/biz/ - Business & Finance

kys

once you go cash you never go back. very bullish for BCH, it will keep stealing hashpower and user sentiment
just think about it... nobody switches from supporting BCH to BTC, we only get converts from BTC every day over to the BCH camp

>>10142333
>After doing my own research
>bcash, iota, nano

>Roger Ver

>>10142371
Honestly, you're right, but if we are both being realistic, neither has mass adoption. I told myself that I'd never sell a single crypto and only keep buying until I can spend it at McDonalds or Wal-mart, and at that point I'll only use it to buy goods and services. When Bitcoin "core" was pushed to its limit, tx fees skyrocketed and it was a disaster. I'm really excited to see what this BCH stress test will do in september. We will see what happens. Tbh, I just hope everyone wins, crypto gets mass adoption, us early adopters make a little scratch, and poor people stop getting fucked by banks.

Why does everyone have to fight with one another?

False dichotomy.

>>10142333
BCASH BCASH BCASH BTRASH!!!

>BCH
>IOTA
>NANO

Is this subtle shitposting against BCH?

Roger is smeared all the time. It's almost trump level smearing. People hate this guy for absolutely no reason other than because that's how they're told to feel. Quite sad really. Wake up guys. Bch is the real bitcoin.

>I feel like DAG coins such as Nano or Iota are better long term investments
LMAO

>>10143398
>People hate this guy for absolutely no reason other than because that's how they're told to feel.
He's a retard with no actual knowledge of what he's talking about acting like an expert. He knows nothing about the actual technicals. The only thing he's good for is trying to set up that Libertarian country which will be a blast to watch crash and burn

>>10142333
I'm unironically starting to believe that Craig Wright is Satoshi. I've called him a fraud and thought he was so shady but after digging into it I'm more and more convinced that Craig is satoshi. Someone please help before I become a bcash shill.

Dr. Craig S. Wright is unironically Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin (BCH) is the only true implementation of his vision.

>>10143443
>>10143464
I really doubt Craig is Satoshi, but hell even if he is why is he worth listening to now?

>>10143418
U mad?

>reddit spacing
shill harder faggot

>>10143398
Because he was behind 3 other failed forks
He doesnt give a shit about anything but making money

>>10142333
Hello Roger

listen up, oldfag OG bitcoiner from 2011 here. some of you biztards are allright. signup at the new #1 exchange in the world coinex immediately. use my referral as a small thank you for the inside scoop on what is coming
http://coinex.bitcoincloud.net
jihan and viabtc are backing this exchange and they are going to take over the crypto world. binance is finished. they are throwing money at traders right now with dividends and airdrops. people on reddit fucking posting about getting thousands of dollars in airdrops! the token is like doubling in value every few hours. this is getting in on the next BNB on the ground floor but better due to the dividend structure.
Jihan and crew are throwing marketing money at this as a loss leader to take over market share and its working. get the fuck in coinex and buy their token CET or forever regret missing the moon mission of 2018
http://coinex.bitcoincloud.net

>>10142333
Glad you've seen the light anon

>>10142351
>>10142377
>>10142400
>>10143370
>>10143418
>>10143443

Www lad look at these salty bagholding corecucks.

>>10142377
being from reddit it makes perfect sense, they love that shit

>>10142333
most reddit post

>>10142333
Have you seen the latest Roger Ver VLOG?
https://youtu.be/8ned3XBxwl8

This is clearly someone that is a true believer in Bitcoin. This is someone you'd really want to have on your side, working for your crypto. Nobody with this much passion exists on BTC nowadays, BTC have trolls online while BCH have Roger Ver flying all over the world and making important deals and meeting important people.

Anyone thinking BCH will not win is blind.

thanks to Roger Ver aka Bitcoin Jesus and CW aka Satoshi

>BagCoinHolder bots at it again

>>10142371
kind of yes, i'm starting to see Roger ain't that bad after all. I ain't mad at ya PogerBear

>>10142333
>I got in right around the BCH fork and sold all my BCH scamcoin for BTC because that's what reddit told me to do.
>because that's what reddit told me to do.
>reddit
>plebbit
You, sir... I have no words to describe your stupidity. I just hope crypto will die already just so the banks and scammers and whales won't profit from the masses.

>>10145837
most of /biz/ is none the wiser

cash clowns are fucking idiots

>>10146583
it's not good tactics to be a clown when accusing others of being clowns

>>10146612
>king of the clowns

>>10146619
this guy is awesome, have you seen the recent interview at The Vin Armani Show? of course you haven't because you just shitpost but here's the link anyway

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWS0uLB-pF8

starts at 1:02:19
really nice and smart guy

>>10146686
I'll watch it. because that's my nature. He's still a fucking dork.

>>10146686
wtf does he mean by...
>for the most part, I stayed in the background of Bitcoin.
Where? is? this? background? what did he do to make this claim? for all I can tell he popped up out of Roger Ver's asshole a year ago.

>>10145134
He loves Bitcoin and wants to change the world yet Reddit and 4chan shits on him. I feel like his intentions are pure. He's already rich and just wants to help others now.

>>10147442
>I feel like his intentions are pure. He's already rich and just wants to help others now.

Dude's the co-founder of Free Society, a project aimed at creating a Libertarian country. You need a fuckton of money to start that kinda thing up

>>10143398
not true. He's hated because he promotes on chain scaling, which is technically not possible, but he's too stupid to understand that.

>>10145134
he has good intentions but he's too stupid to understand that on chain scaling is technically impossible. BCH will not win. No matter what marketing you have, impossible tech is impossible tech.

>>10147600
Is it though?

you boomers are still arguing over a prototype coin? get outta here pops!

>>10142333
>I got in right around the BCH fork
>bitcoin maximalist checking in
topfuckingkek stopped reading right there your opinion is invalid SAGE.

>>10147523

How do libertarians punish criminals?

>>10147600
Lol you are retarded, onchain scaling is absolutely possible, in fact that's how Satoshi designed Bitcoin to scale before blockstream took over and started strangling the network.

>>10143398
>Spread lies and do smear campaigns
>Get smeared
Trump is a Saint.

>>10147900

Dude free market lmao. Most Libertarians accept you need a standing military and a few government entities, but honestly I'm not sure if that applies to a police force as well

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0

BITCOIN INSTANT IS THE REAL BCASH

>>10148017
go away gembitz kys

bitcoin diamond is the real bitcoin

>>10147579
>technically not possible
god damn you're stupid

>>10146485
>most of /biz/ is none the wiser
Maybe you joined late but /biz/ was in 2017 pajeets shilling to other pajeets.

>>10142333
>but he is absolutely enthusiastic, benevolent, and wanting to help others use digital currency.
>I'm very impressed with his professionalism and no longer hate this guy.
https://youtu.be/oCOjCEth6xI

Also BTC and BCH are both obsolete.

corecucks have not yet realized their shitcoins is dead

>>10148258
Links to the rage quit video where a guy had a bet where he'd trigger Roger to ragequit.

Fuck you

BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

>>10142333
Dear Bitcoin Cash Supporters,

Why do you continue to dismantle this community?
You didn't get your way, so you had a fucking hissy-fit and fractured the community into the fragmented mess it is now. Even after everyone voted for BIP148, you still decided to irreversibly fuck up the network by hard forking because of "muh segwit blockstream conspiracy". I'm not saying you don't have legitimate concern. Blockstream is definitely a major influencer over SOME of the developers, but they by no means control bitcoin. BIP148 was voted in fair and square by the community. Instead of trying to cooperate with everyone else, you decided it was best to flip the table and fuck everyone over, including yourselves. You have destroyed any unity we had against the central banks and turned the whole crypto market into a cesspool of worthless shitcoins. If you had not flipped your shit over a slightly different technical implementation, we would be so much closer to destroying traditional banking.

You guys always fall for their fucking divide and conquer tactics. Surprise! Surprise! They successfully weakened both sides to the point where crypto is barely a threat to them. Crypto was about taking them on, and destroying their system; yet somehow they managed to be the ones to destroy our system. If crypto is to have a legitimate impact on the world, we must put aside our differences, and take on the real enemy. Stop talking about blocksizes or retarded shit that doesn't even matter at this point. Talk about the real problem at hand, the reason why bitcoin was created in the first place, the fractional reserve banking system. Stop focusing on destroying bitcoin core, and start focusing on destroying the federal reserve note.

If you don't we will both lose.

From,
A bitcoin supporter

>>10148643

Bitcoin fucked up the network. I won't tie myself to a sinking ship just because it floated at one point

t. bitcoin cash

Bitcoin is a scam fork. A fraud. Bcash is the king of crypto.

>>10148771
Dear Bitcoin Cash Supporters,

Why do you continue to dismantle this community?
You didn't get your way, so you had a fucking hissy-fit and fractured the community into the fragmented mess it is now. Even after everyone voted for BIP148, you still decided to irreversibly fuck up the network by hard forking because of "muh segwit blockstream conspiracy". I'm not saying you don't have legitimate concern. Blockstream is definitely a major influencer over SOME of the developers, but they by no means control bitcoin. BIP148 was voted in fair and square by the community. Instead of trying to cooperate with everyone else, you decided it was best to flip the table and fuck everyone over, including yourselves. You have destroyed any unity we had against the central banks and turned the whole crypto market into a cesspool of worthless shitcoins. If you had not flipped your shit over a slightly different technical implementation, we would be so much closer to destroying traditional banking.

You guys always fall for their fucking divide and conquer tactics. Surprise! Surprise! They successfully weakened both sides to the point where crypto is barely a threat to them. Crypto was about taking them on, and destroying their system; yet somehow they managed to be the ones to destroy our system. If crypto is to have a legitimate impact on the world, we must put aside our differences, and take on the real enemy. Stop talking about blocksizes or retarded shit that doesn't even matter at this point. Talk about the real problem at hand, the reason why bitcoin was created in the first place, the fractional reserve banking system. Stop focusing on destroying bitcoin core, and start focusing on destroying the federal reserve note.

If you don't we will both lose.

From,
A bitcoin supporter

>>10148744
>>10148771
We have our differences. I support offchain scaling you guys don't.

That's fine.

We need to work together to destroy the banks. Focus your energy dismantling bitcoin on dismantling the banking system. The banks are the greater threat.

>>10148788

Lightning netwrok IS the banking system. Don't be a cuck for blockstream

>>10148788
fuck off kike, we will not let you bankster faggots corrupt bitcoin

>>10148365
an individual who with the qualities described does not act in such a manner even if triggered.

>>10148798
No it's not. Not even close. The "IOUS" you guys bitch about are backed on chain.

But it doesn't matter. Stop focusing on bitcoin core and develop your network how you see fit. Just remember that we, and everyone else in the crypto network are your allies, and our enemy is the banking system.

>>10148806
Do some research into the kikes. This is what they do.
They divide and conquer their enemies.
They play BOTH sides.
Don't let them. We must remain united against them, or they will destroy the entire crypto market.

>>10148834
>The "IOUS" you guys bitch about are backed on chain.
You either are a pajeet or you completely miss the point, the debate never was against the LN, it was against limiting the onchain txs to force people into the LN.

>>10142333
seriously, get a fucking life, roger.

or better, just kys.

>>10148629
>>10148635

>>10147600
even if infinite on-chain scaling was not possible BTC needed scaling right now and it was possible to scale it by a factor of 32 just by changing 1 line of code. just increasing the block size to 2 MB would have prevented BCH from ever existing and a bunch of stores wouldn't have dropped their bitcoin support.

>>10142333
Hey ver, does it suck not being able to come back to the US??????

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH fucking felon

>>10149519
he sent firecrackers through the mail, oh no

>>10142333
I never didn't believe in him. I am an an-cap so I always had a soft spot for him, but after being in BTC since 2012 and going through the DISASTER that truly was censorship by /u/theymos on /r/bitcoin was insane.

Once Mike Hearn started coming out and saying this was headed towards disaster, I should have paid more attention. Luckily though, shortly after I went all in into ETH so everything turned out fine but the point is that BTC core devs did this to themselves. Have you ever wanted to see what peak autism looks like? Go watch some interviews with Luke Dashjr. The core devs do NOT understand economics at all and let me say one last thing

LIGHTNING
NETWORK
WILL
NEVER
EVER
WORK

Lol if bitcoin dies this entire experiment fails. No one needs a better centralized VISA. No one will trust any Bitcoin again. Bitcoins value is derived from the immutability. If your shitcoin is actually better let it be better focusing on improving the tech and adoption not that hard. With that said I have no hard feelings against any of you.

"Big blocks win"
-Satoshi Nakamoto

>>10149648
Even if Lightning Network worked I dunno who ever thought it was a good idea that other people can deplete your payment channel. If you go to the pub but can't pay because someone else paid with your channel the other night and you now have to make an on-chain payment to refill your channel then what was the point of LN in the first place?

>>10149657
Luckily Bitcoin is alive and well with Bitcoin Cash though.

>>10142333
>At this point, who knows who is right
Talking like a true retard.
If you can do a bit of math and "research" you'd figure out that off-chain solutions are the only way to reach visa levels.

>>10148087
tell me how many transactions per second can bcash do, and then look at visa.
Then calculate the block size to reach visa levels. Then realize how long it takes to TRANSFER that amount, and then realize that 10 minute blocks are impossible.

>>10149904
>>10149926
we don't need VISA levels today. the 1 MB block just got full at the end of 2017.
what we did need was 2 MB blocks. it's not smart to try to scale for something that might be needed in 50 years while completely neglecting the actual needs of today.

>>10150152
we need 100$ dollar fees like in january 2018

>>10150175
he who waits for something good never waits too long

>>10142333
> propaganda
it's not propaganda, they're just facts.

Bcash is trash and you're an obvious bcash twat-shill.

>>10150257

Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.

>>10151401
this but unironically

>>10151413
there was no way to interpret that as ironic in the first place

>>10149502
a 2mb blocksize wouldn't have stopped bitmain and ver from trying to co-opt btc once again
unlimited, xt, all the other failed forks...

>>10151783
it's about keeping bitcoin bitcoin. if BTC wouldn't have crippled itself Ver would have kept promoting it. as for bitmain im not so sure but im sure they already have most of the BTC in existance anyway so it doesn't matter much

Bitcoin Cash is certainly interesting but they need to prove that their tech is better by getting some real use cases and by sustaining a high TX count with low fees.

I've looked into the people that back it and their ideas, and it all seems good. But it's time to prove things.

I saw that there is a stress test for BCH coming on Sept 1 and another hardfork/upgrade in November. Maybe by then BCH can start showing some signs of life. Right now I heard it has less TX than Doge.

If BCH can live up to the hype then it truly is a sleeping giant. But like I said, there needs to be proof of life.

>>10151783
also you may not realize it but Bitcoin XT came about simply because of BTC's refusal to just fucking increase the blocksize in 2015. yes, the debate is that old. unlimited (a bitcoin cash full node implementation) derived from XT. however since the blocks still had room to grow XT didn't gain enough support, there were still hope that BTC would snap out of their stubbornness. however this time people have seen how dense BTC people are so bitcoin cash became a success.

>>10151890
>but they need to prove that their tech is better
it's literally the exact same tech that bitcoin have been using for almost 10 years. there's nothing left to prove man.

>>10151958
>it's the exact same tech
Right, that's why most people are content to sit on BTC and not make the switch.

If BCH wants to FLIP then they have to prove that they are worth switching to and are much better.
My feelings are this: institutions and businesses know which coin is better and will slowly ONLINE their applications on the BCH blockchain
But they wont do that until BCH passes certain tests and milestones.
SBI Bits was the beginning , dipping a toe in the space. A subsidiary of a subsidiary.

Big things have the potential to come to BCH but all of the attacking of BTC is dumb. Just go prove that your tech is better by having real use on it.

>>10142351
fbpb

>>10151980
HAVE been using for almost 10 years. BTC isn't using it anymore with SegWit and these crazy lightning off-chain.

besides even if the tech is the same the limits and mindsets are. BCH has 32 times more on-chain capacity and will allow for upgrades (hard forks) twice per year. BCH doesn't fear 0-conf transactions for small payments. BCH wants as low fees as possible while BTC devs have openly stated that bitcoin isn't for poor people.

I'm not attacking shit btw, all I'm doing is saying how things are. BTC is no longer bitcoin and the people in charge of the GitHub repository should be fucking ashamed of their community that censor posts on reddit and drag poor Roger Ver's name in the dirt after all he's done for them. screw their so-called store of value, I want my digital cash back.

>>10152098
I agree with what you're saying
But the average person won't be swayed by this.

Maybe if BCH comes near parity with BTC it will force people to understand.
But if that's not a possibility in the near future then my suggestion is to make BCH shine by giving it real use cases that make BTC look like old outdated tech (like it is).

>>10152136
Worst thing to do is drag down the entire market by trying to kill BTC just because you think BCH is better.
Maybe in 2020 you can try that play.
But not today.

Focus on BCH becoming VISIBLY better.

I'll get right on that buddy.

>>10152247
K sounds good.

>>10152151
actually, I think the right time is about now. we're already in the middle of a 7-month bear market, BTC has lost around 70% of its valuation compared to its ATH... Might as well go into a full blown multi-year bear market and start over with the better product. Once we get back to a point where BTC is used as much as it was back in november-december, we're going to be glad that the scaling debate has been settled once and for all.

>>10153076
That would be painful as hell.