/biz/ - Business & Finance

There are major fundamental differences. The difficulty adjustment interval for instance is not 2016 blocks any more, like on bitcoin.

>>10122394
Yeah but when it was set to 2016 it wasn't planned to have a competing fork with the same pow.

>>10122372
You forget that BCH will never amount to anything other than “that fork of bitcoin” because it’s called “Bitcoin *subtitle*”

>>10122427
When it was set to 2016 blocks, it was set to 2016 pernamently by Satoshi. Just like the total coins limit is 21 million Bitcoins, set by Satoshi, so is the adjustment 2016 blocks, also set by Satoshi. And so is the block size cap 1MB, set by Satoshi.

You are free to have a different opinion, but that is an opinion not objective fact.

>>10122466
>And so is the block size cap 1MB, set by Satoshi.

You're fucking retarded.

>>10122466
Kek. Adjustment algorithm is corecucks last straw.
> 1MB was meant to be forever.

Delusional corecucks will have a dead network in a few years

>>10122466
>And so is the block size cap 1MB, set by Satoshi.

woke af

>>10122486
>>10122492
>>10122496

Retards claiming Bitcoin is "uhm you know digital cash whose rules are secondary"

the difference is, that btc is controlled by CME Futures and BCH not. thats why so many People believe in it. the flippening?

>>10122517
No it's digital gold whose rules are made by corecucks Blockstream bankers.

>>10122372
Imagine spending time talking about bcash

>>10122541
Better than rules set by arbitrary chink with the most miners.

>>10122550
F$ck Blockstream. F$ck dem banker kikes.

>>10122517
Retard that doesn't know anything about BTC history.

Block size was unlimited at the start.

>>10122587
from my dead cold hands.
Nakamoto consensus as defined by the longest proof of work chain defined by Nakamoto rules.
As verified on my raspberry.

>>10122597
Show me one block larger than meg from the early history you claim is real.

>>10122430
it really is as simple as this. They need to re-brand.

>>10122601
>As verified on my raspberry.
I knew you're a troll!

>>10122657
cryllar (crypto-dollar)
bytecoin
megacoin
anything is better than "bitcoin-subtitle" it just seems inferior.

>>10122686

>>10122704
How about Bcash?

>>10122741
already taken :)

>>10122617
You're a fucking moron.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/a30b56ebe76ffff9f9cc8a6667186179413c6349

>>10122486
>>10122496
bcashers prove once again they are newfag retards who have no idea what they're talking about.
satoshi himself added the 1mb limit you dumb cunts.
that doesn't mean it wasn't meant to be changed, but the fact is he put it there.

>>10122759
that commit was by satoshi you fucking idiot

>>10122759
sorry bro, I'm a fellow cashie.
I just trolled you

Anyways what we say at this point does not matter, what matters is that pro Blockstream propaganda is at the top, place that everyone reads.

My job is done, have fun retards :)

Core has delayed adoption and ruined bitcoins name, have a seat and let the big boys take control of this situation.

>>10122829
Let's post fake Satoshi Nakamoto for a change the post

>>10122372
I told hold what will make them both obsolete.
Hint
Asic resistant, Set cap, Mineable.

>>10122887
Mimblewimble

lol. imagine being op, and this deluded. bch is nowhere near btc adoption and will always be seen as the coin that no one wants to use. it is a fork, just like btcp, btg, and a bunch of other btc forks. litecoin on the other hand is its own genesis block. the forks will die.

>>10122956
>litecoin

Most traded crypto is BTC but most used flip is BTC>BCH If you think 100 million cap is signs of growth you are living with your head in the sand.

>>10122844
Most intelligent free thinkers believe he is Satoshi, can't help it if your being programmed otherwise

>>10123184
Most intelligent free thinkers are retards.

>>10123243
wow

>>10122372
>The only objective difference between BTC and BCH is that the latter can be used both as digital gold and also to be sent p2p for a tiny fee. Do you agree?
Throwing away segwit made BCH also able to offer reliable enough 0-conf instant payments (crucial for local payments).
Other than that, pretty much the same except the stuff being built on either. For example, BCH has their tumblr quasi-anon thing, tippr, sms transfer service (no internet required).

But yeah overall, pretty much the same except no segwit on BCH, and larger blocks.
Adding smart contract capabilities might change this though. Including it being much much easier to build complex 2nd layer scaling solutions on top of the base layer. Segwit that enables LN are both dead ends in blockchain development.

Personally I don't like BCH very much because I favor casper POS game theory and costs over POW, and prefer the flexibility of what can be achieved with smart contracts + POS when it comes to scaling and fintech.

Realistically though, the first seriously adopted crypto moneys are likely BCH, Stellar and Ethereum. The first two because they are trying and succeeding in gaining adoption (especially in third world) and ethereum because projects built on it and wallets built on it are spreading and ethereum as a currency is piggybacking on that. ICOs recognizing it as money for fundraising purposes was only the first step.

>>10123413
>Throwing away segwit made BCH also able to offer reliable enough 0-conf instant payments (crucial for local payments).

You, sir, have no idea what you are saying.

>>10122956
I agree. Litecoin is way more promising than Bcash. Most of the fud around LTC is coming from Bcashie cultists.