[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 12 KB, 1280x649, bcash.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10705413 No.10705413 [Reply] [Original]

its trash

>> No.10705422

>>10705413
>this will be the end of bcash

>> No.10705427

>that bcuck who calls csw satoshi

>> No.10705603
File: 117 KB, 1269x1313, deal with it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10705603

>>10705413
2 years ago BTC worked like BCH works today and today the bitcoin whitepaper no longer descibes BTC

>> No.10705608

It's bitmain cash not bcash

>> No.10705616

>>10705603
So why is BCH losing value both in dollars and in sats?

>> No.10705617
File: 724 KB, 604x801, 1528502837532.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10705617

>>10705413
Correct

>> No.10706189
File: 328 KB, 451x451, 93C02BDB-7B1B-407E-B518-B16560804193.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10706189

>>10705413
If it ain’t BTC, it ain’t fo me.

>> No.10706434
File: 183 KB, 2048x833, DjsRVXXVAAEGP48.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10706434

>>10705603
>Bitcoin Chad

>>10705413
>Blockstream Virgin

pic related

>> No.10706479

>>10706434
>same cashjeet pics

>> No.10706675
File: 166 KB, 901x1200, bchplease.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10706675

>>10705616
because most people doesn't even know there are 2 versions of bitcoin yet

>> No.10706701

>>10706675
left one is outright ugly
right one is overweight

t. asian gfs expert

>> No.10706703

>>10705413
If it's trash, then what does that say about bcore when it's faster, more efficient, and just generally better than bcore in every single way? Does that make bcore the ultimate shitcoin?

>> No.10706779

>>10706703
Bitcoin core will have 1 min block time with 8mb in the next few days. 80mb block space per hour, block confirmation 8x faster than bcash.

>> No.10706852

>>10706779
no it won't lol

>> No.10706979

>>10706852
>no it won't lol
Wrong!
http://www.coindaily.co/bitcoin-core-schedules-hardfork-upgrade-to-1-minute-blocks/

>> No.10707213
File: 67 KB, 605x742, nike.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10707213

>>10706979
haha, you had me for a moment. it is about https://thebitcoincore.org/ and not bitcoin core the btc client

>> No.10707266

>>10707213
Even Roger Ver is a big fan of bitcoin core, talks about it all the time.

>> No.10707299
File: 346 KB, 914x746, 1524550202858.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10707299

>>10705413
Great, more blockstream subcontracted employees shit posting on 4chan. Kys pajeet.

>> No.10707302
File: 1.17 MB, 2000x1381, death room.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10707302

>>10707266
yeah and there seems to be a lot of bcash fans on /biz/ (the javascript library)
https://ambcrypto.com/purse-io-bcash-implementation-bitcoin-cash-bch/

>> No.10707303

>>10707213
A shame, Satoshi wrote just yesterday about block times..

https://medium.com/@craig_10243/money-must-first-be-stable-a44fbe7574c7

>> No.10707481
File: 76 KB, 960x540, baby carrier.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10707481

>>10707303
interesting read. i think 5 min blocktimes would have been nice.

not that it matters much, i mean 1 min or even 20 sec is still too long to be meaningful in the real world, can't expect to hold a customer for 20 sec after he has paid just to get his transaction into a block. and it's still just 1 confirmation, which means it is not much better than 0 confirmations.

so unless the block time is something like 2 seconds you end up with the same result no matter of blocks are 1 minute or 10 minutes - you need to trust 0 conf.

what did you mean with "a shame"?

>> No.10707492

>>10705413
bcash bcash bcash BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

>> No.10707536

>>10707481
A shame in the sense that I would love to see Blockstream kill their shitty coin

Also, 0-conf is fine for normal purchases

>> No.10707695
File: 215 KB, 599x337, octopussy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10707695

>>10707536
aha