/biz/ - Business & Finance

SHUT THE FUCK UP. LOL. LINK HAS ZERO USE CASES. BEEN IN ICO STATUS FOR 2 YEARS. MEANWHILE ZAP, WITNET, ENIGMA ETC ARE ALL LEAVING LINK IN THE DUST!!! LINK IS SHIT!!! GET OVER IT YOU FUCKING LINKIES STOP SPAMMING THIS SHIT ITS OVER FOR YOU!!

>>12870789
There is no evidence that BLX is using Chainlink. LINK uses BNC's API. BLX has existed since 2014. It does not use LINK.

>>12870831

this board is dead

>>12871195
Everyone is burnt out from the bear market, holding a stack of link just waiting for mainnet. The only ones who can be bothered to post are the guys fudding. We just wait and win

>partners
the word with zero meaning in crypto

also:
>shitcoin with no working product

>>12871171
Holy fuck

They're first run a node

Data available via their chainlink node


Mainnet literally ALREADY RELEASED?!!

>>12871171
how many other projects are currently running nodes?

>>12870831
>>12871171
BTFO
T
F
O

>>12870831
OOF

>>12871252

>>12870789
OP delete this you fucking faggot

>>12871227
This
Alot of us been here since the start lurking, creating memes, getting dubs
There was already so much to discuss but im tired now, i know that i have won already
We just have to wait long enough

>>12870789
Is the reason for binance listing LINK/USD pairs because they want node owners to use binance to cash in their link rewards?

>>12870831
You just got utterly BTFO.

>>12871171
The comes from a Co-Founder and Chairman, for anyone who wants to try and delegitimize that tweet.

IM NOT DONE ACCUMULATING

Literally no news. Using testnet to rune a node, linkies coping hard lmfao

>>12871354
You’ve had almost 600 days, it’s on you

>>12871252
Mainnet already released without the need for LINK tokens

>>12870831
anon, you just got btfo almost as bad as uncle oldfag

Bump

>>12871347
He’s just trying to shill BNC being technologically progressive to link bagholders. He’s literally bullshitting for exposure, what else is new in cryptoland

>>12871403
This level of cope is legendary.

>>12871318
>>12871171
>>12871260
>>12871391

Read it again you fucking retards. BNC/BLX does not use chainlink. Chainlink has a dedicated connector to BNC's API.

Until someone makes a smartcontract that uses this API data it means fuck all for link.

>>12871532
>BNC/BLX does not use chainlink
Stop spewing literal shit out of your mouth for half a fucking second and read this you massive piece of garbage. Fuck you. https://twitter.com/bravenewcoin/status/1044013772929732608

>>12870789
silicon valley has arrived
https://www.teamblind.com/article/Whats-your-asset-allocation-PV5Ak1Ep

>>12871532
Bro it’s ok, just take the L.

>>12871548
stop publicly humiliating the guy, it's clear he's getting aroused from the attention and frankly it grosses me the fuck out

>>12871548
You posted the same shit last time I tried to talk sense into you fucking moronos. That phrase is chainlink's tagline. That's what it does.

BNC/BLX is an index. Chailink provides data to smart contracts. The only the the partnership entalis is waht I said above. LINK sees the value in building a dedicated connection to the a robust crypto index. That's great. But they're not using LINK for anything, LINK is using their index. IF people want to creat smart contracts with it, great. But they're not using Chainlink in any way, and you're too fucking stupid to even understand what LINk does.

>>12871578
(you)

>>12871532
>first to run a #ChainLink node
>BLX & ELX + data for 5000+ crypto markets available via Chainlink from BNC

So I'm guessing this partnership has to do with chainlink nodes fetching data from bnc and nothing more? Do chainlink nodes get a special deal on the api's or what are we talking about here?

>>12871578
FUD level: cringe and gaypilled

>>12871195
Those hands of steels are rough for the body, we, the linky marines, must rest from holding those bags. Soon we'll be rewarded. FUD has no impact.

>>12871594
Chainlink has a dedicated connection to BNC's API. Fucking retards think this means anything other than that and don't realize this has been known for 6months now.

I will give 100 LINK to ANYONE who can prove clearly expalin how BNC relies on Chainlink to create their crytpo index. NO LARP/

>>12871578
>They mention LINK but won't use it.
Right ...

>>12871618
Why is it a partnership though? Chainlink nodes fetching data from apis from company X doesn't make Chainlink partnered with X.
I guess they might just be testing node functionality.
But yeah your right. I don't see how anything points to BNC relying on chainlink lol

>>12871663
they will run their own node.

>>12871663
You're going to make it. The rest of these fucking nulinker faggots cream themselves over a fucking tweet.

BNC isn't a blockchain. They don't have any need for an oracle to aggregate data for them. It's a fucking exchange index. Their basically LINK's official crypto data feed. These faggots uniroincally call this 'FUD' when it's an easily verifiable fact.

I think providing data to Nasdaq is unrelated to chainlink. It wouldn't make sense- major exchanges have tons of trades per second. There's so much data there, it's not all going to go on the chain with a BNC adapter and then back off the chain with another BNC adapter to Nasdaq.

I guessed last week they're probably just using link to provide bnc data to public smart contracts on ethereum and it looks like I was right.

However, what I'm excited about is that the bnc dude's recent tweet seems to imply they already have a node running and providing data. That would imply mainnet is already running.

>>12871694
Then please gently explain to a brainlet
>first to run a #ChainLink node.
why do they need to do that then?

>>12871730
To securely provide data to smart contracts?

https://twitter.com/Techemist/status/1100580111273738240

Strap in

>>12871784
>https://twitter.com/Techemist/status/1100580111273738240

hhhhrrrrrr yas daddy

>>12871784
Bad news: No mainet yet.
Good news: Node already set, ready to flow over
Better news: Literally hundreds teams...

>>12871532

>>12871784
Actually huge. Many teams are waiting.

>>12871784
So he means to say they threw money at a 2 man startup to build a json parser that hasnt released a product in a year and a half, and they are currently excited about “running a node” that, at the moment, has 0 real world value or use whatsoever.

The absolute fucking state of linkies

>>12871913
(you)

The only remotely surprising bit is that any of this is actually new to anyone on /biz/:
https://create.smartcontract.com/#/contracts/b8e0002af355a90f830eb593d62e2aec
>signed Aug 25th 2016

Can't believe I'm spoonfeeding this shit.

>>12871935
They were calling it chainlink back in 2016? That's news to me

>>12871935
it's fucking frustrating that this many people are incapable of understanding what BNC is and what LINK is.

They are on testnet and will flow to mainnet on release. We have known this

Why the fuck do you faggots get so excited about the smallest things

But it still doesn't moon

>>12871949
old fag here wanna elaborate for the new fags? more so on the bnc end

>>12870831
hahahahahaha, literally the CEO of BNC confirmed.

>>12871949
Link is a decentralized oracle network that provides trustless data feeds/ API access for smart contracts. No clue what bnc does.

>>12871532

>>12870789

many of you are not seeing the bigger picture.

Chainlink oracle network is becoming the standard.

Besides bridging data to the blockchain. They can ALSO provide decentralized data to exchanges, input and output.

BNC is the first. Guess who else will be using the Oracle network. "5000+ crypto markets". Anyone that is receiving data will most likely exporting it as well.

Think hard brainlets. People call Chainlink the HTTP protocol for a reason.

"If anyone solves oracles, it’s probably worth more than crypto itself”

-Richard Heart

>>12871532

>>12871347
Kiwi's doing something right?

>>12871578
BNC are running their own chainlink nodes for people who want to use their data in smart contracts

you fucking niggercattle

*whip and sip*

>>12871532
stay in discord and stop making me cringe thanks

>>12872528
woah you mean like I said verbatim in >>12871753

BNC does not fucking use Chainlink. It is not a blockchain. It has 0 use for oracles.

>>12872546
he's still going lmao

>>12872428
>"If anyone solves oracles, it’s probably worth more than crypto itself”
>-Richard Heart

This is worrying - we are relying on Sergeys three man team who rarely code to solve something that Richard fucking Heart thinks is worth more than crypto if solved?

I want to get off this ride.

>>12872546
Delete this ffs

>>12872428
Dick Milktruck claims if anyone solves the oracle problem it'll be worth more than crypto itself while simultaneously not knowing about Chainlink. That's how much insight he has.

>>12872546
how the fuck are they not using chainlink? they are running their own nodes as endpoints for their data

bnc is an aggregated data provider for crypto prices

you sound like a retard i dont know why youre confused. did you not finish accumulating?

>>12872570
he's your typical discord nigger

>>12871532

>>12872546
>iT Is NoT a BlOcKcHaIn.

>>12872546
>>12871949
>>12871753
>>12871694
>>12871618
>>12871578
>>12871532
Shouldn't you be dilating right now?

>>12871784
>>12871794
>>12872363

I can only imagine how many industry insiders a deeply connected guy like this shilled to buy into the pre-ICO. Bullish.

>>12872570
>how the fuck are they not using chainlink?
That's not 'using' chainlink. That's running a node. You know, like we've all known since https://docs.chain.link/docs/bravenewcoin came out half a year ago. LINK has a dedicated connection to BNC's API.

>bnc is an aggregated data provider for crypto prices
Yeah that's right. But it's not a fucking blockchain retard. The aggregate exchange data. There's no way to integrate Chainlink into that system, except, you know, writing that data into smartcontracts after the fact.

>>12872619
Do you converse with your fellow discord troglodytes before you post?

>>12872560
"Make sure you can fees your entire team with just two pizzas." - Jeff Bezos

>>12871694
Um, they're gonna sell their data to smart contracts using Chainlink you fucking idiot.
Congrats, you got me to reply to your nonsense.

>>12872628
*feed. He said this about building a technical solution.

>>12872604
Did you stop reading after blockchain? It says "Blockcahin and Crypto DATA MANAGEMENT' you fucking aboslutely trenchbrain.

I am not fudding. I'm all in on Chainlink. I'm trying to show you fucking morons that BNC doesn't use LINK. It does not make smartcontracts and does not have any need for a blockchain oracle, because it does not have a blockchain. LINK can use their data (which LINK is doing), but not the other way around.

>>12872636
>*feed. He said this about building a technical solution.
Well fuck what does this translate to in terms of bigmacs

>>12872644
>trenchbrain
>trenchbrain
>trenchbrain
I have been reading your sperg rants since mid 2017. You are a relentless bastard. Are you responsible for, "Municipal Marmalade" as well?

>>12872619
So whats the logic here? BNC setup a LINK node, will be selling api data via that node to feed into smart contracts. That node will have LINK tokens as collateral. How are they not using Chainlink ?
>inb4 BNC don't need link to aggregate exchange data.
They're running the Chainlink node to feed the smart contracts.

>>12872644
They ARE called delusional linkies for a reason, you know. What a bunch of fuckin mouth breathers

>>12872699
Correct, they’re betting on the smart contract economy and stand to profit massively by being a premier supplier of quality crypto pricing data for a wide range of assets. It’s worth remembering, though, THE SMART CONTRACT ECONOMY IS STILL THEORETICAL AND NO ONE KNOWS WHEN, OR EVEN IF, IT WILL BECOME A THING

linkies seem to always skip over that small detail

>>12872690
I haven't spawned anything of note. I honestly believe in chainlink because a year ago the community had some of the smartest people out there connecting dots, but now it's a bunch of reddit faggots who are too stupid to think for themselves and act like a bunch of Vechain niggers desperately trying to spin this as 'Nasdaw is using CHAINLINK".

The reality is that LINK is using BNC as it's preferred crypto price feed, in the same way that Nasdaq does because it's a robust price feed for 5000+ cryptos. That doesn't mean it 'uses' Chailink to aggregate data or any other dumb shit that retards are trying to come up with.

I'm fairly convinced that LINK will be the industry standard for oracles and that smart contracts will become ubiquitous in a few years, which is why I try to talk sense to people who are hoping for a use case that isn't there (like OP says BLX using Chainlink).

BLX has been live for a long time and Chainlink is using IT. That's very important distinction. To say that BLX uses LINK is just a straight up lie and can be debunked with 2 minutes of research, yet people are still trying to claim this 150 replies after my first post.

>>12872728
Good point, let's all wait until it's a multibillion dollar industry and THEN invest, right?
Sure glad I waited to buy ETH instead of buying it back before smart contracts and tokens were a thing.

>>12872699
What you're saying is true, but it's distinct from the claim in OP. which is that "BLX uses chainlink".

I've been using BLX on tradingview for at least 6 months now. It does not use LINK at all. BNC running a node is great but it's disingenous to say that they're 'using' Chainlink, at least in the way that projects like REQ, Hydro, or any of the other crypto projects that have a need for oracles will be using Chainlink.

>>12872743
Fair enough old bean. You're doing the Lord's work.

>>12872755
You make it sound like it’s wise to invest in useless technology that, maybe, someday, creates some tangible value. But I guess you’re bagholding because you think people must be dumb enough to fall for the speculation meme again, rather than having any legitimate reason to believe crypto has a future

>>12872758
OK can we all agree
-BNC will use Chainlink network to sell their data
-BLX,ELX or RLX has nothing to do with Chainlink
-Unless you're insider, we're all just speculators bidding on the smart contract economy.

Ok, now wen mainet?

>>12872805
>You make it sound like it’s wise to invest in useless technology that, maybe, someday, creates some tangible value.
strawman way of telling us we are speculating on the future value of this tech.
Theres risk, no shit, but we are all educated enough to form an opinion.
LINK is the strongest lowcap investment in this market. I'm so sure of it that I put my money where my mouth is.

>>12872822
I agree with that.

>>12872619
>They’re not 'using' chainlink
>They’re only running nodes
Holy shit kek

A twitter shoop and we're supposed to believe that it's happening. Geez Louise chainlink investors are brainlets. Buy BTC & ETH nothing else!

I've been working with chainlink test nodes trying to get data from big multiplayer games. This will allow gamers to bet on the outcome of matches or compete in achievements (for e.g. runescape; first to make it to 40 woodcut wins the purse).

I hope you guys understand the power of this shit.

>>12870789
This proves beyond any doubt in my mind thst Microsoft, EY, and 0xbtc are using chainlink as well.

>>12872953
Will I finally be able to win shekels instead of a chicken dinner?

>>12872886
You don't need link to run a node

>>12872886
>haha its only a multi-billion dollar company with ties to the nasdaq running as a node operators on the network.
Wow FUD has gotten so weak lately.

>>12872644
Your an idiot.

Decentralized oracles can be used to send data anywhere it wants. NOT JUST BLOCKCHAINS

>>12872652
1 large extra cheese pizza from dominos has 2,560 calories, 2 would be 5,120 calories total
1 Big Mac has 540 calories
5,120/540= ~9.48
Toppings on the pizza would add a few more calories so we can safely assume that 2 pizzas is roughly 10 Big Macs worth of food, how many people you can feed with that depends on the person (10 Big Macs would only feed 2 Sergeys)

>>12871949
>it's fucking frustrating that this many people are incapable of understanding what BNC is and what LINK is.
Try not to be so desperate for us to believe your shit.
That should help.

>>12872619
>running a Chainlink node is not using Chainlink

>>12871171
Godspeed everyone...its just a matter of time

>>12871252
Not released. Have running to connect when MN goes live. In a way this is even more exciting since others are surely in the same boat. Sitting, waiting to go. To the moon.

>>12871171
you guys are dense, this doesnt mean blx uses chainlink, it only means that the blx price can be requested through chainink.


blx doesnt use cainlink, but chainlink will be able to retrieve the price

>>12873897
im 100% all in link, but seing people act retarded like that makes me sick.

you guys are fucking dumb as hell.
blx price action can be retrieved through an API. the ceo is just saying that that api for blx price will be available on the chainlink network.

just like with any ther api..

>>12873897
>>12873907
When it's the company behind BLX that's attaching the Chainlink node to BLX, that means BLX is using Chainlink.

Also, the implication is that any smart contract that's going to use BLX/ELX (i.e. the gold standard in Bitcoin/Ethereum indexes) is extremely likely to use Chainlink.

Also also, why did you switch IDs, hyFhNr2S?

>>12873915
im not him im just some other linky.
what the CEO said is just : 5000 companies will query the BLX price through chainlink node :) which is great.

but it doesn't mean that nasdaq uses chainlink to query BLX price.

>>12873970
>but it doesn't mean that nasdaq uses chainlink to query BLX price.
Look at those goalposts fly.

BNC is personally running a Chainlink node on its BLX/ELX indices. Suck it.

>>12873978
I think they are using the chainlink network to input the BLX price. but the BLX tech wasnt implemented using chainlink.

unless proven otherwise. i'm just against fake hype man. been holding link for too long to fucking fall for such low quality baits

>>12873983
>but the BLX tech wasnt implemented using chainlink.
More goalposts flying.

Keep squirming, it's making you look good. Honest.

BLX getting cryptofit by NOT USING CHAINLINK

>>12873983
Kys

>>12874098
see >>12871171

>>12872604
Are you an ESL tier pajeet? Top fucking kek

>>12872644
you're getting memed on dude

Imagine actually holding this shitcoin and thinking you will make it :')

>>12872546
>bnc doesn't use chainlink, but like I said earlier, they use chainlink

very cool opinion

>>12871578
You are effing clueless, clearly can not read. Brainlet.