[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 103 KB, 800x401, DC8739A4-B616-43E3-864A-CC39B50F80B6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12847624 No.12847624 [Reply] [Original]

FORGET THE LOW TIME SWINGS FAGGOTS

>> No.12847633

>>12847624
sauce motherfucker.

>> No.12847639

>>12847624
what price will btc be by 2022?

>> No.12847664

what are the metrics?

>> No.12847702
File: 118 KB, 1200x680, 2185E7CC-5081-4E7C-98E8-32965F7003E2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12847702

Roll dubs and I drop more truth bombs

>> No.12847769
File: 124 KB, 1275x777, 1532574041694.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12847769

>>12847702
your numbers are meaningless unless you provide the method used to calculate them

>> No.12847798

>>12847702
I already did you mongoloid.
The documents, sir.

>> No.12847824

>>12847798
Here you go faggot.
https://research.bloomberg.com/pub/res/d37g1Q1hEhBkiRCu_ruMdMsbc0A
Upboat me if you like it.

>> No.12847871

Anybody remembers that /biz/ guy, who made a spreadsheet at the top of bubble and bought $100 of each shitcoin?
Is it still here?

>> No.12848399

>>12847871
I member. I would too like to see it, let me see if I can go ramboautist

>> No.12848542

from the paper

One approach for cryptoassets which have traditionally been called “utility tokens” (broadly, ones that do not entitle the holder to a
cash stream nor are backed by a real-asset) is to posit that their value is directly correlated with the size of the use case / economy it
supports. If we take BTC, as an example, the value of BTC should be directly correlated with dollar volume of the economy it
supports. On the other hand, the value of BTC is inversely related to the frequency with which it trades, i.e. its velocity. For example,
if we have an economy in which $1,000 is exchanged each year by trading 10 coins, assuming each coin is traded only once per year,
each coin will represent $100 in value; however, if each were traded 100 times per year, the value per coin would be $1. Moreover,
as the above example suggests, the value of the crpytoasset is also inversely related to its supply, i.e. the number of coins that are in
circulation.
The technique we have described above is an approach based on the quantity theory of money, which succinctly states that the
price of currency is directly related to the dollar volume of the economy it supports and inversely correlated to its velocity and
supply, that is: P = T / (M * V), where
M = supply (or the number of units of the cryptocurrency)
V = velocity (or how many times the cryptocurrency is used per year)
P = price per unit of the cryptocurrency
T = size of the economy in which the cryptoasset is used as a means of exchange

Im not sure about their valuation method

>> No.12848569
File: 2.25 MB, 1471x622, 1525689998595.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12848569

>>12848542
This is just an overly complicated way of saying
>forever under $1
>>12847871
I couldn't find it sorry Braheem

>> No.12848576

>>12847824
Good to see what they're analysts are holding so they bias it.
Shilling XMR and trashing ETH.

>> No.12848603

>>12847624
>XRP
>$0
>BCH
>$258
Yes, this chart is legit and was definitely not made by a mad bitcoiner.

>> No.12848728
File: 439 KB, 1024x767, 1543081520236.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12848728

>>12848569
>>12848399
Guyz, we need help.
I believe he is still here.
Can anyone help us find the initial threads at least? My search returns nothing.

>> No.12848872

>>12848399
dubs.
>>12847702
deliver anon

>> No.12848905
File: 106 KB, 800x575, DzbMUZcXQAEyOo4.jpg_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12848905

>>12848603
>the fox attacks the water trying to catch the moon

>> No.12849430

>>12847624
BTC was $7k around april last year. so $32k by April confirmed.