/biz/ - Business & Finance

Mistake doesn't mean it was easy to make. Im sure the EU are a pain in the ass regarding press and rules.

Shady shady shady :D

In fact there it is. The EU were just being fussy about stuff. It also means the EU has some news oulet they plan to push the news on. So...

Would be funny if the content is different now. Lets find out if Shillbert got whistled back

Reminds me of when Wikipedia France canceled the partnership with Request.

Shillbert got caught lmao

>>12936743

HAhaha, this afternoon an article is brought out with ZERO mention of overledger and Shill signing the whole deal through overledger.

His telegram cucks will be in denial (again) and say its all happening behind the scene. Meanwhile the team had nother chance to sell the lot at 4.2$

Gills one slick fox thats for sure

damn, I should've sold my stack at today's high

QNT fags will defend this.

Why did they release the news a day early anyway, what morons.

>>12936880

Simple, to shill.

Gills a master at fooling buyers into believing theyre the cherry on the cake. Meanwhile they had to beg to be in the same building the pie was made.

All coordinated. Later on a different post will be made which will be more vague and we can all assume again that quant is the big stealth backbone of the entire crypto society.

>>12936880

Defend what?

It's still happening. It's still what it is. Overledger will still be used for the declaration by the EU Commissioner.

They just announced too early with the EU wanting to coordinate its media coverage. Announcement down for now and then back up later when the timing is better.

Oh no. Whatever shall we do.

One what's to defend? They were obviously told not to communicate independently which they did and then apologised for....?

Also what kind of faggot judges a project that is working with the EU and top banks on a mistimed fucking tweet. Lol...state of Biz.

Theywillchange the post content to diminish Quant's involvement in the whole affair.

>>12937059

Exactly, the tellies are allready in defense mode. Gill did a number on them again.

For months on end they were saying they cant say anything before the 6th yet ´by mistake´ they come up with a thing like that too early.

No mention of overledger used for signing, no mention of overledger being used to link ethereum, jp morgans jew coin.

Think for yourself. Biz just leads you the way.

Wow another scam shilled by biz who wouldve ever fucking thought. Its almost as if biz is the retard kid at school always saying the dumbest shit. If you arent retarded youre in BNB for the next 1-2 months until LINK mainnet.

>>12937109

>> Working with EU commission

>> Overledger being used to sign the declaration by EU Commissioner

>> Scam

If there's any proof that the word "scam" is being used in increasingly retarded ways on Biz, there it is.

>>12936533
Just like the REQ Wikipedia partnership

Yes, if I were you I would SELL IMMEDIATELY

>>12937141

Defend whats coming tellie. Watered down shit article tonight with lesser involvement.

>>12937141
He still thinks those things are true, KEK. They got told to fucking pull the news article because they were talking shit, over-stating their role in the whole business.

Gil said he's going to change the CONTENT of the article, fucking lol. Another load of bullshit from Shillbert.

>>12937159
I want to go and see what the TG is saying but I can't because I'm banned, ages ago, for saying something about QNT going sideways for a while (which it did, for weeks and weeks).

That place is moonboi central, anything other than screeching spastic Lambo talk = immediate ban.

>>12937176

Wake up and use some common sense for a second.

The Quant article says they're a founding member of INATBA, that Gilbert has been selected for the signing event, and that Overledger will be used to sign the declaration on multiple blockchains. These aren't subjective things. They're either facts or lies.

If Gil actually lied about any of those things, the EU deal would be off, there wouldn't be any more news announcements, and he wouldn't be at the signing event. And it would have been hugely obvious that he'd be caught lying within a matter of hours.

Anyone with more than a single digit IQ can tell everything he said is legit. It was just announced earlier than the EU press team wanted it to be.

Imagine buying this flavour of the week shitcoin.

>>12936533

Wildly entertaining

Fanboys allready see Gilbert rising to a stage, the entire EU allready in a circle waiting for him. And Gill pressing a overledger button to seal the deal for the next decade.

Angela Merkel being pounded in the ass by gill screaming QNT WILL BE THE NEW EURO

HAHAHHAHA delussional fags

I am FUCKING SELLING !!! They are fucking you hard !!!
There is nothing clear about them all shady shit

>>12937227
> being this blind to a fucking scam

Let's see what the new article is like today, it will be diluted as fuck and QNT is going under 200, buy book has already emptied.

>>12937249

I'm aware you're the same autistic NEET who constantly FUDs Quant because you got banned from the telegram, automatically making all your opinions irrelevant. Don't worry anon, someone will like you one day.

SELL NOW

>>12937283
Guys guys, let me make a selfy for my scamcoin. Old boys network remember?

They didnt even have a chair for him hahahhahahaha

>>12937283

>> At INATBA signing in Brussels

>> Posted on Twitter by the EU's head of digital innovation and blockchain

>> One of 12 people despite 105 founding members

If you believe the FUD over this you genuinely, genuinely deserve to be poor.

Sit out, and miss out. Quant is biggest in crypto. Larger than ripple. Wake up

>>12937283

Weve seen this shit before.

It not 2017 anymore guys.

>>12937356
>5 posts by this ID
Gee, I wonder who is behind these posts.

>>12937360

Yet its allready dumping.

I mean.. Gilbert is right there at the EU meeting at this current moment..

https://twitter.com/pzilgalvis/status/1103274497174577152?s=21

>>12937367
What's wrong with their faces?

>>12937376

105 founding members.....................

>>12937390
Guess the EU has 105 new partners now.

Not a single fucking buy on the last 100 trades on idex. Some actually still do have a brain.

Gilbert is not buying coz he have enough to dump on you

>>12937439

Man being banned from the Quant Telegram really did mess you up didn't it.

>>12936533
gives me OMG vibes..

>>12936533
And this is why i did not buy at .22 cents, and im still not buying, fuck these niggers!

So is this a scam or no?

>>12937577


Smart move!!

its like the “omg” partnership with McDonald’s all over again

>>12937752
Lol. Yeah u right. Probably the EU is just having them over for a spot of lunch and asked them to sign a visitor book.

>>12937813
>Lol. Yeah u right. Probably the EU is just having them over for a spot of lunch and asked them to sign a visitor book.

Even this overstates their involvement.

Kek, we all saw this scam from a mile off.if you are not selling now before the huge dump you seriously need to leave crypto completely.

>>12938552
>Signed with EU
>Scam

Pick one..

>>12938650
Vechain and walton signed with chinese government.omg signed with mcdonalds.

answer me please already?
is quant a scam or not?

>>12938938
Obviously not. This guy won't risk his reputation on a scam.

>>12938938
Basically yes.They are doing a vechain, walton etc, announcing partnerships that mean nothing.There will be hundreds of free solutions doing what they are charging for in the next 18 months.Essentially Gilbert knews this and is cashing out his coins after evey pump.

>>12938938
DYOR
>Website has no concrete information just a bunch of fluff
>Team hypes up news to dump tokens on top
>Demo they did was literally static webpages
>Oracle 'partnership' was a (paid) incubator program
>...

>>12938958
You have to be so deluded and disconnected from financial reality if you think a single man can actually pull that off.

>Proof of Signature Static Nodes XtraBYtes $10000 EOY
>SOON™

>>12939153
This is essentially like jibrel doing the first sharia approved transfer or whatever.Due to gilberts positions he was able to get this shitty eu blockchain declaration put on a few blockchains by his overledger SOFTWARE.Never mind this eu blockchain declaration is a load of fluff to begin with.Gilbert knows nobody will end up paying for this since free solutions will be everywhere soon, he isnt a stupid man, follow the miney trail, and the money trail has them dumping after they have hyped.

>>12938983
>>12938958

The website has tons of relevant information and you can go use see overledger at https://github.com/quantnetwork

They are literally doing the signing today...

>>12939196
It's all software idiot.

Bitcoin is software.
QNT is genius, it's open source and is more flexible then making a chain to move data. Interoperability chains don't make any fucking sense. It's just a slow intermediary.

>>12939241
There will be tens of qnt versions in 18 months, all not being used, most of them free, all of them better techwise than quant.You are a moron if you cannot see this.

>>12939220
Did you seriously just link to their GitHub? I thought all their technology was patented. The stuff on their GitHub is literally a shit SDK that does RPC to a node.

Also their website doesn't have tons of information. It has tons of typos and gems like
>Address the major limitations of current blockchain technology and unlock its true potential.
If that doesn't sound like a scam I don't know what does.

Still nothing they preached yesterday. Being part of something which has more than 100 members.

Ofcourse Gil acts like he controls the entire EU.

Shameless hyping once again. Same happened with the bank announcements. Same happened with his 'top 10 exchanges' and showing up with digifinex and idax.

If youre still in you deserve to lose money. Future top 5 my ass.

Also seems like they accept anyone in the INATBA

“If you are engaged in the development, use or application of blockchain and distributed ledger technology and share the above goals, please contact us to obtain further information. We are also happy to put you in contact with the consortium of INATBA to join as a Member, Associate Member, observer or as advisor in the Governmental Advisory Board.”

https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/blockchain-technologies

quant is a scam. it's just an app with an erc20 token attached... the jew ceo shills and dumps his coins on you

Yea fuck this I'm out.

>>12939370
Im about to dump the little i have left before it drops below 3 dollars again.

>>12939274
>what is a license
>how do patents work
>how do I broadcast on multiple networks
burger flipper detected

>>12939281
>>12939342
Keep pointing people to that and they can see a working product, they don't let just anyone in and the news is not just that Shillbert is there, it's that they are using QNT to sign to the multiple chains. A live show of the product to 100+ industry and government workers.

>>12939408
Google inatba founding members, they accept anyone.unibright, cardano, iota etc are all members.Basically you could fork some shitcoin and join yourself.

>>12939408
You're arguments are very convincing I'm going to buy QNT right now.

Oh wait I mean whenever someone points out legitimate facts you come up with this shit. Either refute it or accept that you're defending a scam.

>>12939342

Of course they do you fucking dumbass. It's an association. But Quant is a founding member and he's right there with the EU Commissioner for digital and blockchain signing the original declaration.

And Overledger will be used to make the on-chain signing in April.

Anyone who falls for the FUD is top-tier retarded. It amounts to taking a pretty good achievement, pretending it was hyped to be more than what it was (which it wasn't), and then fudding it because it's not as good as the non-existent hype from non-existent people said it would be, despite the fact that overall it's a pretty good achievement and more than 99.99% other crypto projects manage.

But hey, that's Biz for you. Autistic basket-weavers care more about impressing incels on the internet instead of making money, hence why they're poor and are set to remain that way.

>>12939350
>With Jews you
Complete the sentence

>>12939480
Ok the top exchanges were IDAX (rank 8 today in volume) and Digifinex (Rank 3 today)
The "top" US exchange was bittrex (well respected)
Not too sure on the banking news.

>>12939457
>lists leading projects
>they accept anyone!
80<

>>12939534
There are 100 founding members.Any clown involved in blockchain can joun.Unifuckingbright is also a founding member,

>>12939623

Tell me how many representatives of crypto projects were actually at the official signing in Brussels with the EU Commissioner.

There's Quant....and?

I'll wait.

>>12939604
4 mill mc project unibright is also a founding member.

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/unibright/

>>12939604
I didn't even mention exchanges. I said their GitHub has almost nothing in it that can't be coded up in an Indian cubicle by 2 pajeets. The other thing I mentioned was how their entire website has no relevant content about what they are trying to do and is full of typos and terms like 'unlock the true potential of blockchain'.

>>12939640

Where's Unibright's photo at the signing event? You'd think they'd post one.

Face facts. Quant was one of the very few selected to be at the signing event, and Overledger will be used to make the on-chain declaration.

You can fud it if you like for not being a super ultra mega global announcement, but the fact is it's a pretty good one, makes Quant one of the biggest movers in this bear market, and sets it up nicely for the good stuff (actual deals and Overledger adoption) in Q2.

Believe it or don't, but don't say you weren't told.

>>12939640
Unibright are well connected and have a real product as well as fortune 500 clients.

What the fuck are you getting at? I invested in QNT when the MC was 3.5m... Markets don't represent FA or the actual work of a company at all in crypto.

https://medium.com/@UnibrightIO/unibright-joins-international-association-of-trusted-blockchain-applications-1bf5a953e064

Unibright are members of more foundations than quant

>>12939696
Have you thought that maybe Unibright and all the other projects that signed today didn't think it was that big a deal? Only a project that has nothing going for itself would announce this week's in advance and spam photos everywhere.

>>12939645

It's enterprise marketing you pajeet. They are targeting companies, not trying to impress online crypto autists like most sites try to do. Go and look at any other tech site not in blockchain. They're very similar.

And the code is closed source with patents, so obviously the Github isn't going to contain much beyond just the SDK.

It's astounding how retarded people on Biz are.

>>12939730
Who from QNT made a "big deal" out of the signing?

>>12939741
That still leaves NO PROOF that they even have a product. Where are the statistics, the number of transactions on their network, literally show me anything to proof this isn't a scam. All you've done so far is mention marketing.

>>12939730

https://twitter.com/UnibrightIO/status/1102495844148957185

They made an announcement video about it outside the Hague in the fucking Netherlands kek.

Why? Because they weren't invited to Brussels for the official signing. Quant was. And Overledger will be used for the on-chain signing too.

>>12939745
>Who from QNT made a "big deal" out of the signing?

About three telegram pajeets with a combined IQ of 60

>>12939756
>googles overledger
>video demonstration of deploying comes up first

>>12939756

Quant will show you themselves in Q2 when it's already pumping and everyone is FOMO'ing in.

That's the point dude. You make the money buying in early and then those needing "proof" eventually buy your bags at x10 when it's too late.

It's good that there's this much skepticism. There needs to be some people left to buy at the top. I guess you'll be one of them.

>>12939788
They aren't from QNT, no one gave a shit. Gilbert told them to STFU.

I could care less about all of this. It's just govt and industry boys making deals and then probably going to a nice restaurant and spending our tax and investing money.

>>12939800
Wait. You know this is easily refuted right? When I Google Overledger all I say is PowerPoint presentations.

Come on than, link the video. In before "lool pajeet can't Google" or "DYOR". I'm calling you out right now. If you link me the video of "deploying" I'll STFU about Quant.

>>12939837
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=917&v=K6j9vDSt0EM

The top result.

You can be ignored now.

>>12939894
Already mentioned this demo is showing a bunch of static websites being served up. Furthermore it's hard as hell to see anything on the screen. Why is it that other demos have nu issues showing on screen in full screen but this "proof" might as well be Hello Kitty playing?

>>12939968
Those aren't static screens you low IQ faggot.

You asked for proof and you got it. Watch the fucking video.

>>12940029
I did watch it. And I said they're static webpages. How hard can it be to demo this product? Just show me a video of someone using Overledger to send data to multiple ledgers at once. Can't be that. Someone using a command line for all I care and than showing transactions on a block explorer.

What do you expect from a man that pays press.org shill to fake institutional conference?

A man that says hes founder of TC307 meanwhile TC307 is a open source project with delegations worldwide from 150 countries and he was member of one delegation among 20 members from australia? hes a fraud

>>12940380
I don't really care much about QNT. I'm not invested and have no plans to do so. But this project gets 4 or 5 threads a day being shilled by 1 samefag. So I did my research and it just sets of my bullshit detector and I love calling out bullshit.

>>12937090
>>12937237
>>12937371
Holy fuck, you're a massive faggot. Please kill yourself.

Shillbert was all over the ama's hyping the fucking 6th of march. Now you denie your boy doing that because it wasnt anything special?

Gil has you guys by the balls. Bagholders forever

>>12941014

He just said what it was, and what he said was correct. In fact, he even said in the AMA it was "too early" to say if Overledger would be used, and it turns out it will be used after all, so he was tempering expectations there.

If people want to take any little details and hype it up themselves, that's their problem. It happens in every project when holders get too excited.

>>12941138

Youre defending your boyfriend and your bag. Gil hyped it up. Big news in march, media coverage name it.

And who says overledger will be used? Because of their deleted 'accidental' post yesterday said so? Gtfo man

>>12940077

How hard can it be to understand that maybe Gil doesn't really give a fuck about Biz autists just yet and is concentrating more on demoing to potential enterprise users of Overledger? If you look on the site you can even see a "book a demo" page to book a slot for a demo.

It hasn't been long at all since the SDK was launched. It's still early days. Just give them a fucking chance to go down the list of priorities of which a community NEET demo is understandably near the bottom.

>>12940077
Dude you are a dumb faggot. They do a live demo and with no proof you say it's false. GoVerify is deployed. You can build the SDK, there are forum posts of people doing it and troubleshooting it.

>>12941268
Early days? The initial commit was in September last year? Are you telling me that a company valued at $38 million can't release a non-alpha version of their fucking SDK in 6 months?

So all these partnerships are just hoping and dreaming that Quant might have a working product some day?

>>12941369
As said I've watched the demo (again) and what they show is searching for a transactionID on the blockchain by using "Overledger". And some Amazon type website that doesn't provide any proof that its using the testnet and could just be a website. Are you SERIOUSLY not seeing anything fishy about this demo and the fact that it's hardly visible?

So is it a scam or not!?!? They seem to talk pretty but no bank announcements.

SOOOOOOOO

Where exactly is that shiny prepped article claiming quant will connec ethereum and jp morgans quorum that got pulled?

Still waiting on EU synchronisation?

Fucking scammers

>>12941458
>a company valued at $38 million

> thinking that the "market cap" of a crypto is the same as the associated company's valuation.

Being THIS fucking retarded in 2019.

>>12942131
>Still not showing anything that proves this isn't a scam

>>12939599
Win

>>12941458

They've released the SDK in January you retard. mApps are being built as we speak. Overledger itself is a working system already but closed source, so the only people seeing the actual system in-depth will be the enterprise prospects.

>> Partnerships are just hoping and dreaming

In the real world, which some of you don't seem to understand, businesses don't have massive paranoia and automatic assumptions things are scams. Businesses are taken at face value, and if prospects are interested, they book a demo and attend meetings with the team.

Holy fuck, if the world operated like you Biz autists think it does there literally wouldn't be an economy and we'd still be living in the stone age.

>>12942467
Bussiness make deals on face value haha

Occam's razor: either QNT has some patented technology that even IBM can't create and hasn't shown it to anyone. All the while making deals with bussinesses and governments which information they accidentally leak before removing again.

Or

It's a scam.

>>12942467

In the real world, your shitcoin wouldnt be valued at 40m because nobody is using it besides whales and idiots who buy the top on idex.

Qnt getting rely. They even banned people for saying it would be INATBA.
Then they banned people for saying it was the big announcement, and it would be big banks in 6th.

Now they say wait til April.

They hyped it to the max, and now the dump begins.

Telegram is toxic place. Team will keep dumping to pay for their big offices in America. Or was it Australia...oh wait, it is more bullshit.

I even saw one guy say that the EU is going to use overledger for everything... Then today we see that it is signed piece of paper, and anything else will just a one off symbolic gesture that means fuck all

>>12939623
>There are 100 founding members.Any clown involved in blockchain can joun.Unifuckingbright is also a founding member,
Join then faggot and price it to us. Oh... You can't. Thought so bitch fuck off
>>12942511
>Bussiness make deals on face value haha
>Occam's razor: either QNT has some patented technology that even IBM can't create and hasn't shown it to anyone. All the while making deals with bussinesses and governments which information they accidentally leak before removing again.
>Or
>It's a scam.
You sir are a fucking idiot, I'm sorry. The fact that your so emotional about a project that YOU DONT EVEB HOLD is amazing..how's it feel to be arguing with a bunch of neets on an anime board when it makes ZERO DIFFERENCE to your $$$ at the end of the day? Stay salty fag

>>12942613
Salty? I'm just stating observations. Making no personal attacks whatsoever. Unlike some QNT community members

>>12942511

Read my post dumbass. I did not say business DEALS at face value. I said businesses do not automatically assume other businesses are dodgy fake scams.

They take them at face value (i.e. assume they're legit businesses) and then do due diligence with demos and meetings before deciding whether to sign up.

Fucking business 101.

But sure, either QNT does have the patented tech and will gain huge adoption....

OR

The ex-CISO of the year with a proven resume, and guy who was in Brussels today alongside the EU Commissioner, and the guy who's company is a Pay.UK guarantor, and the guy who's company passed the Oracle vetting process, and the guy who's company has Paola Tasca from UCL as an advisor, has fooled everyone and is secretly some con artist.

And ALL these established companies and people have been unable to see this, while you, the basement basket-weaving neet, has seen through the lies.

There's Occam's razor for you.

>>12942916
You really are angry aren't you?
Are the credentials of the CEO really the only thing this project has going for it? Whenever I see someone trying to shill this they mention Gilbert. You know other projects have established CEOs as well but don't list it as a major selling point right? Still haven't shown me a working product btw. This thread has been up for what, 12 hours now and the best you got going is "our CEO is a cool guy". Pathetic.

>>12942946

Some people on Biz are a bit dumb, so it was a good opportunity to help them by categorically proving how weak your FUD is and how little you understand about business, enterprise and life in general, which this thread has done extremely well.

>>12942628
>Salty? I'm just stating observations. Making no personal attacks whatsoever. Unlike some QNT community members
>14 posts in this thread alone
Sure

>>12942976
Really? As I said in my previous post. This thread has been up for 12 hours now. Plenty of opportunities to come up with some - any - kind of evidence this isn't a scam. The best we got so far was a shitty demo and our CEO knows people. This thread really isn't working in QNT's favor yet you keep bumping it with more bullshit. If you were smart you'd just let it die.

>>12943021

There's something called common sense which a lot of people have. Maybe not many on Biz, but some of them.

As I said before:

Either QNT does have the patented tech and will gain huge adoption....

OR

The ex-CISO of the year with a proven resume, and guy who was in Brussels today alongside the EU Commissioner, and the guy who's company is a Pay.UK guarantor, and the guy who's company passed the Oracle vetting process, and the guy who's company has Paola Tasca from UCL as an advisor, has fooled everyone and is secretly some con artist.

And ALL these established companies and people have been unable to see this, while you, the basement basket-weaving neet, has seen through the lies.

And let's not forget the extremely obvious and understandable reasons why Quant is doing closed-door demos of their closed-source platform with enterprise prospects at this stage instead of trying to impress Biz incels with "evidence" when they have precisely zero value to Quant in any shape or form.

But hey, believe it or don't. Up to you. We'll see who's right soon enough.

>>12943099
So far all the hype turned out to be nothing. Oracle partnership was incubator program. Pay.uk guarantor means jack and the big 6th of March announcement was some initiative everyone can sign up for. Yeah, I'll take my chances elsewhere.

>>12942518
Your only FUD is about a fucking telegram group banning people? Jesus you're a retard.

>>12942916
>>12943099

>>12942946
>>12943021
>>12943138
Fucking rekt. Please leave this thread.

>>12943232
So proof that they have the product they claim they have? Still waiting. Seriously this is an awesome opportunity for you guys to really BTFO me, but all I'm getting is 'rekt' and 'hurr you don't know how real life works'. Kind of makes it seem like even the hardcore QNT crowd don't know what the fuck they are doing.

>>12943138
Do u know what an incubator program is? Its not a fucking incubator program. Quant has said stuff and delivered exactly on those claims. It said it had a partnership with a top cloud company where it has access to its ecosytem and 100k customers. Thats exactly what happened.

They said they were going to sign up to a blockchain EU wide initiative. Thats exactly what they did. Any exaggeration comes from speculation in the Telegram. Quant are professionals.

quant is a scam. the make announcments of fake partnerships while dumping their tokens on us.