/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11187810
LINK 33k by July 2019

>>11187810
who?

>>11187810
It's true.

https://twitter.com/bravenewcoin/status/1044013772929732608?s=19

Why did they use the old logo?

>>11187810
doesn't matter. fucking swift has essentially confirmed they are using chainlink and its stuck at 120M market cap meanwhile a handful of random banks say they might use xcurrent and XRP pumps to 25 billion. crypto is retarded and chainlink is never going to moon.

>>11187832
From the cloud master himself

>>11187838
I actually thought that was the sticker logo, not the original one

>>11187856
kek chainlink isn't even live yet

patience will be rewarded

>>11187856
We are witnessing the biggest FUD campaign recorded in biz history.
We should be proud it's under $1 for so long.

bravenewcoin.com
scroll down

>>11187874
>partnered with Amazon Alexa
>bunch of other literallywhats

Amazing.

>>11187874
>hey alexa what is "bravenewcoin"
>answers with first google result
>partnered with amazon alexa

There's some things from the chainlink code that I like, but there shills are annoying. Go build something.

>>11187810
>>11187819
>>11187838
>>11187856
>>11187861
>>11187868
>>11187871
>>11187874
>>11187949
>>11187964
>>11187971
Literally who? Desperate Linkies continue to "connect dots" and find "partnerships" knowing they will never get their money back. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>11187992
my post wasn't even related to chainlink

>>11187992
rent free faggot

>>11187810
>head office in melbourne
drunk anon was from straya. we're literally unironically gonna be 1000k eoy.

>>11187992
Anon this is a big dot

The guy who runs bnc is VERY well connected in the cryptosphere. Chainlink would not be on his radar if it wasn't serious business

>>11188047
who is the guy that runs BNC and how do you know this?

>>11188047
Chainlink does not investigate it's crypto partnerships. It also "partnered" with literal scamcoin Confido

>>11188040
straya cunts are always drunk m9.

>>11188090

>who is the guy that runs BNC?

https://twitter.com/@techemist

>how do you know this?

the section just below partners

holy shit
$50 within a year

>>11188099

TIGER MOMMY I LOVE YOU

If I remember they were already doing tests on smartcontracts.com in 2016, and Aaron Wright was a contributor. It was one of the openlaw dots before openlaw became official.

Im going in. 100k buy order already up on binance.

>>11188212
Welcome aboard. 1000 EOY.

yeah no big deal

>>11187949
>Thomson Reuters

thank you tiger mommy

>>11187810
literally who??

https://create.smartcontract.com/#/contracts/0ccd9464f479480e6a25d4b21e54d023

>2016

They aggregate data from every major exchange and produce an official price for digital assets. So kind of like a legal coinmarketcap. They get their data directly from the exchanges and compile it to give you a constant price. I dont know if you guys remember about 2-3 months ago when chainlink shot up for like 5 mins. Ya that's unacceptable for a contract that's relying on data.
>amazon alexa whats btc price
>fetching data from BNC
>8k

There you go. It's like the Official price for stocks. Like the NYSE of the Crypto world.

>>11188099
Chainlink never even mentioned confido ever. Confido just tweeted that they're going to use it to boost their own credibility before they exit scammed

>>11188625
thatd be likea billion api requests

>>11188625
Why is it so old?

holding for another 3 months before deciding to sell or not

>>11188642
I don't know if you guys were up on friday. But the one larp said something CRUCIAL. Law makers might make that data that is legally binding from an API has to pass through a decentralized oracle. Everyone slept on this. It's the biggest thing I've ever heard from any speculation regarding chainlink.

>>11188640

I still love that people running a literal 'confidence scam' had the brass balls to name their coin 'confido'. Fucking masterpiece

>>11188653
Because they use the centralized smartcontract.com oracles. Now they are gonna migrate to decentralized ones. Why?
>>11188667
Now this just added proof to that claim. Welcome to the biggest network created since the internet.

>>11188666
Fucking checked and I am with you on that. Been holding for a full year I am running out of patience with these incompetent fucks.

>>11188708
Sell then. We haven't even held a year yet and made more gains than most cryptos atm. Be a retard.

>>11188699
Gotcha. I did catch that larp. If true it's one of the biggest breadcrumbs we've heard so far as you say.

>>11188667

>mfw all these bustas have to pump my bags by law

Is Adelyn part fucking time or what. I am sick of her not retweeting or posting stuff. She hits like 1 of 3 posts. The shill twitter accounts do a better job than tiger mommy

>>11188744

>>11188667
Attorneynon here, I don’t think this would happen BUT it is commonplace when, for example, specifying a data source for LIBOR or similar, to specify the exact source and method of obtaining the value. I don’t think it’s as much of a stretch to think that it will be market to require a decentralized data source in a smart contract’s call - to the point where it would be malpractice to not insist upon trustless data

>>11188753

>>11188744
What do you want her to say? Oh our unfinished product has come a long way? The thing isn't even main net ready. Holy shit. The delusions.

>>11188753
The thing is though, if you call from a centralized oracle that basically defeats the purpose of a decentralized blockchain. It's very odd that we are seeing the legal sector acting very aggressively towards this blockchain push. They must want rules and regulations in place before banks jump abroad.

>>11188796
>What do you want her to say?
Hi, I'm Adelyn Zhou, welcome to Jackass

>>11188796
meant for >>11188755

>>11188811
To clarify - I think the practice of specifying a method of obtaining data will be replaced by using decentralized oracles, and in any event, specifying a centralized oracle for a smart contract would be irresponsible/negligent

>>11188667
can someone find this thread in archives?

>>11188712
speak for yourself newfag I bought this shit on etherdelta literally a year ago and I'm up like 2x. missed shit loads of moon missions because of it. now we're in september of 2018 and no mainnet in sight.

>>11188831
Having a centralized oracle defeats the purpose of smart contracts, or at least the trustless execution value proposition they offer. centralized oracles imply a trusted party

>>11188831
awesome.
>>11188832
>>/biz/thread/S11160921#p11168874
>>11188856
So did I, what's your point?

be aware of the support

>>11188879
post isnt specified. just read the thread.

>>11188888
>those digits

>>11188898
>limited hangout
he gave all that insight so you'll believe mainnet won't launch until next year.

We’re going to make it. This thing is $150 in 2019.

>>11187871
This, we can’t be bitching at prices now, the FUD will take decades to lift.

>>11188625
Just realized the SEC will want something like this for the ETF.’instead of getting price from a couple shitty exchanges.

>>11187810

This anon gave us a hint the other day.

Anonymous (ID: yjATeBis) 09/21/18(Fri)23:28:23 No.11169050▶>>11169055 >>11169071 >>11169979
>>11169031

I'm thinking link. Australia loves stinky linkies. that is all i will say

>>11188856
Sell then. You don't deserve LINK faggot. Go chase gains on TRON. You would have lost money trading shitcoins like the faggot you are.

>>11188888
Cheeecckkkeed.

>>11188666
>>11188708
You thought this was going to be quick?

Old news

>>11187810
Nice.

Link belongs in the top 10 based on everything we know right now. But unironically.

>>11188888
Quintos-che ked
ID- che ked
$2500eoy-che ked

>>11187832
>>11187992
>>11188099
>>11188588
>>11190287
Cope.

>>11188744
You'll be seeing someto shit go down after mainnet drops. They hired her beforehand so she can develop her strategy and familiarize herself with the tech and their ideals. Also I bet she's not currently sitting on her hands either, she's talking to big players and her contacts.

>>11190794
That face is fucking horrifying

>>11190888
>Cope.
cope

>>11191013
Not really.

>>11187810
Must be nothing. Price is flat.

>>11188625
thanks for this anon. looking good

>>11188755
>to the point where it would be malpractice to not insist upon trustless data
that would be fucking huge

Blessed be the Stinkies

>>11191200
>price flat while shitcoins left and right take 10% plunges
Hmm, wonder what happens next

if buy linkies will get blingblingskies?

>>11191185
Yes, anon. I'll cope with the constant inflow of new users for my largest holding, and my trip 8s.

bump lol

>>11187810
LINK 100k January 1st, 2021.

>>11188184
This is correct.

If anyone is curious as to whether or not his is a big deal, here's a rabbit hole for you...
Quandl

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $10,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

EVERYTHING IS ENERGY AND VIBRATION
ATTUNE YOUR VIBRATIONS TO MATCH THAT OF MONEY AND IT WILL FLOW TO YOU.

>>11192601
"Data is the new oil" Assblaster said that

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/28/making-millions-from-the-data-hidden-in-plain-sight.html

>>11192601
Also,
Co-founder and CEO of BNC is also head of techemy.capital.
Guess who THEY have as a client/project.

https://techemy.capital/about#clients-&-projects

>>11192713
You're beginning to get it.
I'm the tripfag that found IBM emails.
This is going to be the biggest fucking innovation of our lives.
Will make BTC looks like Yahoo!

>>11192713
Last link, sorry for spamming.
https://youtu.be/ZK0J14MC-CI

>>11192713
>assblaster said

>>11192747
Thank you for your service anon

>>11192747
We gon make it

>>11192784

>>11192720
Can anyone do a reverse image search of the chainlink logo and text? Looks like thats the format they are using going forward. Might be more connections we haven't caught.

>>11192747
Thanks anon, you are making me comfier, yacht drinks on me :)

>>11190888
checked the cope is unreal with nolinkers

>>11192713
>"Data is the new oil" Assblaster said that
Mark Carney, Governor of Bank of England also said this

>>11191355
thank you link jesus

>>11193395

Maybe they are one and the same person!

Lol another shitcoin partnership

>>11193455
>when projects boost their credibility by saying they "partner" with Link, that's bad for Link

C O P E
O
P
E

ETH blew into the next galaxy on nothing but shitcoins.

Guess what idiots? It's still not mooning. Guess why? Because all of your "partnerships" don't mean jack shit. You can connect the dots as much as you want. It's still a fucking useless ERC shitcoin that will die like the rest.

>>11193395
A lot of people say that. I said it too already. It's just a new buzzword.

>>11190794
It belongs in top 3 when mainnet is done

>>11191013

>>11193545
Thanks for your permission, Rebecca. My diary can't wait to read this.

>>11193387
I made the bottom of the screen cap :)

just noticed this:
>for complex smart contracts...
>complex
i reckon there's a whole fucking shit tonne of enterprises about to explode once mainnet launches. LINK really is the missing piece in the fifth industrial revolution.

>>11193646
What's the fourth?

>>11193387
i love seeing verified, confirmed chainlink news like this.

>>11187856
>swift has essentially confirmed they are using chainlink

>>11194451
"...how this works with the SWIFT Chainlink..."

-Sergey Nazarov

Are we really gonna make it or is all this just bullshit? Holding 52k LINK as suicide insurance. Debating on going back to ETH or into BTC. Thoughts?

>>11193696

We completely skip the fourth and jump into a new paradigm

>>11194549
it's all bullshit, i would definitely recommend selling for BTC and ETH

>>11194549
Sell for btc /eth immediately

>>11194597
>>11194615

Tell me why. I don't want opinions, I want facts.

>>11194639
link is a huge meme to trick newfags. A couple of the big larps have been made by me (the microsoft azure connection for example is total bullshit that I made up with insect element and nobody caught on lol). I sort of feel bad for losing people money though so i might stop. anyways the entire chainlink idea is flawed from the ground up. companies will provide their own trusted oracles and theyre not gonna let NEETs steal their data and monetize it. Also, Sergey has started and failed a couple other blockchain projects before this.

>>11194549
better off in eth desu senpai

>>11194639
>I can't think for myself!

>>11193545
Guess what you are a clueless fool, so there is that to consider.

>>11194524
Makes sense that SWIFT would use their own version of Chainlink since theyre using their own SWIFT Oracle. But don't let logic get in the way of your delusion.

>>11187992
>Look at me I replied to everyone, what are you going to do now!

>>11194995
Every node will have their own "oracle".

>>11194753
Actually Sirgay said they are working with Microsoft
Bad FUD 2/10

"Partnerships" mean nothing for chainlink. Literally anyone can use Chainlink. Typical crypto adhd nonsense. Did they announce they're partnering with HTML as well?

>>11195229
the absolute cope

>>11195238
Yes they actually did. Wanna proof?

>>11195266
That's what nodes are, anon. Every node is an oracle.

>>11195273
>what is the chainlink network

>>11195288
A network of nodes/oracles.
That's what makes it "decentralized": all the independent nodes/oracles.

Are you feeling alright, anon?

>>11193696
Croc shoes.

>>11190888
Im all in on link, it is old news. Just confirmed but still old

>>11195315
its a network of nodes that utilise the chainlink token. swift won't be on that chainlink network. cute tech though sweetie!

>>11195756
>swift won't be on that chainlink network
Pic is the slide used by Sergey at Sibos last year.

>>11196640 btfo >>11195756