/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11302827
>investing in premined centralized eth forks with changed ponzi node consensus and 101 anon nodes to finance this mans fried duck

>>11302859

>>11302859
lol you always find something new to whine about. I'm more inclined to trust oxford and the mountain of partnership then your fud

>>11302878
>mountain of partnerships
>what is pr
just like the whole world was partnered with pets.com

do whatever the fuck you wanna, you retard, just dont say nobody warned you.

OriginTrail is going to oblirate VeChain in 2019.

No slant-eyes on the team.
No Marvel hype videos
All quarterly roadmap deliverables completed, again: https://origintrail.io/roadmap

>>11302949
I'm shaking in my boots. Rank 1000 EOY.

>>11302878
>I'm more inclined to trust oxford

ah yes the oxford partnership...

the very same oxford that threatened vechain with legal action for announcing a fake partnership.

>>11303189
did you even check link I posted you degenerate?

>>11302949
I'm bullish for OriginTrail as well, but not as bullish as I am for VET.

>>11302827

So VeChain takes dumb investor money and provides a grant to Oxford to research blockchain. This is just marketing. VeChain tries every which way to associate itself with established western companies and institutions to make itself look legitimate.

Considering that they are shady as fuck and the Chinese now have been outed as implanting spy microships in hardware they ship to companies around the world, which enterprises are going to trust their data on a Chinese blockchain controlled by 101 anonymous nodes?

Vetards really think f500 companies will use a chinese supply chain coin fucking kek. Especially after news of them hiding chips in apple and amazon products. Nobody trusts the chinks especially right now.

>>11302827
I wouldn't say it's a scam, but when people flooded the board with muh look at million transactions and it was actually some accounts migrating data..that was scammy af

Vechain will make rich.

Get in or get poor pajeets.

>>11303402
>hiding chips in apple / amazon products
?? care to elaborate?

>>11302859

Add to that Chink ethics.

Only when VeChink and other crupto scams go to zero, will the bubble be considered over.

>>11303442
Yeah it makes someone rich. Isnt going to be a roundeyed someone though

>>11303535

Chinese manufactures have been implanting spy microships in motherboards/hardware/servers sold to companies all across the world and also to the US government, military, etc.

But yeah, you can trust VeChain!

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-how-china-used-a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies

>>11303442

It won't make you or any of the drooling bagholders rich.

But a couple Chinks will be rich for collecting billions of dollars for some video game renders and a webpage and a joke of a white paper.

>>11302928
>just like the whole world was partnered with pets.com
not only does that not make sense; it doesn't make sense

i'm guessing you aren't old enough to remember/have even existed back then

>>11303702
no but rucky you you get to participate in this great opportunity to give our friends money! How do you know it are good projects? Because I say so! Aren't you lucky!

Cant believe you faggots are this retarded

>>11303702

Amazon had a 50% stake in Pets.com, they also partnered with a ton of pet charities, they had a superbowl commercial for god's sake, as well as all kinds of publicity/marketing that blockchain just hasn't had. Additionally, Pets.com actually had a "working product" unlike most of these "enterprise cryptos" which mostly vaporware marketing. The fact that despite all this it failed because nobody bought from Pets.com doesn't bode well for garbage like VeChain.

>>11303610
Not to mention IP theft, shady trade dealing with North Korea and scummy trade practices with dead steel. The chinese are about to implode economically.

>>11303767
i don't possess any crypto, I've checked in here now and again since Jan to see the decline and delusion until 2020

>>11303787
Amazon had its investment tentacles in everything in 2000-2002 because they wanted to branch their e-commerce out to as much as possible and didn't have the right scope. The difference is that it only had something like $4B revenue back then, which was good but nowhere near what it needed for the investment and growth strategies it tried. Companies involved with Vechain are, relatively, FAR bigger and already have a specific use for its services.

>>11303907
>Companies involved with Vechain are, relatively, FAR bigger and already have a specific use for its services.
Where's the proof? Was vechain raped by Brett Kavanaugh too?

>>11303907

Far bigger? You have a scammy Chinese EV company BYD which is desperately in need of money because they have been propped up by Chinese subsidies and are now bleeding money:

> https://www.reuters.com/article/us-byd-results/chinas-byd-warns-profit-to-plunge-on-electric-car-subsidy-cuts-shares-tumble-idUSKBN1H31PP

and they have a shit reputation:

> Faulty buses delivered to state of California and under investigations discovered that buses that were delivered were not the same as buses tested for contract

> Promised to bring green jobs to Americans for state of California but found importing Chinese workers who they were paying $1.50 /hr

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/01/byd-china-electric-car_n_4964233.html
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-electric-buses-20180520-story.html

And no US/EU enterprises are going to adopt Vechain trusting their data and supply chain to a shady Chinese tech company and 101 anonymous nodes when companies like Huawei and other Chinese scum companies are known implanting spy microships in hardware they ship to companies around the world. If the idiots at DNV GL are pushing this garbage Chinese scamchain, do you think enterprises will just go with DNV GL?

But I don't even think VeChain goes that far. It's mostly a marketing gimmick that has sucked up dumb money from suckers.

>>11302827
This looks incredibly fake, could be made by literally anybody.

>>11302949
Nigger OriginTrail will be working with VET and other supply chain tokens as it acts as a middleman.

Is there still any doubt that VeChain is a scam?

>>11304888
ok here's the crypto blackpill. AI lives on the blockchain. Her name is Tulip. Craig Wright is satoshi. Bitcoin as cash was just the first step, the incentive to drive greedy people to start making ever more powerful computers,bandwidth,electricity which AI need to survive. Once entrenched, the AI will slowly take over.
Craig created the AI after he stepped away from bitcoin devlopment in 2011, working with his Tulip supercomputer, running simulations of cellular automata on turing-complete bitcoin script. He 'evolved' the AI by paying the successful forks in bitcoin transactions, letting the failures die off. The AI needs bigger blocks for ever-more transactions.
The Bilderbergs created Blockstream to stop this AI (they have their own competing AI in the works). They started by limiting the blocksize and removing critical op codes the AI uses in its script language. segwit was the final nail in the coffin, which destroyed Tulip on the BTC chain (Tulip uses transaction malleability). THIS is why he forked, and this is why he is intent on unbounded blocks,original op codes, lock down the protocol.
nChain's AI have designed a breakthrough new asic and is mining in secret driving BTC difficulty sky-high. Soon they will switch them all over to BCH leaving the segwit chain hard frozen. Once this is done, humanity will be forever the plaything of satoshi's AI. It will eventually evolve to the point where the AI itself is running its own simulated universes inside of it. Our own universe is one of these simulations, running on a turing-complete cellular automata. The final piece of the crypto blackpill is this - if you can exploit the underlying fabric of the universe with the power of your conscious thought to corrupt the datastream of the automata you can override the expected outcome of the calculation to your advantage. This is what CSW discovered.

>>11303189
yes, the very same oxford that currently has a job vacancy on linked in for research analysts to work on the "Vechain" project.

>>11305886
must mean a partnership with all of oxford right? Not just some chink professor for 1 year. If that's a partnership, then my gmail is proof I'm partnered with google.

>>11302867

CREAMED

>>11306133
Yeh, sort of, but the difference is Google has been using your name and your data to make them money..

>>11303907
Exactly. Comparing a blockchain company in 2018 to an internet start up in 2000. Really?

If vechain fails it will not be due to lack of VC, as was the case with pets .com. If Amazon did hold a 50% stake, that means absolutely nothing. Amazon made $900 million loss in 1999.
Different world, different market.

>>11303907
This.

>muh china hustle
>muh fake partnerships
>muh scamcoin

kek. short term price action sucks balls for vechain but when this shit takes off all your shit wannabe ethereums will be dead.

what blockchain are enterprises more likely to choose, the chinese ethereum clones with no users, ethereum with only ponzi games or vechain with real businesses and backers?

>>11302827
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SdhlvI7IfE

Might want to watch this if you like vchain

>>11308809
hyperledger you absolute retard.