/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10650061
These faggots copy-pasted their Ledger instructions from Particl and didn't even proofread it. There's also tons of claims I've heard about bugs in their wallet application. Yet they brag about having 45+ developers on the team. This coin is a Seoul Hustle.

the amateur code blunder they had about a month ago was the second I sold my entire stack and haven't looked back. Feels great.

>>10650263
>>10650241
>>10650061

>>10650263
They clearly didn't even test out that function before deploying the contract. Fucking shameful.

>>10650061
I had an extensive look over it, it cant be the real deployed code as far as I can tell. The code is riddled with stuff like "oh we have to fix this for LFT to work properly" .. you know, their consensus algorithm. And it's not even enabled by default, some other consensus algorithm is.
so whatever they have posted on github is super old code or they are just bullshitting more and their stuff doenst work properly and they got nothing.
also why the fuck would you even develop your "high speed" blockchain on python. It just feels so stupid

>>10650241
Yeah I saw that. That was fucking dumb and amateur holy shit.

>>10650263
>>10650341
That was also pitiful. I read it was by the developer who left to start his own coin YGGDRASH or whatever, and that guy fucked the ICON one up and his own one up.

>>10650409
So why would they put this out for developers if it's still not ready? I mean , I get it's a beta, but who are they trying to appease here?

God damnit I wish I sold this shit months ago

lately I've been getting more and more appreciative of all the hate this has gotten so I can keep accumulating

>>10650465
kek no one is stopping you. This shit is still 6x ICO it's got plenty of room to dump.

>>10650493
WHEN DOES THE GOOKENING STOP

>>10650530

when the scam is exposed and the coin reaches zero

What I want to kow is how these clowns got all their samsung and whateverthefuck partnerships and mous.
Someone said that it's a korean thing to create phony partnerships, but I have no way of verifying that.

Garbage, since the whitepaper i knew it'll be shit.


Every project who uses Dpos should get eliminated, it'll happen sooner or later.

>>10650574
>korean thing to create phony partnerships
that's chinese

>>10650409
Also I was going to buy some more ICX since it is cheap and was hoping with this dev portal release, more developers would start using ICX but fuck I don't know anymore

Also if their code is that shitty, then why would Samsung use their loopchain protocol in their Samsung Pass product?
https://medium.com/helloiconworld/chan-id-developed-using-loopchain-to-be-used-in-samsung-pass-service-69669928369d

(not trying to argue, just genuinely curious as a non programmer)

>>10650432
>So why would they put this out for developers if it's still not ready? I mean , I get it's a beta, but who are they trying to appease here?

they arent appeasing anybody except the dumbest investors, they posted the code just to claim that they are open source. Clearly none of their development is happening open source. This is like pushing a .tar.gz source code dump every 8 months. Lol
They also dont really respond to github issues, they dont comment on it, they dont care.
Why not? Why not give a shit, I mean what the fuck makes them so busy that they cant respond?
Also their repo is still not translated, it's all in korean. I mean maybe they already translated it - we dont know because their last update was from Feb 21.

look, bottom line is this: Maybe they are a super professional company behind the scenes and they are doing everything right and we just dont see it because they dont publish any of their updated code.
But everything that they *did* publish and do, like their conferences, their CEO comments, some of their code... all of that seems to indicate the opposite of their portrayed image. It indicates that they are NOT professional.

So we are left to believe that their blockchain will totally work securely and performantly despite all these big warning signs.

>>10650641
Got it alright thanks man

>>10650061
>tech matters in crypto
this crap was all about initial hype and if you didnt sell during or right after the parabolic rise to $11 (!!!) you are fucked in the head or are completely devoid of common sense

>>10650061
Their work doesn't look professional.

>Copyright headers not consistently placed
>Pointless comments like "exception" when obviously an exception is being thrown.
>Inconsistent commenting
>Inconsistent code style
>Unit tests with no asserts
>No CI