/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11110527
66bill coins not in circulation.
what do you not understand about this?
it wont moon until eveyrthing is circulating.
and once they start dumping it will tank to 100 sats.

>>11110547

They cant dump it retard. It will take 5 years to put all of it in circulation because of escrow.

>>11110547

Even the ones in circulation are all owned by a few people.

https://ledger.exposed/rich-stats

A small group of people own like 95% of all coins.

> MUH...banks will buy it from me and make me rich

>>11110527
#XRPstandard
#XRPstandard
#XRPstandard
#XRPstandard
#XRPstandard

>>11110600

yes, unlike bitcoin or any other crypto.

>>11110547
>>11110600

I love how the fud goalposts keep moving. All you anti ripple bitches get in here and answer for your retardation

>>11110559
> they can't dump it

dude it doesn't matter if they can't mega dump. they will release it and it will dilute the value of this coin. how fucking retarded are you?

i htought they may release 1 billion xrp per month. so thtats 66 months of dumping. lol.

>>11110606
updooted and retweeted this guy gets it #XRPstandard #ripple #revolution

>dailyhodl

Sounds like reliable sources. Thanks OP just bought 6 million

>>11111728

is this better

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/17/ripple-hints-cryptocurrency-product-xrapid-will-go-live-soon.html

>>11111601

your stupidity and memes arent going to save you dude.

Just bought 10k.

Wont miss the money if its gone BUT FUCK i want to see those stupid faces when they get proven wrong

>>11110527

>trusting Brad Garlichouse
>trusting the Jew ogre
>trusting a giu who owns 5% of all XRP to his name

THIS IS NOW A STELLAR THREAD

>>11112265

>>11112265

Stellar leaves the chat

https://courts.ms.gov/index.php?cn=87490#dispArea

>>11112287

>how would The stellar development foundation, McCaleb or any of their partners be liable for this?

lmao poor cripples

>>11112284

You must be pretty upset about the chain partnership?

https://twitter.com/jesselund/status/1040032407636697088?s=09

Haha

>>11112439
why would i be upset anon?

>>11112439
Chain partnership... yeah what about their negative numbers they writing ;)

A dying horse aquires a salty waterpot

Gets him to die quicker.

How are the lawsuits in japan going?

Or how does the buttcoinerbatallion think about that JED hold 50k BTC ready to dump on the market?

>>11112439
>stellar "foundation"

Please try to tell me its non profit lmao lmao
LMAO IM DYING RIGHT NOW YOU BAGHOLDING FUCK HAHAHAHAHAHAA

>>11112473

>she actually included the unverified nodes that do nothing

lmao embarrassing pajeet

>>11112509

This is honestly sad. Your retort is "Chain is worthless" lmao

>>11112534

It's a non profit. Deal with it nigga.

>>11112580
>non profit
kek
the inflation lumens go right into their pockets anon
900000000 lumens every year

>>11112634
R3 director said it. They ditched chain last year lmao.

Gtfo butthead.

>>11112659

Who are (they)? The SDF has a fund for operations. It's clearly marked.

Non profits can hold stock and collect capital gains you blithering faggot

>>11112668

The same R3 that just assraped you in a settlement?

>>11112724
>Who are (they)?
the sdf founders
all their wallets and the wallets holding their partnerships' xlm, point to the inflation destination account to receive the xlm created for inflation distribution, provided below
>Account (SDF Inflation Destination) GDWNY2POLGK65VVKIH5KQSH7VWLKRTQ5M6ADLJAYC2UEHEBEARCZJWWI
and the lumens arriving to this adress go straight into their pockets

>>11112845

[citation needed]

Where is stripes inflation account?

Also wouldn't increasing the supply make the coins worth less? Yeah. Basic math pajeet.

How much is Brad paying you?

I love how desperate these bagholders are. I sold at 2.70 and never looked back.
XRP's volume is less than bCash, less than half EOS, and less than LTC.

XRP is dead fren

>>11111587
All minable coins have that problem too

>>11112902
Where is stripes inflation account?
you can search for it here
https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/XLM?filter=asset-holder
make sure to look for pic related
as i said before, all the lumens go right into that adress, and they dump from there

>Also wouldn't increasing the supply make the coins worth less? Yeah.
that's right, it decreases your lumens value as they sell their 900 million they get each year for free

>>11112913
Smartest Anon in this /thread

>>11112948
Yeah well Bitcoin inflation is what; 1800 bitcoins a day get mined? Lol compared to 66billion to be dumped; that got created out of thin air? Only a brain let buys and holds xrp right now

Looks like the market doesnt give a shit

>>11113029
this.
imagine a "non profit foundation" dumping 900 million coins per year (that they get for free)
aside of the 96 billion coins they hold, yet to be dumped into the market, why would you buy this trash?

>>11113029
The escrow prevents them from dumping them quickly and doesn’t obligate them to dump what comes out of escrow either.

Miners have to sell to pay power bills

>>11113053

The "market" is about to assfuck everyone and is playing games as long as they can

Why xrp when liquid allows private btc transactions between exchanges, banks and wallet providers with 1 minute confirmation time? Bitcoin already has over 10x xrp's volume .

>>11112913
and what is going to increase the volume, brainlet?

banks using xrapid...

the tidal wave is coming

>>11113438
so why are banks signing up to use ripple and xrp when they can just use bitcoin instead?

>>11113952
>banks using xrapid
hahahaha
This meme is still alive?

>>11114060
you don't read enough to be relevant

>>11113029
Bitcoin users are paying millions of dollars per day to secure a useless blockchain. The amount of XRP that Ripple sells is a drop in the bucket compared to that. Who are the real brainlets?

>>11113952
Banks won't be using it. Ripple is committed to decentralization and no censorship. Banks won't play because that means sanctions busting and terror financing, unlike SWIFT which can be censored.

Ripple is so obsessed with knocking out BTC and LN that they've compromised their one advantage, regulatory capture, and will not get any institutions on board.

It's over.

>>11110527
>Sagar Sarbhai told CNBC that he is confident that commercial production will soon begin.
>Pajeet is confident in something
Sell

>>11114350
hahaha

amazing

the anti-ripple crew are seriously now jumping on the idea that xrp is going to be TOO decentralised?!

what a joke

you couldn't make this shit up

>>11114350

How do you take the news just posted in OP and get to > it's over

>>11114420

This is a cartoon world man... post has to be troll

>>11114426
because he's a fucking brainlet, that's how

>>11114441
really has to be

nobody could be that stupid

ripple are actively working with regulators, and have former regulators on their current staff, so there's no way they don't understand exactly what's going on and what they need to do

>>11114420
I'm not part of any "for or against crew", I'm just out for myself and making money. I bought XRP last year for 0.24 because I saw the dumb PR pump spend going on, and dumped it at just over 10x. Most of that news was "banks are going to use it / WU is testing it". So that fundamental is already burned out, and it won't move the market again (boy who cried wolf).

I've been following the project closely enough, and watched as Ripple went into a panic over LN. I talked to Schwartz who doubled down on their pursuit of decentralization in response to my very direct Q about SWIFT and Sanctions / Terror. They believe in some kind of twisted "Crypto Anarchy, but for Banks" vision, that isn't going to happen.
>>11114426
Again, xRapid is a shitcoin meant to serve the needs of Enterprise. It's problem will be regulatory compliance. The news of this moved the market last year, but it's become the boy who cried wolf.

>>11114516
for the record, i bought at 20 cents and sold at 15x return, but i've still bought back in for the rise that's coming with adoption

widespread adoption over the coming years is going to dwarf any other project

>>11114534
xRapid isn't XRP.

This is the thinking that ETH was going to moon b/c of CryptoKities.

>>11114516

Youre wrong on both of your claims for a number of reasons but mainly your mentality that any price movement after xrapid goes live is going to be primarily driven by "boy who cried wolf" speculators and not use case demand. Once xrapid goes live the entire paradigm around crypto will have changed.

>>11114550
>xRapid isn't XRP

this conversation is over

go and research the fundamentals

>>11114550
Xrapid uses XRP for liquidity though... and that means massive amounts of volume

>>11114579
>Once xrapid goes live the entire paradigm around crypto will have changed.

>>11114590
>CryptoKitties uses ETH/Gas for transactions though... and that means massive amounts of volume

>>11114621
You're making a false equivalence: the people that played cryptokitties weren't normies that didn't have any crypto and needed to go buy ETH just to play cryptokitties... it was a bunch of people that ALREADY HAD CRYPTO AND ETH TO BEGIN WITH. xRapid is bringing in volume that DOES NOT CURRENTLY EXIST.

>>11114621
you're comparing $30k a day of ETH volume to the potential for billions or even trillions from banks...?

damn, you stupid

>>11114621

>>11114672
I'm using CryptoKitties as the most absurd thing about the whole ETH market token market. Most ETH action was ICO's. That WAS bringing in lots of normies, and they were buying ETH on Coinbase (normie central).
>>11114705
Banks won't use it, or risk US Treasury sanctions, so at best you'll have Iran and Russia and other global pariahs sign up. Even mainstream remittance companies haven't signed on, the one who have are well, pic related.

>>11114757
your lack of patience and understanding is going to cost you a lot of money

>>11114800
How so? I'm not shorting XRP, so I've got no monetary risk to XRP doing anything. I pumped it and dumped it like the cheap slut it is.

>>11114821
stay ignorant

>>11114834
Hey, if things change, and Schwartz told me, turns out to be false, then I'd change my position. As of now, I'm trusting one of the directors over some autism spinner fanatic on an anime board.

>>11114857
if you're citing decentralisation as a reason for XRP failing then you're insane

bye!

>>11114879
Don't drink too much tonight crazy wine lady.

>>11114757
>I'm using CryptoKitties as the most absurd thing about the whole ETH market token market. Most ETH action was ICO's. That WAS bringing in lots of normies, and they were buying ETH on Coinbase (normie central).

At this point you're just propping up straw men. When I point out cryptokitties is a false equivalence you now claim you're using it because its absurd and pivot to claiming ICOs are the equivalent. Which is also absurd because normies that werent already involved in crypto weren't buying ETH to buy ICOS. Coinbase has buy limits of something like $100 a week for new users, that fact alone blows your nonsense argument out of the water.

>>11114757
>Banks won't use it, or risk US Treasury sanctions
https://ripple.com/insights/federal-reserve-task-force-ripple-improves-speed-transparency-global-payments/

I'm done trying to convince you anon. Just remember in five years when you're still poor and thinking "I wish I'd bought XRP..." that I tried to warn you.

>cripple

>>11114757

> global pariahs

Even if this were true, Russia and Iran both have robust banking systems thay would pour in billions.

But it isn't true. I can pretty confidently name some of the initial banks going live... Siam Commercial Bank (Thailand), Kakao Bank (Korea), SBI Sumishin Bank (Japan), National Bank of Abu Dhabi (UAE), Santander (Spain).. then probably half the banks in Turkey , Argentina, Brazil... then Barclays, then Bank of America, then central banks. But keep on believing what you want.

>>11114905
>that fact alone blows your nonsense argument out of the water.
xRapid is a settlement layer using XRP right? My expectation is similar performance with less enthusiasm since there are multiple currencies you can issue a security on top of.

>https://ripple.com/insights/federal-reserve-task-force-ripple-improves-speed-transparency-global-payments/
News from 2017, it moved the market, and I bought and dumped on it. It was fun.

I wonder why banks haven't fully embraced it?

>Just remember in five years when you're still poor and thinking "I wish I'd bought XRP..." that I tried to warn you.

If you really thought xRapid was an unstoppable exponent for the value of XRP, you'd be FUD'ing it into the dirt right now to buy it at $0.01 each. In reality, your $2 bags are probably heavy as fuck.

>>11114982

> If you really thought xRapid was an unstoppable exponent for the value of XRP

... this isnt a thought kid it is an absolute fact. wtf is wrong with you, what are you trying to do here, youre just fucking with us right, good one you got me for a minute

>>11114965
Copy paste list from >>11114905

Let's dig in there. Just throwing names around isn't good enough to buy on.
>Santander
Santander produced the "One Pay FX" app.
It has 16 reviews on the iTunes store, the top one looks like an XRP booster who wants them to "add crypto" to it, which isn't even the point of the app, it's to send Euro's and USD.


https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/one-pay-fx/id1363143795?mt=8


News of One Pay FX goes out on April 12th, 2018.
XRP price on 11/4/18: $0.49
XRP price today: $0.27

Something tells me that One Pay FX by Santander partnered with Ripple isn't having a positive effect on XRP.

>>11114998
then you should be doing your level best to crash the price of XRP to buy in at a deep discount.

You ever read about the Rothschilds and the Battle of Waterloo?

>>11115035

Im not talking about one pay fx. Im talking about xrapid live production. And im not responding here anymore.

>>11115061
The Santander citation from the list is One Pay FX. That is what they built! You have to test the market impacts of these 'partnerships', obviously, didn't work! The hype did from the initial press release, which was good for a pump and dump, but when the rubber met the road, it was a non event.

Why shouldn't I expect similar performance from the same asset? Next hype press release, and a massive let down?

>>11114982
>I wonder why banks haven't fully embraced it?
Because the Fed hasn't chosen which of the 13 (or so, I dont remember the exact number) option they are going with yet .... if you bother to look into all the other options on the table though ripple is the obvious winner, everything else is antiquated tech.... By 2020 the Fed should announce and anybody with half a brain knows the obvious choice is going to be Ripple.

>If you really thought xRapid was an unstoppable exponent for the value of XRP, you'd be FUD'ing it into the dirt right now to buy it at $0.01 each. In reality, your $2 bags are probably heavy as fuck.

I bought at $0.17 dude.

>>11115129
If you took profits at $2+ and bought back in today, you'd be up substantially with more XRP. Holding all the way down like this is dumb.

>>11115055

The price has gone low enough goyjew. If this news is correct it means your running out of time to get it any lower regardless of market makers so you may as well buy now.

>>11115222
I won't be happy until it gives the entire rally back adjusted for inflation. ($0.19)

>>11115162
>If you took profits at $2+ and bought back in today, you'd be up substantially with more XRP. Holding all the way down like this is dumb.

thanks captain hindsight

if you sold at $2 and it went to $20 and you bought back you'd have 1/10th as well

>>11115370
Staying in over 10x is retarded.
Don't take advice from people who don't know this.
See I can buy back in now with my 90k after taxes, while this guy >>11115129 is still up on paper, but holding an asset that is dropping.

>>11115403
>Staying in over 10x is retarded.

Been holding since BTC was $1

Guess I'm retarded huh

0.01$ EOY

>>11115430
>0.01$ EOY
$1 EOY

>>11115427
Did you take profits to get to no risk after it went past 10x?
It's risk averaging numbnuts.

>>11115427

yea man if you didnt sell at exactly 19,994 then you're a fucking idiot

>>11115444
checked and repilled

>>11115441
>Did you take profits to get to no risk after it went past 10x?
>It's risk averaging numbnuts.
Did I take $2k out of my literally enormous holdings? Yeah but not at 10x like a fucking retard at light 1000x

>>11110703

95% of Bitcoin isn't owned by top 100 wallets like XRP.

Only 14% BTC is owned by top 100.

You gotta be retarded to think the original crypto that has been around for 10 years and had to be mined has the same distribution as a token where pretty much everything was rewarded to the founders.

>>11115509
>95% of Bitcoin isn't owned by top 100 wallets like XRP.
>Only 14% BTC is owned by top 100.


97% of BTC is owned by 4% of addresses

No one knows how many addresses belong to each person. 100 people could own that 97% for all you know.

>>11115509
It's actually 37.6% for XRP. A high percentage of that is in escrow and can't be dumped. Much more certainty than BTC.

>>11115573

> 97% of BTC is owned by 4% of addresses

This is close to true but it's also true that a fucking idiot. There are 22 Million BTC addresses created in 10 years. So yeah, a small percentage of active addresses own the majority of BTC.

> If you hold 1 or more BTC or more, then you are also in the top 3% of addresses that owns 96% of Bitcoin

> If you hold .1 BTC or more, then you are also in the top 11% of addresses that owns 99.1% of Bitcoin

> If you hold .01 BTC or more, then you are also in the top 30% of addresses that owns 99.87% of Bitcoin

100 Top addresses, however, own only 14% of BTC

1500 Top addresses only only 35% of BTC

On the other hand, top 100 addresses own 80% of XRP in circulation and Ripple pretty much owns all the XRP that aren't in circulation -- effectively 100 addresses own 95% of the supply

>>11115808
Creating new addresses and wallets with BTC is also trivial. I did some work anonymously for another anonymous person the other day, and created a new wallet for the tx.
XRP you have to pay (cuck) for a wallet, so it's done less often.

>>11115646


> 85% of XRP is owned by top 100 wallets counting exchanges

https://ledger.exposed/rich-stats

> About 21% of BTC is owned by top 100 wallets counting exchanges

https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html

> XRP can't be dumped...more certainty than BTC MUH

That's why there it dumped 93% from ATH?

That's why you have wallets like this that dumped ONE BILLION XRP in Jan/Feb?

https://bithomp.com/explorer/rDahLhHJaowRYn4hRkS9S2YpAeiTR8mjBF

CHAINLINK IS SO MUCH BETTER LOOK HOW DISTRIBUTED THE FUNDS ARE

>>11115859
Click the 'Existing XRP' option on that site which shows 37.64%. Either way, it's not close to your 95% lie.

I didn't say XRP can't be dumped you fucktard. Stop misquoting me.

There are more whales in BTC and they are complete wildcards. The dumping will continue for a very long time while XRP's biggest whale just sold everything.

And lets not forget that the only thing those buying bitcorn have accomplished it to ship billions of dollars to mining pools and electric companies. There is so much more money being sucked out of the bitcorn ecosystem for absolutely no gain that complaining about XRP is absurd.

>>11116044

I swear XRP holders are fucking retarded

> Site shows 80.26 % of XRP (37,634,018,878 ) in CIRCULATION is held by top 100 wallets

SUM(Non-escrowed XRP Top 100 accounts) / SUM(Non-escrowed XRP accounts) * 100

> Site also shows 37.64 % of XRP in EXISTENCE is held by top 100 wallets

SUM(Non-escrowed XRP Top 100 accounts) / SUM(Existing XRP on ledger) * 100

But in the 2nd calculation for EXISTENCE counts the funds in escrow as not being owned by anyone which is blatantly false. ~The 60 Billion in ESCROW are XRP is owned by Ripple - they get to sell it.

Escrow or not Ripple still owns that XRP.

37,634,018,878 + 60 Billion in Escrow is owned by the top 100 holders

97.6 billion out of 100 Billion is owned by the top 100 holders

(((Ripple)))

lol this dumbfuck didn't request any XRP. He owns 2% of Ripple and gets a token salary. What a brainlet

Spends most of his time on Twitter. Loser.

>>11116146
Funds in escrow count as accounts too. You can't just add them together. And like I said before, if it's in escrow it can't be sold. But go ahead, keep changing your numbers on the fly.

>>11116220
>lol this dumbfuck
You must be black

>>11115808
>but it's also true that a fucking idiot
anon I...

Ripple bag hodler delusion /thread

Shitcoins have to die during this bear market, its a healthy part of the process. The XRP bag holders appear to be the most delusional of all the top 10 coins. These echo chambers for the ripplers are getting more polluted with the truth, its great to see!

>>11117513
Yes sir.

Butcoin will die too, because its the king of the shitcoins

>>11117513

maybe you didnt read the OP. Turns out XRP is the only coin that means shit and all the others are trash. who knew.

Why would I buy this piece of shit when ChainLink exists?

> he doesn't anticipate the xRapid pump, he resorts to religion wars

>>11117812


Autism thinks link is something special but autism doesnt understand that its two different use cases xrp and scamlink are going after

>>11117845
>he doesn't anticipate the xRapid pump
thinks anyone can anticipate anything in this market....
Quit thinkin so highly of yourselves, just buy once the pump happens & watch it fall until then (like all crypto ATM)....

>>11117874
>thinks anyone can anticipate anything in this market....

when no one believes anything is actually real then actually real and obviously real news should pump

https://twitter.com/DiepSanh/status/1041980639753322496

Something for the security fudsters

https://ambcrypto.com/ripple-engages-with-sec-for-xrp-use-case-education-says-ripple-official/

“So we are not really worried about it, to be honest.” Ripple’s Sagar Sarbhai, Head of Government & Regulatory Relations, APAC & Middle East

XRP $589 EOY

100% premined centralized jew scam coin

>>11119128
repeating same false FUD since 2017, how does it feel to be retarded?

>>11110527
Why would I buy a number 3 coin? even if it weren't jewish... The goal is to buy a 58 ranked coin and ride it to 1 not 3 to 1 and make few shekels

Futures of XRP are going sideways whilst the rest of altcoins and BTC took a dump. I was wondering what ((THEY)) know.

I'm already in XRP though, you have to be a brainlet to not see XRP world domination coming. SegwitChain and BCHMegablocks BTFO'd.

The revolution has begun. Join us.

>>11110600
Same shit different coin, BTC wallets are centralized, ETH wallets are centralized, EOS wallets are centralized. etc etc etc

>>11119156
>+1.31%
>The revolution has begun.

The absolute state of Ripple bagholders

>>11119188
Still going.

>>11119188
Yes so get in now before 1% turns into 10% and 10% turns into 1000%

>>11110527
Ripple needs dumb normie money to moon. Not in a bear market.
It's a pump and dump.

does XRP pumping indicate the golden bullrun of 2018?

>>11119280
No idea what this indicates. I'm still doing research but all I know is something bigger than us is going on.

>>11119280
>>11119286
discord pajeets
>something bigger than us is going on.
yes, a pump and dump

>>11119286
Ripple has been in a bull market since a couple weeks ago. Any Analyst who knows whats up knows what's up.

https://ripple.com/insights/ripple-and-r3-team-up-with-12-banks-to-trial-xrp-for-cross-border-payments/

>>11119296
P&D of the 2 largest crypto coin? Do you even know XRP's volume you dumbo?

>>11119309

Volume is lower than BCash. BCash pumps and dumps all the time.

>>11119551
FIs don’t do wash trading because they are regulated

Volumes on all coins except xrp are fake because all coins except xrp are primarily owned by non regulated entities

apologize, XRP started the bull run

>>11119561

> Thinks FIs are trading XRP KEK

>>11110559
Hed McCaleb's deal must be getting to the point where he can legally offload in major dumps. Any bizlet with the timescale on that?

>>11119597
this nigger unironically might be right

>>11116146

> 97.6% of XRP supply held by top 100 addresses

It's actually not that bad. You haven't accounted for exchanges.

Accounting for them, I think only 94-95% is held by the top 100.

Also that 60 Billion held by Ripple will be sold and distributed to the public.

>>11110600
>>11119161

The bitcoin plebs (all but 100 top adresses) hold 66,4% of all bitcoin that will ever be.

The Ripple plebs hold 9,24% of all XRP that will ever be.

>It's both centralized by the rich!

Learn to fucking quantify stuff, Brainlet.

>>11119846
Where’s your numbers from

How do you know how many addresses on each chain are owned by how many people

>>11119862
Btc https://bitinfocharts.com
Ripple was linked by other anon.

>>11119846

Reading must be hard for you

> BTC top 100 wallets hold 22% of BTC

https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html


> XRP top 100 wallets hold 85% of XRP in Circulation (37 Billion)

https://ledger.exposed/rich-stats

> Ripple holds another 60 Billion in out of circulation so effectively 100 wallets own 97% of XRP

>>11119905
Ripple was like 36,7 billion top 100 or 80% of what is out there now. So the rest has 9,24 billion. Total ripple ever to be released 100 billion.

>>11119913
19,3%

>>11119913
80,28%
Even at 85 of 40 billion is 34 billion. Plus 60 is 94%
Who fails to read and fails at math?

LMFAO, pathetic

>>11119942

~ 19% so I stand corrected. I was doing a rough estimate based on 125 addresses.

Someone in plebbit cryptotech did an exact number of BTC, ETH, XLM excluding exchanges. Numbers were:

> BTC 14.6% held by top 100

> ETH 30.2% held by top 100

> XLM 98.4% held by top 100

Couldn't filter out exchanges for XRP

>>11120006
You have to pay to activate an address in XRP ledger. You don’t in BTC or ETH.

If you have say 100,000 BTC wouldn’t you hold it over for example 1000 addresses? Or maybe 10000 addresses. You’d still own all the BTC at those addresses.

4% of BTC addresses house 97% of BTC but we have no idea how many actual people own those 4% of addresses

>>11119188
this post didn't age very well

>>11119963

I was going by the XRP owned by the top 100 from this site which shows 37,646,757,416. They probably have a more accurate count of XRP not in escrow - it fluctuates.

https://ledger.exposed/rich-stats

Did not check the numbers. Ok, so it's 94% owned by the top 100. That is shitty as fuck and you're just begging to get dumped on

>>11120055

Posted this before. There are 22 Million BTC addresses over the stretch of 10 years. Mostly dust addresses. A small percentage of active addresses house most coins. If you own BTC you are in that small percentage that own most the coins:

> If you hold 1 or more BTC or more, then you are also in the top 3% of addresses that owns 96% of Bitcoin

> If you hold .1 BTC or more, then you are also in the top 11% of addresses that owns 99.1% of Bitcoin

> If you hold .01 BTC or more, then you are also in the top 30% of addresses that owns 99.87% of Bitcoin

>>11117513
do not kid yourself bitcoin is going to be in use soon ..........

>>11120107
in use of what? store of declining value?

performance a shit
scalability a shit
wastes gazillion W of electricity

https://ethereumworldnews.com/lg-joins-ripple-xrp-stellar-xlm-in-cross-border-remitting/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmJ17e53_BA

>>11119188
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaahaaaaaaaahaaaaahaaa

ha

and he was never seen again

>>11120129

> 3 Million at the time seized from Silk Road

> 23 Million seized from AlphaBay

> China and various countries banning crypto because Bitcoin being used to move capital out of the country to bypass restrictions


You think censorship free unregulated money that the government can't control doesn't have a use case? It is literally the biggest use case of crypto.

>>11110527
Do you think the Jew's and banking cartels have the power to pump crypto?

If yes, you hold XRP
If no, you don't hold XRP

If you're an ethics fag like me you don't hold it despite expecting it to moon.

>>11120276
Based.

I'm an ethics fag but I also love money so this is why xrp is the majority of my holdings. Yes, I do believe Jews have the power to pump crypto and I want in on the ride

>>11120276
you don't hold something that you expect to moon?

that's not ethical, it's just dumb

ethical would be to make some money on an obvious investment and then use it to help people

The FOMO has already begun you stupid fuckers. Imagine the FOMO when Brad pushes the big red button. You dumb biz on biz deserve everything you get

>>11120276

Hahahahaha.... hahahahahahahahahahahahajahaahajajajajajajajjajahwjddjdjdkekekdjxjs8283ue

>>11120276
Bacl to >>>/pol/ you utter fucking retard.

MUH JOOS! MUH JOOS!

Wow this post might have been only piece of good advice this board has ever produced.

This is what autism spinner buyers actually believe.

https://ambcrypto.com/will-xrp-go-to-589-after-the-launch-of-xrapid-bearableguy123s-theory-tested/

i wish i wasn't off the grid for the past 48 hours, is it too late to buy?

>>11121247
Fast up without the rest of the market, expect it to snap back down. Don't FOMO in.