/biz/ - Business & Finance

Yeah, I will agree it is bullish when they specifially mention Chainlink.

At the moment, they haven't

>but muh breadcrumbs! Muh corda must use chainlink!!
Sorry, don't care. No mention of Chainlink -> into the trash it goes

>>12609746
Imagine not having any link

it should be incredibly obvious to you by now that nobody has any intention of working with or using chainlink. its been out there for over a year and a half, and nobody has shown any interest in it, yet they have shown interest in plenty of other very similar platforms or middlemen.

>>12609735
I wonder what this could be be?

>>12609746
Based and Linkpilled

>>12609735
Clearly if Swift GPI Link is using Chainlink, we have made it big. Timing of September displaying coincides with PSD2, coincidence, I think not.

>>12609772
Mainnet is finished till then

>>12609760
Ridiculous fud, nobody has shown interest? Comedy fucking Gold.

>>12609766
Checked

>>12609772
>Clearly if Swift GPI Link is using Chainlink

What if it isn't? I am not trying to FUD, I just don't understand why they would not specifically mention Chainlink

>>12609785
Business focused, the average normie boomer businessman doesn't want to hear about chainlink cryptocurrency.

>>12609796
>>12609772
Sorry not convinced. As far as I understand Sergey & Chainlink made some sort of summer project for SWIFT demonstrating what blockchain and oracles are capable of, other than that, I don't actually think Chainlink will have nothing to do with Swift in the future. This happened in 2016, almost 3 years ago.

I'm sorry, but this is just the way it is. I don't think we will be hearing about "Chainlink & Swift" ever again in official terms

>>12609812
What if you're wrong? Will you take the chance?

Literally on the front page on smartcontract.com

'we are happy to be working with SWIFT on creating their own smartcontact oracle'

>>12609812
>>12609785
>not trying to FUD
>proceeds to FUD
The absolute state of nolinkers/swingers

>>12609779
who's shown any interest in using link's token specifically? so far the only interest has been an academic interest in oracles, of which chainlink is mentioned in passing as a platform in the space.

where are the mentions of non-crypto companies/institutions/businesses stating their usage or planned trials of link, like we saw very early on with ethereum?

>>12609826
Why not address my points?

I don't see Swift mentioning Chainlink, I see swift mentioning R3 and all these other projects.

Why would they keep collobration with Chainlink secret, even though they specifially mention these all kind of other blockchain based companies but just not Chainlink?

To me it seems that Swift is not working (actively) with Chainlink and has not done any sort of collobration with Chainlink for the last 3 years

>>12609855
Dude don't buy lmao at you thinking I owe you an explanation. I'm just shit posting to pass the time until it happens top kek

>>12609893
Based and $1k eoy pilled

>>12609893

Based. “WHY ARE YOU NOT ANSWERING MY FUD THATS BEEN ANSWERED 5824882 times??? SCAM SCAM SCAM!”

>>12609855
Mentioning Link specifically would send value of Link into orbit, which they do not want now. The time for value of Link to go up is post implentation. Believe what you will but my belief is Swift has built their own process and is moving forward with it's eventual implementation, and it does not include XRP long-term. Believe what you want, you could be right but I feel Chainlink is part of their process and am looking to accumulate more as I can.

>>12609828
>who's shown any interest in using link's token specifically?
Everyone interested in using Chainlink.

>>12609825
THEIR OWN!

>>12609855
I watched the Interview from today with Liebbrandt and Garlinghouse. I only had access to the the beginning 19 minutes on periscope

In a nutshell
Liebbrandt was in Chad form.
Quickly dismissed Ripple while schilling GPI Link
APIs and the 10000+ banks he controls.
While Garlinghouse was
>but muh XRP is fast....literally offered nothing more.

>>12609893
really fucking based. We are all going to make it.

>>12609929
This. Means they will not using link.

>>12609929
What's the problem?

>>12609971
>they will not using link.
You speak very good the English, Pranjeet.

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>>12609746
kek, this anon doesnt know what whitelabel means
> SWIFT gpi link works with every dlt
and you think theyre not using link

>>12609996
You know that this is the definition of magic, right Anon?

>>12609930
But what about these points?
https://www.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/7i5pca/clarifying_misconceptions_about_chainlink_swift/

>ChainLink PoC is NOT SWIFT gpi
>ChainLink PoC IS NOT Nostro reconciliation
>ChainLink is NOT the only PoC that SWIFT has in the works

To me it seems, that is more than clear, that the current POC that was mentioned in this video for example https://www.swift.com/sites/default/files/resources/swift_gpi_link_pr_sdc.mp4 has nothing to do with Chainlink

>>12609997
This has been discussed even last year
https://www.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/7i5pca/clarifying_misconceptions_about_chainlink_swift/

Swift GPI link has nothing to do with Chainlink, Swift has multiple POCs in the works

>>12610005
Close your eyes, try to clear any thoughts you are having
Take long, slow, deep breathes and put all your focus and attention onto your breathing
iiiiiiiinnnn.................... ooooooooooooouuuut

good. Do this for a few minutes, then -
VISUALIZE yourself becoming rich through your LINK investment
ANTICIPATE the things you will buy with your new found abundance of wealth
IMAGINE as though it is all happening now in the present moment, for the present moment is all that truly exists
MOST IMPORTANTLY
FEEL the way you will FEEL when that moment comes and you make it!
FEELING THE EMOTION IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN JUST VISUALIZING THE IMAGES!

Now open your eyes, look in a mirror, and recite these affirmations (use/add your own that is relevant to the reality you want to create once you make it)
I AM RICH
I AM WEALTHY
I AM A MILLIONAIRE
LINK HAS GIVEN ME INFINITE ABUNDANCE
It's important to do this when you wake up and before you go to bed, but do it as often as possible. Also hold the image and idea of us making it and LINK being worth $1,000 or more in your mind as you fall to sleep.

WHEN WE DO THIS COLLECTIVELY MY LINK BROTHERS, THE UNIVERSE WILL SEE TO IT THAT CERTAIN EVENTS, PEOPLE AND CIRCUMSTANCES WILL ALIGN AND BE ATTRACTED TO US - THAT WILL ALLOW OUR DESIRE TO MANIFEST INTO REALITY!
I love you all

>>12610013
Time will tell, but I am not selling and am accumulating. Thanks.

Standing by for the comments from the hivemind stating it has nothing to do with XRP and that it will use LINK. Wrong.
R3 uses Corda Settler for global payments. XRP via the XRP Ledger is the first cryptocurrency rail to be identified.

https://twitter.com/inside_r3/status/1070318498214223873?lang=en
SBI Japan owns 60% of R3.
SBI is also a major investor in Ripple.
Ripple and R3 also announced in Dec 2016 they were working together with 12 banks to trial XRP as a banking bridge currency. The R3 member banks involved in the trial include Barclays, BMO Financial Group, CIBC, Intesa Sanpaolo, Macquarie Group, National Australia Bank (NAB), Natixis, Nordea, Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), Santander, Scotiabank, and Westpac Banking Corporation. Here were some of those banks meeting to outline the rules that govern the rollout of RippleNet prior to Ripple's SWELL conference:
https://ripple.com/insights/swell-2018-kicks-off-tomorrow/
Quote: ' On the eve of Swell, representatives from MUFG Bank, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, WestPac, Standard Chartered, Banco Santander, Siam Commercial Bank, American Express, and SBI met at our headquarters in to discuss the rules that govern RippleNet, our global payments network. These rules are critical to ensuring standardization across the network as it scales rapidly.'

You can downplay it if you wish, but stating XRP isn't going to be a factor and that they are using LINK somehow is just denying the obvious at this point.

>>12609918
yeah, all of these companies:

>>12610042
>R3 uses Corda Settler for global payments. XRP via the XRP Ledger is the first cryptocurrency rail to be identified.
And Swift's GPI is the second.

You got this all backwards anon.
Corda Settler is using Swift GPI, not the other way around.

>>12610053
This.
Literally not a single company/project has openly partnered with Chainlink over the past months.
Also, Hillary is the current US president.

>>12610007
The girl doing the interview was a riptard. I’d bet my life on it.

Garlinghouse mic time
>Ripple is really leading the way for the Internet of value.
>But muh cross border payments.

Liebbrandt, like a boss
>not partnered with ripple it’s too volatile
>muh 10000 banks
>Muh API’s

>>12610015
You are a MANIAC

>>12610061
you literally can't name one actual partner of the technology or the token. chainlink has no real interest outside of the typical scammy crypto-crypto "partnerships" that have a net negative effect on how those projects look to actual businesses.

>>12610084
>you literally can't name one actual partner of the technology
This.
Just like you can't name a single one of the planets in our solar system.
It simply cannot be done.

>>12610093
cringe

>>12609996
you are a MANIAC

>>12610103
Crawl back under your rock, tardboy.
This board has been buzzing with Chainlink partnership announcements since early summer 2018.

>>12610084
Stay poor Anon.

>>12610115
given the insurmountable stupidity of cringelink npcs i really cant tell if this is satire or not

>>12610126
How about this: for every planet in our solar system you can name, I'll name a Chainlink partner.
Go.

>>12610120
>stay poor
says the late adopter literally gambling on a random funding token to make them rich. not all of us missed out on the first 10 years of bitcoin.

>>12609877
Czeched

Rory or Thomas confirmed that GPI is NOT LINK months ago... Confirmed that it has nothing to do with LINK... I own LINK but this is too much...

>>12610150
He didn't confirm they weren't, he confirmed only what the poc was they were working on (bond payments). It was Rory.

>>12609893
you are so based dude, that you live in a basement and i'm jealous.

based and linkpilled to the max

Literally dumping like the shit token it is

>>12610132
>>12610126
Can't do it, can you?

It's impossible to name a single planet from our solar system.
Just like it's impossible to name a single Chainlink partner.

>>12610182
Read the question again >>12610063

Fergly clearly asks does Chainlink have ANYTHING to do with Swift GPI poc and to which Rory answers that the only poc Chainlink has worked with Swift is related to bond payments

It is not even a question of "ignoring" the GPI connection, it is clear that CHAINLINK HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SWIFT GPI ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH IT

>>12609971
>their own chainlink Oracle that will in no way be connected to the chainlink oracle network

>>12610115
It wasn't early summer it was mid to end

>>12610135
>not all of us missed out on the first 10 years of bitcoin.
Then what are you doing posting so much in a Chainlink thread?

>>12609826

>>12610330
because it's fun being right

>>12609735
Kek linkies

>>12610236
I guess when they talked about chainlink they didn't actually mean chainlink.
Rory also didn't answer the question.

>>12609759
Anon, IF there is anyone on this board who actually doesn't own link, they ignore link threads and don't actively fud it. I emphasize "if" because I find it hard to believe that anyone who has browsed this board for any significant amount of time does not own any link.

>>12609785
whitelabel.
just like Microsoft cryptlets.

>>12610215
Earth is a plane and the other "planets" are wandering stars

>>12611484
Except I'm right and you're wrong.

See >>12610215
>>12610132

>>12609796
>Cryptocurrency
Chainlink isn't even a cryptocurrency. It's a utility token! 2 man, Chuck-e-cheese bullshit bigmac scam. Maybe smartcontracts.com made something for Swift, but they sure aren't gonna use some bullshit 4Chan project

>>12611662
Based upon what was stated by SWIFT their customers do not want to settle in crypto, which is bullish for Link in assisting with this process and bad fucking news for XRP.

>>12609735
How you know there talking about link

>>12609772
Basel 3 in April too

>>12609812
>I don't actually think Chainlink will have nothing to do with Swift in the future.

>>12609893
Basedville Tennessee
>population: this sick cunt

1/3

>>12611741
2/3

>>12611752

>>12611662
>Maybe smartcontracts.com made something for Swift
This is a slide from Sergey's SIBOS presentation.
Notice any logos?

>>12610236
Wow have a little imagination.

>what is the purpose of SWIFT gpi?
Make cross border payments fast cheap and fully traceable

>what is the biggest challenge involved with cross border payment?
Dealing with currency exchange

>what blockchain based process can drastically reduce friction involved with currency exchange?

Hmm

Imagine if banks could automate the exchange process using a highly secure network, mitigating the single most expensive part of the cross border payment equation.. why is no one talking about this, fml.

>>12611803

Holy fuck

I'm looking forward to when we start getting FUD from people who aren't obvious Link bagholders, when legit ignoramuses from Twitter or Reddit start repeating bits of dumbass FUD they heard secondhand. That'll be fun to watch.

>>12609812
>https://www.swift.com/sites/default/files/resources/swift_gpi_link_pr_sdc.mp4

I would agree with you, but LINK touts their work with SWIFT a but to heavily for it having been just a "summer project".

I think it was recieved extremely well and Sergey and the team know they have made it.

Why do you think he has the courage to the wear the same shirt to each and every event? Why do you think Adelyn, former head of marketing for fortune 500 companies, is working with them?

Ari Juels? Come on people.

>>12611852
After seeing that slide up above my only regret is not having more disposable income to put into LINK.

>>12611803
Wouldn’t this pump eth price also?

Can any nonbrainlets explain this slide

>>12611873
Sure.

Chainlink giving ETH external connectivity would be a massive boon to ETH as well.

>TFW when you realize that 650mm reserve stack FUDers bitch about will be sold to financial institutions all around the world as an inhouse stable to be used for smartcontracts on a global scale, guaranteeing stable, long term prices after the moon mission.

>>12611925
This

>>12611916
It just means data from Alliance Lite 2 will be fed into various DLTs like Hyperledger and ETH for smartcontracts that trigger transactions related to securities.

>>12611852

All of this stuff has been obvious to those that actually care. Anyone who unironically thinks LINK is a scam is retarded.

>>12611762
thread

So with our timeline of psd2, when do you guys think singularity will really start taking place? It looks like we’re still several years out, the way people are talking about chainlink like Tom at the fire chat seems like cautious optimism.

>>12611916
>Built, hosted and operated by SWIFT, Alliance Lite2 has been designed to suit the varying cloud connectivity needs of SWIFT customers. It can be used for manual and automated message exchange with additional options such as back-office integration to make the SWIFT Community Cloud a truly end-to-end solution.

when they say message exchange, its not emails, it's money transfers...basically this just shows that the Alliance Lire2 cloud messaging solution can query a chainlink node to transfer crypto and can transfer fiat using the bank back office applications.

this slide actually shows that chainlink isnt only used for bonds payment, but could in theory be used to convert fiat into crypto, by transferring fiat from a client bank account to the exchange bank account wich will trigger a crypto transfer on the blockchain.

this is what we have been saying for a long time.

t. tech lead at Allianz.

>>12612041
2025 I will start to think about singularity.

>>12611924
How much of my portfolio should be ETH anon?

>>12612059

LINK is the financial equivalent of the Philosipher’s Stone, regional banks could convert their countries’ fiat into literally any form of currency (OR PROPERTY - anything) in moments with CL.

I used to think 4th Industrial Revolution was a meme. I need more LINK asap.

>>12612041
Sergey said it himself its a matter of months for mainnet

>>12612041
With testing, proofs of valuable service, security measures and followed by more tests, I guess no less than 3 years from today.
Mainnet isn't a price chart breaker. Mainnet is just a tool, that will have to be improved, reach standard requirements and certification, till institutional users would think about moving to new tech.
I guess, maybe some laws will have to be developed maybe globally or country wide regarding tax and jurisdiction.
I wonder how companies look at security measures, like mistakes and how to roll back.
There is much more into horizon, then usual /biz/let brain thinks. This is not "buy my new shitcoin, I will exitscam you next month", this is tech, where industry tells what they need, before usage, or Prove me your product is secure and better than what I can find on the market.
There will be long ways. Some aren't capable of waiting. I am.

>>12609735
Idk...seems like a ssstreetchh once again

>>12611852
>Why do you think Adelyn, former head of marketing for fortune 500 companies, is working with them?
Idk, but during the fireside chat when the link marine was streaming and talking to adelyn, he asked her how she started working for chainlink. And she said that she’s known Sergey since school or something like that. Since before he was into bitcoin or anything blockchain

https://create.smartcontract.com/sibos17

>>12609893
Based and Linkpilled

>>12611852
Sergey has known Adleyn for years. Probably banged. He needed a marketing person, asked the only one he knew. rearry gets the noggin joggin

>>12609893
based

>>12612041

Its been known for a while that once mainnet happens there will be a fight for nodes to build their reputation. part of "reputation" is having a large enough LINK stack to handle smartcontracts of all sizes. We are talking about massive amounts buying happening between corps and cos wanting to run their own nodes.

Mainnet is literally months away. maybe even next month. get ready.

Why is the price tanking?

>>12612416
I'd say thats overly optimistic, I think we will see enterprise-grade smart contracts in a test environment with TEEs in 2025, with basic dApps with actual real life usability in 2028-2030 with a smart contract economy boom in 2035 we are where the internet was in 1989. Some anons are overly optimistic and aren't capable of waiting. I am.

>>12614783
because the swift rumour got confirmed as bullshit recently. hence multiple shill threads offering hopium like this one over the past few days. all these types of link shill threads are made by the same 4 people. you are getting dumped on by a group of dolphins

>>12612041
There will be speculative crush before the true singularity, which should make most of us millionaires. Then we get fuck you money after a few years of adoption

>>12615260
what rumers?

>>12615364
None. He’s prob talking about the xrp corda R3 shit.

>>12614738
You sound like a child. This isn’t going to happen.

>>12615137
Too long bud. Smart contracts are coming.

>>12615137
Nice fud, initial start ups get traction and increasing use throughout 2020 - 2021. See the Capegami paper from about a year and a half ago, it appears their timeline is right on target.

>>12612059
based

>>12609912
Poisonous derangement.

>>12609735
gpi Link has literally nothing to do with chainlink.
link is a generic word.
peak delusion.

>>12615523

>>12615523
Panic! At the Discord

>>12615637
Underrated post

bump

>>12615637
kek

>>12615637
KEK

>>12615637

>>12609746
https://www.swift.com/sites/default/files/resources/swift_gpi_link_pr_sdc.mp4

>swift_gpi_link_pr_sdc.mp4
>>

im just a guy i mean i dont know

>>12609735
https://www.swift.com/our-solutions/interfaces-and-integration/swiftnet-link
Literally has nothing to do with our fabled Chainlink. Looks like the in-house adaption of the chainlink idea from the POC SIBOS

>>12610015
Wow this really works anon thank you so much

>>12611470
Damn
Linker for life here but this is based

>>12611852
Just look how she’s giving him that burger
He definitely smashed after the meal
That’s what chads do

>>12609893
Absolutely based and comfy pilled

>>12611470
This is like the 5th time I have seen some type of artwork in the linksphere within the last couple months that has made me think this entity is none other than grounBEEFtaxi

Nice to see you old friend

>>12617727
look at the background anons

>>12617729
All I see is an obese neckbeard sweating out fryer grease.

>>12617727
why is the padlock unlocked. oh shit, we're fucked arent we

>>12617729
It's right in front of everyone yet they still can't see the forest through the trees. Blows my mind

>>12617729
I see it. Feels comfy.

>>12617729
The cloud is raining men. Another Katherine Bush song?

>>12617729
Are companies allowed to use logos on their website without permission? In this case, does the swift logo on chainlink's website mean anything?

>>12617911
No.
Yes.

>>12617911
this isnt just an image asset on a webpage. this is printed on a banner

>>12617911
https://www.upcounsel.com/permission-to-use-logo

one google search dude, how lazy are you?

Do brainlets not understand that 'a swift chainlink' is not for banks themselves to use chainlink for all their operations, but for businesses like insurance, Uber etc to use banking APIs to verify payments etc. A confirmation of partnership will not come from swift themselves, they're simply implementing inputs and outputs.

>>12617915
>>12617924
How are there anons not all in on chainlink then?

>>12617967
Great question.

anyone who thinks chainlink is not permissioned to use swift logo without getting swarmed and sued to the ground by jewish lawyers is a moron.

>>12618045
Likewise, anyone that thinks they’d use it if it didn’t actually mean anything is underestimating the integrity of the team.

Can someone trace it? Having a hard time seeing it clearly.

>>12618165
You wot cunt?

>>12609785
>I just don't understand why they would not specifically mention Chainlink
He specifically mentions the problem of the volatility of cryptocurrencies. If he mentioned Chainlink it would have a volatile spike and crash, which would be bad optics. That being said, there's a very high chance SWIFT will not be working with Chainlink.

>>12618824
Why, Chainlink is a utility not a currency. Swift will obviously be working with Chainlink to some extent. Keep in mind, if Swift happens to own a portion of Chainlink/Smartcontracts they are in theory working with themselves.

>>12617929
this guy gets it, chainlink oracles will simply generate the XML the swift API needs to make bank transfers.

>>12618824
18 decimals faggot

>>12617367
A lot of detail in that one

>>12609825
This. Their own. Probably they will use Chainlink's technology BUT NOT Chainlink's mainnet.
>What does it mean for the token price? Nothing, at least in a direct way.
>What does it mean for SmartContract.com?
Big money for sure.
>What does it mean for Chainlink as a whole?
A fuckton of exposure, the absolute industry standard, no joke.

Conclusion: this is not a moonboy's investment, temper your iron hands or go to play with your chink autistic monopoly(Made in China) money

>>12609825
>>12609825
This. Their own. Probably they will use Chainlink's technology BUT NOT Chainlink's mainnet.
>What does it mean for the token price?
Nothing, at least in a direct way.
>What does it mean for SmartContract.com?
Big money for sure.
>What does it mean for Chainlink as a whole?
A fuckton of exposure, the absolute industry standard, no joke.

Conclusion: this is not a moonboy's investment, temper your iron hands or go to play with your chink autistic monopoly(Made in China) money

>>12611925
>TFW when you realize that 650mm reserve stack FUDers bitch about will be sold to financial institutions all around the world as an inhouse stable to be used for smartcontracts on a global scale, guaranteeing stable, long term prices after the moon mission.

How would that actually work? If this mooned to some exorbitantly inflated price, do you really think institutions will pay $100 per token? Probably more like $2

Too long, didn't read: Are we in the 10k$/Link timeline?

>>12620672
>TFW when you realize that 650mm reserve stack FUDers bitch about will be sold to financial institutions all around the world
How do anons think this is a good thing. It boggles the mind.
Selling that stack directly would suppress the price for YEARS. Why would any normie buy from some shady unregulated exchange when they can buy directly OTC from smartcontract.com?

>>12615137
this makes no fucking sense, sorry. the landscape and influence of tech is completely different than it was in that era. the rate of change and the leaps in adoption aren't comparable to what is an entirely different era at this point. if it works, it won't take very long.

>>12620714
well it depends on what sergey sells them for b2b, right?

>>12620755
What's more likely, that they use some crazy fluctuating pricing to have mad pump and dumps. Or they sell them for a flat rate of like 50 cent and collect 170M USD with no stress or effort....

>>12620796
It depends on the value of the contracts. There have been extensive conversation on this and you can dig them up, but I can't remember if the network actually does need to be worth billions in order to service contracts with super high collateral

>>12609735
buy coinmetro today, use link tomorrow

>>12609855
What a faggot
>please talk to me
>muh points
Good job

>>12611470
nice

>>12617727
>>12617729

>>12611470
Cool

>>12611852
What happened between NXT and swift proof of concept?

No mention of Chainlink.
Linkies BTFO

>>12620714
Uh. A portion of that Link will be used by Sergey and the time as they do initial business with companies... As in we will complete your first month of transactions for free or at a reduced rate so it costs u nothing to see how this works as a trial run... The Nodes will still need to be paid for their contribution or should I say confirmation. This is priming the pump on new business and isn't that unusual at all. Why wouldn't I give it a shot to test it and see the benefits if it is free or low cost to do so. Might hurt the value initially but will be more than offset by growth and eventual adoption. Dig it?

>>12624113
Also, businesses are not using Link, it is a reward to nodes for services rendered within the network. Companies or businesses will pay for services provided by Chainlink in FIAT. So, during that trial period they pay little to get up and running for a short period of time and Sergey rewards nodes with some of that 650m Link.. keep in mind, my guess is a large portion of that 650m belongs to Swift and/or the Banks that are members. Just a guess, nice compensation to Swift for helping Sergey and Link become the macdaddy of decentralized oracle's. Big business man, they always find a way to win. Glad I am along for the ride, even if it takes another 2 years.

>>12624244
Also, don't let anybody tell you that the CEO for Swift didn't get a huge hard on telling the competition that tried to steal their business to fuck off on that stage. Ripple got the BTFO, Swift has their own version to implement and cripple won't be a part of it. Now Swift has to deliver.

>>12620677
>Q+A
Checkm8
Answer: yes
Based kek brossif nigga haha
Get on the LINK train cunt

I read that Sergey said the smart contracts are being audited but by who? Is it Shift or some other major player?

hope you got your ducks in a row frens time is running out

>>12624244
Mate you don't even know how the supply is divided up. There is no "that 650 million"

>>12624458
People have been saying that time is running out since november 2017.

>>12624458
>>12624549
kek BTFO

>>12620672
They’ll pay the fractional price required to buy decentralized data for smart contracts. The price of link could be $1000, but a company would only need to pay .0001LINK worth (like $1 or less) for each time they call the network. That’s why each link can be divisible by 18 decimal points.

You should go to school or learn to read basic economics books.

Why did Linkpool and CL start looking for more devs all of the sudden?

>>12624661
probably so they stop looking like obvious scams, while still remaining scams

>>12624648
you should learn some programming so you can look at Link's code and realize it's a scam and will never be complete.

>>12624687
funny how quiet linkies go when truth gets out

drunkanon here. just poured a glass. thinking of stopping by in a bit

>>12624661
>when your scam becomes a meme so you have to scramble to make a legitimate product

>>12626833
Go for it

>>12626833
Isn't link supposed to be in the top 10 by now?

>>12626833
get out here fren
get a thread going

>>12627142
That probably wasn't him, didn't we hear he got busted by the team and was done sharing info?

>>12627239
No, that's fake news.

>but then who wuz trustless oracle?

>>12627600
Checked not fake it was the dude who used to write the same message in the telegram like a bot. Apparently he thought it was hilarious while drunk. Sergey attracts the weirdos

>>12627624
I warned that drunk bastard to simmer down but noooo.

>>12627624
So the drunkanon posts were real? He wasn't larping? What were some of his key points?

>>12627973
Not your personal army newfag

>>12620677
Checked the id and digits

Hey Swift/*or insert other big name here*

Sooo we've got this really cool tech that brings efficiencies and savings unlike before, it solves many headaches and increases automation, security, traceability and trust throughout the entire industry. It's compatible with pretty much everything and we aim to run it backend for pretty much everything.

-mmm how much is this gonna cost us Sergey? it sounds like some pretty expensive shit, I don't think Swift wants to drop big bucks on some risky new tech. I know PSD2 etc is on the cards but we may wait and see what else is available.

Well, see here, what we'll do is set you up with this Oracle thingy that you can securely connect all your shit to. Along with this oracle please take tons of these utility token thingys too, again FOC, GRATIS!! Oh and by the way, the more this network is used, the more this tokens appreciates in value, you can trade them on the open market too, but I wouldn't recommend it, because as rumour has it... MY LINKY'S STAY SUPER STINKY and they're likely gonna be $1000 ea EOY.

-Right! Well! we are due at the synagogue shortly so we best get you a suit tailored up real quick...yes you can keep the blue check...anything...we are just so pleased to have you as guest of honour at Aharons's bar mitzvah! And you're more than welcome to join the afterparty on my super-yacht where we can christen this holy bond.

>>12627973
In summary, buy Link, Hodl, and make it.

>>12629990
This. We will all make it 1000$eoy