/biz/ - Business & Finance

Based

>>12678841
Shitty ass fake page

>>12678891
try again, buddy

>>12678907
Heh, fucking pathetic

>>12678841
Thanks, just sold 10k.

>>12678841
ughhhhhhhhh they liked pic related....

>>12679246
we're... gonnna make it...

Holy shit. This is unironically huge.
>https://www.docusign.com/partners?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=GIF_NA_Awareness&sf98433367=1

>The DocuSign System of Agreement Platform connects the world’s No. 1 eSignature technology to every other aspect of the agreement process, revolutionizing how agreements are prepared, signed, enacted, and managed.

>With DocuSign, hundreds of prebuilt connectors can pull data from systems of record to pre-fill agreements, embed the DocuSign experience in other applications where employees already work, and trigger post-agreement actions, like billing, account activation, or payments.

>https://www.docusign.com/sites/default/files/resource_event_files/DocuSign-Rise-of-Modern-Systems-of-Agreement-White-Paper.pdf

>As the technology matures, blockchains will have a role to play in providing a secure record of an agreement’s existence and its relevant data, which a company’s partners can use. Blockchains may also enable new ways to manage identity. Finally, they can be infrastructures on which to run smart contracts.

Get those duckies in a row.

LINE EM UP BOYS

>>12679315
bro there is literally no reason to not use chainlink for this, take that in.

>>12679331
In other words: we're actually going to make it? No tricks?

>>12679342
i actually 100% think so lmao. like what other oracle system is as respected and legit as chailink + towncrier? it's being made at a major american universitty by one of the most important figures in cryptography (ari juels), along with a competent CEO that made associate at a very young age..... all delivery no bullshit.... even a major ETH developer (nick johnson) released a tool under chainlnk's github last year.... chainlinks developer's successfully convinced the ETH devs to integrate an entire new token standard just for chainlink..... and people like Tom Gonser are showing up with Sergey and talking about how crucial these agreements are to the 4th industrial revolution.....

this sounds like rhetoric but it's actually all true

https://youtu.be/Lz4Da3de21o

I used to pump
I used to dump and then I'd sell
I used to pump
I used to dump and then I'd cry well

Coming for some profits in this crowded room,
I need a new erc token and I need it really soon

PUMP

>>12678841
Okay so it's pretty obvious now that they're partnered. Question time:
Let's say, mainnet is up and running right now and Docusign is Chainlinks only partner. Does anyone have any guesstimates as to what the token price would look like with Docusign's volume @ full utilisation of Chainlink?

Thready reminder that Docusign has been building towards this for a while

“One of many thousands of partners” linktards desperate

>>12679362
Witnet has a finished product already in use by multimillion rupee companies

>>12679401
Hundreds. Of. Teams.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iYoE4_q0Po

>>12679432
Witnet is actually the shadowfork but whitelisted.

>>12679382
I posted a pricing structure on docusign's thing above. see >>12679315
But I personally think they're prepared to adjust that quickly based on demand, or Sergey has agreements with these companies to pursue an "unlimited" API call per year or month payment plan in conjunction with the 650mm tokens set aside for node operators so it will be very cheap initially for companies to test but rewarding for node operators and this will onboard enterprises quickly because there is very little risk if you're only paying $200 for unlimited API calls for the month. Docusign will probably just subsidize their call level with tokens flowing from Sergy and Co to docusign to encourage use once the network goes live.

>>12679453
So.. where do I put my linkies to make more stinkies?

>>12679464
run a node or use Linkpool. I'm going to do both. Running a node shouldn't be difficult and thomas has posted good instructions and I believe the team is building a simple to use UI so it shouldn't be too hard. Always do tests, never reveal your passphrase, and it should be easy.

I spent some linkies on some linkpool because I think early on as node operators get rewarded, there will be an exponential curve related to the amount of linkies node oeprators receive early on (x axis) vs the increasing price due to supply side shortages (y axis). So the LINK cost of buying a linkpool share will be offset as linkpool is the first to begin caputring much of the node operator distro tokens and this will add up quickly and outpace the price increase so I should, theoretically, gain more links than the amount I've paid for my linkpool contract share.

But
>Theoretically, we're all made of cheese, Sergey Nazarov

>>12678841
people itt actually falling for this. truly the lowest iq board. embarrassing

>>12679512
How many linkies do you have and how many to run a node ?

>>12679532
Only 0 chainlink required to run a node.

>>12679451
So the rumours are true thanks for the tip anon

>>12679544
You wont get any jobs that need collateral, and you will need to still fund it with ETH

>>12679532
all in but you don't need any to run a node so presumably you can setup a node and when mainnet goes live if you supply data to the network you're exchanging your cost of electricity for linkies. With node operator incentives and price increases it should be profitible early on.

>>12679593
>if you supply data to the network
Like what? Is this like these cam shows for interweb toots? I don't want to get nakid infront of a camera, for fucks sake!

>>12679593
Time + AWS costs + ETH = LINK rewards

>>12679601
whatever there's demand for. so a lot of boring APIs for sports scores, financials, market prices, etc. Derivatives are spposedly the first to start using link on a large scale with shipping following after. you take someone's API and plug it into the chainlink network.

>>12679644
>you take someone's API and plug it into the chainlink network.
That doesn't sound like a good idea, and probably wont be covered by the terms of said API's, and if you can't give a source for your data, it's basically useless. You didn't really think this through, did you?
>I just steal his data and put it there
>free monies
retard

>>12679669
Then other APIs will be used and the owner will go bankrupt since no one will want to deal with them. Chainlink is bigger than they are, they need Chainlink, not the other way around. Few companies will be dumb enough to shoot themselves in the foot like that.

>>12679699
Look, kid. If the owner of some data thinks (or sees) there's any value in his data being made available by chainlink, then he will do it himfuckingself. There is literally no need for a pajeet in the middle. What the shit.

>>12679699
>>12679755
Kek is pleased by chaos

>>12679755
Garbage. Why should we trust such a dishonest person with made up centralized information? It just is not going to happen. That might be ok for something that is inconsequential, like quizzes telling you which power ranger you are or what your favorite milkshake flavors means, but that doesn't need chainlink in the first place.

>>12679755
>data source owner sets up his own chainlink, gets paid in link for his data
>data source owner sees that there is demand from dozens of other chainlink nodes to deliver the same data, he sells to them, making even more money on the same data and lowering his risk as a chainlink node operator

>>12679787
I don't know. Still sounds much easier to just buy a webcam and show some titties.

>>12679775
As if normies need chocolate milk to define their personalities on or off chain. They don't know the difference
> T. Crying over spilled milk

>>12679432
>Witnet has a finished product already in use by multimillion rupee companies
>multimillion rupee's = £16

>>12679755
This would be bullish AF.
>Imagine ESPN setting up a node