/biz/ - Business & Finance

>yfw the Akashic records are literally an astrological blockchain, occuring organically in the ether

Genuinely these remote viewings are done by people who are not biased ie. for example by people who don't even know what Chainlink is

Bunch of daydreamers high on hopium will probably see $376, just like you see beautiful women in your wet dreams, but that is more akin to a phantasm caused by lust or greed.

Using a drug to unironically make a random guess. This has to be satire.

>>12674018
You're onto something.

>>12674031
Maybe you have a hard time following instructions. We don't need your opinion unless its attached to a price for 2020. Follow instructions, it's super easy. Even a brainlet like you can do it.

>>12673953
>there's a phenomena whereby a crowd can accurately guess the future within a very accurate range
it doesn't really work if everyone can see what everyone else has guessed, because people just copy each others answers (madness of crowds as opposed to wisdom of crowds). For maximum accuracy each guess needs to be independent

>>12673953
>Op

>>12674061
Ok count this into your average too

$40000000000000 by 2020

Or do you dismiss the outright, blatant overestimations?

>>12673953
I think if everything lines up nicely, Chainlink could hit $10k by the end of 2020.

>>12674062
The idea for harnessing the wisdom of the crowds has stuck for predicting the price and dammit, that's what we're gonna do, Anon.

Stop your FUD and give us a price prediction.

thanks for the fud for twitter. Going to start capping this shit and posting there

>>12673953
I have had a few dreams of chainlink.

I have NOT seen prices. However, I have had a lot of deja vu. Certain events that I've seen before in regard to me making certain investments were things that I vividly remember dreaming years ago, but not understanding.

I've been interested in finance since I was a child. I had a dream where I invested a lot of money, lost a lot, and then became insanely rich afterwards. I forgot about it until LINK dipped to .17. In my dream, I remembered that I had invested in a company that "Helped delete men from contracts". That's what I remember from the dream.

Furthermore, this is one of very few "sequential dreams" that I've had. The follow up to this dream was that I would lose a lot of money and then ask my father to invest. It happened just like that. The second Deja vu happened after I had realized that I shilled to him.
I am in the green now, but the whole experience has been surreal

>>12674082
Your outlandish price has been taken into account. Thank you for following instructions, Anon.

>>12673953
This is just going to turn into a drug hate thread, shoulda kept your post simple OP.

My eoy 2020 prediction (120k stack:) $2.80

>>12674090
Thank you for contributing.

>>12673953
The LINK cultists have seriously gone full retard. You're all going to lose your money and I'm sad for you.

>>12674111
Thank you, Anon.

>>12674129
If you believe that brainlet, then attach it to a price prediction.

Brainlets give themselves away all the time. Without FAIL. Ha.

$10 eoy 2020

I've been watching ChainLink since ICO, and by your theory we're looking at $500. Half the people here say $0, and half say $1000.

My guess is $80

$100 EO2020

>>12674018
Who the fuck is running the nodes? Aliens?

$6 eoy 2020

>>12674094
$30 EOY 2019

15 eoy 2020

>>12674182
Entrepreneurs and people with existing capital.

$3.50 eoy 2020

But by 2030, $500+

23.50 eoy

300$ eoy 2022

777 yo

Given bitcoin halvening and Ethereum becoming formidable with sharding and POS, that should put us in a bubble fueled by the possibilities of smart contracts.
Chainlink’s true potential will still be years off, but that won’t prevent an onslaught of smart contract speculation. Assuming Chainlink is front and center of this bull market, and 100,000,000 tokens added to circulating supply.

I say $40 EOY 2020. But that would be peak smart contract bubble. It could drop 90% from there and take years to reach ATH again

>>12674275
Sorry, 10$ eoy 2020

120

by 2020 i think we will be well into a new bull run fueled by actual adoption in a few industries- the proving grounds upon which early adopter companies can show the cost saving and security improvements that blockchain offers. Think derivatives markets, both retail and OTC, although I reckon the OTC markets will work over permissioned blockchains initially. Sergey mentioned derivatives and insurance adoption in 2019. Based on these factors, I think LINK will steadily appreciate and by 2020 it will be between 50 and 200 dollars- so I'll take the average and predict a price of $125

$270

>>12673953
$2,757.14582

$64

>>12674324
Thanks

I'd say 700$

>>12673953
$1000

>>12673953
I’m sure that if you asked this board in mid 2017 what they thought BTC would be worth today, and averaged their answers, the answer would be a much larger number than 3500 dollars

>>12674324
>follow the crowd
https://youtu.be/iOucwX7Z1HU

I got a small sample size from this thread alone. Anyone who put a price with cents I rounded up (2.50 rounded to 3 for example). I’m leaving my own guess out as to remove bias.

So far I got:

299
376
10000
3
10
80
100
6
30
15
4
120
24
300
125


Add that up and you get 11492. Divide by 15 and...

$766.133 repeating

Based on my extensive and prolonged research of /biz/
$.75cents usd
>my hopes to accumulate more.

>>12674416
I also tried to leave out meme answers

If not dubs 100usd
If dubs 0

>>12674103
Delusional if true

We are officially in complacency

>>12673953
I have a really strong feeling that LINK will reach 1000 in the next few years, and it might do a short dip, but ultimately will surpass 1k.
I also have the feeling that LINK will quickly become very valuable compared to usd after 1k. When adoption waves start rolling in, companies will use LINK and other tokens as currency.

I think LINK will be the first token that makes crypto flip fiat. It can be used across our solar system.

>>12674416
Thank you for your contribution.

>>12674490
We need a larger sample size. I think if we aim for double that and hit 30 legitimate guesses, we should have a nice number.

Curious how far off it will be from 766

Also .133 repeating those digits kek

Link will be $287 in next 36 months. Trust me, I'm from the far off future of 2015

>>12674507
This

>>12673953
I realistically think it will be 7 dollars.

K =11
E=5
K=11

$115.11 eoy 2020

8 dollars eoy 2020

Assuming world wide financial collapse....

1 Link = 1000 food EOY

>>12674512
Believe me or don't. Sergey believes the project is worth $100B. I know this his exact estimate of value. His. Not mine. I won't say how I know this. I don't know how many coins will be in circulation when it gets to this market cap. Worst case scenario here $100 per LINK.

This valuation is post bear market. I have no idea where he thinks bitcoin and the rest of the market are going. I don't think he gives a shit about anything other than just winning. He's more optimistic than I am. He thinks by December of this year. Better get your ducks in a row, anon.

>>12674433
Checked. But
>not understanding the predictive power of dreams

Will you still make it anon?

288.11

>>12673953

You guys are crazy

Get rid of the high (10,000) and the low (3) and calculate again.

Result
-----------------------------------------------
Mean: 114.53846153846
Median: 80
Range: 372
Sum: 1489
Count: 13
Sorted Data Set: 376, 300, 299, 125, 120, 100, 80, 30, 24, 15, 10, 6,


My prediction is $45

>>12674558
Lol that's funny. I actually know what one of the team member's price expectations for the LINK token is and it's much higher than that.

>>12674673
yup, 10,000 is definitely an outlier and should be disregarded

>>12674699
checked and agreed. Source - my dad works at chainlink

>>12674558
Don’t worry, no one believes you...especially because if you knew sergey, you’d know he doesn’t talk prices (even with close acquaintances).

>>12674722
;^)

>>12674699
Thomas doesn't count. He's an actual retard or he purposely lies to fuck with you. I don't care if you neets believe me. Just get your ducks in a row in case I'm not larping.

>>12674772
Thomas is one of the most based motherfuckers on the team. kys.

>>12674799
And he's your source. Sorry he's misinformed as he works for Smartcontract.com and not Chainlink.

>>12674702
Watch the video
>>12674416
Barely anyone gets close to the actual number and most people are way off, including some dumb bitch who guessed 50,000. But the mean is almost spot on.

>>12674816
I can't say who my source is. Thomas is still based. Sergey is more focused on the tech, he could care less about the price.

If Thomas doesn't work for Chainlink why is he listed on the website as part of the team?

>>12673953
$4.50 SRS

i can't place a price prediction, though i've seen very strange coincidences in my daily life - after i invested in chainlink, one of the members started saying "stinky" as a general insult (twitch girl that uses it as an inside joke). the dungeon master of the group accidentally calls my character "sergey" every single session. weird occurrences.

lame ass fucking thread, under $1000 eoy 2020? WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE?

>>12674862
I had a dream last night about Sergey speaking at a conference. My alarm woke me up and in a sleepy haze I quickly shut it off worried that it was going to interrupt his speech.
I’m a fucking autist and i need a break from this shit man.

>>12674416
>299
>376
>10000
>3
>10
>80
>100
>6
>30
>15
>4
>120
>24
>300
>125
But the median is $80

we need a sign that this is all a simulation

>>12674841
that video was very interesting but i'm hesitant to trust it. Couldn't they have fudged the results for the sake of a more intriguing video? I'd like some more scientific material examining this

My 2020 price prediction is 14c. We stay frozen in a bear market and people really start capitulating.

>>12674962
>Academics don't fudge results

Anon are you living under a rock?

>>12674975
You're not welcome here.

Depends on the bull market.
If bull market - maybe, around $77
If no real bull market
maybe $9

If insane balls out bull market, then $222

>>12673953
218$

>>12673953
I think Link will always stay around $10, but updates to the network will reduce the divisibility of each token while simultaneously multiplying every stack proportionately.

So $10 in perpetuity is my answer

See >>12672770

>>12673953
I tried to meditate and I saw something like 390$

>>12674975
Not 14 but around 30cents.
Btc will bounce between 3-4k for the next 5 years and link will follow just like every other shitcoin. Adoption wont come for another 10+ years and most early adpoters will have lost faith ages ago. This is when the late comers finally pump our bags to around 10$.

>>12673953
If derivatives, insurance, trade finance, supply chain, and legal applications see serious adoption this year we could see 2k USD/LINK EO2020 or sooner.

>>12675308
First clever post in this thread. And it's not if btw.

>>12675308
>>12675332
See >>12672770

>>12674852
>could care less
kys

>>12675382
so what? it doesn't matter. stop posting it.

>>12674407
kok

We have an average close to $1000 based on the responses so far (this includes even the far out numbers).

Fine I’ll make a new prediction since my 75 cent doesn’t count.

$75 usd eo2020

The Royal Society understands the Wisdom of the Crowds. I wonder why it took so long for Link Marines to finally harness their knowledge to predict the future. About time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tngG2kAik

$0.60

>>12674322
too soon, the first train ride starts at 2020 and you need another year to convince people that it won't kill you. 2021 mainstream adoption begins, 2022-2023 hype bubble

>>12674037
This is Delphi

>>12674904
jej

$10 2020
$50 2021
$1000 2024

>>12673953
$50

Anon, I'm afraid this won't work the way you want it to work if your are posting about the desired results before you see the predictions.

$1000 EOY is the only correct answer

>>12676300
The "desired" result is my mere opinion, and my opinion is unironically drowned out by the additional replies and predictions. Do you think these people are influenced by what I want? Kek

>>12673953
You were stupid to pick 2020 because the next bubble isn't in 2020. Chainlink will hit 7.50 in 2020 though.

80 USD

>>12676316
Yes, stupid for picking a year that's less than 365 days from now. And stupid for explaining the theoretical model with scientific backing and accuracy. Anyway, thanks for the contribution.

$5000 by eoy 2020

>>12676311
Checked. I recently took LSD and contemplated Chainlink. It felt completely reasonable that a well connected company born out an enterprise need is about to move on a huge new market and become massively valuable. These things just happen sometimes, it's ok to accept it, not as some heady conspiracy, but just an example of the machinations of business and how tech redistributes wealth from time to time. We need to zoom out and be really patient sometimes guys, this team really has it in the bag.
>Accord and Openlaw shit
>Polkadot Q3/4
>Bitcoin halving 2020
>Muh oragle bubble

I am expecting no less than a $100 LINK. I can see it valued anywhere up to 1T, i.e. $1000 EOY 2021. Fucking derivatives alone...

On Dec 31 2029 at 24:00 the price will be negative 5000000$. You'll all owe the IRS tons of money but your coins will drain resources from you. Calculate

>>12673953
$2

>>12676794
I will counter that proposal by adding a googol to the price prediction thread. While seemingly unfathomable, I'm banking on the idea of global society--robot, humans, law, financial incumbents, global shipping, et al to be fully integrated by a decade, but considerable inroads with stakeholders have been made. We may see another Gates nod if we're lucky. And we've had some degree of luck on our side.

>>12676872
I'm countering again. A negative googolplex because the heat death came early and everything, especially chainlink, has no purpose, no function, no identity, no existance.

>>12673953
Guys, I just shot a speedball and the number 0.40 came to mind. Eerie.

>>12677029
What the fuck is a speedball? I guess, oh nevermind...

>>12676976
I could never call you low-energy, that's for sure.

Anyway, fuck you, Anon.

>>12676755
$100 is a nice number, but seriously NEO is a shittier project to LINK and we're still early. $1000 is realistic from seeing some of the use cases described floating on some of the derivative presentations available online.

>>12674416
if we remove the $10,000 prediction and divide by 14 we are left with $106.57142.
>still not bad
($766.133+$106.57142)/2= $436.35237, fwiw

>>12677160
oh and my prediction is $43 end of 2020.

Any have an updated number even including the ridiculous prediction. A prediction is a prediction after all.

>>12677229
Just saw your comment.

As it stands, LINK has a potential 200x by conservative calculations harnessing the the wisdom of the crowd model.

HOLY SHIT

Scientifically-backed approach suggesting a 200x

Thanks /biz/ for changing my life. I will always rep you guys should this become reality.

>>12677266
we need more data

At least 300 predictions

>>12677303
I've read of successful models leveraged with a mere 200. Should we have 100 predictions (we do), then it has some degree of reliability.

>>12677303
256 eo2020

>>12677439
Thanks for your contribution

>>12673953
40c EOY 2020

More than all the herbs, spices, and half price jigaboos Zanzibar has to offer in trade.

Link will be $173 EOY 2020, cap this

>>12673953
i dont think 1k is a meme at all. So 1k 2020

>>12677602
Quantify

>>12673953
557

I do believe in 777 by 2021 or 2022.

$777 2020 EOY

$0.78

$1000 EOY

can someone shoop a chainlink logo in his hands?

I could see link at 150 by EOY

75 usd

Whats our average !!!!??!!!!!!

>>12677956
honk and piepilled

$120 in 2025. But a loaf of bread will cost $900.

How many of the predictions here are duplicates? I predict $5 ath in 2020

>>12678000
checked
but why would you say such a thing fren

$575 USD

$83 2022

>>12677991
I'm curious to know the avg now, too.

>>12674182
You are the node my nigga

>>12674182
you'd run a node if you were smart, but with such comments, even when Anon, I dont have much confidence in explaining to room temps.

bump as we need the crowd by our side. One of the most original and thought-provoking posts on /biz/ related to Chainlink in a while.

bumpity bump

>>12673953
>stoners fantasized and that means something
What the fuck is wrong with you

$525 end of 2020

$44

150

>>12678550
>One of the most original and thought-provoking posts on /biz/ related to Chainlink in a while
stay humble OP

P.S. you keep bumping this back to Page 1 all day like a cockroach
stop interfering with the natural neural net work
if your message was original or thought provoking you wouldn't have to bail your thread from Page 9 every hour

obligatory:
>muh price speculation thread is """oRigNinaL"""

>>12678655
Checked and great numbers

>>12678738
The beauty of /biz/ is the natural skepticism and freedom of speech on the internet. This place is a groundswell for the best ideas. I'm throwing the idea out in the internet and we'll see how close the aggregate prediction is close (if at all)? And within what range?

Obviously, this approach has its flaws, but those throwing out price predictions I'm sure are aware of that and proceed accordingly in their assessments.

>>12673953
I’ve had a dream where I saw the price at $387...no sense of timeframe.

>>12678767
Give us a price update OP

$70

>>12678781
If you can program a quick script for the purposes of scraping the predictions and finding the mean, I'm sure many people here will be appreciative (including me). Let us know.

>>12677105
Yeah it’s plausible and I know that market cap is just a meme. Hard to believe that many here will make it a few times over even with just $100. Link could singularity of control but it’s gonna entirely depend on real world use of smart contracts. At least it won’t be a bubble of purely speculation.

Prediction is easy. Look at the run to 20k btc. Look at the shitcoins at the top 10. Chainlink will surpass those at the very least.

>>12678839
Thank you for your contribution, but please quantify it numerically.

>>12673953
My prediction is $5000 eoy 2019 then crash to $80 after the hedge funds and whales dumb their bags and then an organic run up to $10,000 by 2020

>>12673953
The whole problem with this thread is we need some basic vetting. I have no issues with anons giving really low or high figures (within reason... like nothing above $10k), but the anons who respond need to be tested somehow to prove that they have at least a basic understanding of what CL does. Without that, these guesses won't reflect the wisdom of the crowd because half the people responding will be retards who don't even really know what it is they're guessing the price of. It's like asking a colorblind person what shade of orange the sunset will be at 6:00PM sharp tonight.

>>12678860
>organic run-up
>12400% gain in a year

pick one

>>12678931
I get where you're going with this but remember when the crowd is asked the number of jelly beans in a jar the individual don't have a clue what they're going either.

The individual knows little, that is why the crowd is harnessed in this particular example as it follows the core tenet of the wisdom of the crowd. You ultimately let the crowd decide the direction it will take the prediction. Individuals are silenced by the aggregate wisdom. I invite you to learn more on this topic. It's quite effective.

>>12678931
this statement is retarded, most of /biz by now should have some basic understanding of chainlink. Not many newfags would be entering in this bear market except for autists.

Salam Alakum from 2020, gud sir! 28,600 Rupees per Link.

>>12678931
No that defeats the whole purpose of the wisdom of the crowd exercise

>>12678980
Interesting topic, I can leverage this with my creative projects. Got any good places to start reading?

>>12679058
On a more serious note. I think we will be around $785 per link at its peak in 2020 assuming no dilution to the 350M circulating supply.

$450 peak

>>12673953
$390 by EOY 2020
I can calculate the average in a few hours, will post in here if the thread is still up

>>12678792
should only take 5 mins to scroll through the thread and add the numbers to excel

>>12674018
Based and redpilled

I didn't count the high predictions (10k +)
64 results, min : 0.14 max : 5k
average : $389.6

>>12677105
You are delusional. It is never going back up. None of these projects will survive.

>>12679534
What the fuck, really??? $389

>>12674018
>then who was oracle

>>12679534

No fucking way. Show your results in a spreadsheet at least like >>12679234 did.

>>12679806
HOLY SHIT remember that one anon who took DMT and went to check the akashic records for the price of link in the future and got something like $392? Pretty similar numbers if you're asking me

>>12679989
it was 374

>>12679900

>>12673953
$10

>>12679989
>>12680029
$379

>>12673953
299 is far far too high. To say that you would be estatic at a higher price means you musnt own much. 299 would make most of beyond rich. If you have known about this for a year and not accumulated enough that 299 per token doesnt allow you to make it..... you must be retarded or a poorfag.

>>12674090
Fucking delusional.

>>12674478
You have no idea what you are talking about.

>>12680063
The only realistic answers in this soreadsheet are anything under $10.
Long shot could hit $20.
Rest of you are deluded. Need 100k min to make any descent money out of link

>>12679534
Why wouldn't you count the high predictions. That are a part of the group. Whose ti say what's high?

>>12679900
The problem with this is that alot of people are assuming links price at the peak and not in 2020 while others are giving what they legitimately think 2020 will be like which is screwing the results up.

>>12680091
They didn't check akashic records.

123

>>12679534
You must count the high predictions. Remember the jelly beans

jesua christ... someone go warosu and check some old price prediction threads and calculate, if the result is then also 3** $ i belive 100%. Now I belive only 95%

lucky for me i'm on the $5000 EOY timeline

>>12673953

70 cents, and I’m not fudding. That’s a 90% increases and it’ll be the best performing coin of 2019 as well as 2018.

2021 we hit 2 bucks.

>>12679900
That wasn't mine some anon in another thread asked when will people sell their link and how, And according to that he came up with this. Unfortunately I don't have a link to the thread, but pretty sure you can find it

>>12679138
Watch the Royals video he linked earlier in the thread

>>12679303
Our spirit is the ledger
Dimethyltryptamine is the private key

>>12679534
>drug anon 1: $370
>drug anon 2: $379
>first WOTC: $377
>second WOTC: $389

Seems like that price area is going to be significant in LINK’s future.

>>12681089
So going by assblasters 10k LINK to make it, at $380 that would be $3'800'000 in 2020. That is make it money. For fuck you money you would need at least 100k

>>12681155
fuckyoupilled.gif
t.115k

>>12674182
havent you seen the matrix? we run the nodes by exsisting

>>12680711
This, we must do this, now anons are spitting prices after being conditioned by that "the code video".

I wonder if sergay reads this board...

>>12681276
Thomas does at least

>>12681221
Kek

>>12681155
It still feels a little too low. You’re telling me the market will be worth several trillion but the key to smart contract adoption is only $380 billion with every token in circulation? $400-$600 seems more accurate.

Number's so far:

Average: 374.14
Median: 100
Mode: 1000

But like a lot of people i will be selling percentages on the way up just in case this crypto market doesn't get to 1 Trillion...

20% - $10
20% - $20
20% - $60
20% - $100
10% - $350
10% if it ever gets to $1,000

>>12681446
Don’t sell, stake.

>>12673953
$40 end of 2020

RESULTS
LINK 2020 group price prediction:
Average price: $590
Median: $100
Mode: $10
Geometric mean: $74
Number of predictions: 73
>>12680711
>>12681238
I'll be doing old threads next, shit is fun

My personal prediction has been the high 300s ever since I saw those acid posts

>>12673953
Interesting... an example where a crowd guessed a weight within 1% accuracy, but using the median not the mean
So $100 going by this thread. I'll do more threads and look at them individually and collected all together, should get 1k+ answers

>>12673953
It'll be $237 by 2020, plan accordingly.

>>12673953
link is a shitcoin

>>12681753
Guessing a weight seems a little easier than guessing the price of a puzzle piece to the 4th industrial revolution. Kek.

I found some other threads on warosu but they didn't have many predictions. The total averages from this thread and others:
Average price: $643
Median: $118
Geometric Mean: $57
number of predictions: $101
>>12681962
yeah true kek.

Why would people sell? do you even know how chainlink works? jesus god

>mfw staking just 1k link will make you ultra rich because everyone will be selling thinking it's a shitcoin

If the price predictions become true, we will have a story to tell. This thread will be going down in the history books. I have a feeling. We're truly on the bleeding edge of the tech+finance scene...potentially not for long

>>12682184
so we going with mean or median for the price?

$6

>>12682337
idk dude it still feels super inaccurate
For myself I will assume $100-$300 in 2020

>>12682377
That's the beauty of harnessing the collective wisdom of the crowd instead of relying on single individual predictions. Your own natural limitation of seeing into the future is complemented by random anons from the around the globe who are making similar predictions based on the little bit of info they may have. Collectively, the averages generally turn out to be accurate within .1% of error.

Remarkable if this comes to pass, but I invite others with more experience in using this method to test it out as well. Truly fascinating, but as OP, I'd like this to be done reliable. Anyhow, please keep the contributions coming in if you haven't previous made a prediction.

>>12674255
>But by 2030, $500+
Ok, so $0.35 adjusted for inflation?

>>12682184
Thank you for your efforts, Anon. It's great to see random strangers joining together in their time and thinking to probe into a discussion.

What's the time frame of these guesses? Link should at least be able to beat cardano in the next bull run (26bn). So 75usd +. Whenever the next run happens.

$12

>>12682466
Yes it is pretty fascinating. I included a lot of the crazy/fud predictions to increase the randomness (apart from "0" and "100k") and still in every thread the mean was $300-$500 for 2020. Funny that this hive collective consciousness has chosen LINK and stuck with it from the ico, I think that says a lot too.
>>12682489
np it's pretty fun
>>12682506
Most people in this thread were making predictions for 2020. If link had xrp's ATH mcap then it would be roughly $400 per token. I think we will have another bullrun in 2021 past previously ATHs and link will be top 10 for sure, top 5 maybe.

>>12682553
so i ask again... in the original experiment, was the accuracy based on mean or median? That's huge difference

>>12682466
Thanks for all of the effort you’ve put into this, fascinating thread. By the end of 2020, I will say $484.

>>12682618
Meant for OP
>>12682553

>>12682602
The experiment in the pic here >>12681753 says median, not mean.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom_of_the_crowd

Do this with old ETH threads and see how accurate it is.

>>12682628
This

>>12682648
I doubt you'll find solid answers since there wasn't any precedent back then. Bitcoin was the only substantial crypto and most ETH holders thought they'd never see those kinds of returns

>>12682732
pic related

>>12682732
>>12682746

Amazing. I want to see more like this

>>12673953
consulting numbers on the astral plane is tricky. how do we know that 370 is in base-10? how do we know they didn't see $.370?

>>12682783
Here you go friend

>>12682823
All sounds so firmiliar

My guess: $87

>>12682823
there was also A LOT of FUD back then. The guys who held through it were serious champions

>>12682796
There were a number of people reporting similar numbers-- that's the thing. Imagine, these fooks used alternate states of consciousness to explore into the future. Similar practices have been done time immemorial throughout different times and civilizations.


Our approach in this thread is attempting to use the Wisdom of the Crowd to assess the opportunity horizon for Chainlink's smart contract network and its associated token.

Based on the crowd's assessment, I would imagine the predictions will become more bolder in case this thread rings true as the focus would then be re-investing into the ecosystem of Chainlink from existing parties who were early adopters and of course those who were watching at a distance (the VC types).


Similar dynamics were at play at the early stages of Bitcoin and Ethereum, btw.

$55

>>12682618
Thanks, fren. Much appreciated. This thread is honestly fascinating and I have been sorta glued to the screen. Will pop in later should this thread remain active.

>>12682857
I like it

>>12682857
spoken like a true autist, well done OP

>>12682857
She was a skater girl. I said, "see you later, girl".

>>12682932
he wasn't good enough for her

>>12682857
I just realised that rather than looking at the archives for link price prediction threads, I should look at eth, btc and antshares price prediction threads to see how accurate the mean/median prediction method is.

>>12681726
This entire thread is like TURBO FUD for anyone who isn't a retard.

Chainlink is literally owned by a guy who exit scammed all his failed companies, and the bulk of the discussion about his current scam is conducted by drug addict anonymous users on an internet hentai bulletin board system

>>12682857

>38 posts by this ID

>>12682950
Get out of my head!

Looking only at BTC, ETH, NEO means you are only looking at ones that succeeded. Try looking at PeerCoin, NameCoin, or SuperNET. I bet those predictions were the same and they totally tanked.
With this logic that would mean that BitConnect will be worth $500 by 2020.

Bump - gib moar price prediction anon

>>12682962
Please do my friend

>>12683033
Those are trash that’s why

>>12683033
Yes but peercoin and bitconnect barely had any threads on them, fud thrown at them actually stuck. Meanwhile link has 10-20+ threads every day, endless discussion and constant arguing. It is a little different to any other shitcoin.

>>12682628
That’s not good. The median is a lot lower than the mean...

>>12683033
LINK is demonstrably not in the same category as a run-of-the-mill shit coin. if you think it is you shouldn't even have got into crypto to begin with, let alone still be spouting crap at this late stage of the game.

>>12683074
It's still $100 in 2020 which gives me multiple millions and I plan on holding most of my stack until 2022 and beyond, only selling some of my staking profits. And anyway these predictions are still very inaccurate, there are so many factors that will contribute to the price changing.

>>12673953
>I'll start off by making a guess of Chainlink's price hitting $299 by the end of 2020

This is not FUD, but I think LINK will be any where between $5-15 by eoy 2020. It depends on too many things. I highly doubt salesforce, sap and swift have a very close relationship with LINK and on top of that even if it does hit $100 most of you would have sold everything by then.

>>12675308
I guess this make sense. Also if you consider the tokens being locked up and removed from exchanges, but 2k is too high.

$47

>>12674478
Link has nothing to do with competing against fiat, anon.

>>12682466
its gonna be $111.11 in 2020

>>12683237
>We work with Banking Technology Leaders like SWIFT, helping connect banks to smart contracts with Enterprise Grade Oracles.
>Salesforce are in bed with Docusign
Don't know anything about SAP, but they were shown on Chainlink's old website.

>>12683598
found you

https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xf8c7a679bf528d505ed7eaed147b78d637b3cdf4

So what I'm getting here is a bunch of basement dwelling neets think this going 100x in a year is a conservative estimate

You guys are going to kill yourselves

>>12682962
Please post the results here or link to the thread here

>>12683649
shhhhh

Hey Swift/*or insert other big name here*

Sooo we've got this really cool tech that brings efficiencies and savings unlike before, it solves many headaches and increases automation, security, traceability and trust throughout the entire industry. It's compatible with pretty much everything and we aim to run it backend for pretty much everything.

-mmm how much is this gonna cost us Sergey? it sounds like some pretty expensive shit, I don't think Swift wants to drop big bucks on some risky new tech. I know PSD2 etc is on the cards but we may wait and see what else is available.

Well, see here, what we'll do is set you up with this Oracle thingy that you can securely connect all your shit to. Along with this oracle please take tons of these utility token thingys too, again FOC, GRATIS!! Oh and by the way, the more this network is used, the more this tokens appreciates in value, you can trade them on the open market too, but I wouldn't recommend it, because as rumour has it... MY LINKY'S STAY SUPER STINKY and they're likely gonna be $1000 ea EOY.

-Right! Well! we are due at the synagogue shortly so we best get you a suit tailored up real quick...yes you can keep the blue check...anything...we are just so pleased to have you as guest of honour at Aharons's bar mitzvah! And you're more than welcome to join the afterparty on my super-yacht where we can christen this holy bond.

>>12683665
I can't find any good ones, not where there are lots of guesses on future prices. I'm sure there are some tho, let me know if you find some

0.50$

>>12683649
What is going on here?

>>12683033
LINK, ANS and ETH have all been shilled very similarly. Yes, alot of shit gets shilled on here, but its about longevity. How long do those memes last for?

>>12673953
I get your point, but it isn't natural if applied to /biz/, we aren't exactly a normal "crowd". I'll still play though
>$2.37

>>12674407
We're not in the mania stage, after getting rekt peoples outlook changes.

>>12683656
But imagined if it actually came true though, cause it might

Wow, I did not anticipate the idea and participation gaining so much traction. Almost 50+ replies since being away eating dinner.

>>12684210
Normal has nothing to do with it. We are a crowd after all.

ok faggots i am making a spreadsheet with a running tally of ALL PREDICTIONS aside from the 40 quadrillion from the start of the thread. I will conduct a statistical analysis and find the average, mean, median and standard deviation. continue to post away but please don't submit more than one prediction. So far we have over 90 predictions.

>>12684665
4chan is actually the only place where you can get a good crowd. Because link is so niche, there's only a few concentrated places where you can discuss it. Reddit is normie, discord/telegram is too optimistic. 4chan is just the right mix.

>believe in the existence of the akashic records and the ether yet shit on Indians at the same time
ill never understand this board.

>>12684740
so far: pic related.
If anyone wants other kinds of statistical analysis done on the data, let me know. I don't remember much from my Econometric classes

>>12684857

>that standard deviation

lel this shit is going to 0

>>12684913
This is to be expected, as there were some significant outliers, like 14 and 30 cents, and 10k and 5k. This is a fundamental part of the theory of "wisdpm pf the crowds", as the outliers cancel each other out.

>>12682962
The issue with this is now we actually have an idea of how high this shit can go now. That luxury did not exist before the bullrun. Everything will quite low. Conversely everything will likely be too high now because of that.

>>12684852
Believe. There are things beyond our understanding and our comprehension yet they influence us, and that's OK.

>>12684852
Ohh pajeety, it's not comparable.

>>12682857
Can also confirm psychedelic experience about link. I took some mushroom chocolates that my friend described as "medium dose", what I got was an intensely strong trip, open eye visuals seeing into other dimensions, seeing my dna structure spiralling around in helixes etc. At some point I remembered to inquire the matrix about crypto, all I got was frog imagery, 777, feeling like winning the lottery. Also I felt extremely certain that there is a vishnu in the blockchain, kekd hard because it all seemed so obvious in that state.

My prediction 777 eoy 2020

>>12673953
My prediction is LINK will go high enough to where our taxes on Link profits will pay for Alexandria Ocasio Ortez's communist Green New Deal.

Why would these commie fucks be proposing something so unrealistic unless they knew it could be paid for.

So we have what? 2,000 or so LINKMARINES? How much is that faggot green deal going to cost? 10 trillion dollars?

So can someone figure out what the chainlink price would need to be for 2,000 people payin 40% in taxes to fund 10 trillion dollars?

>>12684857
only the median matters.... i guess $100 by 2020 it is then

>>12684852
I shit on Indians because they shill shitcoins and don't know how to use toilets. That doesn't change my opinion that India is the most spiritually advanced country in the world.

>>12685271
If someone actually took out the time to calculate that for us, I'm sure the figure would drastically skew the prediction to high upper bound levels beyond what has been included so far within the group's assessment.

anything other than $1000 eoy is fud

>>12685291
we need more numbers. I know there are a lot more than 100 investors on this board.

$250

are we supposed to go off the median or the mean? another anon in here said to use the median but the wikipedia page is asking for the mean

>>12685755
Checked and this

Eoy 2019 around $10, eoy 2020, 376, eoy 2021 $3,000 usd.

>>12685415
I think we calculated a while back that there were roughly 12,000 or so holders... and 22k we figured out was the avg biz holder. Since most of those 12,000 are from biz clearly. I don't know tho that seems a tad high. I mean how many Link marines are there you think?of all the big holders down to a private. I'd imagine 80% are marines. So let's say 8k people have invested in Link because of biz... maybe 1,000 from Reddit? With no contact with biz? I don't know... maybe it's half that maybe 4K link marines from biz? And then you gotta figure maybe on avg a Link marine has gotten a half of a person to invest in average spread out over 4K link marines?

So can someone do that math? 8k-9k core link holders..... what's the price of Link to where 40% of our taxes pay for that commie whores 10 trillion dollar new green deal

>>12686057
Sounds about right

I really want to know what the avg amount of people are invested in Link because of a Link marine. Family members, friends, random people you've shilled. I would put it at .5 people.

>>12686057
The number of HODLERS for Chainlink currently is close to 25,000 people. Imagine, these are all relatively high IQ tech savvy individuals. Shits about to get real.

>>12685883
ahem, gentlemen, please answer this. i'm running the numbers and would like t
o know

>>12673953
$15.00 EOY

>>12673953
$0.24 by 2020 eoy

>>12673953
I predict -10000% as this shit imploded into a black hole singularity. Now factor that in you fegts
Unironically tho the absolute state of chainlink shills.

Peak in 2021 or 2022 at $500-1000

>>12685883 #
Its the mean that's important. But feel free to do both. Thidms thread as a servey is fucked though becsuse the fact that we know this thread will serve to do a calculation on the final price of link people are encouraged to give extra inflated estimates, everyone can see everyone else's price estimates which encourages the answers to approach the first few reasonable price guesses, and the fact that op specifies 2020 which likely will be too early for a real bubble some people are estimating 2020 prices which will be much lower than the next bubble high while others are just giving their estimation for the ultimate bubble top. We need alot of people to vote in a servey which won't reveal the result until votes have stopped coming in for a day or something similar.

>>12686627
those are valid concerns that I considered myself. However, I think that there is some value in this study regardless.

$300

>>12686627
Valid concerns.
I think this is largely countered by the low predictions and some of the more extreme negative comments, to an extent. Sure, some of the values are indeed different compared to current day affairs.

Perhaps the predictive power of the 'mean' suggest a new state of affairs within a year's time to the positive.

Perhaps the network will be live and the middleware provided by Chainlink will be seen with tangible value to clients/developers/financial sector/legal industry.

All in all, there are a lot of unknowns as we are dealing with the future. This thread makes for a good group thought experiment. Wonder how much things can change in a year.

Current price of LINK is $.40 as of February 7, 2019. The crowd has predicted a median value for everyone's predictions for 2020 at $118.


Wonder how right did the crowd get it a year from now? Screencap and fingers crossed to a new paradigm.

$330

>>12686897
Someone did a thread similar to this one where people posted the pruces they planned to sell at and the mean price price per link token sold was 389.59 which was in line with tge akashic records.

>>12686984
>>12686897

So what is it 118 or 339

>>12686897
https://youtu.be/iOucwX7Z1HU

>>12687009

How did you get $389

>>12687005
We'll need new updated figures for the new entrants to the predictions and also ensure the elimination of multiple predictions within the thread.

>>12685136
Audible chuckled at visnu sir

>>12687034
Mutliple predictions from the same party*
(One person only gets one price prediction in this thread to screen out noise within this 'wisdom of the crowd' experiment)

>>12687052
I feel like we need to utilize the blockchain to actually get some accurate data here

>>12687076
No blockchain needed.

The Wisdom of the Crowd's approach has been around before the blockchain was a thing.

>>12687027
>>12680063
>>12679234

>>12687153
https://youtu.be/FmuswTEGF-U

>>12687009
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S95DBYFdiQw

>>12687005
118 is the medium, 339 is the mean. The original experiment was accurate with the medium

>>12685755
With the digits!

>>12687456
it's median, not medium lol
pic rel is up to date results

>>12687537
At $100 per token, LINK has changed all of our lives and would leave us with an opportunity to leave a legacy. I mean that unironically.

>>12687153
so is the $390 the price EOY 2020?