/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11596001
is this real?

>>11596001
/ourguy/

he's most definitely assblaster

redpill me on wtf ab is

>>11596207
Link larper that wasn't a larp

>>11596207
go away newfag

>>11596207
>doesn't know about ab

not gonna make it fren

>>11596224
>still hold 10k link based on nothing but constant /biz/ shilling
You can't stop me from making it

>>11596224
Where can i buy AB?

>>11596207
Is this real?

>>11596207
All you need to know.

Let me put it this way, LINK is not a currency. It wont “moon” it won’t “correct”, if LINK is what I have been told it is, if LINK does what SWIFT is planning for it to do, you need an entirely net lexicon for what will happen to LINK. It’s not going to be green candles and red candles of a speculates coin fluctuating. It’s going to be like the railways or oil fields. It’s going to be a proportional entitlement to the entire network of open banking. Secured via ethereum smart contracts to give out dividends, it will entitle you access to the defacto network of transparent decentralised banking. I’m not telling you to go out and buy it because it might be awhile and there’s no real rush, right now the market is bearish and you might get dumped on, but watch LINK closely because one day you’ll be able to buy it and one day you’ll have to pay huge sums of money to get a stake in one of the most significant networks for modern banking you can imagine.

I thought before that it would shoot up to 3 USD when partnerships would announce and then climb up but I’m starting to think this whole thing is going to drop with mainnets, partnerships, functional nodes all at once. Especially after seeing all the documents leaked from LINK recently. (Saved on laptop but they were posted here). This will be a currency traded for speculation until it becomes what is essentially a security, not in the legal sense but in the “this thing entitled me to a share of this network” and people will pay huge sums for that access.

By far the most misinformed statements are the ones about LINK not needing a token and the token having no value, if you guys saw the picture you’d understand. When I have my laptop I’ll possibly post more in depth explanations. I don’t know yet, it’s been a busy week.

>>11596158
https://twitter.com/creatine/status/1057723561559908353?s=21

>>11596282
-assblaster

who tf is creatine?

>>11596289
Some guy who is not AB.

look up archive for post 7569209

that was his last appearance

>>11596297
Ah, good memories. Thrilling times on the Internet.

remember when AB said icon is a bluechip coin top kek linkies on suicide watch

>>11596325
and qash. he had some pretty retarded opinions, but didn't we all then? who didn't think every shitcoin with a strong team was going to make it.

>>11596207
AB is Artemis Blarton, a guy who works in the fintech industry and predicted both of BTC's big moons, both the $1,400 and the 20k moon. He made a comment over a year ago about how the Chainlink project physically could never be successful because of flaws to it's foundational game theory

>>11596207
If you don't know then you don't know. Those that know.. know.

>>11596001
huäre globi

>>11596688
He is my fucking hero, without AB I don't hold my stack, end of story.

>>11596601
Hehe, that'll scare the normies away

>>11596207
LARPER who was wrong on every single one of his calls: eth, quash, coinmetro (topfuckingkek) and link but still gets defended whenever it pumps because he birthed some dank memes like the price singularity. ITT desperate bag holders that bought the ATH from his shilling defend him.

>>11596207
A bitchboi

>>11596207

Why is this guy idolized when he called $3 by May? That alone was bad enough but then you guys yell at black amex about being right

>>11597669
He hated price predictions. He said multiple times that price predictions are pretty much worthless because the market is so volatile. He also knew we were in a huge bubble at the time, so i'm guessing that estimate was calculated with the assumption that the entire market hadn't crashed by then.

>>11596768

He wasn’t wrong about nano.

>>11597669

>he doesn’t know CL hits 3$ may 2019

>>11597688
>>11597689
Ok so say $3 by February 2019, is creatine AB? Why did he stop coming here? Seems like it happened just as link dumped to the grave

>>11597753
Nobody knows if Creatine is AssBlaster. Creatine says he is not, and I can post that tweet if you'd like. I follow the guy on twitter.

HOWEVER:

Assblaster stopped posting on /biz/ the EXACT time that this Creatine guy's twitter was posted. They have the same hair, from the same location, and they both follow and hold LINK.

The guy on the left is Creatine back when his twitter was found, and the guy on the right is a picture Assblaster posted.

>>11596207

Artificial binary-intelligence

>>11597779
That's the same person. Flip the image on the right, the hairline is the same. Also, any autist can see that the edge of the side hair follows the same pattern, as well as the chin sculpt

Creatine is AB, AB is Creatine

>>11596768
>>11597669
>>11597753
Short sighted idiots. Learn to parse information for what it is. He gave us plenty. No one can predict price accurately.

not one of you dumb shits have mentioned his post is a /b/ reference. clueless reddit trash.

>>11597809
The issue is, the Creatine guy has blonde hair. It's either the biggest coincidence ever, or it really is him. I will always remember the first post connecting Creatine's twitter and Assblaster. It was literally a picture of Creatine's twitter, with the text "A...Assblaster?" and it fucking exploded. I can't find it anywhere in the archives.

>>11596207

>>11597779
> someone who named himself Assblaster on a notoriously racist website who got docked denies that it was him

>>11597881
Everyone pretty much left the dude alone to my knowledge. There is great respect for that man. If that truly is Assblaster, be sure to thank him in a few year for opening the eyes of /biz/tards to LINK.

Life is one big ass blast.

>>11597813

>calls people short sighted idiots
>plenty of information
>none of the things he says actually happened

sorry fren, come back in the mornin

>>11597688
Do you have the rest of these?

>>11596282
That's the quote I wanted to read before bed. Thanks fren

>>11598012

>>11597900
>Everyone pretty much left the dude alone to my knowledge
Thank Kek for that. Oosh.

>>11597900
This.

>>11598001
Divide the things AB said into two categories:
1. Things he couldn’t know (like future prices)
2. Things he could know (industry discussions, use cases, interest)
Anything in category 1 that didn’t happen is just bad luck, he couldn’t possibly have known. Anything in category 2 is fair enough to assess him against, and by and large he was right.
So yes, you are short sighted and a brainlet.

>>11598102
Have an upkek

>>11598062
man.. these old ab posts are giving me /thatwintercomfyfeel/ again. i remember checking biz every day, my eyes lighting up when there was a new AB thread.

>>11598102
>Divide the things AB said into two categories:
>1. Things he couldn’t know (like future prices)
>2. Things he could know (industry discussions, use cases, interest)
>Anything in category 1 that didn’t happen is just bad luck, he couldn’t possibly have known. Anything in category 2 is fair enough to assess him against, and by and large he was right.
>So yes, you are short sighted and a brainlet.
This anon is speaking truth. I remember at the time, AB KEPT saying look, nobody knows for sure WTF happens with price but since you dumbfucks keep asking, ok, here’s my guess.
But I agree with this anon that it seems that AB was mostly right about things in item 2. He was the first one (that I saw at least) that actually came in and offered some explanation for why the finance industry would care about link, and also about why it was launched as a separate, independent chain. Contrast this what is happening in another huge industtry, shipping. Maersk teamed up with IBM to create a new DLT for tracking shipping. This is a huge fucking use case by the way which is still mostly run on Fucking paper invoices. Massive savings to be had from even a basic DLT. But everyone is saying fuck you Maersk, we don’t care if we can get 40% cost savings — we’re not joining some network where you are running the show. That would be like joining NBA where Lakers run the rules committee and the referees. Point is, finance world took a different approach and set the thing up as this independent startup. It was AB that explained that to me, and it makes sense, and I’ll always be grateful to him for that. I think he also put himself at some career risk to do it. I truly don’t give a shit whether his off the cufff prediction re price as of May was correct or not. In fact, even that he was careful about. He didn’t make any retarded “I guarantee this coin will moon” statements. In stead what he said was “I’ll be very surprised if it’s not at least $3.00.

>>11597900
>be sure to thank him in a few year for opening the eyes of /biz/tards to LINK
If you weren’t all in LINK before the first Assblaster thread you are a certified newfag. The absolute state of this fucking board

>>11598325
This anon fucks. I owe AB a lot. Also, there is still some interesting shit to be found in his writings, particularly given we know a lot more about chainlink now.

>>11597851
I remember that thread lol

>>11598378
Hell ya brother. This post right here is my favorite post on /biz/

>>11598395
>Hell ya brother. This post right here is my favorite post on /biz/

Totally agree brother. It’s going to be EVEN MORE my fucking favorite when it turns out to be fucking true!!!