/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11947955
I'm sorry, litrerally who?

>>11947955
Another day, another Niggership.

Olympus labs is unironically huge.

It is one of the most highly respected institutions in its industry.

>>11947955
Based and redpilled

literally who?

>>11947955
Source on this?

>>11947981
>>11947993
Absolute brainlets

>>11947995
https://medium.com/olympuslabsbc/olympus-labs-and-chainlink-integrate-decentralized-oracles-into-financial-products-for-reliable-17ad07bc5c80

https://olympus-labs.com/
> the absolute state of link parterships

>>11947955

Like Mount Olympus? Bullish

>>11947955
Toobad serfat noshowed marketwaves 18

Because there is no working product
You dont noshow the biggest international blockchain convention of the year unless you have nothing to show
The biggest logi/supply corporations in the world were there and sirgay no showed

Some leader, youre all fucked

>>11947997
the more obscure the partnership, the more i buy.

>>11947955
Checked. How the fuck anybody on biz can not own a huge stack of Link amazes me. Link is going to be huge moving forward.

No big deal right nolinkers?

Just another literally who crypto startup
Ranked 507
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/olympus-labs/

I get that 'eth got off the ground because of hundreds of literally who's' but we better start getting some real partnerships soon

>>11948127
Yeh, Swift is a chickenshit no name in the financial industry. Keep fudding swingtrader. Lol

>>11947955
>>11948011
This is zyzz coming down from his perch on mt Olympus and blessing link bagholders.

1k eoy = FUD

>>11948127

>amazon web services
literally who?

This is no big deal. Kek the team has to shill partnerships like VEN to stay relevant so pathetic

“We are very excited to be working with Chainlink to bring the world’s first decentralized cryptocurrency futures product to market. Oracles perform a key function in ensuring the fairness and trust of the futures product, so choosing a reliable oracle partner is of the utmost importance."

>>11948124
Not at all

literally hundreds

No-liner suicide when?

HUNDREDS
OF
TEAMS

The ONLY oracling solution
$2500 eoy

>>11948127
or else what anon? youre going to use your hands made of paper to dump your bags? do it you little bitch and stop talking like youre calling the shots around here. the sooner faggots like you sell the better.

YOU JUST WIN

>>11948100
Checked my fellow marine

Who is this company?

No one

Who is r trade no one


I want partnships with KNOWN companies. Not these chink scams

>>11948562
Patience, fren. This was literally how eth mooned. Slowly but steadily.

>>11948562
Smart contracts are an emerging technology. It is start-ups, such as crypto companies, who will take the first steps into experimenting with them. So expect to see a lot more “literal who” partnerships with LINK. Hundreds, in fact.

And like everyone is saying - ETH mooned on the back of literally hundreds of shitcoins. LINK will do the same plus it’s even better because it’s actually gonna drive real world adoption. We really are gonna make it.

>>11948127
This is sergey letting biz know that the big reveal and singularity is coming soon, he's giving us a little more time to accumulate because he's a nice guy and likes our memes

>>11948501
We will win and we will win and we will WIN

>>11948167
The chainlink team hasn't announced a thing all of these partnership announcements are coming from the companies themselves

Olympus labs is itself partnered with Kyber, Hydro and Digix.
https://www.investinblockchain.com/olympus-labs/

Just the fact that LINK is partnered with both Hydro and Olympus labs, which are themselves partnered, made me think Digix will also partner with Chainlink...
And yeah, turns out Digix is tokenised gold. Wouldn’t this require an oracle?? to peg the price of gold to the token?

>>11948562
I want you to sell and then go back

every day theres good news for chainlink. is this real life

is hard to accept but maybe its true. the prophecy

Im not crying its just something stuck in my eye

>>11948786
Me too. Fucking retards don’t deserve Link.

What if there is a Shadow fork?

FUCK I MISSED THE BOTTOM AND NOW I AM TRAPPED IN FIAT
i bought my initial Link stack in january, so I am down a lot, so I wanted to buy an even bigger stack, but I really wanted to buy in at the absolute bottom to make up for my losses. now I missed it and it will never come back.
fuck I should kms

>>11948587
Can you give me a rough date, how long did Eth take?

What stage is link at? How many months till 50$ link?

I have 10k link and @ 50$ is 500k. I sell and quit. Period.

Thank you

>>11948906
Same here. We’ll make it fren. Probably mid to late 2019

>>11948867
Just go all in and never sell your linkies again.
Continue to accumulate up to $1.

>>11948930
Lolno
Crazy high valuations like $50-$100 or even more won’t happen in 2019. Maybe 2020 but my bet is 3-5 years from now.

>>11948193

My god. It really will happen

>>11948785
no.

>>11948956
I get where youre coming from but on the other hand I remember that everything in this space moves way faster and bigger than people normally expect

maybe 50 in 2019 isnt that unrealistic

>>11948956
You are entitled to your opinion

>>11948906
>>11948930
Weak hands.
You'll sell @$10 and make redditors rich.
Pitty.

another day another partnership

>>11948930
That id...More poo

>>11948956
Yah that’s what they said about ETH beginning of 2017... This happen a lot faster than you think

>>11947955
>literally whos of companies

seriously should I go all in chainlink now or wait until the crypto market shits the bed again?

>>11949086
buy when btc 2k thats where link will come close to ico levels...i waiting for that to get in.

>>11949094
what makes you so sure 2k btc is not a meme though? genuinely interested

Big fat reminder for nolinkers pic related

>>11949106

facts...every cycle it goes down 2k and up 1k..retards think that its bull. but infact its proven pattern.

> prove me wrong..you cant.

AAA

>>11949079
We are in a bear market though
If BTC stays in a bear market for next year LINK may reach top 10 or top 5 but not reach $50

>>11948100
Checked. My stack is like my penis, a little underwhelming, but as big as it can be

>>11949170
link doesn't give the slightest shit about "bear markets"
if mainnet launches and works properly link will be THE FIRST crypto in the world to hold real value. at that point link completely decouples from BTC and probably drags the rest of the crypto market up with it. LINK will be the catalyst for the bullrun

>>11949170
as soon as link/usd pair comes out... why you care about btc? Blockchain tech is not the same as cryptocurrency

>>11948626
This.

>>11948969
Yes

>>11949187
have you tried jelqing your stack with some coconut oil?

>>11949363
Lots of tokens have usdt pairs on Binance but they still got dragged down as BTC crashed.
You’re delusional if you don’t recognise that btc controls all market sentiment.
Yes link will moon from adoption but we won’t see crazy valuations from speculative mania with also btc breaching its ATH

>>11948785
everything needs link. all shitcoins are useless. 99% of the shitcoins out there can be made obsolete by a single smart contract paired with a chainlink

>>11949282
>link doesn't give the slightest shit about "bear markets"
The token just lost 50% of its fiat value because btc shit the bed. From 60c to 25c. Retard.

>>11949428
you are braindead

>>11949428
Stop posting this in every thread, retard
Uptrend since July

>>11949438
>>11949454
but he's right you delusional faggots. Everything in crypto moves with bitcoin and it will remain that way for a long time
some of you deluded linkies are dumber than fucking rocks and it's irritating because you don't deserve link

>>11949515
Cope

>>11949438
>>11949454
I hold 17k link and I just bought 1k more today.
You can’t deny that BTC shit the bed and LINK lost fiat value.
Measuring in sats is retarded.
Link could moon to the #2 position but if BTC crashes to $1000 then 10,000 sats could be worth like 5 cent.

No crypto is independent of btc because everything is measured in sats.

>>11949515
Morons panic selling link because of btc can only keep the price suppressed for so long

>>11949528
read my post again you braindead idiot >>11949282
I swear you must be literally retarded

>>11949515
Exactly.
Maybe BTC really has bottomed out and we bull now. But if it crashes to 1k, shit is gonna get painful with LINK again.
Imagine mooning to the top 10 but losing $$

>>11949541
What you said doesn’t mean anything. I agree that LINK will moon on mainnet and may even kickstart the next bullrun. But all crypto moves with btc and you can’t escape that.

>>11949537
It wasn’t panic selling that caused the fiat value to drop?
Do you not understand that LINK Maintained satoshi value relatively ok but the value of 1 satoshi diminished?

>>11949555
Coins keeping / increasing USD value but fluctuating in sats has happened all the time. (Are you newfags?) If btc is $1000 (which will never happen btw), then link won’t be 8k sats. It’ll be 80k sats.

>>11949555
Are you just pretending or are you really that stupid? Do you know WHY all crypto moves with BTC? Because crypto has no real value right now. All of crypto value is speculative. When LINK launches the bullrun LINK's value will be real. That's when decoupling happens and BTC no longer matters.

>>11948139
If HIV/AIDS spreading was like chainlink...... we would be like the first people to figure out that AIDS would be a worldwide phonomenon killing 10's of millions of people, and we would have figured it out like 10 mins after that ape (African) fucked an actual monkey to get the disease and start spreading it

>>11949584
oldfags and maximalists calculate in satohshi to increase their stack by swing trading or am I missing something?

>>11949593
This. People just don’t get it. :^)

>>11949524
what exactly is cope? the price of link got cut in half because of bitcoin's crash. you're low IQ and a total deluded fanatic just like the fags that think trump colluded with russia, except my some divine stroke of luck your delusions will probably work out. This isn't a complement, you're a retard that got lucky.

>>11949640
Cope

>>11949640
What's the price of Link OTC?

>>11949736
do you know what OTC means you fucktard

>>11949773
over the cock? check em

epic quads on LINK's price

>>11949528
full on autism.

never gonna make it

>>11947955
Why is chainlink partnering with a workout supplement company? Google it

How big is this? I feel like everyone who announces they are using the LINK token is massive why is price 35 cents still? I’ve been saying this for 2 years though I’m really confused. Way back there really wasn’t any news but now there’s been a bunch every single day. What’s going on are all these companies that announcing actually getting the “free” link tokens and on mainnet they will be released thus raising total supply (but not really bc locked up in nodes) but will pump chainlink way up in CMC causing FOMO

>>11949773
I know you're not potty trained you little monkey

>>11950084
Because nano shills made a "chainlink" discord and have successfully convinced everyone to fud the shit out of it on places where it could spread to other people.

>>11947955
Another day, frens. Another day indeed.

Mainnet isn't coming out. Jan things get reset and the eoy memes start anew

threadly reminder that the only projects making legit real world, known partnerships are XLM and BAT

>>11949407
What the fuck dude!? My ledger is ruined! Fuck you 4channel

>>11948011
>The absolute state of LINK fudders
https://olympuslabs.io/
They raised $60MM through their ICO in the beginning of this year. Should last some time.

>>11950084
Because crypto is dead and nobody trusts partnership news anymore after getting burned over and over by the chinks. If this happened at the same time last year LINK would be in the billions. That said, slow steady growth is way healthier than pumping to absurd levels on nothing but speculation. Every shitcoin that did that last year crashed 99% and is NEVER coming back from it. See: nano, vechain, req, neo... all dead in the water

>>11950269
Not bad projects but I’d just rather invest in potential breakthrough tech that solves crucial bottleneck issues keeping smart contracts from mainstream use. It’s really just personally preference.

>>11947988
Lal not even close

/hundreds of teams/

>>11948033
someone refute this

>>11950874
Ivan, OL CM here.
We raised 45mil from the presale, cancelled ICO due to a spike in ETH price.
We've done the calculations and even with ETH floating around 100 USD, we'd have enough to build and promote our ecosystem for a few years.
Not saying the bear market didnt hit us like everyone else, cause it sure did.

>>11951625
When OL mainnet, how do I use it?

>>11951736
OL is a blockchain-agnostic ecosystem focused around the Olympus protocol, which allows easy and convenient creation of B2B and B2C decentralized financial products (indices, funds, futures, etc).
Our first products - indices are already live on the Olympus marketplace Dapp, which is currently in beta-testing mode on ImToken.
Our futures product will hopefully be released for the public before the end of the year.

Sorry for a clunky explanation linkmarines, had a very long and tough day.
Here's a simple and a bit cartoonish article on what essentially we are doing:
https://medium.com/olympuslabsbc/what-exactly-are-we-doing-at-olympus-labs-our-vision-olympus-ecosystem-and-its-layers-d7980d296750

>>11951792
Also, proud to be a LINK-marine since the ICO <3

>>11951792
>>11951829
Based
OL certainly looks good too.

>>11951792
Can your first futures product please be a Link/USD contract?

>>11951792
Thanx fran

>>11948011
Lmao another literal who shitcoin. Muh swift, muh docusign, muh salesforce. Kek.

>>11949369
maybe

https://medium.com/@valueprop/florincoin-the-tzero-connection-66697c81c873

Reasons why Tzero and Overstock use FLO

1. floData is accessible and easy to read. You don't need to decompile a smart contract or have a special software to read it. It's in plaintext on the chain. This helps with auditing and explaining how it works to regulators. Any extra steps are a barrier to adoption.
2. floData is easy to write. It is appended to the blockchain using a simple RPC command. This makes maintaining the software around the solution less costly.
3. FLO is a fairly launched blockchain with no premine or ICO. Again, this helps for practical regulatory reasons, but also is a philosophical choice made by those who maintain the software. It guides the decision making for our software and also allows those implementing it to check off a box they couldn't check using another chain without those features.
4. FLO is secured by proof of work. This is arguably the best security a network can get, requiring actual buy in of physical devices and constant operational cost in both manpower and electric power
5. FLO has open source software built on top of it (OIP) that can be used for building more advanced applications (this is how etdb.caltech.edu became a thing).
6. FLO transactions are cheap and fast. This will always be the case - we will likely increase block size as the network grows
7. FLO's main use-case is floData, unlike other chains who support complex smart contract languages and operations unrelated to storing data. Sometimes it's best to use a tool that's meant to perform best at a single job rather than bringing around a Swiss army knife and using it for only 1 of its functions.

Look for free and fairly launched coins.They go to BINANCE.

@cz_binance
Follow Follow @cz_binance
More CZ Binance Retweeted Binance
Back to listing. Ravencoin, no ICO, community project, humble people, no listing fee.

Check out the binance description page for FLO.Look how similar it is to RVN

>>11951916
BTC and ETH first

>>11952049
Its olympuslabs.io actually

>>11952363
Is there an Olympus Labs that sells steroids or am I mis-remembering?

Seems an interesting project anyway.

>>11952476
There is :)
We have peacefully accepted the existance of each other

>>11952666
Woah, self checked and keked, dem trips

>>11952666
Checked. Are you currently testing a Link implementation on testnet or your own private blockchain? If so, how has it been for your devs to work with it?

>>11952666
Nice haha

>>11947988
Lmfao the cope

>>11952363
>olympuslabs.io
Lmao another literal who shitcoin. Muh swift, muh docusign, muh salesforce. Kek.

I had an Olympus camera once. Wasn’t bad desu