[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 226 KB, 617x834, methheads.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346320 No.11346320 [Reply] [Original]

mETHeads on suicide watch

>> No.11346332
File: 97 KB, 800x789, OP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346332

>>11346320

>> No.11346357

is gambling that much better on eos?

>> No.11346448
File: 44 KB, 776x561, 1521474402954.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346448

>>11346320
these numbers are fake because of double counting.
there's no data for 9 October yet, but on 8 Oct EOS had 19k active accounts IN TOTAL
which means there's a small core of heavy gamblers (or is it intentional stats spamming? who knows) that uses several apps daily

>> No.11346472
File: 51 KB, 1355x614, 1509615575188.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346472

>>11346320
it's spamming for stats, see
eos win jumped from 166 users on 8 Oct to 7236 on 9 Oct, but eos volume stayed constant.
It's fake marketing.
https://dappradar.com/eos/662/eos-win

>> No.11346484
File: 3.20 MB, 480x270, 1526826137557.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346484

Dapps are shit though. I looked into a lot of them and they're bad no one will use them.

>> No.11346497
File: 55 KB, 1360x622, 1519511787104.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346497

EOS play dice has the same story, an absurd jump from nowhere. Are all these gambling dapps owned by the same person?

Looking at total active accounts eos has probably 5k active unique dapp users, tops

>> No.11346507
File: 1.34 MB, 300x300, eospepe.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346507

>>11346472
>>11346448
>>11346497
C O PE
O
P
E

>> No.11346509

>>11346497
yeah, and when it costs nothing to achieve this, this is the result. Get to the top of the list on a big website -> free marketing -> huge incentive to do so

brainlets will reply and deny this but it doesn't matter

>> No.11346521

>>11346507
it's mathematically impossible to have more dapp users than total daily active accounts nigger
https://coinmetrics.io/charts/#assets=eos_log=false_left=activeAddresses_zoom=1536364800000,1538956800000

>> No.11346535

>>11346521
you've done enough by posting this info, this guy will just proceed to waste your time, so don't bother unless there's something meaningful to be added

>> No.11346576

>>11346521
Your website says there were 200,000 active EOS accounts yesterday. That's more than enough to generate these types of numbers. The two websites are obviously just not rolling over the dates at the same time.

>> No.11346584

>>11346576
no that 210k jump is 6 Oct, 8 Oct has 19.1k total accounts

>> No.11346594

>>11346584
>EOS transaction volume figure includes only transactions of transfer type. Median transaction value for EOS is actually median transfer value (currently, most transactions in EOS do not transfer EOS tokens).
It looks like they aren't counting accounts that use dapp-specific tokens like DICE. Nice detective work there.

>> No.11346602

>>11346594
read what you quoted again
>EOS transaction volume figure
>transaction volume figure
not
>active accounts

>> No.11346623

>>11346602
they're obviously not going to count the accounts when they aren't counting said account's volume you retard.

>> No.11346644

>>11346623
is english your second language or what? all they're saying is that they aren't counting value of transferred tokens to the daily volume. They are counting all active accounts.

>> No.11346659

>>11346644
>They are counting all active accounts.
No, they clearly are not, because the numbers don't match up.

>> No.11346673

>>11346644
>Active addresses is the number of unique sending and receiving addresses participating in transactions on the given day.
And tell me, how did we define "transactions" again?

>> No.11346683
File: 48 KB, 819x539, 324234wrewer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346683

i dont really understand what your talking about but they match up with this?
im retarded btw but maybe they just aren't moving the tokens?

>> No.11346688

>>11346659
Individual user counts on dapp radar aren't supposed to be added.
If I use two dapps with one account, that appears as 1 user in two different dapps, giving a mistaken count of 2 dapp users.
>>11346673
again:
>transaction volume
>volume
>>11346683
that counts all active addresses, regardless of what they do.

>> No.11346698

>>11346688
>If I use two dapps with one account, that appears as 1 user in two different dapps, giving a mistaken count of 2 dapp users.
No shit sherlock. Why the fuck would dapp radar not count the same addresses using different dapps? They're doing dapp specific traffic, not accumulative traffic.

>> No.11346709

>>11346472
Reminds me when EOS was allegedly airdropping ungodly amounts of shitcoins on ethereum to bog down the network. They have the money to basically do anything to manipulate media and the outlook of their centralized piece of shit.

>> No.11346715
File: 33 KB, 680x453, 1531573930221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11346715

>>11346698
>They're doing dapp specific traffic, not accumulative traffic
the tweet you posted adds individual counts and claims there were 51k+ active users...

>> No.11346728

ETH has no future. Shit like this just proves it.

>> No.11346744

>>11346715
He does the exact same thing for ethereum you absolute brainlet. The comparison is valid no matter how you count it.

>> No.11346761

>>11346744
dapp radar counts all unique dapp users by itself:
24h Users: 14,972
It includes eos too because the numbers don't match otherwise.
So there were 15k dapp users on eth and eos total.

>> No.11346769

>>11346744
note that it didn't counts makerdao for some reason, which is the biggest dapp on ethereum

>> No.11346774

>>11346769
>counts
count*

>> No.11346791

>>11346769
>>11346761
It's been a while since I've seen this level of mental gymnastics and self-delusion.

>> No.11346841

>>11346761
it only counts ethereum. That's why they show volume in ETH

>> No.11346914

>>11346791
ok you're right, they claim "Daily users of all dapps" for some reason. This means there's nothing that counts unique users on eos.
https://www.stateofthedapps.com/stats
daily unique users on ethereum 13.85k

I don't know where to get active accounts on eos from last 24h, that would solve it if it's still small.

>> No.11347016

>>11346320
Didn't even notice - betdice has 13846 users on his chart.
they have 810 today.
se7ens is no longer on the list
eos.win 7183 -> 192 (!)

no more proof needed that it was fake.
In 24 hours total active account count is going to become available on coinmetrics.io