/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12364876
>https://www.ledger.com
i love the marketing video where you see business people using it.. nobody using cryptos.

>>12364876
I don’t fucking get it, these so called security experts actually think Bluetooth is safe? Lmfao

>building wireless connectivity into a cold wallet
are these retards serious?

>>12365609
>>12365628
t. brainlet

I can see this being useful for people who trade on their phones but only plebs trade on their phones. I see no need for bluetooth so as it stands I would choose the nano s over the new model.

You guys haven't ordered already?!?

Bumping for Hardware wallet awareness, funds not safu!

>>12365650
this.

Wtf I already have to buy a new one
This company is becoming like apple

>>12364876
God damnit I bought the ledger Nano S like 2 months ago and haven't even put my crypto on it.

>>12365650
>>12365895
Is bluetooth not Susceptible to packet sniffers?
Are you actually saying that bluetooth is 'secure'?
t.brainlet

Still waiting for ledger live for nano to be released. My BTC is stuck on binance, need to transfer to my ledger using Android phone.

>>12366137
Meant ledger live for Android. Nano is trash

>>12366111
>not understanding what hardware wallets are le post
no wonder so many bagholder of link are here

>Bluetooth
great, another unnecessary attack vector

>>12366147
Dont worry we knew what you meant he he

>>12366148
Fuck off, I've had a trezor (1st) & ledger for years.
No, I was asking why they were calling others brainlets about the bluetooth security... I am not overly technical, just wondered if there was some magic BS i did not know about BT!
t. proud nolinker

>>12366111
i'm saying it does not fucking matter

>>12366194
>Ledger works for months on end designing a secure wallet
>They wouldn't have though about bluetooth security

>wallet.fail
hardware wallet cucks will never learn

fuck! All my coins are on my old nano S, have I lost them now?

Great, just keep adding new technologies and potential for attack vectors to something that needs to be 100 pct secure. How hard is it to buy a cheap laptop and just install linux and just make paper wallets? Fucking normies.

>>12366194
right so supposedly, wallets sign the transaction internally on the secure device. and the only thing transmitted is the signature. not the private key

>>12366626
I would rather have a good usb only wallet but I agree with this sentiment, more features mean more black swans

>>12365651
plebs will make you rich, dumbass

>>12365609
>>12365628
these

>he's a new point of attack
I'm sticking w the Nano S, what a dumbass decision to add Bluetooth

>>12366148 Leave, pajeet.

>>12365609
Bluetooth is a transport protocol absolute brainlet. It only depends on how you use it

>>12367116
>Leave, pajeet.
Fuck off Mutt!

>>12365935
even the fucking packaging

>>12366593
not if you fixed the btc price at 19k or higher

>>12366051
my boiiiii

This is what you dumbass faggot normies get for relying on few single centralized entities (trezor, nano). Paper wallets will always be superior because there are so many different methods of creating them -> more security.