/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11541454
Its probably nothing. What a boring thread lets all just not read it.

>>11541470
agreed, what a waste of a thread. kys OP

>>11541475
>>11541470

>>11541454
HOLY shit 1k eoy

>>11541454

basically by collect they mean gather, and by aggregate they mean compare in a way. They're talking about penis girth and length.

LMAO there are people still holding this shitcoin?
i sold my bags months ago

Solution looking for a problem.

Thomas said a while back that this was one to focus on.

We could well see a very narrow 'mainnet' that would be slowly rolled out and expanded.

>>11541538
This but unironically

>>11541454
>>11541470
>>11541475
>>11541508
>>11541538
>>11541543
>>11541546
>>11541682
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>>11541694
damn.. . you rly now youre shite i think ill trust it

>>11541454
Listen, I genuinely care about anon's financial well-being

>>11541454
YOU MANIAC

>>11541778