[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 19 KB, 1200x463, Digibyte_Blockchain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11671419 No.11671419 [Reply] [Original]

> best PoW protocol, resistant to 51% attacks
>objectively the fastest UTXO blockchain today, and scales to over 250k TPS by 2035
>tech pioneered by DigiByte is found in over 10 different coins
>creator has spoken at Ivy League schools, has been invited back to speak again
>listed on over 70 exchanges
>real estate and DAPP projects have been in the pipeline for months, won't be released until fully functional
/biz/ has made me inordinate amounts of money, so I feel compelled to shill to you the coin you rode with me from 300 sats all the way to 2000 last summer. You cannot fault the fundamentals of the coin: it is a more decentralized, faster Bitcoin that can handle DAPPs without crashing (see ETH's cryptokitty debacle). We're holding steady at around 330 sats currently, and I don't want my bizbros left behind when the market shakes out the ICO scams and shitcoins.
Digimarines assemble.

>> No.11671434

>>11671419
>resistance to 51% attacks
Resistance is not the same as immune

SHITCOIN
H
I
T
C
I
N

>> No.11671482

>>11671434
>immune
Nothing's truly "immune", what I'm saying is that it is incredibly expensive to even have a chance to attack the chain.

>> No.11671492
File: 112 KB, 600x800, 1524799735424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11671492

>>11671419
>strong fundamentals

>> No.11671514
File: 453 KB, 1871x1657, salvation.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11671514

>>11671419
did you write this masterpiece?

>> No.11671540
File: 469 KB, 675x508, 1497135092852.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11671540

>>11671482

Objectively not true. I can go on Nicehash and actually do it very cheaply since I can get about 100% of the hashing power on 3 out of 5 of the algos. Digishield really isn't that good, and Jared stole the code from Myraid coin anyway. Jared literally copied and pasted the code and called it his own. He's such a faggot.

Pic related.

>> No.11671565

>>11671419
Digiposse finna ride on these broke azz link fags bruh

>> No.11671570

>>11671419
>tech pioneered by DigiByte is found in over 10 different coins
I think that tech is used in over 20 coins now.

don't forget
>flipped of CZ Binance that they can suck his dick, latest 2019 that they won't be THE relevant exchange anymore, exposing the shitshow Binance is delivering

oh and a guy sharpie doing stupid shit:
>>11671540
What does it cost to get 3 of 5 algos with nicehash?
How much algos with what percentage power do you need to fuck with the blockchain?
Do the math and try the FUD again.

>> No.11671651
File: 454 KB, 414x499, 1436593539227.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11671651

>>11671514
hearty keks were had, this is when shilling was done right.

>> No.11671783

>>11671570

Dumb fuck, it costs $33,394 to attack Litecoin for 1 hour and get 51% of the hash rate. DGB shitcoin is much cheaper. Let's do the math.

DGB is at 87 PH/s. 51% would be 44.37 PH/s. DGB is split between Groestl, Qubit, Scrypt, sha256d, and skein which rotates each block mined. That means I only have to pick the 3 least used and least costly algos to fuck Jared.

I can get 129 GH/s of Scrypt for an hour for $18 on Nicehash right now. The entire Scrypt DGB algo is at 4 TH/s. To 51% attack just that algo for an hour would only cost 2000 GH/129 GH = 15.50 * $18 = $279.07 for an hour.

Lmao give me a break. This is a shitcoin and this is actually extremely dangerous to hold. Any proof of work coin that is not Bitcoin is extremely easy to 51% attack and no one should be investing in these coins.

>> No.11671841

>>11671783
I'm not going to doubt this numbers
thanks
just sold 100k

XVG is the right coin to buy now, right sirs?

>> No.11671927
File: 108 KB, 640x640, 1534182401977.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11671927

>>11671434
>>11671540
>>11671783
>he doesn't know about DigiShield/MultiShield

You're not be wrong with your hashrate calculation and Nicehash rates, but you would need more than 93% of one algorithm and 51% of each of the other four. Nevermind the fact that the difficulty adjustment would BTFO you immediately after you started attacking.