/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12342972
nah it's fucked, couldnt break ath, we're going back down

>>12343001
its heading to 20k sats

>>12342972
What are you basing this on? Explain pic related pls

Delet NOW

>>12343066
Not a chance. Cucked at Jan high, didnt even touch sibos high. Now roaming sideways like a hungry bear.

>>12343132
>that 30 year old boomer who tracks the price of link in USDT

>>12342972

Chainlink has the best LARPs. U better not be a busta.

>>12343149
we're talking btc pair, usd ath isnt even worth talking about

>>12343132
What a photograph you paint with your words, pajeet. Are you, perchance, potty trained?

>>12343278
Dunno what youre getting mad at me for. OP is full of shit.

>>12343278
It’s true. It is roaming sideways like a hungry Sergey.

>>12343132
If you cant tell the classic bull flag sign , you are beyond helping.

>>12343227
>we're talking btc pair
Have you, by any chance, looked at the btc chart?

>>12343001
>couldnt break ath
Except it did.

>>12343066
provide some actual proof of this claim or your just enough larper who's throwing shit at the wall

literally dumping right now
target: 9k sats

>>12343300
Next youll start telling me about le cup and handhole
>>12343301
adults are talking

>>12343320

Nahh, just gaiing some momentum for the blast off. its gaining volume steadily

What’s driving the price tho? There’s really no reason for it go higher at this point

>>12343343
>just gaiing some momentum
>just gaiing some
>just gaiing
>gaiing

>>12343324
Weekly cup and handle is playing out right now chief

>>12342972
>herp derp

>>12342972
>doing TA on a pump and dump
thanks for the pump, see you all at 15 cents
t. 11500 sats seller

>>12343364
lol

things that didnt age well: this thread
>i saw a couple of TA chart patterns, therefore im basically a master at trading
this is why biz will always failed, filled with lazy losers with god complex

>>12343381
>>12343386
Oh no, what the fuck OP? you said it would be going up right now! Who could have possibly seen this coming?

>>12343481
hERE IT COMES

>>12343324
fuck off gramps

>>12343481
2 hours

>>12342972

90 mins til we find out larp or liar

>>12343001
??? It did break ATH

>>12342972
Dumps post 3 weeks.

>>12342972
larp

>>12343353
Fake and gai

>>12343448
LMAO this is unironically true for me and all the other scabs on here.

>>12344119
imagine having the intelligence of this retard lmao. the prediction was based on the simetrical triangle in OPs pic, which has been broken downwards 2 fucking hours ago.
>>12343386

TL;DR: OP is retarded and nothing is going to happen

just gonna leave this hear,
now that link pump is over for the time being,
get some tron, moved up to long term resistance trend line, wedged out, broke up out of wedge, and then broke massive resistance. look
last tidbit if you really need it be convinced, if the TA pattern is an argument for bearish triangle, it broke up which generally means there is going to be a bigger more rapid move than if it broke down as expected.
there is also the argument present in the chart for descending wedge, which is bullish continuation pattern based on slant of bottom line so.....

>>12342972

>Well, we're waiting anon

>>12342972
lets have a good 2019, please pull this larp off anon

>>12342972

>mfw it was all a ruse to get u all to hold while he dumps on u

Why are people saying we broke ATH? Not to shit on the parade, i can't think of many alts that have performed like stinkies past year

>>12344572
Woops forgot pic

>>12344564
if any idiot didn't see this then they deserve to lose

current chart (1/2)

>>12344580
chart from last big pump on 11/16/18 (2/2)

>>12344586
that was entirely due to the btc crash at the same exact time (nov 15). This is a measure move from the bottom of the cup, Breakout should take us to 15k sats. We're just reloading for the time being.

>>12344615
heh, lol
went from 800 to almost 12000 in 2 days, hitting record highs
chart forms near textbook-perfect trend reversal wedge break and rounding top with corresponding volume

>we just need to cool of for another rally


sure bud, 1k EOY amiright?

except it's literally dumping right now
saged

>>12342972

>3 mins to go

what do you know OP was lying

OP please stop posting if you are a TA noob

fucking idiot drew a symmetrical triangle on the 15 minute charts in a downward trend then came to tell us about it

stop embarassing yourself please

Time to lose all my money because I just can't bring myself to give up on link. God damnit, I'll probably buy more after the dump to 6000 SATs too... I'm a sucker.

>>12344650

actually this isnt true

on the nov 13 high there was serious bearish divergence on the RSI

that top was going to come down anyway, its just that the BTC drop pushed it quicker and deeper

>>12342972
this didn't age well

>>12344119

hes not even larping, hes just posting extremely bad TA

Serious question. Is there any faster method to determine my specific average on binance for my LINK? I have a solid guess but I DCA'ed so much over the last year and didn't keep 100% track which I regret. I guess I'm going to have to go through all my transactions in the history log? Probably over 20 trades.

>>12344720
sell 1/3rd of your position so you still have most of it, "just in case" and you still take profit.
dump the 1/3rd into tron and ride the pump on that. flip it back to link after tron pump slows and link drops some

>>12344728
just fyi, charts/indicators don't cause the market to move. the movements of the market generates chart patterns and indications. both what I am saying and what you are saying are patterns/indicators of market movement.
don't mix up your cause and effect or else you'll get fucked trading. all you are doing is finding an edge, not claiming patterns cause market movement

anyway,
>sage

>>12344756
oh booh hoo, 20 trades. it will take a few minutes.

try reporting and tracking thousands of trades over a year with piss poor tools. also the taxman demands you track it all yourself and will take a portion from you if you err towards over-reporting and will penalize you if you get it wrong on the side of under-reporting

>>12344756
youre overthinking it bro just divide your dollar total by the number of links you got if, i have $4,000 and 10,000 links its 4,000/10,000=.40cents a link

Not only it was a larp. But it's probably from a whale group since it's dumping literally now

Why do you guys look at BTC price and not USD? Wouldn't USD be more accurate since BTC is so volatile?

>>12344756
nigga, just look at how much you put into crypto via coinbase or whatever gateway you use. divide your link stack by that. Done. Unless you're unironically holding other crypto besides link. I which case, why? Why gamble on vaporware when you have link?

>>12342972

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

>>12342972

SET HIS TROUSERS ABLAZE

>>12344809
if your shitcoin isn't consistently outpacing btc, theres no reason for it to exist

that said, this clearly manipulated pump on link is nothing to get excited about

$0.28 incoming. Tick tock.

10k sats is the bottom

>>12344987

You are a bit off. Try 9pm GMT 6th.

european here, just woke up, dumping my bags

>>12343066
Checked

>ctrl + f "except"
>2 results
mmh-hm.

>>12345099
checked

It is dumping.

First of all, the volume was close to 5000 BTC last 24 hours, it cannot sustain it like that for long, we are going down during this weekend and early next week

W E A R E P U M P K I N

>>12342972

drawing two random lines is not TA

LOOK HOW FAR WE'VE COME

>>12343300
>dump it and paaAiint a bull flag

>>12342972

ALRIGHT, time to talk about ChainLink's price.

I've been crunching some numbers, researching how much api providers charge right now, looking into Oraclize and other oracle services customer-base and how much are they paying...

And I've came to the conclusion that LINK holders are completely out of their mind. The network just WON'T have nowhere near the fee revenue to justify the price predictions that are thrown around in this board.

If we're LUCKY, we might see a 10MM USD a YEAR at the beginning at the network. It's fucking ridiculous.

Even if we the network eventually gets adopted by a few banks for derivatives trading purposes (which WON'T happen in less than 03 years, you idiots have no idea how far away smart contracts are from being actually usable) it'll be HARD to get over 100 MM usd a YEAR in network fees. Shit just isn't that profitable.

So yeah, LINK is basically overinflated in price because delusional neets bought into the non-sense from a group of LARPERS and didnt actually do any research.

I'll buy back at 0,30

>>12346828
>literally spewing diarrhea out of your mouth (no data and just your baseless opinion)
Nice dude.