/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12779948
did the mods delete this thread when it was posted 10 min ago?

wtf?

>>12779964
He probably made a mistake and reposted.

Next bubble, $10 per link token ath

>>12779981
im hoping to see 500x, that's probably silly though

>>12779964
The thread post was too long i had to reformat it to reduce character count and make it look better.

>>12779948
Whenever posts like these get made link prices increase. Anyone else notice

>>12779999
Nice quads

>>12779999
KEK noticed

>>12779999

>>12779999
The volume is unusually low

>>12779948
Supposing link takes the #10 spot on coinmarket cap by the next bubble , and supposing the market cap of all crypto goes to about 2 trillion, the link market cap will be about 20 billion. That's a 130x from now so about

65$

Probably this will happen by 2021 or so. Given the lengths of the previous market cycles. But who knows maybe we'll take the number 2 spot, this would put us at like 500 billion market cap. Or more than

1000$

>>12779999
Checked. Yes it’s called meme magic

>>12779948
I don't know if it takes one bubble or two bubbles, but it will max out at around $30. So I'd say 40k LINK to make it.

>>12779999
Checked.

>>12780065
Nice fud. The next bubble will be 20 trillion mcap

In the next bubble ath will be 1747$ a token

>>12779999
check’d

>>12779948
We’ve done this so many times. Stop trying to fucking cope you insecure beta.

>>12780108
Actually agree with this. Somewhere in the 10 tril+ range will be net market cap.

Combined with the hard price support from all 4chan chain link fanatics, this baby could hit close to 1k

*tink tink tink*

AHEM

I want to make you aware of Keks will. He clearly states he wants more Link threads.

Checked
based
and Linkpilled
have a nice evening gentlemen!

>>12780213

*tink tink tink*

AHEM

AHEM

I forgot to link the post >>12779999

I have one more thing to say

FUCK JANNIES!

>>12779989
Do you mean 500x from the current price or your buy in price? I think this could hit 1200 per link token. The dot com bubble hit golds market cap in december 1999 and crypto is just as revolutionary if not moreso. Bitcoin/crypto is often compared to gold so i don't see why we won't hit golds market cap in the next bubble.

>>12780065
>65$
fud

>>12779989
That's not silly at all. Chainlink could hit $1200. Dot com companies hit golds market cap in december 1999, bitcoin/crypto is often compared to gold and crypto will likely be more revolutionary than dotcom technology, and since history "rhymes" i think crypto will hit golds market cap at 8 trillion.

>>12779989
Is that 500× from the current price or 500x from your buy in price?

>>12779948
eat your fruit kiddies

>>12780490
Thank you, Damu, very cool!

>>12779948
347$

>>12779999
HOLY FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHUUUU-

$2.71

70$
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G33FHeInzIg

Screen cap this. On June 30th 2020 link will pass the 100 dollar mark.

Count my honest prediction in.

Gun to the head prediction with available info now: 1-10$ EOY depending on market.
IF we see major adoption and a killer app using chainlink oracles or a major service using chainlink we're off to the races, probably new crypto boom and 50$ or 10 times that, who knows at that point. Chances of that happening in the next 2 years? 25%¿

>>12779999
checked
this thread is now blessed

>>12781188
checked

Why should I invest in a technology with no product, no mainnet, not even a proof of concept? If it were super undervalued like iExec I would understand but even then, why not just invest in an actual product that's undervalued, such as REQ?

>>12781188
done.

I’m hoping to just get solid rewards from running a node for a few years, then $100+ I’ll have to dump it

>>12781397
stay on the sidelines and buy with redditors once it's $50 a pop thinking you're an investing genius you cuck

I did some calculations in a previous thread, others have done them aswell. Based on the marketcaps of coins in top 15 at the previous bullrun.
You end up with numbers in the range of 10$ to 1000$.

I have no doubt Chainlink is a "top 15", and i furthermore believe that the next bullrun will be greater than the last.
so if chainlinks real life adoption coincide with the next bullrun, i would say chainlink can easily go for 3 digit usd.

Screencap this, LINK will never pass $1 in price again. Ever. Put this in the collage, you know it's true.

>LINK is designed to be a cheap, cup of coffee automated platform

>>12781613
Not an argument.

>>12781661
the fact that you are even considering such trash bags like req or rlc makes you unworthy of any arguments, seriously

>>12781397
>no proof of concept
wrong

>>12780065
LINK is a top 5 coin by conservative estimates. No way this real world protocol required for the whole market to function should be below shit like IOTA. It could be $50 even without market recovery.

>>12781397
>If it were super undervalued like iExec
iExec doesn't even need a separate currency to function it's such a piece of fucking shit

>confirmed partnership with the Shire

We’ll never hit $1 with cunts like this dumping on every 8% move

>>12782512
>he thinks the price action before the mainnet matters

When memes become a reality. I'm tripping

>>12782512
It's just bots. Nothing you can do about them except find solace in the fact that 99% of them will lose all their money when the singularity happens.

Why do link threads always have the best digits ???

>>12779948
What year do you want a price prediction for? Or just the next peak in general?

>>12782512
which app, anon?

>>12782557
dat shit real?

I think the worst thing is when BTC or ETH moons and LINK dumps completely

>>12779948
1000$ per link end of 2019.

>>12779948
244

Triple digits minimum but it will go higher after initial speculation into 1200usd region. Pajeets have just started infecting the telegram but are being pushed aside with things they don't understand.

>>12779948
EO2019: $0.90
EO2020: $3
EO2021: $6
Tippy top of the next crypto bubble: $22

t. all-in marine with 130k

>>12783669
Why are the so many street shitting pajeets here yet so few on Chainlink's Telegram? I'm not keeping up with National Geographic.

>>12783680
YOU'RE FUCKING WRONG, YOU'RE LITERALLY GOING TO BE A MULTIMILLIONAIRE

>>12779999
Praised Kek and checked

>>12781188
Holy shit, Assblaster having dinner with old men all the time makes way more sense that way

>>12783554
Screenshot from twitter kek

>>12781633
oldest fud in the book

>>12780065
Bro can you stop playing with my feelings? pls

LINK won't hit 1$ ever again

>>12784706
you're deluded if you really think that
LINK is worth more a piece than fucking XRP lol

EOY 2019: $0,20
EOY 2020: $0,05
EOY 2025: $1,50
EOY 2030: $5,00

$777 a stink

500$

>>12783703
With his numbers he is a multi millionaire?

>>12785006

t.delusional xrp fag that fell for the scam

55

Mars

>>12781626
Yeah - if chainlink reaches the same mcap as XRP now it would be $50, if it reached the mcap of ETH at peak bull it would be $300
So my prediction is $50-300 and I have enough link to make it if it hits $50.

Where is the best place to buy some LINK?

>>12786774
I buy them on binance

>>12779948
Your prediction is false. I’d have 87,000,000 USD and obviously that isn’t happening

>>12781633
I agree. But what people don’t anticipate mostly are multiple token splits to accomplish this.

Will be $1 but there will also be a 1:1000 token split prior.

reminder that bitconnect reached rank 26 and 2.7bn market cap at one time.

>>12787652
> Be Euro-anon
> Buy lottery ticket for draw on Tuesday
> Win £140m (and you don't have to pay tax on it)
> I have equal odds as any other player
> Something that hasn't happened before doesn't mean it will never happen

eoy 2019: $1.75
eoy 2020: $8
eoy 2024: $1000

>>12787652
In theory you would have 87 million USD, but you won't, even if LINK hits that 877$.

You can't hold all your linkies to that, you (and everyone else here) will begin selling something starting from 2$, and when LINK is 25$, most of current holders have sold 95% of their tokens. This happened with Bitcoin, it happened with NEO, ETH etc.

Most of those who will have link when it is 877$, have bought it for 100-500$ each, and are holding a few, or maybe 10-30 LINK.

>>12779948
bog here, I'll dump it all, you have 72 hours before shutdown

>>12788705
The thing with LINK is that you can stake it either by running a node yourself or putting it into a pool(paying a fee). If the ROI is at least 8%(gonna be a lot bigger earlier) a year, then I doubt anyone will start selling a lot. As long as the staking returns are good and smartcontracts are getting adopted, then there's no point to sell your LINKs unless you need the money for a car/house whatever. You can just ride out the passive income and then when the ROI gets small(which means LINKs price will probably be very high), then you can start thinking about selling and putting into some other stock funds with better ROI.

At the moment LINK seems speculative, but when mainnet is up and smartcontracts are saving money, then it will be seen as a secure investment, not just some "crypto". It will be a piece of the smartcontract economy.

The reason BTC, ETH etc where sold was because you couldn't get any passive income from it. You couldn't stake or anything. For mining you don't need to put anything for collateral. Chainlink(in theory ofc) is a completely different beast.

>>12789262
so you just pulled that 8% our of your ass?

>>12789279
8% is a ROI that you can get from safe stocks. That's why I said that if the ROI is at least 8% then there's no reason to sell LINK and put it into safer investments.

pic related you

>>12788705
>You can't hold all your linkies to that
What makes you so sure? Never underestimate iron hands.

>>12789443
so you know the cost of the api data, you know the % of collateral need for the contract, and you know what company and industry will use CL network already? So you pull that 8% out of your ass just because 8% is a safe roi from stock? amazon and apple ELKs didn't even do 8% last year

>>12789496
Jesus fuck do you have any reading comprehension? I'm saying IF the ROI of running a node with LINK collateral or letting someone else use your LINKs is bigger than 8% a year, then there's no point to sell your LINKs just to put them into safe stock funds/indexes.

Take your time reading it. Read it more than once.

pic related still you

>>12779948
I'd say 782$

>>12789496
Also it doesn't have to be exactly 8%. Just look up some stock indexes/funds whatever and see what you get for yearly ROI. It can be between 5%-10%.

In the current market, if link was to get to No 5 (where litecoin is at the moment) at 3 billion MC, we would be looking at around $10 LINK. I think that's probably achievable over the next few years. The only thing that worries me about link is the amount of exchanges to buy it on - the CL team don't seem to give a shit about wanting to get LINK purchased by the public.

>>12789668
Are you retarded? It‘s on binance and will be listed on coinbase after mainnet

>>12789703
Look at the amount of different exchanges big MC coins have. Link has fuck all in comparison

>>12789813
not linkpilled at all

>>12789870
Nigger please

>>12789901
nice

>>12779989
8T mcap would be crazy. But if we did, I think that there would be less coins in the space than there were doing big bullrun. Meaning most of the money would be located in a few other coins.

ive said it before and ill say it again. we'll go beyond eth's peak to around 1700 dollars

>>12783554
Tabtrader methinks

>>12789901
jelly as fuck. Only 134k here. Could have had 250k if I'd held since last march but I had to go chasing shitcoins in the middle of a bear market.

>>12790166
I rode antshares through neo up to $35 in August 2017 and onwards. Sold and bought cl. Never looked back. Been buying since start of October 2017. If only my average buy had been 17c

>>12790210
You realize you're gonna be a multi billionaire?

Link token will never become so high because it will become too volatile. Volatility is a dangerous thing for companies staking link into contracts for any length of time which could be affected by large volatility.

Also it doesn't make sense for the price of link to rise high and fast either.
Imagine this:
>You need to place a multi billion dollar derivative contract.
>You stake $10billion thus increasing every link token by about $10.
>4chan neets all market sell their links and crash the price making your derivative contract worthless by the time it executes.
>You cry because you thought tokens would be locked

change my mind

>>12790457
>change my mind
pay me a consultant fee first

>>12790210
Kek, literally what I did same time line and everything. Rode neo then bought link and held ever since. Feels good brother

>>12790457
hahaha like close your eyes nigga hahaha

>>12790457
>Link token will never become so high because it will become too volatile.
The higher it goes and the more is staked, the lower the volatility will become.

>>12791187
You think 4chan neets wont want to withdraw at 10,20,30 etc...? Any business who funds their contracts to deploy them will find that the value of their contract, along with the node operator who staked link to support that contract will become worthless before it is executed.

>>12782557

that's so fucking cool