/biz/ - Business & Finance

I'm glad i don't own that shitcoin. Talk about depressing.

What coin is this

>reducing blocksize

wew

>>12048887
store. of. value.

You shut your mouth

>>12048869
some altcoin (pic related)

>>12048903

they should make the blocksize 1KB... you cant sell if you cant send a transaction

ALL IN

>>12048848
Jesus. And who has a link to that stiffed website. Someone needs to tweet it at this sorry shitcoin team.

> STIFFED

>>12048923
based. then if you get hacked its not like the hacker can spend your funds.

Sounds a lot better than "we will put the internet on bitcoin as a sidechain" or "because the transactions are so many, privacy will be really good"

>>12048848
How could anything compete with this?

>>12049044
fucking cringe

>>12049086
How do you do fellow cultist

>>12048848
>turing-like flexibility

>>12048848

Thy steal code from Monero look :
> Confidential Transaction.

>>12048848
just fucking increase the fucking blocksize already ffs

with the tumult happening in the Bitcoin Cash space right now BTC has literally been given a second chance to redeem themselves and win back almost all the people they lost.

just fucking increase it NOW before it really is too late. hard forking is CLEARLY not a valid excuse since 100% of the miners and exchanges upgraded immediately last year when that critical bug was found.

>>12049097
i'm BSV, not some cringe lolbertarian bcasher

>>12048955
no. at least that is an ambition that would add value to the world. can you imagine how many more tx/s it would create if it would actually be achievable? meanwhile reducing the block size limit and calling it "making bitcoin sustainable" is the dumbest thing to do right now. imagine end of 2017 but the fees would be ten times higher and the loss of adoption going five times faster, that's what the BTC devs appear to be wanting.

if OP is true, i hope not

>>12049280
Holy newfag. Adam Back was the first to talk about ct on bitcointalk, gmax was the guy who did most of the initial work. Monero didn't have ct at first and gmax helped them implement it.
Blockstream were part of the bulletproofs authors and monero took their work.

>>12049340
Nah. Signature aggregation and batch verification is all that's needed right now. Much more than bigger blocks.
Most of the blockspace is used by exchanges with huge transactions that have 10+ multisig inputs. Plus the current max blocksize of 1.9-3 mb hasn't even been reached yet.

>>12048848
> maybe perhaps we can fix some bugs? possibly in the future?

>>12049303
L

>>12049303
O

>>12049303
L.

>>12048862
>>12048887
>>12048903
>>12048923
>>12049302
>thinking you know more than one of cryptocurrencies biggest contributors
>being so shortsighted you can’t see the potential problems large blocks create

Theres a reasom you fucking dunces are shitposting on /biz/ and Luke is a top Bitcoin developer.

>>12049302
Hardfork is the most valid reason not to. I like that its immutable and doesn't change. Plus I'm still making transactions at 1 sat.

>>12049520
>>12049528
>>12049542

>>12049628

>>12048848
good fucking lord, king shitcoin

>>12049687
Serious question how much money have you lost in the last few days?