/biz/ - Business & Finance

Selling globes

> dress up like hooker
> Suck off round earther for $2
> With cum still in mouth grill him about how the horizon looks flat
That'll show em

Sell shirts mocking flat-earthers so you can profit off their stupidity! I think that’ll show ‘em good.

>>12859299
the sun is round
the moon is round
venus is round, mars a bit faint but is round too

how come then earth is not

also how come we have gravity, how do things fall down

>>12859343
being this deluded go educated yourself :) this man is so smart he will help you understand so much!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8-YdgU-CF4

>>12859395
can you answer please

>>12859395
OP look up the Michelson Morley experiment...From that we got Albert

>>12859495
no I am here to talk about business ideas to profit of round earthers like you are lol :) not to explain simple physics to you. if you watch that video you will have no more questions that man is so smart

>>12859333
checked

I like this idea very much then they can think they are "superior" to us much more intelligent flat earthers and then in the end we can point at them and laugh at everyone wearing that shirt!

some more good ideas?

>>12859299
what is your favorite Rick and Morty episode?

FLAT EARTH IS A CIA PSYOP TO DISCREDIT ANY AND ALL GROUPS THAT ARE CRITICAL OF THE GOVERNMENT

What you think the federal reserve is bad? youre just a FLAT EARTHER! What you think 9/11 was orchestrated by insider groups? FLAT EARTHER!

SAGE AND IGNORE

>>12859544

>>12859559
i dont like rick and morty. they show a round earth very often! so they must be from the cia or nasa or something. and to be fair you have to be very stupid to like rick and morty

>>12859299
I want to believe too, it'll be quite cool and sci-fi-esque but it being true would mean all these physicists and researcher's work since the 1900s were wrong

maybe there's some nuggets of truth in flat earth theories (wisdom of the crowd) but at the moment things are simply too disconnected from each other. Perhaps the truth lies somewhere in between

>>12859601
you think maybe a cube earth? I have thought that to but that is way to high level to talk on this image board! you can join our cube earth discord server :)

>>12859620
or maybe a round earth but inside is hollow, this way it's still technically flat as it's geometrically a surface and not solid

>>12859564
Flat Earth has been a dominant belief in cultures troughout the world. The idea of the earth being any other shape came from the Greek and spread to other parts from there.
The Mayans who had better astronomy than any other civilization believed the earth was flat. The argument that Copernicus heliocentric model allowed for better calculations on the movement of heavenly bodies is a flawed one. The Mayans had better astronomy than Copernicus and they used a flat model. Sure it improved European standards but it the Mayans show that it isn't much of an argument, other than that Copernicus had access to better tools such as telescopes.

Saying it's a psy-op is ridiculous. If anything it could be the other way around as every culture that developed apart from eachother thought it was flat. The Spanish convinced the Mayans that the earth is a sphere with ptolemy's experiment (only on land) but this experiment is complete bull. The curvature of the earth according to mainstream science isn't even visible standing on land. It is actually perspective that was mistaken for a curve. In the same way that I can give perspective to lines on a 2d piece of paper to make it look 3d but it's still a 2d image.

Science is litterly just another religion and a pretty stupid one to.

here I made a rough sketch how I think cube earth looks like but this is top secret!!! dont share with anyone that is not super intelligent!!!!

>>12859343
"my light bulb is round so my living room must be too"

If the earth is spinning on it's axis at 1k mph, travelling around the sun at 67k mph, which is travelling through the solar system at 43k mph, which is travelling through the galaxy at 500k mph, which is travelling through the universe in upwards of over 1 MILLION mph, then how come the north star Polaris remains still, directly above the north pole, and all the other stars do a 360 degree around it? the night sky shouldn't be the same 2 nights in a row. and it should be COMPLETELY different at the very least every 3 months or so as you would be facing a completely different direction.

your materialist "scientific" excuse of the stars being so far away and therefore their light takes a long time to reach us and so we simply can not see its moved for a long time falls flat on its face at the first hurdle. astrology charts from ancient civilisations show the stars have been the same place for thousands of years, plus if a rotational movement of 1k mph on it's axis is enough to make it so we can see the stars spinning around Polaris, then a lateral movement of over 1M mph should be more than enough to see them move laterally. They do not, ever.

The Earth is stationary, and the heavens revolve around us

>>12859731
it is a very simple question that you can observe
how come the other bodies are round
why do thing fall down

>>12859753
the luminaries in the sky are round. and? what the fuck does that have to do with the ground beneath your feet? it's demonstrably flat, regardless of the other so called "planets"

>>12859741
you are in a gravity well, speeds are relative to each other
if you are on a train the world is moving, you are at rest

>>12859741
Man they always got stupid excuses for every argument they give. And they cherry-pick their arguments as they please. They still won't admit that Ptolemy's experiment is bullshit even when they themself say that you can't see curvature standing on the ground. But then when it suits them you got the National Geographic doing it on TV and not even in a scientificially correct way by their own standards. Bunch of hypocrites. And you got everyone laughing; ''hahahaha, look at the people that believe the Earth is flat!'' yet not one of them can actually think of any good reason why the Earth is sphere.. ''Duh... NASA CGI images show it's a sphere!'' "You think I am lying?'' ''You think everyone is lying?''

Fools!

Saged and reported.

kek

*pew pew*

>>12859763
have you noticed how the sun can illuminate the moon when the sun is behind the earth ?
how can the sun go behind

>>12859785
the sun is not illuminating the moon, it's producing it's own, only in NASA and other space agencies photos is the moon a lump of rock.
the sun light is warm and anti septic, moon light is cool and septic, proving it's not the suns light being reflected.

>>12859343
>how come then earth is not

How do you know the sun, moon, mars, and venus are round?

>also how come we have gravity, how do things fall down

Source of gravity doesn't have to be from Earth. There could be a huge mass far below Earth that produces a uniform gravity field.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ax_YpQsy88

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSIPolpvjBY&t=
Stars are sound vibrating in water

>>12859814
how come the moon is self illuminating in accretion disk, is it alive, is it artificial
accretion disks are only possible when there is a single external point of light
>>12859819
you can observe the sun spots traversing the sun as it rotates
you can sea crates on the moon and they are all circles, creates around the edges are changing accordion to perspective, also shadows follow perspectives too
http://ioho.ca/mosaic.png

is that mass round ? why do mountains have higher gravity than sea. You can measure that too with a weight. Take 25KG weight exact, measure it will super accurate electronic scale, now go to a sea on boat or something, then go to big ass mountain made of dense rock, on the mountain you are higher and you would expect less gravity but, you are closer to a heavy object and you will measure the weight to weigh more than what it would if it is on less dense object like water

>>12859867
Well isn't that just interesting as fuck... thx fren

>>12859979
yeah sure
over the firmament there is a sea and we see the glow of bubbles
>>12859837
all questions posed by that retard can be answered by the ok google spyware, it is the simplest things in physics

>>12860001
So how's the atmosphere of the earth holding together? Why doesn't the vacuum of space suck in the atmosphere? And if gravity is holding it together, then how am I able to move and why isn't everything being pulled down to the ground as gravity has to be stronger than the vacuum of space in that case.

>>12859343
The earth is also round but not a ball. Space is fake and it is not determined if "planets" are round. Stars are visible through the moon so it is possible it is also not a ball. Gravity is Masonic garbage. Density determines weight and buoyancy, just like in water.

>>12859814
You can measure the temperature of a spot under a shaded tree at night and you will find it warmer than an area outside the shade. The moon's light cools.

>>12859564

>>12860622
actually if gravity is stronger than the vacuum of space, wouldn't the earth collapse in on its own weight? You don't have to answer this though. Just trying to demonstrate how this stuff just falls apart at close examination, you don't even have to really try.
>>12860001

>>12860622
because the earth has mass enough to hodl gasses attracted
the force of gravity as all forces works with the inverse square, and that is because the universe is 3 dimensional

so gravity will be much stronger close and 10x weaker at a distance that means that at e certain point earth is not going to have enough mass to attract gasses, so the atmosphere is what it is

typically in space you have "radiation" - changed particles - particles stripped out of their pair particle so they are charged

bigger planets have bigger atmosphere, venus similar size planet have similar size atmosphere, different composition

gravity is the weakest of all forces, the electromagnetic force that makes electrons orbit protons makes it impossible for gravity to squish things, but gravity adds up, and you can get to a point where all is squished

you are able to move because all molecules in your body work with electromagnetic, technically chemistry is just the exchange of electrons

>>12860643
you cant see start trough the moon muslim
planet moon is round, you will see on the next bull run
gravity, ok, tell me then why do things fall
buoyancy only exist if gravity exists

>>12860726
The inverse square law is not noticeable if the distances between the source and and the points of measurement are large enough.

>>12860726
>gravity is the weakest force
So how does the vacuum of space not suck in our atmosphere?

>>12860758
A rock falls because it is denser than air/heavier, but a rock is not as dense as you.

>>12860726
Oh and btw.. Neil Degrasse Tyson says its not gravity. So I really really like to point that out to you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECUJLEtDrIw

Yeah ehm I'm not really buying it.

>>12860805
first he says its gravity, then says its not gravity, but it is gravity and then gives another explenation. Don't mean to be misleading. This is part of the point I'm making, that arguments are just cherry-picked and made up on the spot (atleast that's what it looks to me)

>>12860761
you dense layers up to 40km
then you have much less dense up to 400km
and then you have the losses escaping, earth is losing atmosphere all the time, but if you lose atmosphere the pressure drops and more is vaporized from the oceans and other places

eventually earth will lose its atmosphere completely

>>12860759
gravity is theoretically infinite

>>12860818
Well I'm no expert or genius in this as you can probably tell. But I'm just not really buying it. I sense a lot of lies and bullshit in this NASA fairytale. So I'll just say that I don't know with a slight bias towards flat earth.

>>12860815
Also a scheming filthy Mason

>>12860780
ok but what makes the thing go down
if you have free object the heaviest will fall to the bottom, that way water is under the air
but, both water and air are falling - WHY ?

>>12860832
nasa was created as to counter the soviet propaganda with better propaganda

space is real and there are aliens on other planes

Air is less dense and lighter so it is above water.

>>12860850
ok it is great
both air and water are pulled down by what
why do they not just sit there

>>12860847

There is no pulling force. If you put a rock in an acquarium it sinks because it is denser than water and bubbles rise because air is less dense than water.

>>12860863
look the other way and you will see the stars
satellites are 10 000 km apart and are the size of refrigerators, you can still see them if they flash light at you, so called satellite flairs

>>12859299
Earth is hollow. No larp.

>>12860870
air
water
rock
that order is ok, rocks will be on the bottom
what determines where the bottom is, why are all 3 things going down

Frens can we please get back to the subject
>how I can profit of "Round Earthers"

>>12860847
And what prove do you have for aliens? Without relying on governments who actively spread disinfo to conspiracy theorists making them believe they just unrafeled a huge secret but are actually only a vessel for the government to spread that disinfo. Science is a religion. There's no prove for aliens whatsoever. Ever seen an alien? On who's authority are you relying that there are aliens?

Aliens are just a new age belief system. They say ''it's logical'' but on what info are they relying to conclude this is logical?
>Easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they've been fooled.'' -Twain

Every culture on earth except the greek has said it is flat. The arguments that a heliocentric model is more accurate at calculating the movements of heavenly bodies is easily refuted by mentioning the Mayans who believed in flat earth and had better astronomy than copernicus, the same time this argument appeared. Lots of spherical earth arguments are ATLEAST outdated and still being propogated as a reliable source of truth even when modern science refutes it itself.

Cherry-pickers. They choose their arguments as they please. Hypocrites. Liars and I don't trust them. Nor should I have any reason to trust them.

The CIA is supplying weapons to ISIS, the army fights them. Wars are being created for profit. Space was created for profit.

>>12860932
>>Aliens are just a new age belief system

Literal stone carvings/paintings all over the Earth from as far back as humanity goes telling of people descending from the sky.

Pick one?

>>12860932
closest aliens to earth are in the Pleiades
I cannot provide you with proper evidence in public without getting droned. In the Pleiades the funny thing is there are 2 inhibited planets with 2 completely different types of aliens. And they had wars. You need Cosmic clearance for more. And for the origin of life you need Core reality clearance.

CIA is a drug racket.

>>12860885
Molecular weights are different, which separates them.

>>12860923
Sell tokenized pet rocks to the gullible sheep.

>>12861130
why would weight matter
it would matter if there was a force that forced heavier thing more than a light thing

if there is no force that selects for weight how does weight matters

>>12859299
>how I can profit of "Round Earthers"
>movies
>tv shows
>novels
>comic books
>video games
>text books
>globes
>t-shirts
just to name a few

Get woke.

>>12859731
ur mom didn't think so

here's the score so far
flatcucks 0
spherechads 1000

Our “planet” is round but that doesn’t mean you are not being lied to about its true nature.

>>12861154
Are you trying to argue objects only have weight because gravity selectively pulls on them?

>>12859299
Pay your rivals to fly from california to russia and watch them fly off the edge of the earth and die in space.

>>12861282
yes
the more mass you have the more gravity affect the object
objects like electrons that have very little are affected little
photons are almost not affected

therefore in a gravity well high mass object will be imparted with more force downwards than a low mass object

object 1 is 5kg
object 2 is 1kg

both object will receive 100% pull per time

at time 10
obj1 will have energy of 50
obj2 will have energy of 10

if at time 10 both hit the ground the 1 will hit harder, but since both receive proportional pull they are accelerated at the same speed

>>12861339
>gravity

>>12861339
My argument is that you do not require a mysterious force that selectively pulls objects. Objects sit in relation to each other based on their density. This can be observed by placing objects of different weight in an acquarium.

>>12859343
How is the weak vacuum of my lungs able to pull water through a straw when gravity is supposedly so strong that it keeps everything on earth from being sucked into the infinite vacuum of space? Gravity is a theory that has not been proven.

We live on a flat realm suspended by a toroidal energy field. Through the center of it is inner earth (agartha).

>>12861339
In your case gravimeters would show a stronger level of gravity near mountains but they do not. These devices show differing levels of gravity based on altitude. I suspect they contain altimeters. The measurement of "gravity" is suspect.

>>12861376
they don't sit
they move
they move downwards
object will sit and float in zero g

if you pick up an object you have to exert a force, then you let go and the object moves down

if you push the object sideways, like a cart, it will not do anything on its own, it will stop when it hits something or when the friction slows it down

friction is between the object

but downwards you don't have gradual slow down, you have even more acceleration on top of friction

>>12861436
you are creating a pressure differential, if you cut yourself like pinhole with a needle, the blood will form a round shape that is raised above by the surrounding air pressure

you body is at the right pressure, if you pull a fish from the dept, it eyes will pop out because that fish has different internal pressure, if the fish is low dept fish it will be ok

>>12861483
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4E5T9PSbo0
they do I just give you a testable way that does not require a gravity meters

well since you frens clearly dont want to discuss the subject at hand I only want to say one last thing

*ahem*
FUCK JANNIES!
goodbye gentlemen

>>12861512
Nice strawman.

>>12861551
well can you clarify or ask a bit different

>>12861589
You brought up the subject of pressure, when I bring up the argument of my weak ass lungs are capable of sucking water through a straw which is more powerful than the vacuum of space because space cannot even suck anything off of earth's surface because gravity is so strong.

>>12861617
your lungs are pressurized the same as your environment, then all they do is to expand that create a slight pressure difference
space vacuum has to overcome 5.972 sextillion metric tons of earth pull
there is a boundary at witch that happens, that is where space begins

>>12861658
Still believes space is real. Ha

>>12861658
Are you saying space has to pull the weight of the earth (5.972 sextillion metric tons) in order to pull water, a feather, etc etc off the surface of earth? If so that means earth is exerting that much pull to keep everything on the surface, which means we would be crushed under the enormous (5.972 sextillion metric tons) of gravity. That sounds like pseudoscience bs.

So I am able to lift a cup up through the 5.972 sextillion metric tons of gravity, but the vacuum of space cannot even budge it.

>>12859564
this is actually true

>>12861729
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTY1Kje0yLg
in a gravity well orbits that you will see as circles are straight lines
you experience the world as flat because of that

as for the atmosphere we have no intuition about it, at 1 cm you will have wifi signal strength of 10 000 , at a distance of 100 meters that will 1 (hyperboli) look at the image

there is a distance at which the gravity will have sufficient pull we just don't have anything in our lives that can compare it to

>>12861796
Your video just proves that people are easy to fall for high school "science" experiments to believe in gravity.

>there is a distance at which the gravity will have sufficient pull we just don't have anything in our lives that can compare it to
We don't have anything to compare to because you are spewing pure bullshit.

>>12861208

That's a shit theory.

>>12859299

Live view of the earth, idiot.

https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/ESRS/HDEV/

>>12859299

Why don't all the flat earther pool all their money to prove the earth is flat instead of spewing conspiracy theories. Test it out like a real scientist. Prove us wrong, flat earthers. For real. If not then you're just going to be lumped in with the anti-vaxxers.

>>12859299

The earth is round but "creation" which is the universe is flat, it actually expands in 2d

NASA = National Agency of Space ACTORS

muh 50,000 mph spinning ball
muh water sticking to curved surfaces and not finding a surface
muh objects seen above the "curve" at earths 8 inches squared per mile drop
muh ability to put 5 senses to anything even beyond its scope
muh testimony from the first person to visit "space"
muh flight paths
muh antarctic treaty

globetards can't be bothered to think above government propaganda once again