/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10919831
I'm have a cvhi and I can affirm that you are wrong.

>>10919831
Damn, you know your shit!
I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning.

OP is such a poor fag he can’t afford Link. He missed his chance with Bitcoin, ETH, and soon Link. This time he’s going to kill himself when he misses it

>>10919831
Give me your fucking ETH address and i will send you 10 links when it moons just to prove how retard you are.

Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>>10919908
>Giving away $25,000 to an unbeliever
Why

>>10919887
I'm so rich I probably have some LINK lying around as a joke

>>10919858
Here's some research for you. It's September 2018. By May 2018 we were supposed to be at $3. It's 1/10 of that. Is that because of the lack of care from anyone outside biz? Or is that because you jack offs think a token is actually important

>>10919831
My digits say otherwise

$1000 EOY chain link

>>10919966
Praise kek!

>>10919966
checked. $1000 EOY we will all make it

>>10919831
I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

>>10919966
Here we go again with the digits

Folks, if it didn't moon during the great golden bull run, it never will. Sorry son, that's life

>>10920035
That's because you don't have faith anon

>>10920035
Why do you care so much then?

>>10920035

OP is a brainlet who doesn’t understand what Link is so he tries Fudding it, he either is a no linker or actually has a substantial stack. To think Link relies on Bitcoin to Moon is the absolute deluded state of no linkers right now though

>>10919908
Ill take 25,000 for free fren. :^)
Email me.
>bl4derunner@protonmail.com

>>10920058
Because LINK dominates this board. Not even top 30 with all those "connections" huh?

>>10920081
A laugher to think I don't understand it. I would be the great con man of 2018 if I had a substantial stack huh? It doesn't rely on BTC, I'm simply stating it won't have the volume, outside interest, or hype to eclipse $1. The team knows this. Don't ask me how I know. Just know that there are 650 million LINK ready to dump if the price ever eclipses a couple dollars

>>10920113

Wrong try again brainlet, If that was the goal to “exit scam” they would market it like all these other shit coins, they already are millionaires you fucking cuck. Holy fuck I can’t wait til you kill your self

>>10919831
Nobody worth a fuck would post this much on 4chan, you're a pathetic queer and you should do something else with your time. I have actually talked to hedge fund managers who dabble in crypto, I've heard LINK is just a longshot, a risky one. But it definitely has a chance, all or nothing situation. Fuck off faggot.

>>10920125
Millionaires always want more millions, brainlet

>>10920127
>hears link is a longshot
>definitely has a chance

pick one, fag

>>10920146
Lol so instead of selling during the December pump, they decided to continue not marketing their project, regularly commit to their github and develop their product. So they can do an elaborate exit scam to get more millions?

Why the fuck aren't they shilling their product then?

>>10920127
If Link is a longshot then what's a goodshot?

>>10920207
btc is going to 35k so get in

>>10920234

LMFAO, if OP isn’t larping this shit is hilarious. He thinks Bitcoin is going to almost double ATH but Link is a scam? Holy fuck OP is definitely a poor fag virgin

>>10920175
complicated, long timeline for the team to wash the $$$

Big news will be out on 11 sep for the link holders. Screen cap this.

Hello you sonofabitch did they let you outta your fuckin cage again?

>>10919831
Your card expired 6 years ago just thought you should know

>>10919831
>Sergey's scam erc token

Unlikely. Why didn't they exit at the ath? Why have they been working on the project with zero hype all this time? Where's the proof? See, that's just something you pulled outta your ass. You're just trying to ride along with established fud. Cmon, you can do something more original than that.

>>10919931
Assblaster also said that there could be a crash at any time, and obviously, that happened. Had the bullrun kept going it certainly would've hit $3 by May. Regardless, price predictions are irrelevant to the success or failure of an asset.

>>10920035
Going from rank 120 to 60 in a couple weeks kinda proves you wrong there. Had it done that during the bullrun, your point would be invalid. It's disingenuous to base its legitimacy on weather or not it moons during a purely speculative bullrun where everything eventually lost its gains and most worth cryptos went to 0.

>>10920113
Some of the connections have already panned out. OpenLaw and Accord for example. Both were speculated on simply by anons connecting the dots. These partnerships are extremely underrated by most people, including yourself. Funny how you conviently ignore them since it doesn't suit your narrative. I don't trust people who do that.

>>10920113
Also, the fact that there's 650 million tokens held by the team is already known by everyone on biz, and it's priced in. The reason for it is because if all the tokens were currently on the market an entity could buy up the vast majority for cheap which would ruin any chance of it being a decentralized network as intended. Some of those tokens are intended to be distribued to node operators, some to get institutions on board, and some for the team's own purposes. If you don't trust the team, don't buy. I doubt they would be planning to exit scam for this long while making no effort to artificially raise the price, but believe whatever you want to. You have no way to be certain, so again, your expressed confidence that they will scam is suspect.

Glad I'm here to post this. Remember this is what this pajeet thinks will happen with chainlink.

>>10920146
You again pull out the exit scam theory, and again you have no evidence of it.

A long shot is by definition something that has a chance albeit an extremely small one. I personally wouldn't even call Link a long shot. But that's just my opinion.

>>10919831
what sort of absolutely pathetic loser posts threads like this? jesus christ you people are sad.

>>10920234
So to clarify, you have a problem with the team holding 650 million out of 1 billion Link, but have no concern with the vast majority of btc being controlled by a small number of wallets (Chinese mining pools)? Again, your logic here is suspect and leads me to believe you have an agenda here that you're not being honest about

>>10920596
>I personally wouldn't even call Link a long shot. But that's just my opinion.
what the fuck are you on about? LINK is partnered with the most important players in the fintech world. it's anything but "a long shot". it wont hit $1000 - this year at least - but as a 12 to 24 month hold it's basically a license to print money. you cant be so dumb to rank LINK alongside scam enterprises like AMB or REQ, can you?

>>10920596
>but that's just my opinion
Bullshit. Tell me who sent you!

>>10920284
So here's where your whole larp unravels. Here's where you exposed yourself. Let me explain very simply. You can see the tokens on Eth scan. Yes that's right, you can see that they are still there... in the same wallets... clearly not being dumped over time. There would clearly be no benefit to not dumping the ath and then waiting for it to go to .34 cents.

AGAIN, YOU CAN VERIFY THIS YOURSELF. You see, this post is one where you reveal your desperation. Your laziness. Your whole larp.

>>10920630
You misunderstand. I mean it's not a lonshot in the sense that the odds of success are way too high for it to be considered that.

>>10920692
apologies anon. i realized that just after i rage posted.

>>10920677
>implying they didn't 'sell' to themselves in the presale
No smart contract for the presale and ico, how do you know they didn't print a majority of the tokens for themselves?

>>10920717
It's all good anon, were gonna make it

Where ya at oldfaggot? I'm gonna keep doing this in every one of your threads. Promise ya, I won't miss a single one.

>>10919831
>Chainlink will never pass $1 again.
well of course, that would defeat the purpose of the token. did you even read the white paper?

>>10919966
checked

What would 1000k eoy bring links market cap to?