/biz/ - Business & Finance

As someone considering picking up a Link stack thank you for your efforts. Let us test the autism of this collective.

>>12729091
link is a scam you fucking idiot

Agree.
100x in crypto

Correction
Agree
No 100 x in crypto

Except for traders

>>12729091
We are all literally made of cheese

>>12729091
>communist music Playlist on YouTube
What?

>>12729161
How new are you? Adelyn has a youtube channel full of communist propaganda

Bored so I'll shit on your FUD
(1/2)

>witnet has the first mover advantage and the best product
Developing a product with business development / standards in mind vs an obscure non-agnostic solution that's in a completely different realm than Chainlink?

>openlaw is now using rhombus for the juiciest contracts (derivatives)
They're considering all options as they should, Rhombus is not even close to Chainlink and their connections. Not an argument.

>swift is working with ripple, poc was only bond coupons
Come on man don't be dumb Ripple is SWIFT's direct competition. It is a fair point that the PoC revolved around bonds, one thing to consider was just how early this occured during Chainlinks history.

>eth can't scale
Why not? Do you understand truly the unknown territory they're entering is?

>gonser chat was a flop, stuttering pothead, gonser doesn't work at ds anymore anyway, gonser is a moron who literally got scammed by a previous ico (SHOPIN)
Nobody knew Shopin would flop, not an argument.

>masters left digital asset because their dlts are btfo by Corda
Proof?

>sgx defeats the point of trust less ness, even ari admits it can't be trusted, it's just a high school project
Not a highschool project by any means. This whole Intel SGX being fundamentally flawed argument has been beat to death. Projects do not need to choose Intel SGX.

>permissioned chains, token is worthless
Higher efficiencies present themselves once the chain becomes public

>>12729248
I have the ultimate fud: your favorite project was being shilled by a rich pajeet who is probably wealthy enough to poo on American streets

>>12729248
I didn't read anything you posted but it can't be a valid refutation of what OP said. You're just coping

>2/3 of supply to flood the market
Legal agreements avoid this.

>big crash on the horizon, btc will keep shitting the bed and taking down everything else with it
More money flooding in vs flooding out

>adelyn typos, communist music Playlist on YouTube
Not an argument, obviously a fake YouTube account

>no more x100 in crypto, much less a x1000
So what? You realize the marketcap will be over a trillion in a few years right? Who's going to fill these gaps?

>nobody else but biz giving a shit, no normie hype no moon rocket
Too complicated to explain/understand, too early in the project, no one truly understands the infinite use cases, normies are fucking braindead.

>APIs are single point of failure
IT WILL ALWAYS BE A SINGLE POINT OF FAILURE, this will never be avoided, at best you can diversify to different API's. Companies currently harness these API's without the Blockchain... Chainlink simply connects them to Smart Contracts.

>accord already said they'd use competitors too
The market hasn't even began to grow yet? Ofcourse they'll do this since we're all diving into the unknown

>obsolete in less than 5 years, replaced by Enigma etc
Not an argument, Enigma is COMPLETELY different. Ruined your FUD post even more.

>he literally never washes his shirt and potential partners are turned off by the unprofessional smelly odor
Zzz

Man fud is getting so stale latley

i like this fud because it makes people think link is worth buying into. we've pretty much accumulated all the good areas of this field it's probably too late for the linkies to realize desu

>>12729091
yaaaaawwwnnnnnn clap.....clap....clap....great post op