>>13043470
>>13043472
>>13043480

>>13043475
Who is Craig?

>>13043470
>>13043472
>>13043480

What do you think of OnChain Ventures and fiews.io? How relevant are they or are they literal who's? How much contact is there between team and these 3rd parties?

>>13043468
How much will we see adoption within 2019? When will we, the neet node operators, get a nice piece of the pie? I know the big corps will need to have a nice bit of testing before that but how much time do they really need, more than a couple of years? Could it really take until 2025 for Chainlink to take off?

>>13043468
Estimated price ?

>>13043468
Any clues on any of the larger projects, especially ETH competitors, that are in discussions with the Chainlink team?

Is corda/r3 using cl or only oraclize ?
Is there plans to integrate cl in R3?

Thanks !

>>13043508

>>13043468
How much $ per Link in 2020?

>>13043535
>he doesn't know

>>13043536
OOOOOOOOOOO

>>13043468
Any announcements coming up?

How many people will be running nodes? Has the estimate changed from Sergey's number of 19k? Is that number actually realistic?

>>13043494
Tim curry funny, post morr tim curry when you reply in this thrrad.
Based on tim currys reaction in this gif i would say we are close to mainnet

Was the trx mail fake? Is there collaboration with trx behind the scenes?

>>13043494
BASED

Op pls

>>13043468
DID CHAINLINK TEAM ASK BINANCE TO SURPRESS THE PRICE TILL MAINNET??

>>13043508
Not sure about OnChain Ventures but Fiews.io is an interesting one. I can't really speak about any discussions but the team has communication channels open to anyone willing to contribute to the chainlink network, and it's quite common for someone to reach out.

>>13043512
Adoption happens at different rates. I can't foresee the future but there is an established need for these tools from corporations to government bodies. To answer your question simply, i would say before 2025.

>>13043468
Do you prefer Municipal or Off Brand Marmalade?

>>13043580
I prefer my Babushka's.

>>13043468
Horseshit thread. This dude knows zero.

>>13043556
I wouldn't want to ruin the surprise though.

Am i deluded? I have tens of thousands of united states dollars into this fat mans dreams

>>13043577

what about clcg and linkpool?

>>13043577
Thanks for the reply, I hope I don't have to wagecuck 5 more years but if it comes to that I will do it. Never letting myself get into a situation where I would be forced to sell any of my links.

Can you tell us something that /biz/ has most likely missed and holds immense value in discussing its ins and outs?

>>13043617
Again, I can't speak directly on discussions, but yes those two have reached out to the team.

If you’re in the know, when $1 assblaster disciple

>>13043468
Dearest !xkY larp,
I am but a simple neet, with my small stack
plz give me some hope
anything
im losin it

>>13043612
Me too. We are gullible retards

>>13043632
Not entirely sure on what /biz/ knows or not. The way I think about it is, as the world becomes digitized and incorporates technology into daily life to assist and automate more mundane chores, the more data there is siphoned into networks that need to be able to process that information and record it into a database (blockchain) where it can be readily made available to either be audited and/or referenced at some point in time to all parties involved in that transactions.

>>13043693
How sure are you that LINK is going to become big? Give us a percentage.

What happened to the tron announcement?
The team understands the network effect, so why aren't they releasing mainnet asap? The first network on the scene will get all of the usage, they know that. Or are they so in bed with their big sponsors that they don't care.

>>13043651
Take my hand.

>>13043705
Very sure, but nothing is certain apart from death and taxes.

Is this trip that same shitty larger who posted bullshit about two weeks then on March 4th had nothing but even weaker larping and hoping?

Or is it a different trip? I can't keep these larpers staight

>>13043710
what is ur connection to the team

how many links u have

do u work in this industry

which do you think is biggest market for link: insurance derivatives law or something

I cant think of any interesting questions but thanks for the larp m8 appreciate reading these threads for the hopium

Tim Curry's first line in Home Alone 2 is:

CONCIERGE: "Yes, two at eight, Henri."

Mainnet on the 28th confirmed?

>>13043593
Gross. Grand Mammy's Finest is Off Brand swill you philistine.

>>13043733
I mean damn when this thread started I was pissed at the asinine questions wasting your time, but now I'm pissed at your asinine answers wasting my time.

Say something of value or fuck off christ

From the last thread by !xkYhOIw6wY 2 weeks ago:
>>>/biz/thread/S12923987#p12924281

Any comments on this in retrospect?

god damn i cant wait to kill all of you one by one

Man I'm all in on link but feeling the fomo for req/rlc/hot/sky/bsv

Do you ever feel fomo for other crypto projects?

What would be the most exciting thing you can tell us about, that you think we probably don't know yet?

>>13043805
Seconded -- what say you, non?
>>13043733

>>13043468
How often do you lurk?

>>13043651
can you wait till 2025? you will make more money with the next btc pump then link

>>13043705
Do you need an insider to answer this when /biz/ collectively have found the billion and 2 partnerships? The blockchain industry is literally depending on Chainlink to succeed. Too many projects are relying on it and the ecosystem it created (Linkpool, fiews, CLC Group). And note that I brought up the ecosystem. How many start ups do you know have other start ups formed independently to support the platform before the product is even out? Hell, how many companies do you know accomplished this?

>>13043923
but if we gotta wait till 2025 for anything to happen whats the point?

>>13043903
>the next btc pump
lol.
I believe 1 link will be worth $10k someday, but I'm not that retarded to think that btc or crypto currencies will ever come back

YO OP u skipped my last question fren so what kind of return do you expect from staking linkies on a monthly/annual basis?

>>13043946
yeah i know i making a point kinda. Whats the point of holding link when the can keeps getting pushed down the road. Im starting to really thing this is a fucking scam. its been almost a year now and now 2025 is when we are going to see some real action? pls i might as well start putting my cash into my 401k.

>>13043468
so are you going to drop what you came to drop?or jerk us around more?

>>13043938
Look at it this way; if you could invest in your retirement fund, knowing fully well that if you use this method, you are guaranteed to be retired by 2025, would you?

>>13044016
im a fucking boomer already. its looking like it wont matter either way

>>13043710
EXPLAIN YOURSELF: >>13043805

so threads dead?

Maybe he's being vague because it won't matter anymore in a few days?

are you guys really this fucking stupid and helpless? this dude isnt telling us anything we dont know what the fuck is wrong with you guys holy shit

Tim Curry's bday is 4/19. Maybe pointing to mid April? Are there any events happening at around that time?

>>13044155
im not stupid. Its funny how the faggot took off when people started capping his posts and posting

>>13043468
>>13043490
>>13043494
>>13043577
>>13043637
>>13043610
>>13043693
>>13043710
>>13043733

so what happend to your free time?

>>13044174
>>13044258
The questions you keep asking surrounds main net.

>>13044270
So? Whats the problem

>>13044290
I've already answered it.

>>13044270
Why was it ok to talk about it before but not now?

>>13044270
Cmon give us some details pls
ANYTHING

>>13044301
Because [redacted] is currently in stealth.

>>13044296
What is something new you can tell us?

>>13044270
can you confirm the team has people post here for marketing purposes?

>>13044319
Thomas absolutely posts here, anon. Idk if others do as well

>>13043468
Boring larp. Sage

>>13043468
Do you think corporations like Google that currently enjoy a virtual monopoly over the curation of information will be made obsolete by Oracles?

It seems it would only be a matter of time before somebody developed a means to query the entirety of on and off chain data without going through an intermediary party.

>>13044303
>>13044318
Because you asked nicely. There's been mention of a large logistics company looking at chainlink.

>>13044377
DHL?

>>13044347
Amazing how anons still don't understand. Chainlink is not an oracle, it will be a decentralized network of oracles. Google will simply be one of the thousands of information providers.

>>13044377
>There's been mention of a large logistics company looking at chainlink.
Is this what we've been reduced to? Ambrosus tier bs?

Haven't logged on this faggy board for months. Who's OP? Sergey himself?

I am TIRED of LARPS fucking with you all. SWIFT will announce they are using a custom oracle to settle on CORDA powered by CHAINLINK. now CHAINLINK will be USED by MICROSOFT, FACEBOOK, ORACLE, DOCUSIGN, SALESFORCE, ETC. this is true and this is why they’ve been silent.

>>13044412
if this was sergey i would sell all my link

Sweet, no new info, no clues on mainnet, nothing

We already know they’re the de facto standard but at this point facebook, mck, microsoft and amazon could announce partnerships and nothing would change

When mainnet? My balls are so fucking blue with this hold

>t block 478

>>13044453
Just hang on, it literally happens this year. Sergey has been doing serious work behind the scenes and chainlink mainnet will drop with actual usage.

>>13044377
Logistics like FedEx or UPS?
What would be the smartcontract use case for Such a large logistics company?
pls gib more info

>>13043468
>What is something that you see frequently ignored or misexplained about the project?

>>13044406
This is why it's going to be hard to gain adoption. Even half the fags on this board don't even understand what it is. Imagine explaining this to some mid level manager who has to pass this on to his boss and explain to him why they should set up a node to sell their API data. Kek.

Why iexec is a worse option compared to chainlink in the short term considering adoption will be in 2025

What a waste of fucking life biz
is anymore. Fuck this place. Even the larps aren't even fun or entertaining anymore.

Why are people treating OP like he's Sergey or a member of the team? What proof is there? It's just another larp

>>13044406
I didn’t even mention chainlink let alone characterize it as an oracle.

Your reading comprehension leaves a but to be desired, fren.

As I was saying, if Google is merely one of thasands of information providers among a decentralized network, it stands to reason that one will soon be able to circumvent using third party search engines to query all existent on and off chain data, no?

If not, explain.

>>13044406
continue

>>13043468
Does Sergey have a gf or bf? Asking for a friend

>>13044406
>Life After Google
literally the name of the book

>>13044599
>discussing chainlink with a mid level manager

Even if the trisomy 21 victim ever figures a fraction of it out he'll realize we are coming after his job.

>>13044489
but no price movement till 2025

>>13044599
Also reminder that if you're not a NEET, but in an industry that could utilize smart contracts, don't be a fag. Yesterday I stood in front of the entire management of my company (with some 15k employees) and shilled the fuck out of smart contracts because they'd quite literally save us tens of millions a year, and of course I namedropped LINK when explaining why no one has been able to utilize smart contracts until now.

Do your part, faggots. Smart contracts will revolutionize just about every industry. We just need to force the fuckers to take the leap.

>>13044417
Based. Can you give us anything to back that up besides connecting dots

>>13044174
show me ONE thing hes said that we dont know...been here since the beginning so you got yourself a challenge. as of rn theres absolutely nothing in this thread of value that we havent already discussed/found.

>>13044377
Factom and partners. Old news

>>13044377
what will be better in the future: become a consultant shilling oracle services
or
run a node yourself providing various closed source apis to the network?

>>13044377
>a large logistics company
nice digits. what country?

>>13044748
My child, R3 already uses Oraclize. Swift will need an adapter to settle on CORDA. sergey is a mastermind. There is reason why they’re so tight lipped. I’ll let you in on a secret. Remember the LARPS about Jan 3 with the whole key? Like on Szabos Twitter? Notice how he still has the key but removed the jan 3rd? Go look at chainlink volume for that period, it exploded to 27 million per day for almost 2 weeks. They don’t want you holding but have no choice to let you in you’re smart enough to figure it out. Ari Juels coined POW, szabo coined smart contracts. Now why do you think sergey has these people on his side? Why is sergey such an enigma and we can’t find shit about who he is and where he came from? It all starts to make send when you really think about it.

>>13044377
fed ex

>>13044821
the price surpression makes sense now

>>13043468
Gib discord

>>13044697
Add the following pasta to your online and IRL sales pitch

It’s increasingly apparent with SWIFT adopting LINK to execute smart contracts, Chainlink is to be the industry standard. This is huge because SWIFT is how establishment banks comply with the EU’s PSD2 regulations, but, instead of getting their lunch eaten with red tape LINK allows these banks to comply with PSD2 while making even MORE money due to cost savings in what will be the next generation of derivative markets. It’s basically their “fuck you” to regulatory agencies.

But that’s not all. Consider the following conundrum unfolding in the global financial system:
As you know, the IMF, World Bank and BIS manage the global money supply. Well, Basel I and Basel II have been implemented and on the 31st of March 2019, Basel III will be implemented, effectively reducing world money supply so derivatives can be cleared and the system can be deleveraged.

Now if rumors of a March mainnet launch are true, then once Basel III takes effect and counter parties start failing again, what emerging low market cap asset do you think everybody will flock to make up for losses?

Because if the stars are aligning like I think they are, we’ll see the following scenario play out across all kinds of industries.

- “Oh, you're an ambitious startup that needs access to our customer’s balances? We’ve made our data fully available through the industry-standard, trusted, decentralized Chainlink network, you're free to access them there at any time. And just in time to meet the regulations of PSD2!”

- “What's that? You're upset that each access costs more than you have allocated for such transactions and now you can't compete? Well that's just a shame. I mean we did have LINK available for over a year at less than a dollar. Why didn't you buy then? And you're mad that we hold 30% of the supply? Why wouldn't we? Look at what a fine investment it has been, friend!”

My 50 cent linky better stay stinky

>>13044858
Correction: Basil III goes into effect on the 29th of March.

>>13044528
you need to watch Consensys 2018 with the CTO and ceo of Fedex to get an understanding of how blockchain will transform the headache of cross border shipping

>>13044847
Look at the volume man, it’s been close to a billion since Jan 3. They’re slowly moving into a “new protocol”. The only project worth shit in this space is LINK. Satoshis next project. In my opinion it’s why everyone that’s been in the game long enough is showing immense respect for sergey because he is unironically satoshi, or apart of that core group.

>>13044882
I believe it.

>>13044882
>Big players moving into Chainlink.

How much money does it take to get a low liquidity crypto to a market cap of $170? Only a fraction, probably less than 10% of actual money buying the token.
The only reason Chainlink is at rank 35 is the year long constant shilling on /biz and the combined money from anons buying it.
Without the buying demand from /biz Chainlink would be rank ~200, which makes it an insanely risky buy right now.

>>13045118
Haha ok my dude. I am unironically an insider. Look at the volume. Look at the wallets growing. LINK will be a new internet. FUD at this point is pointless.

>>13045170
hes right you know. Its biz iron hands and only buying more. Thats why

>>13044821
can you elaborate about this january 3, what key?

>>13045170
Can you describe how you envision Chainlink in 3-5 years? What the network will look like and what goals will be achieved?

>>13043468
you know nothing
t. real insider

What other applications can decentralized verifiable data be used for other than the common use cases we have already discovered?

>>13045237
There is a reason Adelyn was hired for marketing, her expertise is AI. Chainlink will be worth in the hundreds of billions, possibly trillions. You have to understand that LINK is going to be an AI and will impact just about every industry.

>>13045301
>LINK is going to be an AI
Lolwut

>>13045118
>>13045195
It’s cute you guys think the stinky pajeets on biz have the kind of money to singlehandedly prop link up

>>13045301
>>13045317
"Protocol buffer stubs are going to be an ai"

>>13045324
>>13045301
"Message broker middleware is going to be an ai"

honestly fuck off linktards. Just fucking die

>>13045301
>>13045317
>>13045324
Holy shit, actually why do you need a human node operator if an AI can accept contracts using data available on the oracle market to set pricing, and monitor node uptime and performance and automatically make updates. Literally why does a human need to operate something that is all software running computation?

>>13045301
Can you recommend reading material that expands on this?

>>13043468
and you are...

LINK larpers are just bitcoin whales having some giggle at the shitcoiners, prove me wrong

>>13045301
RN chain link is pure shit, nothing, more precisely. And if you think this philosopher will create oracles not to mention AI, you need to wake the fuck up brainlet.

>>13045364
because they need a way to fund it using public money. Its the bait ans switch

>>13044821
You are literally delusional the "key thing" was the extremely well publicised "proof of keys" bitcoin movement. Absolutely nothing to do with chainlink.

>>13044821

But you know who Sergey was, he was a couchsurfer who banged the hottest girls all over the world and then had an existential crisis, studied philosophy and Plato protagoras, and he decided to preach to the world his vision about connectivity based on plato's view

>>13044821
are you the anon that wrote the epic pasta a few days ago about redpilling all normies on link?

>>13044882
How old is Sergey? I think he's too young to have been involved way back in 2008.

>>13044821
The key was “hold your own keys” shit none of this conspiracy theories bullshit you’re coming up with

>>13043468
Thanks for dropping by Anon, anything we should look for this month that hasn't already been discussed?

Also I second this anons comment >>13043805

Can you give us anything of value? Anything at all? I've been in this project since the ED days and frankly am getting restless.

>>13044444

>>13045708
>ED days
holding LINK gave me ED too

>>13044377
https://www.oracle.com/hk/customers/cargosmart-1-blockchain-cl.html is it Cargosmart?

>>13045797
>https://www.oracle.com/hk/customers/cargosmart-1-blockchain-cl.html
-cl.html

>>13045815
cl.html means CargoSmart Limited.

>>13045880
wrong
it's an insider leaving breadcrumbs

>>13044377
"Looking at" is very different then "partnership"

If you are in the know, tell us....how close are they to a partnership. and how about more details of this large logistics company.

Thank you fren for the hopium.

>>13045301

>>13045301
>AI

You had a good larp going and you blew it.

>>13045632
eternal

>>13045364
Smartcontracts & oracles oversee and frow the network that powers smartcontacts & oracles. It's self-sufficient. Jesus.

>>13046318
•grow

>>13046202
What’s the need for an accountant, a paralegal. In a way chainlink is an AI.

>>13043468
Where is a good solid place/source for me to get an understanding of investing. I'm not talking about fucking strategies, newest hot tickers, any shit like that; just a good basic understanding of how things work and operate on a child reading level?

What is a stock, what is a bond, the difference. Shorts vs. Puts. Basic shit.

Also, can we get an /ABC/ (anything but cryto) general.

>>13046318
That’s what biz is actually referring to when they call it the singularity, isn’t it? The $1000 EOY meme is just a carrot leading us to our own invalidation

>>13043468
should i sell my stellar and rlc to all in link

>>13046428
Start your own fuckin thread then. Also read A Random Walk Down Wallstreet

>>13046428
www.reddit.com

Fuck larpers
Fuck LINK
Fuck Sergey
Fuck jannies
Fuck trannies
Fuck niggers
Fuck people
Fuck biz
Fuck reddit
Fuck 4chan
FUCK THIS FUCKING WORLD

Still not selling [Redacted] though

>>13046473
Thanks for the source.

>>13046476
>www
Or should I ask Jeeves you antique.

>>13046428
investopedia

also fuck you

>>13046487
Thanks and fuck you too buddy.

How hard is it for devs to build adapters? How long does it take for a single adapter? I see there's a very active ecosystem and even a website catalog for all the adapters but there are barely any blockchain adapters. Why no Corda adapter yet? I saw ziq and aion, iota... Still needs tezos quorum tron cardano eos etc why is no one doing them? I don't know how to code or I'd do that to help

>>13046579
It's very easy for someone with basic dev knowledge to make adapters.