/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12620292
200$ EOY

This is the only project worth investing in all crypto space.

>>12620300
checked and based

When v4 comes out its going to be INCREDIBLE

>>12620292
*blows smoke in your face*
Pathetic.

>>12620314
V3 is for may
This will be fucking huge

>>12620329
>iExecubot pops out of my backpack
>iExecubot uses vacuum on the smoke to prevent me from breathing it
>iExecubot focuses target on you
>iExecubot stabs you to death
>iExecubot returns to my backpack
>iExecubot confirms bodyguard.exe ran successfully with PoCo
>you lie there on the ground and your last words are "my stinky linky stays 0$ EOY"

>>12620354
Fuck i cried

>>12620292
>hurrrrr lower supply is better
That's like saying 1kg of lead is heavier than 1kg of feathers.

>>12620517
> lower supply isn't a better investment
that's like saying a scarce resource isn't a better investment than a non scarce resource.

>>12620526
>hurrrr lower supply is a better investment
That's like saying 1kg of lead is heavier than 1 kg of feathers.

>>12620534
this is what brainlets think.

>>12620292
>Uses chainlink to get attention
>has no threads for months then has a ton of threads out of nowhere
How you know something is inorganic on biz 101

>>12620544
>>12620526
Please, pretty pretty pretty please, tell me you're joking.

>>12620526
>>12620526

you need to ensure the coin can grow, obviously...

I aim for investing in coins under a 100 Mill cap as this guarantees each coin can reach a healthy amount of growth..... A total circulation gives you an indication of what values each individual coin can reach:

Coin A: 1 Billion Coins | Market Cap 100 Million = $0.10

Coin B: 100 Million Coins | Market Cap 100 Million = $1

Now whilst both are as popular as each other, due to the sheer cap with coin A, the price is 10x less than coin B. Therefore it is often very unrealistic to get dollar plus value through a currency with over a billion coins in circulation.

in fact hang on I don't even know why im explaining this, people on biz are just way too retarded

>>12620563
getting sick of you retards.

if there's a token that has a 10 billion supply and there's a token that has a 10 million supply, suppose that they do exactly the same thing in terms of project, it's exactly the same thing, a 100% copy cat, just a different name and token. Which token do you think will be the more valuable?

Do you think its the 10 billion token coin? then you are retarded cause the more tokens there are, the more potential holders, the more it can dump.

do you think it's the 10 million coin?
then you actually have a brain and understand market psychology

do you think it's neither because its the same tech and just the token name is different?
you were nearly a non brainlet, but still a brainlet.

>>12620292
>>12620544
>>12620526
>>12620596

Scenario 1:
>buy 2 tokens for $500 total
>after a week you double your money

Scenario 2:
>buy 200 tokens for $500 total
>after a week you double your money

Now tell me what the difference is.

>>12620600
>
you fall in the still a brainlet camp. but atleast you tried.

>>12620600
RLC CONFIRMED 250$ PER TOKEN EOY

>>12620611
Tell me what the difference is, tiger.

According to your logic, Elastos ($2.15) is "more valuable" than Ripple ($0.3).

So this is the link whales last fud before the singularity. Careful not to fall for it.

>>12620596
>if you cut a pizza into 8 slices you have more pizza than if you cut the same pizza into 4 slices

>>12620628
marketcap and coin fundamentals are all that matter
RLC's marketcap is extremely low in comparison to its supply and price.
therefore, RLC is highly undervalued for the potential value it holds
therefore, buying RLC is the best play in crypto right now.
therefore, 250$ EOY GO FUCK YOURSELF NOW GET OUT OF MY OFFICE

>>12620669
None of what you said is relevant to the discussion I'm having with OP and the purple ID retard.

>>12620680
ok stay poor faggot

>>12620628
if you put ripple and valuable in one sentence there's nothing to explain. You don't have the mental capacity to understand and I'm just wasting my time with yet another brainlet.

>>12620292
19.5m mcap, most undervalued token in the entire market.

V3 is coming

>>12620292
why would normalfags buy into this

>>12620701
> decentralized cloud computing that will take on Amazon AWS.

there, easy.

>>12620710
why do they need this

>>12620693
Suppose you invest $1,000

Scenario 1:
>buy 100 tokens at $10
>token price goes to $20
You turned $1,000 into $2,000

Scenario 2:
>buy 10 tokens at $100
>token price goes to $200
You turned $1,000 into $2,000

What is the difference?

>>12620720
because it's like investing in google, ibm, or intel or some other tech company that eventually rules the world. If it can fight these centralized companies (because the cost of using iExec will be much less due to the worldwide marketplace) it will be life changing.

>>12620737
why would they need to buy 100 tokens

>>12620758
maybe they want to run some sort of dapp?
we don't know what amazing dapps will surface over the next few years. Could be insane with gpu support.

The thing is, they'll most likely be using iExec without even knowing it.

>>12620758
Even the OP admits RLC's tokenomics are shit.

>>12620769
good thing a tokenomics report is this year so you faggots stfu about MUH TOKENOMICS already. shit has staking and other reasons velocity will slow down over time. It's gonna fucking moon.

>>12620773
>you faggots stfu about MUH TOKENOMICS already
By "you faggots" you mean RLC fanbois like OP too, right?

>>12620729
human psychology interferes. there's more potential for people to dump a coin where there's a 100 billion supply, simply because there can be more holders.

especially with how prices increase in the crypto markets.

whaty ou said doesn't matter at all.

the scarce item will always be more valuable than the non scarce item no matter if the tech is exactly the same. because of psychology and how humans behave.

owning something where there's less of them is just more attractive than owning something where there's a lot of them.

>>12620777
>human psychology interferes
You mean how human psychology naturally prefers assets that have a lower price because they seem cheaper?

>>12620766
>>12620769
nobody will buy tokens if they don't have to, either they'd have to sell computation power through tokens or else it's a fail

>>12620783
yes indeed. that's true also, but only up until a certain point, and only brainlets buy for this reason, no brainlets are left in the market right now, so investing based on that principle would not be wise.

>>12620777
>there's more potential for people to dump a coin where there's a 100 billion supply, simply because there can be more holders.
You do realize RLC is an ERC20 token right?
Divisible to 18 decimals?

>>12620795
You are an idiot who thinks slicing a pizza into 8 slices magically gives you more pizza than slicing it into 4 slices.

>>12620801
Yes. I know this. it's also blockchain agnostic.

>>12620809
>Yes. I know this.
Then you realize how dumb you sound when you say shit like "hurrr there can be more holders".

>>12620807
stop making assumptions, we aren't slicing pizza here this is the crypto market.

>>12620815
that's besides the point. I said an item that is scarce is more valuable than an item that is not.

ERC20's having a big divider has nothing to do with this.

Last reply

>>12620776
OP doesn't know enough to talk about the tokenomics, clearly. Most people can't tell you much about the tokenomics because it's extremely complex.

>>12620292
Should have bought coinmetro

>>12620818
Fractions don't apply to crypto?

>>12620827
>I said an item that is scarce is more valuable than an item that is not.
Scarcity is not a factor when there are 86,999,785,000,000,000,000,000,000 items to go around.

>>12620834
>Most people can't tell you much about the tokenomics because it's extremely complex.
… and that's a good thing.
Surely.
R-right?

>>12620875
you can't buy 0.000000777 RLC on any markets so your point doesn't matter at all.

>>12620886
Normans don't need to understand tokenomics.
Don't buy RLC if you can't DYOR and understand why we're all talking about it now.

>>12620913
If the price gets high enough, you bet your ass you'll be able to buy 0.000000777.
Tardboy.

>>12620919
>we're all talking about it now.
See >>12620558

>>12620924
Here we are. Kek

>>12620932
>implying I haven't been solely shilling RLC for months, and just recently upped my game on how to shill it so now everyone is a RLCommando

Don't buy it, we don't want you. Unless you DYOR, then come back to us.

>>12620941
So basically >>12620558

>>12620957
No. It has nothing to do with it being organic. If anything it's ultra organic due to there being zero shills besides a handful of us doing it here and there, to now there's tens of people doing it at all times of the day.

If only you could get outside of your ignorant head and realize WHY people are shilling it, maybe you wouldn't be a poor wagecuck.

>>12620975
> It has nothing to do with it being organic
inorganic*

5K RLC is like bagholding 25K LINK.Think about that for a second. Remember you only need 10K Link to make it.

>>12620975
Honestly I'm investing in the iexec team, it's one of the few alt coins with people who actually know what the fuck they are doing. I would probably invest in Chainlink but I just cant see Sergey pulling it off.

>>12620292
THIS IS NOW A COINMETRO THREAD

>>12621029
Yup the team is unbeatable

>>12620834
Tokeneconomics report will come in february if im not mistaken.

>>12621029
why did you plebs take so long to realise?

i found out i am absolutely shit at stocks, i cant even make fucking meme lines to get 50% of my guesses right.
i lost like 1k and have 2k more. i currently have 6k rlc at 666 sat, i am thinking about just letting it sit on binance and close all crypto tabs, then recheck in a few months.

what dates should i check in to see the price spike so i can maybe do 1 or 2 swing trades?
also where do i start to get good at meme lines?

>>12621076
yeah, buy high sell low

>>12621130
Just check at the end of april